<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: dd214</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/dd214/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:00:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Its official, DD-214&#x26;#x27;s are NOW Online.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1622670/posts</link>
<description>The National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) has provided the following website for veterans to gain access to their DD-214s online: http://vetrecs.archives.gov/ This may be particularly helpful when a veteran needs a copy of his DD-214 for employment purposes. NPRC is working to make it easier for veterans with computers and Internet access to obtain copies of documents from their military files. Military veterans and the next of kin of deceased former military members may now use a new online military personnel records system to request documents. Other individuals with a need for documents must still complete the Standard Form 180,...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1622670/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>VANITY: Veterans, DD214 Question</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1415392/posts</link>
<description>Veterans, I have a question. An associate of mine cannot locate his DD214. I looked at mine to see where another could be retrieved, but didn&#x26;#x27;t see anything about that subject. Do any of you know where this can be accomplished by a phone call? If not, a web address probably would work. He needs to prove his veteran status for a fairly sensitve line of work. Thanx. HOOAH!</description>
<author>Free Republic</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1415392/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Observations on the Navy DD-214 posted on Kerry&#x26;#x27;s website (vanity)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1266450/posts</link>
<description>I went to Kerry&#x26;#x27;s website to look at his naval records today, and noticed something interesting. The only DD-214 provided is the one that discharged Kerry, for the purpose of accepting his commission as an officer. This is not the DD-214 that Kerry would have received upon his discharge after returning from Vietnam.</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1266450/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Regarding questions surrounding Kerry&#x26;#x27;s discharge...</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1263406/posts</link>
<description>Had a thought tonight. Kerry is a Life Member of VVA (Vietnam Veterans of America). VVA fell out of VVAW. When folks join VVA, they are required to furnish their DD-214. I wonder if there is a copy of that lovely form anywhere on record in the VVA offices???? Anyone know???</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1263406/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 05:47:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Regarding the questions surrounding Kerry&#x26;#x27;s Discharge - we had a thought tonight...</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1263403/posts</link>
<description>Had a thought tonight. Kerry is a Life Member of VVA (Vietnam Veterans of America). VVA fell out of VVAW. When folks join VVA, they are required to furnish their DD-214. I wonder if there is a copy of that lovely form anywhere on record in the VVA offices???? Anyone know???</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1263403/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 05:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Question about Kerry&#x26;#x27;s DD214</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1247597/posts</link>
<description>Some sharp cookie at Ted Nugent&#x26;#x27;s site brought this up. Why does J Effin Kerry&#x26;#x27;s 214 indicate he was discharged as an Ensign, wasn&#x26;#x27;t he a LTJG? Someone? Anyone? </description>
<author>Kerry Campaign</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1247597/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:12:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Law Cited on Kerry&#x26;#x27;s 1978 Discharge [And Analysis]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1244385/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#xA0;[This is the 10 USC 1163 and 1162, cited on Kerry&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;Discharge.&#x26;#x22; It is no longer in force, and probably slightly different, in wording, in 1978.]&#x26;#xA0;-CITE- 10 USC Sec. 1163-EXPCITE- TITLE 10 Subtitle A PART II CHAPTER 59 -HEAD- Sec. 1163. Reserve components: members; limitations on separation -STATUTE- (a) An officer of a reserve component who has at least three years of service as a commissioned officer may not be separated from that component without his consent except under an approved recommendation of a board of officers convened by an authority designated by the Secretary concerned, or by the approved...</description>
<author>United States Code</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1244385/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 02:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>J KERRY&#x26;#x27;S DISCHARGE</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1225131/posts</link>
<description>I RECIEVED AN EMAIL THAT SUGESTED KERRY&#x26;#x27;S ORIGINAL DISCHARGE MAY BE LESS THAN HONORABLE , AND WAS ALTERED DURING THE CLINTON YEARS. IS THERE ANY POSSIBILITY THAT THIS IS TRUE. THAT HE DID NOT FULFILL THE REQUIRED ACTIVITIES . CAN THIS BE CONFIMED THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF IMFORMATION LAWS .</description>
<author>EMAIL UNKOWN SOURCE</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1225131/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x27;V&#x26;#x27; for valor or Kerry&#x26;#x27;s version?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1202113/posts</link>
<description>Of the many charges against John Kerry&#x26;#x27;s Vietnam record made by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, the Kerry campaign has managed to keep Mr. Kerry&#x26;#x27;s Silver Star story above water. Chicago Tribune editor William B. Rood came out last week as an eyewitness to the events of Feb. 28, 1969, bolstering Mr. Kerry&#x26;#x27;s version of events, as have official Naval records. Though Mr. Kerry has had to backtrack on at least two of his accounts -- the &#x26;#x22;Christmas in Cambodia&#x26;#x22; story and whether he really deserved his first Purple Heart -- the day when Mr. Kerry beached his swift...</description>
<author>The Washington Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1202113/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 05:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kerry - Discharged &#x26;#x22;Under Other Than Honorable Conditions?&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1196519/posts</link>
<description>The truely troubling failure/refusal of Kerry to release, without exception, his military records after he&#x26;#x27;s made such a big deal about his weeks in Nam, has to permit folks to guess what is in them that he is hiding.First, it is important, because Kerry has emphasized these weeks as being the basis for his qualification to lead the nation (nothing else in his record since does). The focus has been on his falsification of events in 1968 and 1969. He never expected this and, as an arrogant elitist, didn&#x26;#x27;t take early steps to defend against it.What Kerry has been worried...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1196519/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>