Posts by VaConstitution

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Va Gov. Bob McDonnell has been called out to perform his mandatory duty.

    03/29/2012 9:16:38 AM PDT · 1 of 6
    VaConstitution
  • Taking the wind from Race Baiter (Democrat) Sails - Two points:

    03/27/2012 3:14:31 PM PDT · 1 of 4
    VaConstitution
  • BREAKING NEWS: Obama Executive Order: Peacetime Martial Law Signed 3/16/2012

    03/24/2012 7:00:07 AM PDT · 61 of 61
    VaConstitution to Delta 21
    FIX IT NOW?

    An open or brokered convention may require rule changes to succeed in raising an electable Republican platform and FULL slate of candidates.

     

    Given the relative extents of A) neo-con/neo-lib primary voting fraud and  B) Pro-Paul convention delegate placement: The Ron Paul for President campaign may need to prepare for RNC Convention rule 40(b) “Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination.”

    Even though the required plurality of state delegates may be readily achieved for Paul once the delegate have fulfilled their 1st vote candidate commitment -The convention may set its rules and the rules of the RNC and there is cause for the Paul inclined delegates to change that rule.

    Consider that No POTUS, No single man can save our REPUBLIC. Republicans need to recognize their situation and act resourcefully and cooperatively.
    Personal ego raised above the necessities required to SAVE OUR REPUBLIC MAY be quickly used to disqualify any proposal or proposed candidate.

    So much must be accomplished so quickly if we are (God so helping) restore our economic prosperity and liberty.

    The Republican party needs to raise that proposed cabinet (1st & 2nd strings) and include that proposed cabinets objectives in the party platform.

    By platform and practical necessity, most cabinet secretaries will need to devolve their departments unconstitutional missions to the states – employing congress-authorized interstate compacts were needed – this will return to the states their power, along with inherent political and budget problems.  Dr. Paul is best positioned to bring this proposed cabinet together – particularly since Dr. Paul might be happiest, safest and most effective if he stood for three offices combined: VP, Treasury & Chairman of the Federal Reserve.  

    Then that cabinet needs to raise a POTUS candidate from the convention floor that is fit to MANAGE such a strong cabinet.

    We do not need a POTUS Candidate who grandstands which both inflames opposition and steals both the credit and heat due a cabinet officer.

    We need a POTUS with a Calvin Coolidge style of presidency.

    VA Gov. Bob McDonnell might be the best fit available among the constitutionally eligible ‘natural-born-citizens’.  It might take a change of rule 40(b) for that to happen.  But if the platform and proposed cabinet was truly excellent then the rule 40(b) plurality should not be difficult to obtain.

    Speaking of a FULL SLATE: In all this it is useful to remember that retaining the House majority and winning a senate majority is important.  These persons should take an active & highly visible role in gaining platform solidarity and solidarity with the proposed cabinet.  Their labors and buy-in should be formally, publically and gratefully acknowledged by the convention.   Exceptionally American Victorious Teamwork by Republican will win the confidence, minds and hearts of the American People – And will win votes come election time.

    VA Gov. Bob McDonnell can earn the public stage for this honorable elevation of the Republican party by gently, graciously and firmly doing his VA Constitutional duty to ‘take care that the [duly authorized constitutional] laws be faithfully executed”, and honorable embody all such force as is necessary to suppress insurrection, and enforce the execution of the laws upon each and every customary felony of each and every officer of the Virginia Judiciary, by offering them pardon upon the virtue of parole oath.  The customary conclusively evidenced felonies, each having evidenced criminal intent, are against Va-248, Va18.2-481(5), Va18.2-482, Va18.2-111, Va19.2-191(2) & the VFOIA.  Once the honor of Virginia’s courts are restored, including the Federal Courts in Virginia in that each Va Federal Judge is an officer of the SCOVA, then EVERY POTUS candidates Constitutional NBC eligibility can be examined according to VA1-248 under the as-ratified evidenced intent.  It is likely that Obama’s signatures as POTUS will be ab inito void and indictments must issue to many out-of-state persons that fall under Virginia’s jurisdiction.   Those indictments may be preceded by Gov. McDonnell’s invitation to surrender and pardon under the virtue of their parole oath.  The United States may have its political alienations healed by Va. Gov. McDonnell even before he is vested as POTUS.

  • What's With All of the Executive Order's Flying Fast?

    03/18/2012 8:59:49 PM PDT · 108 of 124
    VaConstitution to Popman
    Others see the EO as just another bit of criminal conceit of authority:

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    If other POTUS' criminally violated our law by perpetrating executive legislation (and got away with it) thatt is not a lawfully significant justification for any other POTUS to do so.

    Just because someone robbed you once and got away with it does not make it their right to rob you again.

    The crime is still a crime and

    a crime that is not subject to any statute of limitations

    that could shield the perpetrator from either temporal or eternal condemnation.

    The criminal code violated by unConstitutional Executive Legislation is US Code Title 18 Chapter 63 Sections around 1346 "Frauds & Swindles" having a leg landing in Virginia so as to perpetrate VA18.2-481(5) statutory treason and VA18.2-111 statutory embezzlement.

    The context for this question of criminally perpetrated 'frauds & Swindles' by EO's which are not addressed ONLY to subordinates in the executive branch

    or not limited in scope to the mere detail of implementing laws explicitly authorized under our Constitution

    is raised in the 1792 words of Thomas Paine:

    “A constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people constituting a government; and government without a constitution is power without a right. All power exercised over a nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or assumed. There are not other sources. All delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature and quality of either”.

    It appears that neither execute orders nor signing statements can be given or conceited to have the authority of general civil law upon the people of the United States as that is “legislation-by-executive-order" explicitly prohibited by our U.S. Constitution in Article I Section 1 “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

    'ALL' in #A1S1 means just that, 'ALL', as in EACH AND EVERY INSTANCE THAT CAN EXIST.

    The Legislative authority vested in the members of Congress by the member's oath are of personal duty in nature. "Duty is not collective; it is personal.” - Calvin Coolidge

    No member or aggregation of members has been vested with Constitutional authority to sell, assign or delegate their oathed personal service duties to any other person or agency.

    It seems obvious to me that every instance of legislation-by-executive-order or signing-statement appears to be criminal fraud and usurpation - It is of no matter that the judges, justices, legislators and the executives are willing - they do not appear to have the authority to come to terms as that authority as is retained by the people and the states (US Constitution 10th Amendment).

    It seems obvious to me that the POTUS -Commander-in-Chief has authority that allows him to make constitutionally lawful orders and constitutionally lawful standing orders upon the US military, applicable to the POTUS’s military employees only.

    It seems obvious to me that the POTUS - Chief Executive has authority that allows him to make constitutionally lawful orders and constitutionally lawful standing orders upon of the POTUS’s civilian employees, applicable to the POTUS’s civilian employees only.

    It seems obvious to me that the POTUS - Chief Executive has authority that allows him to make signing-statements-attached-to-legislation that have no conceit to a binding effect upon legislation.

    It appears obvious to me the every executive order or signing-statements-attached-to-legislation that is an exercise of executive legislation is a grievous trespass against the Constitution and its duly authorized penal laws.

    If my perception is in error, that this appearance is not fact, please show me the source of my error by reference to the U.S. Constitution and its duly authorized law.

  • What's With All of the Executive Order's Flying Fast?

    03/18/2012 8:51:23 PM PDT · 106 of 124
    VaConstitution to Popman

    ED MORRISSEY’s Hot Air post http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/18/national-defense-resources-preparedness-executive-order-power-grab-or-update/ sounds knowledgeable but when I read the EO at whitehouse.gov it sounds evil - that other POTUS’ have addressed that issue does not really comfort me at all. No other POTUS before BHO was so unAmerican and so begged for indictment.

  • BREAKING NEWS: Obama Executive Order: Peacetime Martial Law Signed 3/16/2012

    03/18/2012 3:48:43 AM PDT · 1 of 61
    VaConstitution
  • We cannot continue a replay of 2008 if we intend a different result.

    02/17/2012 11:31:37 PM PST · 3 of 3
    VaConstitution to cvq3842

    I have posted this to the 50 state republican committees. Some are friendly, some are not. I don’t know who/how else can repair the Republican Party in time.

    Got any suggestions for me?

  • We cannot continue a replay of 2008 if we intend a different result.

    02/16/2012 10:26:30 AM PST · 1 of 3
    VaConstitution
  • Why We Were Defeated

    02/04/2012 5:22:57 PM PST · 14 of 16
    VaConstitution to Pollster1
    Perhaps, the Judge(s) wanted it moved to superior court for a de nuvo trial. If BHO can be made to defend himself BHO may lose much more than a place on the 2012 ballot. ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-7 (2011) § 5-3-7. Appeal suspends judgment; effect of dismissal or withdrawal of appeal An appeal shall suspend but not vacate a judgment and, if dismissed or withdrawn, the rights of all the parties shall be the same as if no appeal had been entered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-20 (2011) § 5-3-20. Time for filing appeals (a) Appeals to the superior court shall be filed within 30 days of the date the judgment, order, or decision complained of was entered. (b) The date of entry of an order, judgment, or other decision shall be the date upon which it was filed in the court, agency, or other tribunal rendering same, duly signed by the judge or other official thereof. (c) This Code section shall apply to all appeals to the superior court, any other law to the contrary notwithstanding --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-21 (2011) § 5-3-21. Notice of appeal; form; service (a) An appeal to the superior court may be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the court, agency, or other tribunal appealed from. No particular form shall be necessary for the notice of appeal, but the following is suggested: (NAME OF INFERIOR JUDICATORY) STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) v. ) (Case number ) designation) ) APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT Notice is hereby given that , appellant herein, and , above-named, hereby appeals to the Superior (plaintiff, defendant, etc.) Court of County from the judgment (or order, decision, etc.) entered herein on (date) , . Dated: . Attorney For Appellant ------------------------------------------------------------ O.C.G.A. § 5-3-22 (2011) § 5-3-22. Payment of costs prerequisite to appeal; affidavit of indigence; dismissal for nonpayment following court order; supersedeas bond (a) No appeal shall be heard in the superior or state court until any costs which have accrued in the court, agency, or tribunal below have been paid unless the appellant files with the superior or state court or with the court, agency, or tribunal appealed from an affidavit stating that because of indigence he or she is unable to pay the costs on appeal. In all cases, no appeal shall be dismissed in the superior or state court because of nonpayment of the costs below until the appellant has been directed by the court to do so and has failed to comply with the court's direction. (b) Filing of the notice of appeal and payment of costs or filing of an affidavit as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section shall act as supersedeas, and it shall not be necessary that a supersedeas bond be filed; provided, however, that the superior or state court upon motion may at any time require that supersedeas bond with good security be given in such amount as the court may deem necessary unless the appellant files with the court an affidavit stating that because of indigence he or she is unable to give bond. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-29 (2011) § 5-3-29. De novo investigation An appeal to the superior court in any case where not otherwise provided by law is a de novo investigation. It brings up the whole record from the court below; and all competent evidence shall be admissible on the trial thereof, whether adduced on a former trial or not. Either party is entitled to be heard on the whole merits of the case. ---------------------------------------------------------
  • VIDEO: The Birther's Victory In Atlanta Court

    02/01/2012 10:02:44 PM PST · 28 of 28
    VaConstitution to Cicero
    On "Georgia challenges Obama's ballot access" at http://teapartyconstitutionalists.ning.com/forum/topics/georgia-challenges-obama-s-ballot-access David Farrar, the Ga. voter courageously lending his name to give the lawyers' complaint standing in the Ga. STATE court, say:"in my case, Obama is trying to suggest he simply considered our Georgia case too ridiculous to attend. But that is just the smokescreen. The real reason they couldn't show up at trial is because they had boxed themselves in so horribly with the pre-trial order, they couldn't even enter Obama's birth certificates into evidence. Have you look a Jablonski's PTO? To add insult to injury, when Micheal Jablonski wrote his now infamous letter of non-participation to Sec. Kemp, he stuffs a copy of Obama's birth certificate into the envelope. This whole non-appearance ploy is just a Chicago-styled attempt to maneuver himself out of the legal bind Obama and Jablonski found themselves in at the time of trial -- nothing more. They had no reason for going. They couldn't put on any rebuttal, no exhibits, no witnesses!!!!!!"
  • The Romney Con

    01/10/2012 5:03:44 AM PST · 18 of 18
    VaConstitution to Diogenesis
    Ron Paul has some explaining to do.

    In Paul’s primary campaign Paul has acted much like Romney’s campaign manager, focusing his questions like a serial wrecking ball upon the other candidates’ presidential aspiration.

    In doing so the steady respect he has gained for both himself and the gospel of Liberty is reflected in the polls.

    Now only Romney remains as a soft target for the force of Paul’s inspection.

    Given the difficulty that BHO is facing in certifying his eligibility for election, Hillary is apt to face Paul, not BHO.

    All those pseudo conservatives are becoming increasingly frantic as they expose themselves as holding the delusions of neo-cons, neo-libs and advocates of creeping Sharia law. From their behavior, it is apparent that they know the truth exists to prey upon their delusions.

    They should relax and get over their panic.

    Liberty under our Constitution’s republican rule-of-law is a good and wonderful thing – American Exceptionalism shines again. “In God We Trust” is a bankable proposition. Be happy – those fears are not so real - being born of fatigue and ignorance that is easily relieved.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Famous Quote - "The Constitution is not neutral. It was designed to take the government off the backs of people." - from Justice William O. Douglas

    =========================================

  • Republicans?

    01/05/2012 4:09:08 AM PST · 1 of 17
    VaConstitution
  • NDAA, AKA 'Indefinite Citizen Imprisonment w/o Trial Act' is still open to veto

    12/31/2011 3:59:14 AM PST · 43 of 45
    VaConstitution to DugwayDuke
    You may better defend your person and your rights if you read more carefully. Note the word 'requirement' - The 'option' to detain YOU indefinitely without charge or trial remains.

    How To Cope With Your TSA Detention

    ===========================

    Contact BHO at http://www.whitehouse.gov/webform/comment-legislation?billname=H.R.+1540+-+National+Defense+Authorization+Act+for+Fiscal+Year+2012 

    View legislation pending a POTUS signature (non-void) at http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/pending-legislation 

    View H.R.1540 at ( http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf  )

    =============================

    If not vetoed by BHO please ask your Congressmen to enact due amendment.

     

    If not vetoed by BHO it may be necessary to promptly attack BHO’s void ab inito standing as POTUS using indictment under state laws and in state courts. If not vetoed this could not safely wait until after BHO is selected as 2012’s POTUS candidate.

    If not vetoed by BHO Please take note of "NDAA: RON PAUL IS THE ONLY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO GETS IT" and do all that you may to understand why you should support Ron Paul as best as you can.

  • NDAA, AKA 'Indefinite Citizen Imprisonment w/o Trial Act' is still open to veto

    12/25/2011 8:13:19 AM PST · 1 of 45
    VaConstitution
  • Video surfaces of Ron Paul talking about racist newsletters in 1995, far earlier than he said he

    12/24/2011 12:55:55 AM PST · 33 of 33
    VaConstitution to Nachum
    How is that? Who has the burden of carrying the charge and to what degree of evidence?

     

    Regarding accusations of ‘isolationism’ or ‘racism’ against Ron Paul:

    1) For all those who would see Ron Paul stoned for any cause on motive that Ron Paul is clearly neither neo-con nor neo-liberal I ask you to take care for your soul's sake.  

    Both neo-cons and neo-liberals are statists who raise big government as an idol to replace a big God they feel has abandoned and abused them.

     

    2) Those that have no problem with 'bearing false witness against their neighbor', being children of the lie, have no problem playing the role of the 'accuser' by hyperbole raised far beyond all reasonable extrapolations of evidence that could reach

    2.1)  the probable cause criteria 

    2.2)  and certainly very far from the wrongful intent that must be proved so as to meet the beyond a reasonable doubt criteria 

    2.3)  were the evidence given hyperbolic extension is so ancient that any civil or criminal misdemeanor complaints that could arise from that evidence is decrepitly ancient  - so far beyond the time limits established by statute that evidence witnessed is legally false at least to the point of being inadmissible witness in justification for ANY cause of action.

     

    3) I will grant that blessing any candidate with your vote is a civil issue –

    but when an accusation upon Ron Paul is made to forestall that purpose - and that accusation that goes so far as to impune malum per se intent on a Ron Paul action which could only be misdemeanor at worst and constructive good at best - the criteria for judgement in assigning guilt MUST shift to both the  felonious  criteria and the malum per se criteria of 'beyond a reasonable doubt'  - else by slander (false witness) a person may make themself accomplice with evidenced criminal intent much as Saul did with respect to the martyring of St. Stephen and friends.  

  • Great Awakening: A real battle or just some political debate?

    12/02/2011 9:07:58 PM PST · 1 of 2
    VaConstitution
  • Judge Napolitano "What if..." its all true?

    12/02/2011 4:32:30 PM PST · 26 of 26
    VaConstitution to bert

    Not my calling yet.
    Constitutional Law is more my calling.
    Recourse to a personal, rapport-based, relationship with all that is within the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” is result, necessity and appetite.

  • Judge Napolitano "What if..." its all true?

    12/02/2011 4:32:23 PM PST · 25 of 26
    VaConstitution to My hearts in London - Everett

    Got any better suggestions?
    It appears that the stage is set for a ‘dark horse’ candidate to arrive.

  • Judge Napolitano "What if..." its all true?

    12/02/2011 4:32:07 PM PST · 24 of 26
    VaConstitution to vanilla swirl
    Agreed.

    “Faith without works is dead”

    See 'Journal of Constitutional Reset from Virginia' to view the prepared grounds for battle.

    Much of what is needed could happen as if by natural gravity IF God chooses to touch Va Gov. Bob McDonnell's heart and incline him to embrace his honorable duty rather than customary felony.

    At this small point in time I think the most important and effective works that can be done is in area of prayer warrior works.

    I think it best if Gov. McDonnell not be leaned on too hard through political channels right now.

    God may choose to use him regardless of his ego or his neo-con friends. It would be best if God did most of the restructuring of Gov. McDonnell's POV - not us.

    To a large degree the layout of the battlefield needs to become McDonnell's - not mine or anyone else's.

    There is plenty of more conventional political work to be done that will become doable and easy once our constitutionally republican-rule-of-law is restored. So first things first in the order of battle, IMHO.

    See This Country’s Time: Calling all Prayer Warriors to agree with God - 'Constitutional Reset' can be Va. Gov. McDonnell's gift to our country.

    Boots-on-the-Ground 4 'Constitutional Reset' You can see a whole bunch of follow-on conventional works at http://TeaPartyConstitutionalists.ning.com

    There is large menu of 'low hanging fruit' to be picked. Once that is done the remainder becomes much easier, IMHO.

  • Judge Napolitano "What if..." its all true?

    12/02/2011 4:09:24 AM PST · 1 of 26
    VaConstitution