SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Elections  Obama  ACORN  TalkRadio  CopyrightList  Rally  WalterReed  TeaParty  TeaPartyExpress  TeaPartyRebellion  MarchOnDC  FreeperConvention  Donate 

Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Keyword: defensecuts

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • [California Congressman] McKeon: F-22 cuts hurt U.S.

    04/10/2009 12:43:01 PM PDT · by BenLurkin · 4 replies · 386+ views
    Valley Press on ^ | Friday, April 10, 2009. | JAMES RUFUS KOREN
    Cuts to the F-22 Raptor fighter jet program could endanger pilots of other U.S. military jets, U.S. Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon said Thursday. Asked about Defense Secretary Robert Gates' recommended cut in the number of F-22s to be built, McKeon said the reductions would kill area jobs and deprive the country of stealthy jets that, in some cases, are the only ones that could accomplish a mission and come back safe. ... The Air Force had requested Lockheed Martin and Boeing, which jointly build the F-22, to produce 60 more of the aircraft but was hoping for a minimum...
  • Cutting Defense While ACORN is Getting Billions ?!?!?

    04/07/2009 7:06:09 PM PDT · by Shellybenoit · 22 replies · 953+ views
    Fox News /Yidwithlid ^ | 4/7/09 | Yidwithlid
    President Obama's cuts in defense spending is just wrong on so many levels. When you are fighting a war on two fronts and facing two rogue regimes intent on building nuclear weapon, his defense cuts are putting all of our lives in danger. This is an affront to common sense. After using the Stimulus and subsequent Omnibus bills to reward his buddies and those of Nanci Pelosi's crew, the President is going to take from the money being used to protect our families. Instead of cutting defense, why not take the money the Democrats are using to reward ACORN. You...
  • No shield if Iran gives up nuclear programme - Obama in Prague

    04/07/2009 7:49:00 AM PDT · by pissant · 18 replies · 524+ views
    Zpravy ^ | 4/7/09 | staff
    Prague - The anti-missile shield project would be unnecessary if Iran gave up its military nuclear programme, U.S. President Barack Obama said in his address in Prague today. "If the Iranian threat is eliminated, we will have a stronger basis for security and the driving force for missile defence construction in Europe will be removed," Obama said. However, he pointed out that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile activity poses a real threat not just to the United States but to Iran's neighbours and to U.S. allies. "The Czech Republic and Poland have been courageous in agreeing to host a defence...
  • PRESIDENT OBAMA’S MASSIVE DEFENSE CUTS - DISARMS AMERICA

    The MSM refused to listen . . . their own narrative was more important than a strong America and a free society . . . we tried warning you . . . the Obama Truth Squads, massive voter fraud . . . phony birth certificates . . . broken promises on every important issue . . . FISA . . . now the Obama Brown shirts are listening in on your conversations . . . he kept his promise and ACORN helped set the country’s agenda in his first 180 days in office . . . he promised a compromised...
  • Powell's No-Brainer

    09/22/2008 5:11:08 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 3 replies · 120+ views
    IBD Editorials ^ | September 22, 2008
    War On Terror: Islamic terrorists have attacked a hotel and a U.S. embassy in the span of two weeks. Russia is invading American allies and sending warships to our hemisphere. What would Obama do? Gut the military.That's right, the Democrat choice for commander in chief wants to not only slash military spending but dismantle our nuclear arsenal — all so he can pay for his massive new welfare programs. Didn't hear that in his acceptance speech in Denver? That's because he knows better than to make such an anti-military plan widely known. But he made the little-noticed pledge just before...
  • Obama's YouTube Defense Talk 'Bizarre,' Analyst Says

    06/04/2008 9:56:04 AM PDT · by Tolerance Sucks Rocks · 23 replies · 373+ views
    Cybercast News Service (CNSNews.com) ^ | March 4, 2008 | Evan Moore
    (CNSNews.com) - Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) is facing renewed criticism regarding his national security policies as he continues his campaign for his party's presidential nomination. In a YouTube video Obama made for a liberal pacifist organization last year, the senator called for major cuts in defense spending, slowing the development of future combat systems, and cutting investments in America's ballistic missile defense program. Some conservatives have expressed surprise at the degree of Obama's proposals on the video, and this past weekend, Sen. Hillary Clinton's (D-N.Y.) campaign released an ad criticizing Obama's alleged national security inexperience and trumpeting her as the...
  • Financial crisis rocks Swedish military

    01/13/2008 4:31:54 AM PST · by sukhoi-30mki · 20 replies · 120+ views
    The Local,Sweden ^ | 12 Jan,2008
    Financial crisis rocks Swedish military Published: 12 Jan 08 10:35 CET Online: http://www.thelocal.se/9635/ Sweden's armed forces are mulling extensive cutbacks as a deepening economic crisis looms in 2008. The cost of running the Armed Forces is expected to exceed the military budget by between 1 and 1.5 billion kronor, Svenska Dagbladet reports. Lietenant General Jan Salestrand confirmed that the military was experiencing considerable financial problems. "I want to underline the fact that we are sticking to our allocation and looking after our finances - but this also means that we have to put measures in place to reduce our ambitions...
  • AMERICA’S DEFENSES: HEADED FOR ANOTHER TRAIN WRECK?

    08/22/2005 2:44:21 PM PDT · by WTTed · 15 replies · 911+ views
    NationalSecurityOnline ^ | 8/21/05 | Christopher Holton
    In the mid 1990s, as the Clinton administration began slashing America’s defensive capabilities—cutting not just “fat,” but “bone” as well—Senator John McCain warned that America’s defenses were headed for a “train wreck.” He was right. The list of personnel, weaponry and program cuts during the Clinton years is nothing short of startling:
  • America: Rich or poor?

    01/26/2005 4:27:41 AM PST · by Convert from ECUSA · 6 replies · 342+ views
    The Washington Times ^ | January 26, 2005 | William R. Hawkings
    President Bush set forth a global vision of a world without tyranny in his Inaugural address. Earlier, in her Senate confirmation hearing, Secretary of State-designate Condoleezza Rice had listed six countries which were "outposts of tyranny." Four of the outposts (Cuba, Burma, North Korea, Iran) have strong ties to China. Yet, it has been widely reported the Pentagon will eliminate, cut back or delay a number of major weapons programs under orders from the Office of Management of Budget to bring down the federal deficit. So the question is: Can the Bush administration muster resources needed to support its ambitious...
  • Lockheed, Northrop Face Big Cuts-Document

    01/04/2005 1:15:36 PM PST · by Drago · 14 replies · 689+ views
    Reuters ^ | 01-03-2005 | Jim Wolf
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) would bear the brunt of proposed cuts in U.S. weapons purchases totaling $30 billion over the next six years, according to the summary from a Pentagon budget document made available to Reuters Monday. Nearly $18 billion would be slashed from programs run by Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon's biggest supplier, according to a trade publication, InsideDefense.com, the first to report details of the plan. The cuts were spelled out in a so-called Program Budget Decision signed by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul...
  • U.S. Plans to Retire Navy Carrier, Buy Fewer Ships

    12/31/2004 6:13:37 PM PST · by nypokerface · 127 replies · 2,446+ views
    Reuters ^ | 12/31/04 | Will Dunham
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States plans to decommission one of its aircraft carriers more than a decade early and buy fewer amphibious landing ships for Marines and sophisticated new Navy destroyers, officials said Thursday. The proposals are part of an effort to slice $10 billion from the Pentagon budget for the 2006 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1, said U.S. officials, who asked not to be named. The Pentagon is aiming for $60 billion in cuts over six years, said defense analyst Loren Thompson, citing Pentagon insiders. The Navy plans to decommission the USS John F. Kennedy, among the...
  • Pentagon Said to Offer Cuts in the Billions

    12/29/2004 9:49:50 PM PST · by 1LongTimeLurker · 53 replies · 1,026+ views
    The New York Times ^ | 12/30/04 | Eric Schmitt
    WASHINGTON, Dec. 29 - The Pentagon plans to retire one of the Navy's 12 aircraft carriers, buy fewer amphibious landing ships for the Marine Corps and delay the development of a costly Army combat system of high-tech arms as part of $60 billion in proposed cuts over the next six years, Congressional and military officials said Wednesday.
  • Report: Pentagon Plans Cuts to Fighter Jet Program

    12/29/2004 10:27:10 AM PST · by Max Combined · 70 replies · 1,469+ views
    Yahoo! News ^ | Dec 29, 2004 | Reuters
    NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Pentagon (news - web sites) is planning sharp cuts in the Air Force's program for its new F/A-22 fighter jet in a move budget analysts said was intended to offset mounting U.S. deficits and the growing costs of the Iraq (news - web sites) war, Wednesday's New York Times reported. The newspaper said the Pentagon's decision, which four administration and Congressional officials described on Tuesday and which Congress must still approve, comes as the Bush administration is pressing all agencies to scale back spending requests for the fiscal year 2006 budget, which will be submitted...
  • HOW THE MILITARY WAS DECIMATED UNDER CLINTON & SENATOR KERRY

    10/28/2004 6:29:34 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 34 replies · 2,277+ views
    Private Email | OCTOBER 28, 2004 | Unknown
    THESE IS HOW OUR MILITARY WAS DECIMATED UNDER (COMMANDER IN CHIEF)CLINTON, SUPPORTED 100% BY JOHN KERRY (THESE VOTES HE DID SHOW UP FOR). THEIR TERRIBLE JUDGMENT IS WHY OUR MILITARY IS STRETCHED NOW...ALL DUE TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY LEADERSHIP (I USE THE TERM LOOSELY). Send to all...people need to know what they're voting for. 709,000 REGULAR (ACTIVE DUTY) PERSONNEL. 293,000 RESERVE TROOPS. EIGHT STANDING ARMY DIVISIONS! 20 AIR FORCE AND NAVY AIR WINGS WITH 2,000 COMBAT AIRCRAFT 232 STRATEGIC BOMBERS. 9 STRATEGIC BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES WITH 3,114 NUCLEAR WARHEADS ON 232 MISSILES. 500 ICBMs WITH 1,950 WARHEADS. FOUR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS...
  • A John Kerry Ban on Bunker Busters Would be a Military Victory for Terrorism

    10/04/2004 3:27:10 PM PDT · by GiovannaNicoletta · 12 replies · 599+ views
    BrookesNews.com ^ | October 4, 2004 | Gerard Jackson
    When during the debate John Kerry said he opposed the development of bunker-busters he not only committed an electoral gaffe he provided America with an open window into his real attitude toward the American people. The more one thinks about it the more one realizes the enormous ramifications of what John Kerry said. Far from just being a key topic the bunker-buster statement could become the straw that broke the back of the John Kerry campaign. During the debate John Kerry stated: "I think the United States should have offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel, test them, see...
  • Kerry Castles His King: From Retaliation to Preemption to Prevention

    10/02/2004 12:29:49 PM PDT · by vanderleun · 4 replies · 325+ views
    American Digest ^ | October 2, 2004 | Gerard Van der Leun
    Hugh Hewitt has initiated an online symposium concerning John Kerry's announced position on "nuclear bunker busters. (NBBs)" These are weapons that, targeted precisely, burrow into the ground to an undisclosed but significant depth, and then detonate a nuclear warhead of an undisclosed but significant strength. NBBs are not healthy for underground fortified targets. The current public information is that "research" to develop these weapons is underway, but that such research is funded only to a level of $35 million and not the "hundreds of millions" Kerry contends. It is likely, given the opaque nature of how weapons are developed or...
  • Kerry Opposes Another Vital Weapons System [nuclear bunker-buster]

    10/02/2004 12:15:23 PM PDT · by Mike Fieschko · 23 replies · 733+ views
    billhobbs.com ^ | Oct 1, 2004 | Bill Hobbs
    Soon after the 9/11 attack on America, the Bush administration and the nation's defense establishment began to mull how the nation could be defended against terrorists who might seek to attack armed not with hijacked airplanes but with a nuclear or other weapon-of-mass destruction acquired from a rogue nation such as Iraq, Iran, Libya or North Korea. In the years since, the rogue regime in Iraq has been removed and its efforts to develop WMD interrupted, while Libya's leader voluntarily gave up his nuclear and other WMD programs and weaponry. Libya's former nuke program sits in crates under heavy guard...
  • Not a forgery: John Kerry's 1984 weapons system hit list

    09/12/2004 1:35:51 PM PDT · by mastercylinder · 15 replies · 1,063+ views
    http://www.worldtribune.com ^ | Saturday, September 11, 2004 | Christopher Holton
    In recent days CBS News revealed 30-year old documents regarding President Bush's service in the Air National Guard. Those documents now appear to be forgeries. But what has been lost in the Bush National Guard memo affair was the release of another old document that appears to be much more relevant to the presidential election. Powerline Blog published a 1984 press release from John Kerry's senate campaign [Page 1 / Page 2] in which Kerry's stance on defense is clear. This press release is especially interesting because (a) Kerry is running on building a "stronger America" and (b) the Kerry...
  • Zell's Zeal and Kerry's 'Defenselessness'

    09/11/2004 2:50:41 AM PDT · by kattracks · 8 replies · 896+ views
    CNSNEWS.com ^ | 9/10/04 | Paul M. Weyrich
    Senator Zell Miller (D-GA), an ex Marine, is angry that the party he spent a lifetime helping to build has gone so far to the left that it is barely recognizable. Miller attacked the Democratic nominee, Senator John Kerry (D-MA), in terms that no Republican would dare to do. He gave a litany of the weapons systems that Kerry voted against in his two decades in the United States Senate. The Kerry apologists, who were all over the media the morning after the Miller speech, tried to suggest that when a Senator votes against a bill containing a weapons system...
  • Kerry's Voting Record on Defense

    09/04/2004 1:43:16 AM PDT · by Mockingbird For Short · 9 replies · 1,173+ views
    Hannity.com ^ | unknown | Sean Hannity
    Kerry's Voting Record on Defense.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kerry has voted for at least SEVEN major reductions in Defense and Military spending, necessary for our national security: 1) In 1996 - Introduced Bill to slash Defense Department Funding by $6.5 Billion. 2) In 1995 - Voted to freeze Defense spending for 7 years, slashing over $34 billion from Defense. 3) Fiscal 1996 Budget Resolution - Defense Freeze. "Harkin, D-Iowa, amendment to freeze defense spending for the next seven years and transfer the $34.8 billion in savings to education and job training." 4) In 1993 - Introduced plan to cut numerous Defense programs,...
  • Examine the record (of Cheney vs Kerry on defense cuts)

    09/02/2004 3:44:58 PM PDT · by PhilipFreneau · 14 replies · 1,323+ views
    Washington Times ^ | 8/20/2004 | Peter Huessy
    Sen. John Kerry's campaign defends his proposals to eliminate major U.S. weapons systems during his career as a senator by claiming Vice President Dick Cheney proposed similar cuts as secretary of Defense during the first Bush administration. The spin-doctors in the Kerry campaign responsible for these claims obviously know nothing of history. These claims are baseless for the following reasons: (1) Mr. Kerry proposed eliminating 65 major U.S. weapons systems in 1984, including the ships, planes and missiles we currently have in our inventory that are the backbone of both our nuclear and conventional deterrent. If these proposals had been...
  • CIA pick voted to cut personnel for spy operations

    08/26/2004 7:38:27 AM PDT · by lelio · 11 replies · 314+ views
    Boston Globe ^ | 8/25/2004 | Dana Milbank
    WASHINGTON -- President Bush's nominee to be the director of central intelligence, Representative Porter J. Goss, Republican of Florida, cosponsored legislation that would have cut intelligence personnel by 20 percent in the late 1990s. ... The Bush reelection campaign has been blasting Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry as deeply irresponsible for proposing intelligence cuts at the same time. A Bush campaign ad released on Aug. 13 carried a headline: "John Kerry . . . proposed slashing Intelligence Budget 6 Billion Dollars." But the cuts Goss supported are larger than those proposed by Kerry and specifically targeted the "human intelligence"...
  • Kerry's defense(less) posture

    08/25/2004 11:27:14 PM PDT · by kattracks · 5 replies · 341+ views
    While Sen. John Kerry continues his attempt to demonstrate his presidential bona fides by concentrating virtually exclusively on his four-month tour of duty in Vietnam in the late 1960s, it is instructive to examine the potentially destructive role he has played on the national-security front during his two decades in the Senate. Perhaps no issue offers more evidence of Mr. Kerry's foreign-policy follies than the matter of defending the American homeland against ballistic missiles carrying weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear warheads.     The issue is particularly timely given that the first ground-based missile interceptor was installed on July 22 in...
  • Kerry Anti-Military Votes

    08/23/2004 1:14:07 PM PDT · by BattleFlag · 9 replies · 591+ views
    8/23/2004 | BattleFlag
    I received this list by email today. In as much as kerry is trying to get Americans to believe in his "reporting for duty" super soldier hawk persona I wondered how many are actually taking a look to see how his actions compare with his words.(My guess is very few). Maybe this is why his hawkish talk doesn't raise the hackles of leftists, they know there is no substance to it. The list; He voted to kill the Bradley Fighting Vehicle He voted to kill the M-1 Abrams Tank He voted to kill every Aircraft carrier laid down from 1988...
  • Kerry Seen Cutting Spending on Missile Defense

    08/17/2004 11:47:02 AM PDT · by demlosers · 15 replies · 540+ views
    Reuters ^ | Tue Aug 17, 2004 | Andrea Shalal-Esa
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - If Democrat John Kerry becomes president he could cut up to a third of the annual $10 billion in spending on missile defenses, but overall defense expenditure would stay high, analysts said this week. Burgeoning budget deficits and the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are expected to limit growth in new weapons spending, regardless of who wins. And the costs of military personnel are expected to keep rising under either a Republican or Democratic president. "I would not expect a big difference, at least initially, if Kerry is elected, as long as the wars in Afghanistan...
  • Bush-Cheney '04 Launches New Television Advertisement "Intel"

    08/14/2004 2:05:49 AM PDT · by RWR8189 · 8 replies · 811+ views
    George W. Bush ^ | August 13, 2004
    ARLINGTON, VA -- Bush-Cheney '04 announced today the release of the campaign's newest television advertisement, "Intel."  The new advertisement highlights John Kerry's proposals to cut intelligence funding and his poor attendance record on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The advertisement will begin airing Monday on national cable and in select local markets.Script for "Intel"President Bush:I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message.Voice Over:John Kerry promises ... Graphic:John Kerry promises ...John Kerry:I will immediately reform the intelligence system.Voice Over:Oh really... As a member of the Intelligence Committee, Senator Kerry was absent for 76 percent of the Committee's hearings.Graphic:John Kerry...ABSENT76% of publicSenate...
  • BUSH BATTLES BACK

    08/09/2004 1:06:37 AM PDT · by kattracks · 7 replies · 663+ views
    New York Post ^ | 8//09/04
    [snip]* Military: According to his acceptance speech, Kerry claims that he "will build a stronger military . . . to strengthen American forces that are now overstretched, overextended and under pressure. "We will double our Special Forces to conduct . . . anti-terrorist operations . . . provide our troops with the newest weapons and technology." But as Bush notes, when it came time to actually help troops in a war zone now, where was John Kerry? "Last September, when our troops were in combat in both Afghanistan and Iraq, I proposed supplemental funding to support them in their missions....
  • Can you guess which country?

    08/05/2004 6:04:51 PM PDT · by TheRedSoxWinThePennant · 9 replies · 675+ views
    e-mail | today | UNKNOWN
    Can You Name This Country? 709,000 REGULAR (ACTIVE DUTY) PERSONNEL. 293,000 RESERVE TROOPS. EIGHT STANDING ARMY DIVISIONS. 20 AIR FORCE AND NAVY AIR WINGS WITH 2,000 COMBAT AIRCRAFT. 232 STRATEGIC BOMBERS. 19 STRATEGIC BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES WITH 3,114 NUCLEAR WARHEADS ON 232 MISSILES. 500 ICBMs WITH 1,950 WARHEADS. FOUR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS AND 121 SURFACE COMBAT SHIPS AND SUBMARINES PLUS ALL THE SUPPORT BASES, SHIPYARDS, AND LOGISTICAL ASSETS NEEDED TO SUSTAIN SUCH A NAVAL FORCE. IS THIS COUNTRY: RUSSIA? NO CHINA? NO GREAT BRITAIN? NO FRANCE? WRONG AGAIN MUST BE USA? STILL WRONG GIVE UP? THESE ARE THE AMERICAN MILITARY FORCES...
  • 1984 FLASHBACK: KERRY ASKS FOR MASSIVE CUTS IN REAGAN DEFENSE OUTLAY [Boston Globe]

    06/09/2004 8:07:27 PM PDT · by nwrep · 37 replies · 282+ views
    The Boston Globe Archives | May 30, 1984 | CHRIS BLACK
    Lt. Gov. John F. Kerry, a Democratic candidate for the US Senate, yesterday recommended elimination of at least $54 billion in spending from President Ronald Reagan's proposed $289 billion defense budget for fiscal year 1985. Kerry described his proposed list of cuts as "preliminary" at a press conference at the Parker House and said that he believed the US government could freeze defense spending at current levels without any adverse impact on national security. He recommended cancellation of 27 weapons systems including the B1 bomber, the cruise missile, MX missile, Trident submarine, Patriot air defense missile, F15 fighter plane, Sparrow...
  • Caution and Years of Budget Cuts Are Seen to Limit C.I.A.

    05/12/2004 6:04:41 AM PDT · by OESY · 1 replies · 99+ views
    New York Times ^ | May 11, 2004 | DOUGLAS JEHL
    WASHINGTON, May 10 - Even now, 32 months after the Sept. 11 attacks, America's clandestine intelligence service has fewer than 1,100 case officers posted overseas, fewer than the number of F.B.I. agents assigned to the New York City field office alone, government officials say. Since George J. Tenet took charge of the Central Intelligence Agency seven years ago, rebuilding that service has been his top priority. This year, more new case officers will graduate from a year-long course at Camp Peary in Virginia than in any year since the Vietnam War. They are the products of aggressive new recruiting aimed...
  • A question of patriotism

    04/21/2004 1:27:36 AM PDT · by kattracks · 4 replies · 126+ views
    townhall.com ^ | 4/21/04 | Jonah Goldberg
    According to the funhouse logic of the Kerry campaign, I have no choice but to question Kerry's patriotism. As Mort Kondracke of Roll Call has been dutifully chronicling, ever since Kerry became the unofficial nominee, Kerry has claimed that criticism of his record equals criticism of his patriotism. In February, when Ed Gillespie, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, listed the number of defense programs Kerry opposed - the MX missile, the B-1 bomber, the Tomahawk missile, the Apache helicopter, the Patriot missile, the Harrier jet and the F-15 fighter aircraft -Kerry's campaign manager immediately replied, "Today, RNC chair...
  • Who Needs Weapons? It's good we didn't listen to Kerry back in '84.

    03/22/2004 6:46:54 AM PST · by .cnI redruM · 12 replies · 388+ views
    National Review ^ | March 22, 2004, 9:08 a.m. | By Rep. J. D. Hayworth
    "We are continuing a defense buildup that is consuming our resources with weapons systems that we don't need and can't use." — John Kerry in 1984 on the Reagan defense build-up. What are some of these weapons systems that John Kerry said "we don't need and can't use?" The list might surprise you. It includes many of the most important weapons in our arsenal and weapons that have performed brilliantly in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Among the systems John Kerry said he wanted to cancel were the B-1 bomber, the Apache helicopter, the Patriot anti-missile system, the Aegis...
  • "Kerry's vote to fund Defense, part 2" CARTOON by Linda Eddy

    03/20/2004 8:34:40 AM PST · by IPWGOP · 32 replies · 230+ views
    www.IowaPresidentialWatch.com ^ | 3/20/2004 | IPWGOP
    here's a list of weapons systems Kerry has opposed over the years: the B-1 bomber, the B-2, the F-15, the F-14A, the F-14D, the AH-64 Apache helicopter, the AV-8B Harrier jet, the Patriot missile, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, the Trident missile Kerry sought to reduce procurement of the following: the M1 Abrams tank,the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Tomahawk cruise missile, the F-16 jet
  • Kerry's 1994 Effort to Cut Defense Exposed [by AP writer John Solomon]

    03/19/2004 5:58:35 PM PST · by nwrep · 10 replies · 274+ views
    AP ^ | March 19, 2004 | John Solomon
    By JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON - When John Kerry (news - web sites) offered a surprise plan to trim $43 billion in spending a decade ago, he encountered some harsh resistance: The cuts would threaten national security. U.S. fighter pilots would be endangered. And the battle against terrorism would be hampered, opponents charged. And that's just what Kerry's fellow Democrats had to say. "We are putting blindfolds over our pilots' eyes," Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, a decorated World War II veteran, said of the impact of Kerry's proposed intelligence cuts. Senators rejected Kerry's plan on a vote...
  • A question RE Kerry and the $87B for Iraq

    03/16/2004 5:52:58 PM PST · by Liam · 12 replies · 129+ views
    None | 3-16-04 | Liam
    On Special Report tonight they ran a clip of Kerry saying that he didn't vote for the final version because it didn't buy troops body armor, and some other things I don't remember, but he'd voted for another version of the $87B bill. Carl Cameron explained that the other version was to be supported by new taxes on 'the rich.' My question, especially for those who have time and/or expertise to look up the answer is: Was the other version essentially the same as the final version except for the funding? It would seem to be significant if Kerry voted...
  • Bush argues Kerry turned back on troops in new ad

    03/16/2004 2:49:26 PM PST · by ambrose · 27 replies · 193+ views
    AP ^ | 3.16.04
    <p>President Bush, trying to counter John Kerry's record as a decorated Vietnam War veteran, argues in a new campaign ad that his Democratic rival has turned his back on U.S. soldiers engaged in war.</p> <p>"Though John Kerry voted in October of 2002 for military action in Iraq, he later voted against funding our soldiers," the Bush-Cheney campaign ad says.</p>
  • Hayworth says Kerry tried to halt Apache

    03/13/2004 4:16:17 AM PST · by veronica · 33 replies · 284+ views
    The Arizona Republic ^ | Mar. 13, 2004 | Jon Kamman
    <p>If John Kerry had prevailed in his calls for cuts in specific defense programs 20 years ago, AH-64 Apache helicopters, made in Mesa and seen as vital in two wars, would not have been built, U.S. Rep. J.D. Hayworth charged Friday.</p>
  • Kerry - His Record on Defense- a Great Ad

    03/12/2004 7:50:50 AM PST · by silverleaf · 12 replies · 154+ views
    Please disseminate! http://paradigmassociates.org/TheTruthAboutKerry.html
  • Kerry Voted Against Body Armor for U.S. Troops

    03/08/2004 9:37:51 AM PST · by areafiftyone · 39 replies · 1,883+ views
    Newsmax ^ | 3/8/04
    Likely Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry slammed President Bush over the weekend for not supplying U.S. troops in Iraq with enough body armor to protect them from attacks. But it turns out, Sen. Kerry actually voted against supplying the troops with more body armor in 2002. Addressing a Texas audience on Saturday, the Massachusetts Democrat said it was "shocking" that "tens of thousands of other troops arrived in Iraq to find that -- with danger around every corner - there wasn't enough body armor." But Bush campaign press secretary Scott Stanzel told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg on Sunday that Kerry...
  • "Clinton's Failures" CARTOON with John Kerry asking why 9/11 happened. By Linda Eddy.

    03/08/2004 4:06:44 PM PST · by IPWGOP · 28 replies · 197+ views
  • John F-ing Kerry Unmasked

    03/07/2004 6:30:44 PM PST · by annyokie · 18 replies · 135+ views
    email
    http://www.pabaah.com/Kerry.html
  • Help Needed re Kerry votes on Defense Systems

    03/06/2004 5:23:50 AM PST · by SCHROLL · 2 replies · 99+ views
    any one have a quick link to the PDF of the Kerry letter on his defense votes?
  • Patriot Games

    03/01/2004 4:50:02 PM PST · by RWR8189 · 10 replies · 210+ views
    The Weekly Standard ^ | March 7, 2004 | Fred Barnes
    Why is John Kerry so defensive about his national security record? HERE'S A DOG that won't hunt: John Kerry's accusation that President Bush's reelection campaign is questioning his patriotism. This elevates a Democratic refrain--if we disagree with Bush on national security, we're called unpatriotic--to a ridiculous new height. In Kerry's case, his record on defense, intelligence, and foreign policy has been criticized by Republican national chairman Ed Gillespie and Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia. Theirs were conventional attacks by supporters of one candidate on an opponent's record. Neither got much media attention, but the response by Kerry was indeed newsworthy....
  • A Fitting End for the Comanche

    03/01/2004 4:58:33 PM PST · by RWR8189 · 5 replies · 367+ views
    The Weekly Standard ^ | March 7, 2004 | John R. Guardiano
    The Army shoots down its helicopter. IT'S AN AXIOM IN WASHINGTON that government programs never die, and they don't fade away either. Instead, they invent new rationales to perpetuate their existence ad infinitum. So it was rather stunning when, last Monday, the Army announced the cancellation of its prized $39 billion Comanche armed reconnaissance helicopter program. Credit the dramatic about-face to the Army's new chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker. The former head of the U.S. Special Operations Command was brought out of retirement last August by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to shake up an Army many observers think...
  • "Who voted NO on our body armor?" John Kerry CARTOON by Linda Eddy

    02/29/2004 4:10:49 PM PST · by IPWGOP · 28 replies · 443+ views
    www.IowaPresidentialWatch.com ^ | 2/29/2004 | IPWGOP
  • Kerry lays out plan on terror (Voted against body armor spending measure last year)

    02/28/2004 11:29:42 PM PST · by KQQL · 45 replies · 706+ views
    sacbee.com ^ | 02/28/04 | Dan Smith
    <p>Assailing Bush's efforts, he calls for more troops and police officers.</p> <p>LOS ANGELES - Seeking to zero in on the differences between himself and a wartime president, Sen. John Kerry on Friday laid out a broad plan for dealing with threats both at home and abroad, and said President Bush has "fallen short" on his vow to protect Americans after the 2001 terrorist attacks.</p>
  • Playing the Cheney card. Who woulda thunk it?

    02/28/2004 9:35:18 PM PST · by Pokey78 · 13 replies · 104+ views
    U.S. News- Washington Whispers ^ | 03/08/04 | Paul Bedard
    The fight between President Bush and Democratic front-runner Sen. John Kerry over who's more supportive of the military is about to take an unexpected turn. We're told that Kerry plans to boast that Vice President Dick Cheney as Pentagon boss made the same kinds of spending cuts and reforms Kerry voted for but that are now being called unpatriotic. "Kerry shares most of those votes with Sen. John McCain and Dick Cheney, all crusaders against Pentagon waste," says a Kerry pal. "If Bush wants to run against his own vice president, that's fine." Not so fast, says Bush-Cheney spokesman Terry...
  • KERRY ASKS CUTS IN DEFENSE OUTLAY

    02/28/2004 1:15:29 PM PST · by Monti Cello · 31 replies · 817+ views
    The Boston Globe | May 30, 1984 | Chris Black
    Lt. Gov. John F. Kerry, a Democratic candidate for the US Senate, yesterday recommended elimination of at least $54 billion in spending from President Ronald Reagan's proposed $289 billion defense budget for fiscal year 1985. The cut would reduce defense spending by a percentage point below last year's level, Kerry said. His long-range proposal to cut $200 billion from the defense budget over four years would represent a 4 percent increase in actual defense spending, Kerry said. Kerry described his proposed list of cuts as "preliminary" at a press conference at the Parker House and said that he believed the...
  • The Passion Play of John Kerry

    02/24/2004 5:26:01 PM PST · by NortNork · 8 replies · 400+ views
    Mens News Daily ^ | February 24, 2004 | Brian O'Connell
    Geez, you’d think a guy who traded bullets with the Viet Cong would have a thicker skin. But that doesn’t seem to be the case with Senator John Kerry. In a perplexing and peevish letter to President Bush dated February 21, the Massachusetts senator threatened to take his bat and ball and go home if the mean old president didn’t stop talking about his voting record. No doubt the journey from war hero to wuss has been a painful one for Kerry, but it seems the Senator is edging toward the same hole that swallowed fellow Democrat Howard Dean. Who...
  • Kerry opposed key weapons

    02/23/2004 9:48:16 PM PST · by kattracks · 24 replies · 147+ views
    Washington Times ^ | 2/24/04 | Charles Hurt
    <p>Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry has opposed some of the most effective — and publicly popular — military weapons in the U.S. arsenal during the past 15 years.</p> <p>The Massachusetts senator voted against defense appropriations bills that included money for weapons such as the Patriot missile, the Tomahawk cruise missile and the B-2 stealth bomber — all of which military leaders say have become integral to the U.S. force and were crucial to winning the 1991 Gulf war and last year's war in Iraq.</p>