http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/hollister/ en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:49:22 GMT Focus Forum 15 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2697126/posts Springs man's claim to have Obama records starts buzz A Colorado Springs “birther,” retired Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister, has Internet blogs abuzz with what may be an illegal foray into an online Social Security data base and how he obtained a copy of President Barack Obama’s draft registration from 1980. “Col. Greg Hollister, USAF (Ret.) contacted the Selective Service, falsely impersonated President Obama, improperly registered his own address as President Obama’s address, and by this false impersonation and identity theft he managed to obtain a duplicate registration acknowledgement card with President Obama’s Selective Service information on it,” a blogger... gazette.com/THE GAZETTE http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2697126/posts#comment Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:49:22 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2697086/posts Link only. The Denver Channel 7 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2697086/posts#comment Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:35:57 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2684938/posts March 7, SCOTUS denies re-hearing of Hollister vs Soetoro with no comment. Scotus Blog http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2684938/posts#comment Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:28:25 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2675406/posts "Stunner! Supremes to give eligibility case another lookChallenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate. The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4. It was in... wnd.com http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2675406/posts#comment Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:04:49 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2650286/posts "New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court Attorney calls for recusal of Obama judicial appointees"There is a widespread perception among 'conservative' media figures such as Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin that judicial appointments have been made by the respondent Obama with the expectation of favors in return. This has combined with a campaign of ridicule and 'unthinkability' on these serious issues led by the press spokesman of the respondent Obama among others," said a "motion to recuse" submitted by attorneys working on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired military officer. The motion cites Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, both of... www.wnd.com http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2650286/posts#comment Sat, 1 Jan 2011 22:12:48 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2648964/posts "Gregory S. Hollister, Petitioner v. Barry Soetoro, et al. Docketed: November 23, 2010 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Case Nos.: (09-5080) Decision Date: March 22, 2010 Rehearing Denied: August 23, 2010 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 22 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2010) Nov 22 2010 Appendix of Gregory S. Hollister filed. (Volumes I, II, III) Dec 22 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barry Soetoro, et al. to respond filed.Dec 29 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011. Attorneys for Petitioner: John David... supremecourt.gov http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2648964/posts#comment Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:49:16 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2633616/posts "Supremes challenged to put Constitution above Twitter Case questioning eligibility says facts don't support Obama storyThe U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether the Constitution will trump Twitter on issues of national importance, including the eligibility of a president, which could determine the very future of the American form of government. The request is being made in a petition for writ of certiori, or a request for the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower appellate court, in a case brought on behalf of Col. Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force officer. ...The pleadings submitted... www.wnd.com http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2633616/posts#comment Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:40:03 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2525448/posts "GREGORY S. HOLLISTER, et al. v. Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural person; de facto President in posse; and as de jure President in posse , also known as Barack Obama, et alMOTION FOR RECUSAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 455 The plaintiffs/appellants jointly move for recusal of the judge below pursuant to and the vacation of his opinions as a consequence of the recognition of his bias and appearance of bias under that statute. They also request of the members of this Court, particularly those who have embraced the bias of the court below, that they consider... scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2525448/posts#comment Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:36:20 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2520393/posts A rule 28(j) letter has just been filed in Hollister v. Soetoro citing the actual language of Vattel from his 1756 treatise and David Ramsay’s essay as well as St. George Tucker’s American edition of Blackstone with commentaries on the Constitution in contrast to the common law.From the letter:  Re:Hollister v. Soetoro, No. 09-5080, consolidating No. 09-5161 Dear Sir: I write pursuant to Rule 28(j) to bring to the attention of the Court supplemental authority which has come to our attention since we filed our briefs in the case, now under reconsideration. This authority is about the issue of the... Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2520393/posts#comment Tue, 25 May 2010 00:30:46 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2499810/posts "IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITGREGORY S. HOLLISTER, et al., v. Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural person; de facto President in posse; and as de jure President in posse , also known as Barack Obama, et al.PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND SUGGESTION FOR HEARING EN BANC TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CONFLICTS WITH THE SUPREME COURT AND OTHER CIRCUITS………………………………………………. 1 II. NO INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS: THE LOWER COURT OPINION ADOPTED: COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS NOT TAKEN AS TRUE; THE MERITS AVOIDED ………………………… 2 III. EXTRAJUDICIAL SOURCES OF EVIDENT BIAS ………………. 5 IV. RULE 11 ASSESSMENT... Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2499810/posts#comment Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:51:22 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2477903/posts ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Henderson, Tatel, and Garland, Circuit Judges These consolidated appeals were considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed March 5, 2009, and March 24, 2009, be affirmed. The district court correctly dismissed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief... U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2477903/posts#comment Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:49:42 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2464379/posts Nothing on the wires yet. No more news given than what I put in the headline. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2464379/posts#comment Fri, 5 Mar 2010 00:17:20 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2423856/posts In part... "MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF HAWAIIAN TERRITORIAL STATUTES, THE REVISED LAWS OF HAWAII, CHAPTER 57, “VITAL STATISTICS,” AND THEIR EFFECT I. THE BACKGROUND OF THE JUDICIAL NOTICE EFFORT TO THIS POINT The appellant John D. Hemenway previously asked the Court to take judicial notice of certain matters of public and official record, including a statute of the state of Hawaii that was enacted in 1982, § 338-17.8 of the revised laws of Hawaii of that year, and which was entitled” “Certificates for children born out of state.” ... We thus asked to the Court to take judicial... Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2423856/posts#comment Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:30:02 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2422326/posts Snip's: "THE LACK OF ADVERSITY ARGUMENT IS NOT WELL TAKENAND NOT SUPPORTED BY THE AUTHORITY CITEDThe first “COUNTERSTATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED” in the Opposition is1. Whether dismissal of Hollister's complaint was properunder Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) because he failed to state a plausible interpleader claim with adverse claimants and a tangible stake.We point out that the appellees filed no cross appeal so that they havepresented no such issue....In his opinion of March 5, 2009, Judge Robertson found that he had jurisdiction because of the interpleader statute (App. 210). Since the statute requires diversity of rival claimants addressed in the... Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2422326/posts#comment Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:53:00 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414705/posts "REPLY OF THE APPELLANTS TO THE OPPOSITION TO THEIR MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT Opposing our motion for oral argument the appellees assert in a quite conclusory fashion that all three reasons of Rule 34(a)(2) are met here. (Doc No.12200734) The first prong that they assert is true here is that the present appeal is frivolous. This is so because the judge below found that the case was frivolous. That finding, based largely on “blogging and twittering” and “vetting” on the Internet by America’s “vigilant” people, was not supported by any actual legal authority. In fact the assertion by the judge... Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414705/posts#comment Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:30:27 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2398759/posts Some updates in the HOLLISTER v. SOETORO case:HOLLISTER v SOETORO - Joint Motion - To Substitute Reply Brief (Ecf Error) THE TACTIC OF MISREPRESENTING THE CLASSICAL EXPOSITION OF “STANDING” UNDER THE FACTS OF THIS CASE The brief of the appellees purposefully creates confusion by continually citing cases involving Article III standing where there is no specific grant of jurisdiction to the federal courts by Congress under Article III as there is if one actually applies the Interpleader Act in this case. Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution states: “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and... Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2398759/posts#comment Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:47:50 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2382646/posts A new court filling in the HOLLISTER v. SOETORO case:Hollister-v-Soetoro-Hemenway-Reply scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2382646/posts#comment Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:51:03 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2366893/posts HOLLISTER v. SOETORO (et al)APPELLE BRIEF (09/04/2009)UNOPPOSED ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (09/22/2009)EMERGENCY MOTION (w. Declaration of L. Liberi) (09/22/2009)APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF (09/22/2009)MOTION (09/23/2009)EMERGENCY MOTION (09/28/2009)PER CURIAM ORDER (10/20/2009)CLERK'S ORDER (10/20/2009) Scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2366893/posts#comment Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:53:28 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2226178/posts PRESS RELEASE FROM PHILIP J. BERG RE: HOLLISTER For Immediate Release: - 04/09/2009 For Further Information Contact: Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.com Berg states Hollister case has been ‘Appealed’ as Opinion is so ‘outrageous’ and Sanction imposed was ‘totally unfair’ Judge showed his total bias since case was filed We will be successful on Appeal ! Spread the word ! (Lafayette Hill, PA – 04/09209) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H.... Obamacrimes http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2226178/posts#comment Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:21:39 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2226177/posts Team defending Obama, Biden warns of 'costs, expenses, fees' A Washington, D.C., law firm defending President Obama in a lawsuit challenging his eligibility to be president that earlier was tossed by a district judge because the issue already had been "twittered" now is threatening sanctions against opposing counsel if he doesn't withdraw his appeal of that decision. The warning from Robert F. Bauer of the Washington firm Perkins Cole was delivered via letter to the plaintiff's attorney, John D. Hemenway. It is not the first such warning issued. Lawyers trying to kill a similar California lawsuit filed on behalf of... wnd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2226177/posts#comment Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:59:51 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2219598/posts On March 25th, Clinton-appointed Judge James Robertson (U.S. District Court), after having threatened to impose financial sanctions on John D. Hemenway for having enjoined the Berg lawsuit to force President Obama to release his birth records to prove his citizenship, backed down. Instead of financial penalties, the Judge issued a reprimand tinged with flippancy. Judge Robertson reconsidered his previous sanctions threat, possibly fearing monetary sanctions might spark a backlash and give a boost to the grassroots effort to force Mr. Obama to relinquish his records for public scrutiny. While the Judge gives passing tribute to Hemenway's long career of public... Family Security Matters http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2219598/posts#comment Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:52:28 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2214274/posts GREGORY S. HOLLISTER, Plaintiff, v. : Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR) BARRY SOETORO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER We live in a free country. Our liberties are manifold and are the envy of the world. In the very top tier of those liberties, enshrined in the First Amendment, is “the right of the people . . . to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Many of those petitions are presented to judges. Every judge knows that a disturbingly high percentage of them involve petty slights, or imagined injuries, or matters that lie well beyond the reach of the... United District Court; District of Columbia http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2214274/posts#comment Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:51:50 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2210316/posts Filed On: March 18, 2009 Gregory S. Hollister, Appellant v. Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural person; de facto President in posse; and as de jure President in posse, also known as Barack Obama, et al., Appellees O R D E R The notice of appeal was filed on March 16, 2009, and docketed in this court on March 18, 2009. It is, on the court’s own motion, ORDERED that appellant submit the documents listed below by the dates indicated. Unless otherwise noted, an original and one copy of each document must be provided. Certificate as to Parties,... scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2210316/posts#comment Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:43:20 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2208530/posts 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREGORY S. HOLLISTER, : Plaintiff : : vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 1:08-cv-02254 JR : BARRY SOETORO, et al., : Defendants : :COUNSEL’S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE John D. Hemenway, Esquire, Attorney for Plaintiff Gregory S. Hollister, who filed the within-captioned lawsuit pro hac vice for the principal attorneys Philip J. Berg, Esq. and Lawrence J. Joyce, Esq., hereby responds to Honorable James Robertson’s Order issued March 05, 2009, to Show Cause as to why he should not be sanctioned under Rule 11 (b) of the Federal... Obamacrimes http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2208530/posts#comment Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:55 GMT http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200137/posts ORDER For the reasons set forth in an accompanying memorandum, the defendants' motion to dismiss [#9] is granted, and John D. Hemenway is ordered to show cause within eleven days of the date of this order why he should not be sanctioned under Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. http://www.scribd.com/doc/13033216/Dismissed scribd http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200137/posts#comment Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:52:30 GMT