<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: carbonfootprint</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/carbonfootprint/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:11:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Who&#x26;#x92;s pushing a green agenda in Copenhagen? Business, that&#x26;#x92;s who</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2409949/posts</link>
<description>Brace yourselves for the really big news coming out of the Copenhagen conference. It&#x26;#x92;ll be your corporate customers that force you to address climate change, not EPA or Congress. Yes, EPA will regulate the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters, mostly coal-fired power plants and large industrial facilities that release more than 25,000 metric tons a year of those global warming bad guys. But that doesn&#x26;#x92;t mean smaller companies are off the hook, not at all. The challenge ahead for small businesses will come from your big corporate customers &#x26;#x97; from auto makers, food and beverage companies, electronics manufacturers, and giant...</description>
<author>Greener Working.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2409949/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Job Killing At EPA (Lisa Jackson Accepts CRU Fraud)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404157/posts</link>
<description>Junk Science: The Environmental Protection Agency&#x26;#x27;s sneak attack on the U.S. economy and our freedoms, curiously timed for the opening day of the Copenhagen climate charade, won&#x26;#x27;t go unchallenged. Nor should it. (snip) EPA administrator Lisa Jackson, in a conversation with Sen. James Inhofe, ranking Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, has in effect admitted the finding was based on the junk science and data manipulation practiced at Britain&#x26;#x27;s East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU). &#x26;#x22;She told me that EPA accepted those findings without any serious independent analysis to see whether they were true,&#x26;#x22; Inhofe said. Dr....</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404157/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:26:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Copenhagen summit: Europe turns on US and China over weak emission targets</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402306/posts</link>
<description>The European Union today rejected the new carbon emission targets tabled by the United States and China and said they were much too weak to prevent catastrophic climate change. The dispute between the three main players at the Copenhagen climate change summit overshadowed the first day of negotiations and dashed hopes that a deal on emissions was imminent. The EU called on President Obama to announce a more ambitious target next week, when he arrives in Copenhagen for the last day of the conference on December 18. But the US insisted that the provisional offer made 10 days ago by...</description>
<author>Times Online (U.K.)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402306/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carbonhagen: World Leaders Drive to Climate Summit in Gas-Guzzling Luxury Fleet</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402313/posts</link>
<description>World leaders and VIPs began pouring into Copenhagen Monday morning for the city&#x26;#x27;s long-awaited climate summit, arriving in style in a fleet of gas-guzzling limos and luxury cars. Most delegates to the climate change conference haven&#x26;#x27;t exactly been hoofing their way to Denmark&#x26;#x27;s capital, swarming the city&#x26;#x27;s airport with 140 private jets, 1,200 hired limousines and a carbon footprint the size of a small country. Video shot on the scene Monday shows squads of new arrivals at the green gathering pulling up in BMWs, Mercedes Benzes, sleek Volvos and plush Jaguars. A bus reserved for the delegates rode along empty...</description>
<author>FoxNews.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402313/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>GPs &#x26;#x27;should offer climate change advice to patients (UK)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2396326/posts</link>
<description>The Climate and Health Council, a collaboration of worldwide health organizations including the Royal College of Nursing, the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal Society of Medicine, believes there is a direct link between climate change and better health. Their controversial plan would see GPs and nurses give out advice to their patients on how to lower their carbon footprint. The Council believes that climate change &#x26;#x93;threatens to radically undermine the health of all peoples&#x26;#x94;. It believes health professionals are ideally placed to promote change because &#x26;#x93;we have ethical responsibility&#x26;#x85;..as well as the capacity to influence people and our...</description>
<author>Telegraph.UK</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2396326/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Road To Hopenhagen</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394631/posts</link>
<description>Climate Change: Major U.S. corporations have set up a Web site calling for a global climate treaty to be signed in Copenhagen. Considering recent evidence of massive climate fraud, perhaps they should reconsider. Many will remember the classic soft drink ad campaign where young people from many nations gather on a mountaintop and sing that they&#x26;#x27;d like to buy the world a Coke, the theory being that sharing a soda was the key to world peace. That sort of naivete has led peoples and governments around the world to accept at face value the outright fraud perpetrated by the Milli...</description>
<author>Investors.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394631/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>E-Mails Of Climate Researchers Buttress Case Of Warming Fraud</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393091/posts</link>
<description>Junk Science: Hacked e-mails from Britain&#x26;#x27;s Climate Research Unit are only the latest evidence of climate fraud. Just ask NASA&#x26;#x27;s James Hansen about the faking of climate data or EPA employees about the suppression of climate fact. For years, noted scientists and other global warming skeptics have been accused of being on the take, their research tainted and funded by grants from Big Oil and other fossil-fuel interests. Now, it turns out, it&#x26;#x27;s the warm-mongers who are fudging the numbers and concealing the inconvenient truth. We don&#x26;#x27;t know who &#x26;#x22;Deep Throat&#x26;#x22; is. But according to an interview in Investigate Magazine&#x26;#x27;s...</description>
<author>Investors.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393091/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Day Global Warming Stood Still (But Warming Lies Didn&#x26;#x27;t)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2391179/posts</link>
<description>Climate Change: As scientists confirm the earth has not warmed at all in the past decade, others wonder how this could be and what it means for Copenhagen. Maybe Al Gore can Photoshop something before December. It will be a very cold winter of discontent for the warm-mongers. The climate show-and-tell in Copenhagen next month will be nothing more than a meaningless carbon-emitting jaunt, unable to decide just whom to blame or how to divvy up the profitable spoils of climate change hysteria. The collapse of the talks coupled with the decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to put...</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2391179/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Eat Your Dog - Laugh a little with News Busted</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2387112/posts</link>
<description>This is the latest video clip from News Busted with Jody Miller it covers dogs carbon footprints, obama&#x26;#x27;s weight loss, illegal aliens and more there is a link below if you would like to have this delivered to your inbox. Video at site</description>
<author>blueloriblogspot.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2387112/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>EPA Lawyers: Cap-And-Trade &#x26;#x27;Fatally Flawed&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2384316/posts</link>
<description>Warming: After stifling a report questioning the science behind climate change, the EPA is censoring two of its lawyers for saying the proposed solutions are also problematical. The debate isn&#x26;#x27;t over. It&#x26;#x27;s being suppressed. In the proud tradition of EPA whistle-blower Alan Carlin, whose leaked study blew the lid off the EPA&#x26;#x27;s hyped and flawed science behind climate change, two EPA lawyers, Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel, have produced a Web video titled &#x26;#x22;A Huge Mistake.&#x26;#x22; In it they say cap-and-trade in general and the Waxman-Markey bill in particular are the wrong answers anyway. Williams and Zabel do not deny...</description>
<author>Investors.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2384316/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dog&#x26;#x27;s Eco-footprint a Hummer</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2377516/posts</link>
<description>Thanks for killing the planet, dog owners. Well, that&#x26;#x27;s a rough paraphrase of a New Zealand study that claims a medium-size dog leaves a larger ecological footprint than an SUV. In &#x26;#x22;Time to Eat the Dog? The Real Guide to Sustainable Living,&#x26;#x22; authors Robert and Brenda Vale argue that resources required to feed a dog &#x26;#x97; including the amount of land needed to feed the animals that go into its food &#x26;#x97; give it about twice the eco-footprint of, say, building and fueling a Toyota Land Cruiser.</description>
<author>The Seattle Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2377516/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dog&#x26;#x27;s eco-footprint a Hummer, study says</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2376834/posts</link>
<description>Thanks for killing the planet, dog owners. Well, that&#x26;#x27;s a rough paraphrase of a New Zealand study that claims a medium-size dog leaves a larger ecological footprint than an SUV. In &#x26;#x22;Time to Eat the Dog? The Real Guide to Sustainable Living,&#x26;#x22; authors Robert and Brenda Vale argue that resources required to feed a dog &#x26;#x97; including the amount of land needed to feed the animals that go into its food &#x26;#x97; give it about twice the eco-footprint of, say, building and fueling a Toyota Land Cruiser. Noting that a cat&#x26;#x27;s pawprint was roughly equivalent to a Volkswagen Golf&#x26;#x27;s, &#x26;#x22;New...</description>
<author>Seattle Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2376834/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carbon Pawprints (Save The Earth -Eat Your Pet)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2369661/posts</link>
<description>Environmentalism: As polls show belief in global warming is dropping, a new study suggests that dogs and cats, like people, are a plague upon the earth. They say people should have edible pets. Here, kitty, kitty. A new Pew Research Center study conducted Sept. 30-Oct. 4 says the number of Americans who think there&#x26;#x27;s solid evidence the average temperature on earth has been getting warmer over the past few decades has plummeted from 71% in April 2008 to 57% today. Over the same period, there&#x26;#x27;s been a comparable decline in the proportion of Americans who say global temperatures are rising...</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2369661/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carbongate (Obama&#x26;#x27;s EPA Cover-up)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2280395/posts</link>
<description>Climate Change: A suppressed EPA study says old U.N. data ignore the decline in global temperatures and other inconvenient truths. Was the report kept under wraps to influence the vote on the cap-and-trade bill? This was supposed to be the most transparent administration ever. Yet as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the Waxman-Markey bill, the largest tax increase in U.S. history on 100% of Americans, an attempt was made to suppress a study shredding supporters&#x26;#x27; arguments.</description>
<author>IBD Editorials</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2280395/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Three Decades Of Global Cooling</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2361066/posts</link>
<description>Climate Change: As a Colorado Rockies playoff game is snowed out, scientists report that Arctic sea ice is thickening and Antarctic snow melt is the lowest in three decades. Whatever happened to global warming? Al Gore wasn&#x26;#x27;t there to throw out the first snowball, er, baseball, so he might not have noticed that Saturday&#x26;#x27;s playoff game between the Colorado Rockies and the Philadelphia Phillies was snowed out &#x26;#x97; in early October. The field should have been snow-free just as the North Pole was to be ice-free this year. It seems that ice at both poles hasn&#x26;#x27;t been paying attention to...</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2361066/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cap-And-Trade For Babies? Holdren, Cal Your Office)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2366275/posts</link>
<description>Earth: An environmental writer mainstreams an idea floating around the green fringe &#x26;#x97; save the earth by population control and give carbon credits to one-child families. Are we threatened by the patter of little carbon footprints? New York Times environmental writer Andrew Revkin participated in an Oct. 14 panel discussion on climate change with other media pundits titled &#x26;#x22;Covering Climate: What&#x26;#x27;s Population Got To Do With It?&#x26;#x22; People who need people they are not. In a recently rediscovered book, &#x26;#x22;Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,&#x26;#x22; co-authored with Malthus fans Paul and Anne Ehrlich, Holdren wrote that families &#x26;#x22;contribute to general social deterioration...</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2366275/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama&#x26;#x92;s stance on energy/environment doesn&#x26;#x27;t jibe with his immigration goals</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2353643/posts</link>
<description>The president has talked a lot since taking office about creating new energy guidelines, and the White House paid the usual lip service to Earth Day. But I&#x26;#x92;m wondering: How does this president square his energy and environmental concerns with his apparent willingness to continue fueling our population growth with a reckless immigration policy that benefits only vote-hungry politicians and companies fearful of losing their abundant supply of cheap foreign labor? In other words, when those charged with establishing these &#x26;#x93;needed&#x26;#x94; energy guidelines that would include reducing greenhouse gases finally sit down and begin their calculations, will they take into...</description>
<author>NumbersUSA</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2353643/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wow Chicago Eliminated In First Round!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2353401/posts</link>
<description>That&#x26;#x27;s it Folks wow Chicago tossed out in the FIRST round!</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2353401/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>So Michelle flies AF2 to Copenhagen at $56.5k per hour</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2351526/posts</link>
<description>She hops on board the backup 747 and flies to Copenhagen SEPARATELY from the prez. $56.5k per hour is $452k x 2 means the taxpayers just paid $904k for the flights there, and including the return the tab is $1.8 MILLION NOT INCLUDING limos, advance security, security while there etc. etc. This is easily going to be $5 MILLION paid for courtesy of the taxpayers of the U.S. to benefit a few people involved in securing the Olympics for Chicago. My question is, is she as narcissistic as the prez that she considers herself self-important and deserves her own adulation...</description>
<author>Me</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2351526/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Two Planes for the Obama&#x26;#x27;s to Copenhagen</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2351521/posts</link>
<description>The Obama&#x26;#x27;s are flying a day apart to Copenhagen to pitch Chicago for the 2016 Olympics. I just saw Michelle Obama getting off what they are calling AIR FORCE TWO. The President is arriving tomorrow on AIR FORCE ONE. Think of the carbon footprint these two limousine liberals are spewing all over the planet. And, the average taxpayer is taking it in the shorts on this. But, what the hell, he is the One to follow. Go get &#x26;#xE9;m, lemmings.</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2351521/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>President and First Lady Travel 4,000 Miles to Lobby for Olympics - in Separate Planes</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2351412/posts</link>
<description>SNIPPET: &#x26;#x22;(CNSNews.com) &#x26;#x96; President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama are both traveling to Copenhagen this week to promote Chicago&#x26;#x27;s bid to host to the 2016 Olympic Games--and they will be making the 3,979-mile trip on separate airplanes.&#x26;#x22; SNIPPET: &#x26;#x22;As reported earlier by CNSNews.com, a Congressional Research Service (CRS) report cited two cost estimates for an hour of air travel by the president, vice president and first lady. One estimate comes from the White House Military Office, the other from the U.S. Air Force. Using the CRS cost estimates and the inflation adjuster from the Bureau of Labor Statisitcs,...</description>
<author>CNS NEWS.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2351412/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is the carbon crater of the newspaper industry ?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2349039/posts</link>
<description>I heard reference to the carbon footprint of the meat industry on something...... I can&#x26;#x27;t remember what. But it got me to thinking, the complicit progressive media even uses carbon footprint as a weapon against industries that they don&#x26;#x27;t like. How about the press and the TV propagandists investigate their own hot air and see how much it damages the earth?</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2349039/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Green Justification</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2336563/posts</link>
<description>While Orwell&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;s &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x91;1984&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#xB2; &#x26;#x26; Huxley&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;s &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x91;Brave New World&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92; tend to corner the market when it comes to predicted dystopian societies, Anthony Burgess offered his own dystopian masterpiece in the form of 1962&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;s &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x91;The Wanting Seed&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;. It foresaw a culture that dealt with overpopulation by enforcing contraception, encouraging Self-sterilization and homosexuality. Overpopulation concerns from the left, have been floating around since the publication of Paul R. Ehrlich&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;s &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x91;The Population Bomb&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92; in 1968. The book was famous in exaggerating the future ramifications of excessive famine due to &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x91;overpopulation&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;. Most particularly, Ehrlich claimed, &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x93;In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people...</description>
<author>solidprinciples.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2336563/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:40:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>(Vanity) Malthusian Ethics and Government Health Care</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2315748/posts</link>
<description>A couple of weeks back, when the hottest topic of discussion on most forums was the &#x26;#x22;birther&#x26;#x22; movement, I ran across a nifty little article on The Wall Street Journal Online. It used the topic of so-called &#x26;#x22;birthers&#x26;#x22; to introduce the left-leaning interest of &#x26;#x22;anti-birthers&#x26;#x22;. Not in relation to the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President, but in relation to overpopulation. It was quoting an article from a couple of statistics professors at Oregon State University, pontificating from their lofty self-annointed perch, about the dangers to the environment from population growth. Just like the 1960&#x26;#x27;s and early 1970&#x26;#x27;s,...</description>
<author>grey_whiskers</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2315748/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Giving Up Meat To Save The Planet?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2312671/posts</link>
<description>One of the persistent, shallow global food myths is that the world could feed more people if we gave up eating meat. Ezra Klein wrote another misguided column about this--&#x26;#x22;The Meat of the Problem&#x26;#x22;--in the Washington Post of July 29. Klein cites as his authority a naive &#x26;#x22;study&#x26;#x22; by the kids at Carnegie-Mellon University. Klein asserts, &#x26;#x22;It is more energy efficient to grow grain and feed it to people than it is to grow grain and turn it into feed that we give to calves until they become adults that we then slaughter to feed to people.&#x26;#x22; No, Mr. Klein,...</description>
<author>Right Wing News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2312671/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>