Posts by Why So Serious

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 7:45:36 PM PDT · 190 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12
    A Time in America! Hey history buff, America has been around 236 years. The world has been around for several thousand years. I would love to know your nationality for this, but it is not important.

    There was a time in America that blacks were "defined" as 2/3rds of a person and they could not be free. I wonder what your post would have looked like when they changed that.

    There was a time in America that blacks could not go to school, sit in the front of the bus, eat in a diner, drink out of a public water fountain ... all because they were "defined" as 2/3rds of a person. I guess your recollection or history studies have taught you that the homosexual/Islamic agenda came to the rescue. And now all people are a whole people.

    Women were not allowed to vote, and then the homosexual/Islamic agenda changed that.

    In the early 1900s when my family came here from Ireland signs were posted "No Irish Need Apply" because they were "defined" as dirty.

    What history have you studied. Our founding fathers [really Thomas Jefferson] had great vision. He was not perfect. He was one of the men that "defined" blacks as 2/3rds of a person, and he owned slaves. Tell me, was his definition correct? You would be well served to actually study some history. It would make for a better conversation.

    Give me a quick snapshot of what your post would have looked like when they "re-defined" blacks to be a whole person from 2/3rds. Just for the entertainment!

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 7:18:14 PM PDT · 186 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12

    ansel, my politics is to the right of Genghis Khan. I did not post anything behind your back. I included you in the post. I did not lie about anything. In my post I said we should make homos pay higher taxes and heteros should get tax breaks. You turned that around to say that I said that they currently pay different taxes. Inasmuch as you have informed us that you are very astute in history you have shown that you lack understanding of basic English. I have not lied any where in this post. I can assure you that Islam does not support homosexual marriage but you some how feel that there is a homosexual/Islamic agenda. Your understanding of Islam is closer to your understanding of basic English than it is to history, I guess. I have been trying to figure out what the “12” in “ansel12” is. I think I have a good guess. I typed this post a little slower than the others so that you can read it a little slower and understand it. This is supposed to be a simple discussion and you started responding like a democrat does when they cannot discuss with logic. You start making up stuff that people did not say and then you call them a liar when they tell you that they did not say it.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 7:02:44 PM PDT · 184 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12; Texan5
    How does getting homosexual churches and polygamous Islamic churches, and cults of every flavor, defining marriage, help keep the definition of marriage as one man, one woman?

    ansel, I know you have already explained that you are this big history buff and will not be interested in research some one else's nonsense, but could you please tell me who and when defined marriage as between a man and a woman?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:56:27 PM PDT · 182 of 253
    Why So Serious to Texan5

    Ansel sounds like a student of history. Do you want take a guess where he studied and what his grade was?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:56:10 PM PDT · 181 of 253
    Why So Serious to Texan5

    Ansel sounds like a student of history. Do you want take a guess where he studied?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:53:36 PM PDT · 180 of 253
    Why So Serious to little jeremiah

    Good one Lil’ Jeremiah. Marriage has an age limit, as could a civil union. In fact I believe that in most states you have to 18 to enter into a contract. Besides, mentally ill perverts already have access to our children. It is called the public school system.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:50:11 PM PDT · 179 of 253
    Why So Serious to Texan5
    Tex, ansel will never do any research on the subject. He has already said that marriage to be defined ... "That means a HIS common definition, not the definition of the Muslim church, or the FLDS church, or the definition of the liberal arm of the Episcopal church, or of the San Fran gay chapel church.

    This means that he wants to determine who creates the definition. It was like Al Gore and his sill azz recounts in Florida. How many recounts did he want? Only as many as it took for him to win. Ansel wants the entity of his choice to define marriage and every one should live with that definition.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:41:54 PM PDT · 176 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12
    Here is your quote. Quit posting all the lies. If you think that you worded it badly then just say so, but quit denying you said it.

    "Homos, lesbos cannot get married. The should pay more in taxes. We heterosexuals should get tax breaks."

    Ansel, this DOES NOT say that homosexuals pay a different tax rate than heterosexuals. I said "should" not "do". Let me help you understand the difference between "should" and "do"

    should: Indicating a desirable or expected state: "by now students should be able to read".

    do: Perform, a current action.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:33:48 PM PDT · 172 of 253
    Why So Serious to avacado
    It’s interesting that you do admit that there is a tax penalty based on married or not. Do you believe that people should be penalized/taxed based on marital status?

    Do you think people should be taxed based on marital status? I kind of think that everyone should be taxed at one rate, and that should be a % of what you make. My tax return could be done on n index card with three lines ... how much did you make? ____ What is [blank %] ___________ send it in!

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 6:29:34 PM PDT · 169 of 253
    Why So Serious to scottjewell
    Scott, if marriage is a "solemn affair which is a fusion of both church and state, altar and government. Tell me why they have the same rules on the way in but have different rules on the way out. Again, as I said earlier, if the government said that you could only marry once and that only with an annulment could the marriage be dissolved. If divorce was made to be much harder "by government" people would be arguing that the Government does not have the right to define marriage. Most people wear government like they wear socks .. whatever goes with MY outfit.

    Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery."

    If the government came out and said that marriage is forever and there can be no divorce there are a couple of people here in this post who would argue that government does not have the right define marriage. Theme: I want government to define marriage my way, or they have no business defining marriage. I am saying it is not governments business. If they would just follow the US Constitution and provide me with freedom and defense.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 4:06:34 PM PDT · 148 of 253
    Why So Serious to Texan5

    Just trying to keep it light with some humor.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 4:04:14 PM PDT · 146 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12

    in post 125 I used the word “should” which kind of indicates “that which is not”. I said homos “should pay more, and married people “should” get a tax break. That said, I always thought that homos and heteros were taxed the same. On board!

  • Rep. Joe Walsh: Sandra Fluke, You’re 31, ‘Get A Job’

    09/08/2012 3:59:36 PM PDT · 22 of 61
    Why So Serious to rightwingintelligentsia

    She can afford a $10 Latte at Starbucks, but she cannot afford $10 for her pills ... give me a break!

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 3:43:35 PM PDT · 140 of 253
    Why So Serious to BobL

    Bobl, post 137 was not to you, I wrote your name in there in error. It was to Two. This post was meant as a discussion. I would say that the most activity came from you, Two, and me. I would say that if I gave each of you a piece of paper and I said write down the ten individual things that most threaten us [the Unites Sates] as a society, and I did the same. I would say that it would scare me if any of the three of us had civil unions in the top ten. I am sure that we would all have the democratic party as number one, which would encompass the civil union thing. But there are more important things that are bring us down. I am sure that we agree on more than we disagree on. That said, it was a nice way to blast through a beautiful afternoon. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 3:33:14 PM PDT · 138 of 253
    Why So Serious to two134711
    Point taken, Two. I will never endorse a radical societal change as I should realize that society has hit the bull's eye and i will not mock people in a joking way because they hold thousands of years of beliefs and values dearly to their hearts.

    Hey Two, these radical Muslims have thousands of years of values that they hold dear. Are we going to accept those without arguing, discussing, changing, or mocking? Or would that be over the top?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 3:32:09 PM PDT · 137 of 253
    Why So Serious to two134711
    Point taken, Bobl. I will never endorse a radical societal change as I should realize that society has hit the bull's eye and i will not mock people in a joking way because they hold thousands of years of beliefs and values dearly to their hearts.

    Hey Bobl, these radical Muslims have thousands of years of values that they hold dear. Are we going to accept those without arguing, discussing, changing, or mocking? Or would that be over the top?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 3:23:15 PM PDT · 135 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12
    Ansel12, I never said ... "Homosexuals and heterosexuals are taxed differently." Why do you continue to imply that I said that? "Married" people and "non-married" people are taxed differently. And I do not know why it is weird or dishonest, but it is! One day you will understand that it is weird and dishonest and one day I might know why.
  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 3:17:10 PM PDT · 132 of 253
    Why So Serious to fwdude
    fwdude- The problem comes when we will be forced to recognize these "civil unions" which aren't marriage - just like homosexual activists are trying force recognition of counterfeit marriage.

    It is legislating same-sex "marriage" by lowest common denominator. Forget it.

    Dude, there was a time that blacks were owned and women could not vote. That stuff was legislated away. Do you realize that for thousands of years there were slaves and women were not allowed to vote. With the exception of those two facts, were we more civilized? You do not have to recognize anything.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 2:52:17 PM PDT · 124 of 253
    Why So Serious to A_perfect_lady

    Here in Illinois Drew Peterson killed his THIRD wife and his FOURTH one went missing. If it was not for all the talk about gay marriage these last two marriages would have ended in a more civilized manner. See once the talk started moving toward gay marriage the world become uncivilized.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 2:47:32 PM PDT · 123 of 253
    Why So Serious to svcw

    I love your byline

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 2:30:39 PM PDT · 117 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12
    Why so weird, or so dishonest? Homosexuals and heterosexuals are not taxed differently.

    I did not say that. What I said is that people within "government sanctioned institutions" are taxed differently than people that "are not allowed to have government sanctioned institutions". Quit coming at me, we have us what sounds like a gay-cowboy and a teacher to fight. The real libs are landing. GOD would expect that we unite against this abomination.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 2:25:31 PM PDT · 114 of 253
    Why So Serious to Texan5

    Thank you for the compliment on the alcohol. Other than that the rest of your post makes you sound a little light in your cowboy boots. You better not come out from behind that cactus, they might not take too kindly to your type down thar’

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 2:21:19 PM PDT · 112 of 253
    Why So Serious to Teacher317
    Teach, maybe if you showed up a while ago while I was on the left shoulder with sparks coming off the left guard rail, you may have had my attention. I am back in the right lane. After all, if you are a teacher, you are one of them. You might have tenureship but your silly ideas about gay marriage do not. There is a reason that heterosexual government employees that are married get benefits. These are the people that hold civilization together. We are the thread. All that you said in your first paragraph is right except the last line ... Gay marriage is NOT illegal in any way.. If you go back and change it to ... Gay commitment is NOT illegal in any way. Then it would be correct.

    Other than that, if you are not doing anything to hold civilization together don't come asking for recognition. I went to a wedding in June. It was the guys third and her second. Those five marriages have done more to hold civilization together than all the homos and lesbians in the world, combined.

    School is back in session, aren't there kids you could be dumbing down and giving free contraception to?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 2:04:39 PM PDT · 108 of 253
    Why So Serious to two134711; BobL; ansel12

    Okay, you guys have convinced me that i have hit the left guard rail. I did some damage to the left side of my political vehicle. I am veering back to the right. Homos, lesbos cannot get married. The should pay more in taxes. We heterosexuals should get tax breaks. Heck, marriage should come with some special treatment because we do so much to hold civilization together. Have a happy Saturday.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 1:36:12 PM PDT · 102 of 253
    Why So Serious to two134711
    At last you admit it! Your “GOD” is not a spiritual being; it is Mamon! Material wealth and earthly pleasures are what matter to you. Money, money, money. That’s what you worship, first and foremost just like so many others.

    Not in the least. My GOD expects me to do everything that I can to not destroy myself, and to not allow others to destroy me. We will all have to answer to Him in the end. You should not allow yourself to be a victim. Jesus said, "If you don't have a sword trade your cloak for one." We are required to stop people from destroying us. Two gay men in a civil union getting a $4,000 tax credit on that civil union to match the $4,000 tax credit I get for my "government sponsored marriage" will not destroy me. Allowing a government to strip me of my ability to survive via debt can destroy me. Read into it what you will.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 1:25:02 PM PDT · 98 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12

    I am not promoting homosexual marriage. I am support less government. When I got married I went to city hall and gave them $75 for a piece of paper and then we went to a Catholic church and the priest married us. The fact that I paid a toll to the government had absolutely no input on the marriage, in my eyes. You find it hard to believe that some one on the Free Republic is supporting homosexual marriage? Your reading comprehension lacks something. I find it hard to believe that people on the Free Republic are supporting more government. I guess it is government by design ... more when it serves me!!!!

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 1:18:52 PM PDT · 95 of 253
    Why So Serious to Berlin_Freeper

    You are not flaming. You just disagree with me and are passionate about your reasons. I am okay with that.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 1:13:46 PM PDT · 91 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12
    Is alcohol alcohol because we don't allow children to drink it? If we allowed children to drink would alcohol cease to be alcohol?

    That did not happen when we invented the "kiddie cocktail". Imagine if all the drunks got together and said if you make "kiddie cocktails" you will be diluting my drink. The state should not recognize the kiddie cocktail. The bartender would say, "No, I am still putting into your drink the same thing. This is different, and changes nothing that existed before it" I cannot get my arms around the thought that you have that the government is some how holding marriage as an institution together when it originated as a religious institution that was hijacked by the state. Yet you don't at the same time admit that the state has done just as much damage by allowing divorce. In fact, i would be willing to bet that allowing civil unions would do no more damage to the institution of marriage than divorce has. You and I can just disagree with this issue. In the end, I just think I have a better understanding of what is destroying our civilization than you do and I am sure you feel the opposite. I understand that sometimes minds cannot be changed and I am okay with that.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 1:00:03 PM PDT · 86 of 253
    Why So Serious to Berlin_Freeper

    Maybe the left likes starting these silly issues so that we are preoccupied fighting over things that really don’t matter while the real important things get destroyed while we are not paying attention. To suggest that marriage is the cornerstone of civilization is to suggest that people were not civilized before marriage and that we have since marriage been civilized. I hardly believe either of those to be totally true. My point is that with a $16 Trillion debt and a country that is about to fall off a cliff the fact that we do not allow civil unions is by no means a safety net and the arguing over it is taking us away from the real issues that will destroy us. When the United States no longer exist in the first world because of the destruction caused by debt and unfunded liabilities all of us married folks can sit on a curb and say, “Well, at least we went down without homos being able to get married!” History will think we had it all on the ball, right?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 12:41:18 PM PDT · 83 of 253
    Why So Serious to two134711
    Well, then, how do counterfeit bills destroy the economy? They look just like other bills, don't they? Why do cashiers use those special markers to spot fake bills? If fake marriage is not detriment to real marriage, than fake money shouldn't be a detriment to real money, correct?

    You are confusing man's world [currency] with GOD's world [marriage]. Nothing to compare.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 12:30:43 PM PDT · 81 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12

    Anyone suggesting that my marriage can be destroyed by anything man made is kind of dopey. I do not care what the world, country, state, or county recognizes my marriage as. I only care that my wife recognizes it and that GOD recognizes it. When I face GOD he is not going to care about the stupid things that man recognized. I believe that if you were married and divorced GOD is going to question you on that. If your answer is it is a “state issue, not yours’” you might not appreciate that he does not agree with you. Question: Have you ever been divorced and re-married?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 12:20:22 PM PDT · 79 of 253
    Why So Serious to Berlin_Freeper
    Change the tax law you disgusting ignoramus

    Yeah, let's do that too. You see this is why the government is fighting the gay marriage thing. They know all to well that it is a big money maker for them. What if the government was more like GOD and did not recognize divorce. What side would you fall on then? If government recognizes what GOD recognizes .. that marriage is between one man and one woman, then what if the government said that they do not recognize divorce [GOD does not]. Would you support that. In fact it would interest me to know how many of you people that argue that marriage is between one man and one woman have actually been married more than once.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 12:13:37 PM PDT · 77 of 253
    Why So Serious to BobL
    I would also like my kids to grow up in a country that at least somewhat resembles the one that I grew up in, but I guess a lot of people here would rather have the ‘change’ involved in turning relationships into free-for-alls.

    The country that you grew up in had Catholic priest molesting children and then quietly being moved to other parishes so that they could again do it to other children. The country you grew up in had a Penn State coach molesting boys in the shower for 30 years while others looked the other way and pretended it was not happening. Is that what you want your kids growing up in. A country where we "pretend" that this sick stuff does not happen. Look son, everyone that you see together is a man and a woman. Oh, and if you see anything else it is just a figment of your imagination. I do not need the state to deny basic rights of survivorship in order to teach my kid what is right and wrong.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 11:59:18 AM PDT · 67 of 253
    Why So Serious to kingu
    This has nothing to do with health benefits, social security benefits, etc. It has everything to do with using the force of law to recognize sodomites, and to compel those who disagree with them to shut up. You can not refuse sodomites entry into your establishment, nor deny them your skills. You must recognize their relationship and celebrate it in any manner they choose.

    If you are right all you need is for the government stops recognizing the institution of marriage and ... WALLA! Homos have what we married couples have. You assume that they will want what we DON'T have. If they then want a "marriage" tell them to find a church the recognizes it, or start one.That is not their battle.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 11:53:44 AM PDT · 66 of 253
    Why So Serious to Berlin_Freeper
    Then, any one can have a civil union [man/lady, lady/lady, man/man, mom/son, dad/daughter, brother/sister, person/multiple people] You have serious issues, Weirdo.

    I am a weirdo? I believe that if you and I start a business as partners and that if upon my death that you should be given all the assets without penalty/punishment/taxation, that makes me a weirdo? What you are not smart enough to understand is that if you and your wife build a life together and one of you die the other gets all assets tax free. If you do not have a spouse [for any reason], but you have children there is no way that you can pass those assets, at death, without penalty/taxation. Why? If you make a million dollars and you pay taxes on that money whatever is left IS YOURS' to do with as you wish. If you die your wife gets it [thru some relationship set up by government], yet if your wife passes before you your assets cannot be passed to your children because of a relationship that is not allow. Who is weird? There should be government recognized relationship that allows everyone to enter into an agreement that allows for the same benefits that my marriage allows me. That has nothing to do with sex, you dope. If it does get the government over to my house quickly because I want the government to inform my wife that marriage means sex.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 10:04:17 AM PDT · 48 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12

    Wondering how anything can destroy a marriage other than the two people involved in the marriage

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 10:01:55 AM PDT · 45 of 253
    Why So Serious to SumProVita
    Will taxpayers be required to pay for benefits to those in civil unions?

    Which benefits would that be?

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:57:35 AM PDT · 42 of 253
    Why So Serious to aimhigh
    What a bunch of liberal crap. The result of your fantasy will result in more out of wedlock children,

    Wait, if we allow gay men and women to get married it will result in out-of-wedlock children? HUH!? 75% of black kids are born out of wedlock and in the white community it is spiking away, as well. As far as people voting to ban things ... that is not always a good thing. People voted for Al Gore to be the President. Thank your lucky stars that the Electoral College stopped that. Be careful with saying that you want the "people's vote" to dictate. In 25 years the "people's vote" will be majority muslim. You obviously support that notion while it works for you, at which point you want to waste it on stupid issues

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:46:28 AM PDT · 27 of 253
    Why So Serious to ansel12
    Activists know that they could have civil unions pretty easily, what they want is the word “marriage”, so as to destroy it.

    You want to destroy “marriage” as well, making government civil unions (which would merely replace marriage) the norm, and allowing “marriage” to fade into obscurity as it becomes a little religious ceremony for some, in their individual churches, something for personal consumption only, but not applicable to society at large.

    You legalize homosexual marriage and polygamy either way in your proposal.

    Libertarians are leftists who are attacking our culture and society, and morality using a different name.

    Really? I have been married for 22 years. I started dating my wife in 1978 at the age of 16, we got married in 1990 at the age of 28 and today we are 50. Do you really believe that the government and its marriage thing had something to do with it. You sound like Barack Obama .. Julie and I did not create this marriage ... government created it!!! And if government allowed civil unions some how my wife and my marriage will become something other than what it is now. If you think that, I feel sorry for your spouse. I guess you love your spouse because government marriage mandates it.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:39:49 AM PDT · 22 of 253
    Why So Serious to duckworth
    I’m 58 and my son is 22. We both came to this conclusion independently of each other — local government offers civil unions, religious organizations offer marriages. DONE!

    You and your son are both good at critical thinking. The apple does not fall far from the tree.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:37:59 AM PDT · 20 of 253
    Why So Serious to ex-snook
    So it’s really all about money and not getting government approval for sodomy with the ‘one you love’?

    It is all about the money. The fact that gays cannot get married has been preventing sodomy, is that what you think? I have news for you, it is taking place without government approval.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:31:18 AM PDT · 16 of 253
    Why So Serious to avacado
    Because I am now single I pay $4000 dollars a year more in federal income taxes. Get the damn government out of the marriage business/social engineering!!!

    How stupid is that? And it is because you are NOT married.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:29:48 AM PDT · 15 of 253
    Why So Serious to Dutch Boy
    What’s interesting about the gay marriage issue is that many gays that pushed for it never get married after they are able to. I live in NY. Thanks to Cuomo, gays can get married. At work not a single gay person that posted signs on the subject, flew the equal rights flag or wrote letters to the editor ever got married. They aren’t even planning to get married. We ask why and we get some crap answer like “we don’t need a paper to tell us we are married...”

    Exactly, it is all about the argument. Remove the things that divide us and focus on what unites us.

  • All of the BS About Gay Marriage earned me a big ol' ZOT!

    09/08/2012 9:03:58 AM PDT · 1 of 253
    Why So Serious
  • If Ever, Now!

    09/07/2012 10:59:45 AM PDT · 4 of 6
    Why So Serious to Revolting cat!

    Just having fun with it

  • If Ever, Now!

    09/07/2012 10:31:09 AM PDT · 1 of 6
    Why So Serious
  • Poor Little Barak Obama, He Tried... Get this to Rush...

    09/07/2012 10:21:32 AM PDT · 25 of 89
    Why So Serious to nascarnation

    He is worth $16 million

  • How 'Pro-Choice' are Democrats?

    09/07/2012 10:15:06 AM PDT · 4 of 4
    Why So Serious to Jean S

    They are not pro-choice at all. They are pro-ABORTION, it just not have a good sound to it because of what it is. They cannot say that the are “Pro-baby-killing” so they pick a word that sounds nicer, “choice”. However, the only choice you have is the choice to kill your baby before its born if you are a woman. All other choices are left to the government to decide

  • This Should Scare Everyone

    09/07/2012 5:42:54 AM PDT · 1 of 15
    Why So Serious
  • Very Clever

    08/28/2012 8:03:06 AM PDT · 4 of 6
    Why So Serious to SumProVita

    Well, I do not think the government went out and got the url and linked it to the house.gov website. So someone went out and paid for the url and did it themselves ... which was something that I was think. Not the same, but close. Maybe I am clever, just slower.