<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: georgewbush</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/georgewbush/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:50:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Questions Pit &#x26;#x91;W&#x26;#x92; Bashing Against Love of Obama</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417998/posts</link>
<description>Several times each day, I find in my inbox one of those &#x26;#x22;must-forward&#x26;#x22; e-mails from some well-intentioned person upset with someone or something. Usually, I delete them quickly. Today, however, I felt compelled to share excerpts (below) from one such message that uses rhetorical questions to slam the media bias apparent when one compares coverage of President Barack Obama to that given President George W. Bush.</description>
<author>Bob McCarty Writes</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417998/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George W. Bush:  Man of the Decade</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2416263/posts</link>
<description>Clearly, this is my month to really annoy liberals. After picking Rush Limbaugh as Man of the Year, I pick the liberal version of Satan as man of the decade. But again, I ask you, read my arguments, and then make up your mind... Most decades are defined by the Presidents who dominate them. FDR dominated the 30s and 40s. Eisenhower the fifties, LBJ the sixties. The Seventies were the decade of incompetence. The eighties clearly was Ronald Reagan&#x26;#x27;s, and Clinton dominated the nineties. In the same way, for good or ill, President George W. Bush had the most profound...</description>
<author>Neoavatara</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2416263/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:25:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George W. Bush:  Man of the Decade</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2416251/posts</link>
<description>Clearly, this is my month to really annoy liberals. After picking Rush Limbaugh as Man of the Year, I pick the liberal version of Satan as man of the decade. But again, I ask you, read my arguments, and then make up your mind... Most decades are defined by the Presidents who dominate them. FDR dominated the 30s and 40s. Eisenhower the fifties, LBJ the sixties. The Seventies were the decade of incompetence. The eighties clearly was Ronald Reagan&#x26;#x27;s, and Clinton dominated the nineties. In the same way, for good or ill, President George W. Bush had the most profound...</description>
<author>Neoavatara</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2416251/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:04:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The GOP had at most 55 Senators during Bush&#x26;#x27;s presidency (backhand praise from another lib)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2413836/posts</link>
<description>I&#x26;#x27;ve heard people say that it&#x26;#x27;s not fair to criticize the Democrats for botching health care reform because the Democrats never truly had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. Sure, they have 60 votes in principle, the argument goes, but with Lieberman, Nelson, Landrieu, and Bayh counted as four of those votes, it&#x26;#x27;s not really a solid 60. Perhaps. But then how was George Bush so effective in passing legislation during his presidency when he never had more than 55 Republicans in the Senate? In fact, during Bush&#x26;#x27;s most effective years, from 2001 to 2005, the GOP had a grand...</description>
<author>America Blog</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2413836/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:09:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How Does Geithner Fit Into the Harvard-Goldman Filter?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2411788/posts</link>
<description>Arnold Kling has a post on what he calls the Harvard-Goldman filter: The Harvard-Goldman filter works like this. 1. To get into a position of power, you have to pass through a filter. The easiest way to show that you can pass through the filter is to go to Harvard and then work for Goldman. 2. If you do not go to Harvard and work for Goldman, then you have to show that you can get along with people who did. 3. The best way to show that you can get along with people who pass the Harvard-Goldman filter is...</description>
<author>Economic Policy Journal</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2411788/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:36:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tiger and GWB Have Something in Common: People Really Don&#x26;#x27;t Like Them
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2408181/posts</link>
<description>It&#x26;#x27;s come to this: Tiger Woods is the George W. Bush of the sports world. But unlike the 43rd president, Woods needed less than three weeks to see his popularity plummet to 33 percent. And it&#x26;#x27;s still falling. Bush, who left office with the worst ratings in history, took nearly eight years to become similarly loathed. (GWB&#x26;#x27;s final approval numbers? Twenty-two percent. Seriously. That&#x26;#x27;s worse than Nixon and Truman, and according to CBSNews.com, &#x26;#x22;The rating is far below the final ratings of recent two-term presidents Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan, who both ended their terms with a 68 percent approval...</description>
<author>Back Porch Fanhouse</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2408181/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Helen Thomas: &#x26;#x22;Obama Is Now Called A &#x26;#x27;War President&#x26;#x27;&#x26;#x22;-Escalates War in Afghanistan [GRAPHIC IMAGES]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404585/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama had a golden opportunity to become a peacemaker compared to his hawkish predecessor. But he has let that opening evaporate by escalating the war in Afghanistan. Now he is called a &#x26;#x22;war president&#x26;#x22; -- a dubious title that former President George W. Bush personally embraced after starting two devastating wars, one in Afghanistan, the other in Iraq. In both cases, the U.S. is touting its exit plans. In Iraq, Obama has declared a victory and plans to pull out many troops next year, though leaving thousands behind to secure the Baghdad government. In Afghanistan, Obama...</description>
<author>TheBostonChannel.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404585/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George W. Bush Quietly Visits Fort Hood Shooting Survivor (No photo-ops, no publicity)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2399321/posts</link>
<description>I got this e-mail from a friend today. I checked it out with Snopes.com under the SEARCH string : &#x26;#x22;George W. Bush Fort Hood&#x26;#x22; and the story is TRUE. I&#x26;#x27;d like to share it with you. It just shows where the heart of our former President lies. These are folks who truly care about our veterans and their families, not publicity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Randy Royer, from Dothan, AL, is a shooting victim at Ft. Hood. A man in Dothan had his television on in his office when the news of the military base shootings came on. One of his employees had...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2399321/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:10:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Time Cover Story: Bush Decade &#x26;#x27;Hell,&#x26;#x27; Obama Decade Better</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394212/posts</link>
<description>In one tidy cover story&#x26;#x97;The Decade From Hell And Why The Next One Will Be Better&#x26;#x97;Time sums up the last decade and the one to come. Things were &#x26;#x22;hell&#x26;#x22; under George W. Bush, but will be better under Barack Obama. Class dismissed: that&#x26;#x27;s really all you need to know. But just to drive home the Manichean message, Time editor Rick Stengel and Andy Serwer [of Time stable-mate Fortune], who wrote the cover story, appeared on Morning Joe today. Of course there&#x26;#x27;s the inconvenient detail about Barack Obama having been elected in this decade. But not to worry. Serwer explains &#x26;#x22;you...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394212/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:36:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>BushdiditBushdiditBushdidit</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2391694/posts</link>
<description>On Friday, Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner blamed the Bush Administration for the country&#x26;#x27;s woes&#x26;#x85;. again. Oh, you can&#x26;#x27;t blame Tim &#x26;#x22;I Don&#x26;#x27;t Pay taxes&#x26;#x22; Geithner for this reflexive fall-back position of blaming all his failures on Bush. After all, this narrative comes from the top. It&#x26;#x27;s an Obama mainstay, of course. But contrary to those who say Obama is ignorant of history, I&#x26;#x27;d say he has learned from history&#x26;#x27;s blamers and obfuscators... </description>
<author>Publius Forum</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2391694/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:32:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The George W. Bush Institute: Free Markets, Small Government... Since When</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2385706/posts</link>
<description>Get ready because I am going to slap George W. Bush around a little bit. Now, don&#x26;#x27;t get me wrong, it isn&#x26;#x27;t like I hated him. After all I voted for him twice. There was a lot that Bush did that I supported, mostly on the security and war fronts. But, I really stood against his domestic agenda almost completely. I was against no child&#x26;#x27;s behind left alone -- er, I mean no child left behind -- I was against the bailouts and against the drug benefit for seniors program. I disagreed with his &#x26;#x22;compassionate conservatism&#x26;#x22; narrative because it really...</description>
<author>Publius Forum</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2385706/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bush Warns of Threats to Freedom, Economic Growth</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2385552/posts</link>
<description>Former President George W. Bush, outlining plans for a new public policy institute, on Thursday said America must fight the temptation to allow the federal government to take control of the private sector, declaring that too much government intervention will squelch economic recovery and expansion. (snip) In his speech, which set out his goals for a new policy institute focused on economic growth, education, human freedom and global health, Mr. Bush said he entered politics because &#x26;#x22;because I saw society drifting away from the values at the heart of the American Dream.&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>Washington Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2385552/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George W. Bush Admits He Went Against His &#x26;#x22;Free Market Instincts&#x26;#x22; in 2008 - Video 11/12/09</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2385239/posts</link>
<description>Here is video of former President George W. Bush today in a speech he gave at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, admitting that he went &#x26;#x22;against&#x26;#x22; his &#x26;#x22;free market instincts&#x26;#x22; when he decided to move forward with the Wall Street Bailouts in the Fall of 2008. But Bush warned: &#x26;#x22;History shows that the greater threat to prosperity is not too little government involvement, but too much.&#x26;#x22;That&#x26;#x27;s exactly right. He should have stuck to his principles and instincts. Obama is sticking to his principles and instincts in trying to ratchet up government involvement in everything to the greatest extent possible. Bush...</description>
<author>Freedom&#x27;s Lighthouse</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2385239/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Former President George W. Bush Speech Unveils Plans for Presidential Center in Dallas - Video</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2385041/posts</link>
<description>Here is complete video of former President George W. Bush today unveiling plans for the George W. Bush Presidential Center on the Campus of Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. Bush said the Presidential Center will be composed of an Archive, a Museum, and a Policy Institute. The archive will contain 4 million photos, and &#x26;#x22;hundreds of millions of emails.&#x26;#x22; It will also house the papers from his Presidency. The Museum will tell the story of his eight years as President. The policy institute will be called the Bush Institute, and will promote the principles health, education, freedom, and economic...</description>
<author>Freedom&#x27;s Lighthouse</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2385041/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thank you former President George W. Bush (On Hillary Supporter Website)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2384167/posts</link>
<description>We know absolutely no one in Bush family circles and have never met former President George W. Bush or his wife Laura. If you have been reading us for any length of time, you know that we used to make fun of &#x26;#x93;Dubya&#x26;#x94; nearly every day&#x26;#x85;parroting the same comedic bits we heard in our Democrat circles, where Bush is still, to this day, lampooned as a chimp, a bumbling idiot, and a poor, clumsy public speaker. Oh, how we RAILED against Bush in 2000&#x26;#x85;and how we RAILED against the surge in support Bush received post-9/11 when he went to Ground...</description>
<author>Hillbuzz.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2384167/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Americans Are Starting to Miss President Bush</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2381644/posts</link>
<description>Obama &#x26;#x27;Cold&#x26;#x27; and &#x26;#x27;Bloodless&#x26;#x27; The UK Telegraph has a remarkable story from America about a new trend that, so far, seems to be going unreported in the American media. Americans, turned off by President Obama&#x26;#x27;s cold demeanor, are missing George W. Bush. &#x26;#x22;In a sign that the Obama honeymoon truly is over, I began to hear this week the first stirrings of a wistfulness about Mr Bush. &#x26;#x27;I never thought I&#x26;#x27;d hear myself say it,&#x26;#x27; one Democrat told me. &#x26;#x27;But Obama makes you feel that at least with Bush you knew where he was on Americans Are Starting to Miss...</description>
<author>Associated Content</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2381644/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>At Least Someone Is Acting Presidential</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2381511/posts</link>
<description>Barack Obama is our President. But as far as I&#x26;#x92;m concerned, George W. Bush is still our Comforter-in-Chief.</description>
<author>Grand Rants</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2381511/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bloodless President Barack Obama makes Americans wistful for George W Bush</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2381041/posts</link>
<description>Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s reaction to bad news is to play it so cool that Americans yearn for a bit more drama - and some even for his predecessor, writes Toby Harnden in Washington. During the election campaign, Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s cool detachment was a winning quality, the &#x26;#x22;No Drama Obama&#x26;#x22; a welcome contrast with the &#x26;#x22;Mr Angry&#x26;#x22; John McCain, never mind the hot-headed &#x26;#x22;I&#x26;#x27;m the decider&#x26;#x22; President George W Bush. A year into his presidency, however, Mr Obama seems a curiously bloodless president. If he experiences passion, he seldom shows it. It is often anyone&#x26;#x27;s guess as to whether an event or...</description>
<author>Telegraph (U.K.)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2381041/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Helen Thomas: &#x26;#x22;It&#x26;#x92;s The Same Old Mideast Policy-Obama Administration Follows Bush Path&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2379373/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON -- The Palestinians had hoped they would see a new day coming after the Bush administration&#x26;#x92;s eight-year capitulation to all that Israel wanted. But they were wrong. The Obama administration is moving down the same Bush road -- perhaps a little slower -- but nonetheless still enabling the Israelis to continue to violate international law and the U.N. Charter by annexing occupied Arab land. First, the new administration made it clear that U.S. policy opposed new Jewish settlements on the West Bank. This declaration was met with a thumping rejection from the Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu. Then,...</description>
<author>TheBostonChannel.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2379373/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George W. Bush throws out first pitch in Japan</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2377379/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;TOKYO &#x26;#x97; Former President George W. Bush threw out the ceremonial first pitch before Game 3 of the Japan Series between the Yomiuri Giants and Nippon Ham Fighters.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;Bush, wearing a Yomiuri warmup jacket, took the mound Tuesday at Tokyo Dome and threw a pitch to Giants catcher Shinnosuke Abe that bounced once in the dirt before being caught.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>www.bostonherald.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2377379/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Funder Jodie Evans Calls for Kidnapping of George and Laura Bush</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2376586/posts</link>
<description>One of President Barack Obama&#x26;#x92;s top funders, Code Pink&#x26;#x92;s Jodie Evans, is encouraging the kidnapping of former President George W. Bush and his wife Laura, according to new statements issued this week by Jodie Evans and Code Pink. While it might be tempting to look at this latest effort by Code Pink as an innocuous publicity campaign, Code Pink&#x26;#x92;s history of working with state sponsors of terrorism and supporting violent protest against President Bush&#x26;#x96;and their near successful arrest of then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales&#x26;#x96;is cause for concern. Two weeks after meeting Obama at a high dollar fundraiser in San Francisco, Jodie...</description>
<author>Big Government</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2376586/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In Pakistan, Hillary Says Obama-Bush Like &#x26;#x27;Daylight And Dark&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2373566/posts</link>
<description>So much for politics ending at the water&#x26;#x27;s edge . . . Hillary Clinton has gone to Pakistan and bragged of having opposed Pres. Bush during her entire Senate career. Clinton also depicted the difference between Barack Obama and George W. Bush as being &#x26;#x22;like daylight and dark.&#x26;#x22; For good measure, Clinton played the moral equivalency game, declaring &#x26;#x22;we cannot let a minority of people in both countries determine our relationship.&#x26;#x22; The Pakistani minority she had in mind is presumably composed of al Qaeda and its sympathizers. Clinton didn&#x26;#x27;t specify which Americans she would apparently equate with them.</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2373566/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>President George W. Bush Gets Pro-Life Award on Abortion</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2368578/posts</link>
<description>Saskatoon, Canada -- A Canadian pro-life group gave former President George W. Bush an award yesterday honoring his pro-life record and recognizing his fight against abortion. The Saskatchewan Pro-Life Association presented the president with the award while he was in town to give an address. http://www.LifeNews.com/int1368.html</description>
<author>LifeNews.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2368578/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ICON: LeBron James (The one famous person I would REALLY like to DUNK ON is...)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2364374/posts</link>
<description>By 14 he was dunking. By 16 he was facing down reporters. Now the greatest basketball player in the world is 24 years old&#x26;#x97;and he&#x26;#x27;s just getting started. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So you first dunked when you were in junior high? It was during a warmup game when I was in middle school. Every year we had a teachers-versus-basketball-team game in front of all the students. I got one in during the warmups, and then I actually did it during the game. Was it on a teacher? No. I wish! I wish it was on the teacher who gave me a C-minus;...</description>
<author>MAXIM</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2364374/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Blames Bush for 13,000 New Troops in Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2361635/posts</link>
<description>The Obama administration blamed President George W. Bush for 13,000 new support troops headed to Afghanistan, even though Bush has not been commander-in-chief for nearly ten months.The Washington Post had a front page story this morning saying Barack Obama had authorized the troops in addition to the 21,000 increase in combat troops he ordered in March.White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters today, according to the AP, that President Bush, who left office 276 days ago, was to blame for the latest troop increase:Later, spokesman Robert Gibbs rejected a published report that the president had authorized 13,000 additional troops...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2361635/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>