<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: colbaquiddic</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/colbaquiddic/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:04:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Obama&#x26;#x92;s Birth Announcement in 1961 confirmed</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2405214/posts</link>
<description>STAR BULLETIN EDITION OF AUG. 14TH, ON FILE AT BERKLEY IDENTICAL TO PUBLISHED IMAGES by John Charlton The Post &#x26;#x26; Email has just received PDF files from a highly credible source, establishing that the birth annoucement in the Star Bulletin Edition of Aug. 14, 1961, for Barack Hussein Obama, is authentic. (Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...</description>
<author> The Post and Email</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2405214/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vanity: Usurper Detection Legislation Should Be Passed Within Each State</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2374911/posts</link>
<description>Since it appears that the judicial branch is intent on abandoning it&#x26;#x27;s duty to uphold the Constitution, perhaps it&#x26;#x27;s time for the states themselves to individually pass legislation that will protect their citizens from the actions of anyone who illegally occupies the Oval office. There is nothing to prevent a state from passing a law requiring that the President must file his PROOF of meeting eligibility requirements with the state and that such a filing is open to public challenge in court. Such a law could stipulate that any legislation signed by a President who refuses or is unable to...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2374911/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:00:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hawaii refuses to verify president&#x26;#x27;s online COLBs</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2310251/posts</link>
<description>In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama&#x26;#x27;s short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online. One recipient of this COLB image was Factcheck, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman bomber, Bill Ayers. In June 2008, Tommy Veitor, Obama&#x26;#x27;s campaign spokesman, sent a scanned image of Obama&#x26;#x27;s COLB to Factcheck, saying that &#x26;#x22;I know there have been some rumors spreading about Obama&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;s citizenship, so I wanted to make sure you all had...</description>
<author>WND</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2310251/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Aug 2009 04:11:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Forged Kenyan Document Splinters &#x26;#x91;Birther&#x26;#x92; Movement (Free Republic Mentioned)
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307574/posts</link>
<description>Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can&#x26;#x92;t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya. &#x26;#x93;It&#x26;#x92;s madness,&#x26;#x94; said Chessoni on Monday. &#x26;#x93;His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.&#x26;#x94; Nonetheless, Chessoni spent part of his day fielding inquiries about an image posted at the fringe conservative web site WorldNetDaily&#x26;#x96;a purported &#x26;#x93;certified copy of registration of birth&#x26;#x94; belonging to &#x26;#x93;Barack Hussein Obama II,&#x26;#x94; submitted...</description>
<author>The Washington Independent</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307574/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Truce [Leo Donofrio walks away from Obama eligibility issue]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2178601/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;I have seen some really sick comments posted recently which encouraged the military to disobey orders. That is wrong. I strongly suggest that all active military step back and refrain in any way from taking advice over the Internet on a matter of this importance. Consult with your family attorney or a JAG advocate. This is my final statement on the matter. I pass on having anything to do with military suing over POTUS eligibility. I don&#x26;#x92;t have the resources to guide such a litigation, nor do I see that any court would ever provide true justice after what I&#x26;#x92;ve experienced with my case and Cort&#x26;#x92;s. I have absolutely NO faith in the US legal system. None. Nada. Zilch. Zippo. So I don&#x26;#x92;t see the point of subjecting our troops to legal harm for a case they will NEVER win in the cult&#x26;#x92;s courts. The military can deal with any situation in their own court system.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>Natural Born Citizen</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2178601/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Feb 2009 02:02:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Proof Obamas Certificate Of Live Birth Means Nothing</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2114825/posts</link>
<description> Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country. This is straight from the Hawaii Department Of Health Website. So in other words the certificate of live birth that is posted on Obamas website, Factcheck.org and KOS do not matter. Simply because someone who was born in a foreign country could obtain one.</description>
<author>Markedmanner</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2114825/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:33:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Judge rejects Montco lawyer&#x26;#x27;s bid to have Obama removed from ballot [Berg&#x26;#x27;s lawsuit]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2114819/posts</link>
<description>A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.[snip] In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg&#x26;#x27;s allegations of harm were &#x26;#x22;too vague and too attenuated&#x26;#x22; to confer standing on him or any other voters. Surrick ruled that Berg&#x26;#x27;s attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were &#x26;#x22;frivolous and not worthy of discussion.&#x26;#x22;...</description>
<author>Philadelphia Daily News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2114819/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Justiciability of Eligibility: May Courts Decide Who Can Be President?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112733/posts</link>
<description>The 2008 election cycle has been a busy one for legal disputes over the qualifications of presidential candidates, with federal cases having been filed to challenge both major candidates&#x26;#x92; eligibility under the &#x26;#x93;natural born Citizen&#x26;#x94; clause. These cases unquestionably present vital questions of constitutional law, touching on matters of self-evident national importance. It is doubtful, however, that they are justiciable in lower federal courts. Standing requirements and the political question doctrine make it unlikely that a federal court will reach the merits in cases of the type filed to date.</description>
<author>First Impressions (companion to Michigan Law Review)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112733/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112732/posts</link>
<description>The enigmatic phrase &#x26;#x93;natural born citizen&#x26;#x94; poses a series of problems for contemporary originalism. New Originalists, like Justice Scalia, focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. The notion of a &#x26;#x93;natural born citizen&#x26;#x94; was likely a term of art derived from the idea of a &#x26;#x93;natural born subject&#x26;#x94; in English law&#x26;#x97;a category that most likely did not extend to persons, like Senator McCain, who were born outside sovereign territory. But the Constitution speaks of &#x26;#x93;citizens&#x26;#x94; and not &#x26;#x93;subjects,&#x26;#x94; introducing uncertainties and ambiguities that might (or might not) make McCain eligible for the presidency.</description>
<author>First Impressions (companion to Michigan Law Review)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112732/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg response in oppostion to Obama / DNC protective order</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2102013/posts</link>
<description>Attached is Philip J. Berg&#x26;#x27;s Opposition to Defendants, the DNC and Obama&#x26;#x27;s Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery pending Decision on their Motion to Dismiss. If the Protective Order were granted, discovery could not occur until the standing issue has been resolved and only if it is in favor of the plaintiff. Following is an excerpt from the response: PLAINTIFF&#x26;#x92;S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS BARACK H. OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE&#x26;#x92;S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON DISPOSITVE MOTION .... 1. Defendants&#x26;#x92; pending Motion to Dismiss does not entitle them to a Protective Order...</description>
<author>Obama Crimes</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2102013/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg Outraged: Obama &#x26;#x26; DNC file motion to delay discovery until ... motion to dismiss is decided</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2100067/posts</link>
<description>Berg is &#x26;#x93;Outraged&#x26;#x94; that Obama &#x26;#x26; DNC Hide Again Behind Legal Issues as their attorney files a Motion for Protective Order to &#x26;#x93;not&#x26;#x94; Answer Admissions &#x26;#x26; Production of Documents while Betraying Public in not Producing Documents proving Obama is &#x26;#x93;qualified&#x26;#x94; to be a candidate for President. It is believed Obama is an &#x26;#x93;illegal alien&#x26;#x94; For Immediate Release: - 10/06/08 (Contact info and pdf of press release below) Country is Headed to a Constitutional Crisis (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania &#x26;#x96; 10/06/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama&#x26;#x92;s lack of &#x26;#x93;qualifications&#x26;#x94; to...</description>
<author>Obama Crimes</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2100067/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg vs Obama: Obama and DNC File Motion to Delay Discovery</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2099064/posts</link>
<description>TWO FILINGS: Berg Files Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Obama and DNC File Motion to Delay Discovery Until Judge Decides on Prior Motion to Dismiss It was a busy day in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania today. First, attorney Philip Berg files a motion asking the court to permit him to file an amended complaint with several additions, and then next, attorneys for Barack Obama and the DNC file a motion asking the court for a protective order, essentially asking that the judge rule on their motion to dismiss for lack of standing before ruling on Berg&#x26;#x27;s motion...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2099064/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Phil J. Berg files amended complaint in Berg v. Obama</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2099409/posts</link>
<description>Phil J. Berg filed an amended complaint today in Berg v. Obama. The amended complaint adds the Pennsylvania Department of State, the Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortes (in his official capacity), the U. S. Sentate Committee on Rules and Administration, and Senator Diane Feinstein (in her official capacity as chairman) for their failure to exercise due diligence with respect to Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s contitutional qualifications to be elected and serve as President of The United States, and for his inclusion on the ballot in Pennsylvania as a candidate for President of the United States. The amended complaint also bolsters...</description>
<author>Obama Crimes Website</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2099409/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg v. Obama Update (Berg Files Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2098795/posts</link>
<description>This morning, prominent Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Philip Berg filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint in his ongoing case against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and others, arguing that Obama is in fact not a natural born United States citizen and, pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution is ineligible to serve as president of the United States of America. Now, this does not mean that the amended complaint has been filed. Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits amendments by leave of...</description>
<author>Americas Right</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2098795/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DNC steps in to silence lawsuit over Obama birth certificate</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2097435/posts</link>
<description>The man suing Sen. Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee for proof of Obama&#x26;#x27;s American citizenship is outraged that his own party &#x26;#x96; rather than just providing the birth certificate he seeks &#x26;#x96; would step in to silence him by filing a motion to dismiss his lawsuit. As WND reported, prominent Pennsylvania Democrat and attorney Philip J. Berg filed suit in U.S. District Court two months ago claiming Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen and therefore not eligible to be elected president. Berg has since challenged Obama publicly that if the candidate will simply produce authorized proof of...</description>
<author>World Net Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2097435/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg Confident Obama &#x26;#x26; DNC Motion To Dismiss Will Be Defeated</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096922/posts</link>
<description>(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania &#x26;#x96; 09/29/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama&#x26;#x92;s lack of &#x26;#x93;qualifications&#x26;#x94; to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he filed his Opposition and Brief to Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] Joint Motion to Dismiss in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083. Berg feels confident that he has &#x26;#x93;Standing&#x26;#x94; and the Court will allow the case to go forward. Our response was due in 14 days, but the Court requested our answer by Monday, September 29, 2008 and we complied....</description>
<author>Obamacrimes.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096922/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:15:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>US State Department Subpoena Denial in Obama Eligibility Suit</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096690/posts</link>
<description>Update on latest information from Berg v. Obama regarding eligibility for POTUS.</description>
<author>Jeff Schreiber @ &#x27;America&#x27;s Right&#x27;</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096690/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Is Using CAIR Lawyer to Defend Him in the Berg Lawsuit</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096874/posts</link>
<description>Here come another of those &#x26;#x22;Guilt by Associations&#x26;#x22; that Senator Barack Obama will try to weasel himself out of. As you may know, Philip Berg is suing Senator Obama in Civil Court. Berg wants Obama to Produce his real birth certificate to prove that he meets the citizenship requirements to be President. Rather than just product the birth certificate (is he trying to hide something?) Obama&#x26;#x27;s legal team filed a motion to dismiss. One of the Lawyers filing the motion was Joe Sandler (sandler@sandlerreiff.com) of the Washington law firm Sandler, Reiff, and Young (see the document below). If Mr. Sandler&#x26;#x27;s...</description>
<author>Yid with Lid via Hillary Clinton Forum</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096874/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg v. Obama: Could Obama Still Be Disqualified?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2096430/posts</link>
<description>Hat tip to commenter Carolyne at Wake Up America A note from Radarsite: Not being a lawyer, I cannot presume to write intelligently about the possible ramifications of this decision. However, the fact that the court has refused to dismiss this case and furthermore is requiring the submission of additional documention seems to be a troubling sign for the Obama camp. Radarsite has posted the first page of the full PDF transcript of this decision below and has posted a link to the complete document. If any of our readers who are lawyers would like to send in comments on...</description>
<author>Radarsite</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2096430/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Is Using Terrorist&#x26;#x27;s Lawyer to Defend Him in the Berg Lawsuit</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096393/posts</link>
<description>Here come another of those &#x26;#x22;Guilt by Associations&#x26;#x22; that Senator Barack Obama will try to weasel himself out of. As you may know, Philip Berg is suing Senator Obama in Civil Court. Berg wants Obama to Produce his real birth certificate to prove that he meets the citizenship requirements to be President. Rather than just product the birth certificate (is he trying to hide something?) Obama&#x26;#x27;s legal team filed a motion to dismiss. One of the Lawyers filing the motion was Joe Sandler (sandler@sandlerreiff.com) of the Washington law firm Sandler, Reiff, and Young (see the document below). If Mr. Sandler&#x26;#x27;s...</description>
<author>YidwithLid via Hillary Clinton Forum</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096393/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x27;Fight the Smears&#x26;#x27; Website Admits Obama was Kenyan Citizen: Where&#x26;#x27;s the MSM?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2092955/posts</link>
<description>Following the controversy over the authenticity of Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s birth certificate can be a bit confusing with all its detailed analysis. Your humble correspondent will leave that up to the experts. However, in response to the charge that Barack Obama is not an American citizen, Obama&#x26;#x27;s Fight the Smears website, quoting FactCheck.Org, has made a bombshell admission...Barack Obama was once a citizen of Kenya. You read that right, Obama had Kenyan citizenship until 1982. Here is the startling admission published in Fight the Smears (emphasis mine): &#x26;#x93;When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2092955/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Conundrum: If a total stranger can do it, then why not Obama?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2096169/posts</link>
<description>I&#x26;#x27;m writing this brief post to put into perspective what it all means when Obama cannot (rather refuses to) release his genuine birth certificate to put all rumors to rest. The time for surprizes has long past. Obama is not going to magically produce it, saying &#x26;#x22;Gotcha,&#x26;#x22; because that would have been done in response to Berg&#x26;#x27;s suit. You can take this to the bank, that when Obama is forced show his &#x26;#x22;vault&#x26;#x22; long-form birth certificate, the whole world will know that the COLB image was a forgery from Day One, as well as the phony FactCheck photos. BUT, now...</description>
<author>The Greater Evil</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2096169/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:39:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>OBAMA USES TERROR LAWYER TO FIGHT FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE LAWSUIT
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2096113/posts</link>
<description>The plot thickens. The lawsuit Philip Berg filed based on my blockbuster expose of Obama&#x26;#x27;s birth certificate forgery has taken a bizarre and disturbing twist. Why is a Presidential candidate using a terrorist lawyer. Every allinace, every allegiance, malevolent. Barack Hussein has recently admitted to dual citizenship ... media yawned, too busy going through Sarah Palin&#x26;#x27;s trash (at least they are in their own element). How ironic that what we need is a federal elections specialist. Obama is considered an expert in this area having taught it for several years at University of Chicago law school after his stint at...</description>
<author>Atlas Shrugs</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2096113/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2008 21:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg files motion asking court to deny Obama&#x26;#x27;s dismissal request [No order]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095499/posts</link>
<description>On defendant&#x26;#x27;s Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National Committee&#x26;#x27;s Motion to Dismiss Plaintifs Complaint.........Denied........... Order of this Court that the following discovery is to be turned over to Plaintiff within 3 days 1. Obama&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;vault&#x26;#x22;version (certified copy of his original long version Birth Certificate and 2. A certified copy of Obama&#x26;#x27;s Certification of Citizenship 3. A Certified Copy of Obama&#x26;#x27;s Oath of Allegiance Filed September 29, 2008</description>
<author>United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095499/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2008 03:16:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berg Confident Obama &#x26;#x26; DNC Motion To Dismiss Will Be Defeated</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095343/posts</link>
<description>Berg Confident Obama &#x26;#x26; DNC Motion To Dismiss Will Be Defeated Tuesday, 30 September 2008 Berg Filed an Answer Sept. 29th, 2008 (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania &#x26;#x96; 09/29/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama&#x26;#x92;s lack of &#x26;#x93;qualifications&#x26;#x94; to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he filed his Opposition and Brief to Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] Joint Motion to Dismiss in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083. Berg feels confident that he has &#x26;#x93;Standing&#x26;#x94; and the Court will allow the case to go...</description>
<author>Obama Crimes</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095343/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>