<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: dojsuessandp</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/dojsuessandp/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:56:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>DoJ lawsuit against S&#x26;#x26;P even sillier than first thought (Banks got duped on their own offerings?)
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2986547/posts</link>
<description>I wrote Tuesday about the hypocrisy and perhaps vindictiveness of the Department of Justice&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;s lawsuit against ratings agency Standard &#x26;#x26; Poor&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;s for rating toxic mortgage-backed securities and their derivatives highly before the housing bubble popped. Apparently I wasn&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;t tough enough on &#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#xA6; the DoJ. Bloomberg&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;s Jonathan Weil explains why the lawsuit isn&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;t just ill-considered, but downright silly: Oh, the poor suckers at Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., fooled about the stench of their own garbage by those sneaky credit raters at Standard &#x26;#x26; Poor&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x92;s.The U.S. Justice Department made some peculiar allegations in its lawsuit this week against S&#x26;#x26;P...</description>
<author>Hotair</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2986547/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Obama Hypocrisy: US sues S&#x26;#x26;P over pre-crisis mortgage ratings</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2986507/posts</link>
<description>In charges filed late Monday in Los Angeles federal court, the Justice Department said S&#x26;#x26;P gave high marks to mortgage-backed securities that later went sour, even though it knew they were risky. The government said S&#x26;#x26;P misrepresented the risks because it wanted more business from the banks. The case is the government&#x26;#x27;s first major action against one of the credit rating agencies that stamped their seals of approval on Wall Street&#x26;#x27;s mortgage bundles. It marks a milestone for the Justice Department, which has been criticized for failing to make bigger cases against the companies involved in the crisis. &#x26;#x22;Put simply,...</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2986507/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>