SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  Corruption  Taxes  Bush  Congress  Elections  ObamaTruthFile  Rally  WalterReed  GatheringOfEagles  MAF  TalkRadio  Donate 
Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Other

Lets git 'er done: Make it a monthly!

2008 Q3 FReepathon. Target: $76,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $38,439
50%  
Woo hoo!! Over 50%!! Way to go FReepers and Lurkers!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: gettingold

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Karl Rove Is the Father of Anna Nicole's Baby

    03/29/2007 11:51:38 AM PDT · by NewMediaJournal · 5 replies · 155+ views
    The New Media Journal ^ | March 29, 2007 | Brian Cherry
    Karl Rove fathered Anna Nicole Smith’s baby. In an unforgettable night fueled by alcohol, lust, a lion tamer outfit, a failed attempt to freebase "Sweettarts", an Al Franken blow-up doll and some crimes against nature with a very confused puffer fish, Karl fathered her child. I think we should all be ashamed of Mr. Rove (how much is she worth again?). Now, admittedly, there is no crime in having sex with Anna Nicole Smith. If that were illegal most of the Western Hemisphere’s male population would be perp walked into a future of Federal incarceration that includes forced labor, strained...
  • 25 Signs That, Sadly, You've grown Up

    09/29/2006 10:58:37 AM PDT · by tx_eggman · 26 replies · 1,091+ views
    email | Unknown
    25 Signs That, Sadly, You've Grown up 1. Your house plants are alive, and you can't smoke any of them. 2. Having sex in a twin bed is out of the question. 3. You keep more food than beer in the fridge. 4. 6:00 AM is when you get up, not when you go to bed. 5. You hear your favorite song on an elevator. 6. You watch the Weather Channel. 7. Your friends marry and divorce instead of hook up and break up. 8. You go from 130 days of vacation time to 14. 9. Jeans and a sweater...
  • LA Times Columnist Slams Intelligent Design as a "Ruse" and a "Ploy"

    07/30/2006 12:56:40 PM PDT · by infoguy · 311 replies · 3,218+ views
    Newsbusters.org ^ | 30 July 2006 | Dave Pierre
    Under the corrupt cloak of a "book review," this Sunday's Los Angeles Times (July 30, 2006) continues its underhanded and one-sided assault on the theory of intelligent design (ID). "The language of life," by Robert Lee Hotz*, is a review of three new works that attack intelligent design. The review was promoted on the top of the front page of the "Sunday preview" edition under the heading, "Less than 'intelligent design': Darwin's believers debunk the theory." And rather than providing its readers an honest critique, the Times' "review" is nothing less than a full-on Darwin propaganda piece. Hotz begins his...
  • Darwinian Conservatism: How Darwinian science refutes the Left’s most sacred beliefs.

    07/23/2006 8:49:26 AM PDT · by PatrickHenry · 677 replies · 6,164+ views
    The American Thinker ^ | 23 July 2006 | Jamie Glazov and Larry Arnhart
    An interview by Jamie Glazov with Larry Arnhart, a professor of political science at Northern Illinois University, about his new book Darwinian Conservatism. Glazov: Larry Arnhart, thanks for taking the time out to talk about your new book. Arnhart: It’s a pleasure. Thank you for inviting me. Glazov: Tell us briefly what your book is about and your main argument. Arnhart: I am trying to persuade conservatives that they need Charles Darwin. Conservatives need to see that a Darwinian science of human nature supports their realist view of human imperfectability, and it refutes the utopian view of the Left that...
  • Basic Evolutionist Time Sandwich

    07/23/2006 9:36:42 AM PDT · by tomzz · 369 replies · 3,943+ views
    7/23/06 | self
    Assuming macroevolutionary scenarios were possible (they aren't), the question arises, how much time would you actually need for them? The basic answer to that question is known as the Haldane Dilemma, after the famous mathematician and population geneticist J.B.S. Haldane who published his work in the mid 1950s. The basic answer is that you would need trillions and quadrillions of years, and not just the tens of millions commonly supposed. Walter Remine puts a simplified version of the idea thusly: Imagine a population of 100,000 apes or “proto-humans” ten million years ago which are all genetically alike other than for...
  • Some humor regarding aging [for you baby boomers out there!]

    02/02/2006 7:39:45 AM PST · by COBOL2Java · 39 replies · 1,440+ views
    email | 2 Feb 2006 | email
    I feel like my body has gotten totally out of shape, so I got my doctor's permission to join a fitness club and start exercising. I decided to take an aerobics class for seniors. I bent, twisted, gyrated, jumped up and down, and perspired for an hour. But, by the time I got my leotards on, the class was over. Reporters interviewing a 104-year-old woman: "And what do you think is the best thing about being 104?" the reporter asked. She simply replied, "No peer pressure." The nice thing about being senile is you can hide your own Easter eggs....
  • Intelligent design becomes 'universal debate'

    09/01/2005 8:52:24 AM PDT · by Para-Ord.45 · 88 replies · 961+ views
    http://www.wnd.com/ ^ | August 31, 2005 | REID FORGRAVE
    ...he co-authored with theologian Jay W. Richards called "The Privileged Planet." The book claims that Earth is so unique, it must have been created by an "intelligent designer." One Iowa State professor, Hector Avalos, accused Gonzalez of having a hidden religious agenda...Gonzalez's academic archenemy at Iowa State is Hector Avalos, an associate professor of religious studies at Iowa State who is also the faculty adviser for the ISU Atheist and Agnostic Society. "I didn't expect this level of vitriol," he says after hanging up. "This level of intense hostility, just knee-jerk emotional response from people...."
  • Hello, I'm starting "slow": Intelligent Design and its implications

    08/25/2005 10:11:22 PM PDT · by Rurudyne · 90 replies · 1,200+ views
    Hi! I'm new here and this is my first post here so I'm starting "slow". My topic is "intellegent design" as it relates to evolution. A topic which has appeared in the news recently in the wake of the President's commented that it should be taught in public schools. I have posted on this topic in the Hannity boards and have found some of misunderstanding there (at least on the part of a number of forumites) as to what intelligent design is and what its scientific merits are. The short, short version is that intelligent design is not scientific (in...