<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: ignorantmedia</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/ignorantmedia/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:40:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>LATimes Finally Finds Graphics Like Commie Propaganda Art&#x26;#x85; And Its Glenn Beck, NOT Obama</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2339420/posts</link>
<description>After the last three years of President Obama&#x26;#x27;s graphics and poster art that evokes the style of graphics used in communist propaganda someone in the Old Media has finally discovered the similarity between today&#x26;#x27;s political graphics and communist styled propaganda art. And on top of that another we see another member of the Media calling us all &#x26;#x22;tea baggers&#x26;#x22; So which of Obama&#x26;#x27;s posters is the L.A. Times saying is like commie art? Is it the &#x26;#x22;Hope&#x26;#x22; poster where Obama stares off into the distance like a communist leader attempting to inspire confidence in the viewer? Is it one of...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2339420/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC Anchor Ponders: Is &#x26;#x201C;Socialist&#x26;#x201D; The New N-Word?&#x26;#x201D;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2312862/posts</link>
<description>The mind of a liberal who likes to play racial politics. you start to wonder whether in fact the word socialist is becoming a code word, whether or not socialist is becoming the new N-word for frankly for some angry upset birthers and others So typical. You disagree with Obama and his SOCIALIST....yes, socialist....policies and your once again a racist. The video: (H/T HotAirPundit) [VIDEO AT SITE] Whole transcript: Carlos Watson - Today I want to talk about a word that we&#x26;#x27;re hearing more and more, and that&#x26;#x27;s the word socialist. You hear it from a lot of conservatives these...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2312862/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC Anchor: &#x26;#x27;&#x26;#x27;Socialist&#x26;#x27; Is Becoming the New N-word&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2312827/posts</link>
<description>Did you know that when you refer to someone as a socialist, you&#x26;#x27;re really calling them the N-word?</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2312827/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x26;#x27;s Costello: States&#x26;#x27; Rights is Like &#x26;#x27;Asking the Children to be the Parents&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2305638/posts</link>
<description>CNN correspondent Carol Costello aired a fair report on Friday&#x26;#x92;s American Morning about the several states which passed resolutions that asserted their rights under the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and asked for viewer responses on the issue, but later stated that her &#x26;#x93;favorite [viewer] comment so far...&#x26;#x91;asking for states&#x26;#x92; rights is asking, you know, the children to be the parents&#x26;#x92;&#x26;#x94; [audio clips from the report are available here]. Costello began her report, which aired just before the bottom of the 6 am Eastern hour, with the question, &#x26;#x93;should states&#x26;#x92; rights trump the fed?&#x26;#x94; She also highlighted the premise...</description>
<author>NewsBusters.org</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2305638/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:38:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x26;#x27;s Olbermann Twice Gets Free Republic Founder&#x26;#x27;s Name Wrong</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2293195/posts</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x26;#x27;s Olbermann Twice Gets Free Republic Founder&#x26;#x27;s Name Wrong By Matthew Balan Created 2009-07-15 12:11 Keith Olbermann, one of MSNBC&#x26;#x92;s resident leftists posing as anchors, named Jim Robinson, the founder of FreeRepublic.com, as his runner-up on his &#x26;#x93;Worst Person in the World&#x26;#x94; feature on his Countdown program on Monday evening but twice called him &#x26;#x93;Jim Thompson.&#x26;#x94; After first implying that &#x26;#x93;Thompson&#x26;#x94; and his site&#x26;#x92;s moderators were a bunch of juveniles, Olbermann explained that the reason why the Free Republic founder was so bad was because a few posters on one of the regular picture caption threads made &#x26;#x93;racist&#x26;#x94; comments, that...</description>
<author>Newsbusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2293195/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:18:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x27;Jim Thompson&#x26;#x27; of Free Republic Is One of Keith Olbermann&#x26;#x27;s Worst Persons In the World</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2292614/posts</link>
<description>The runner-up, Jim Thompson, the owner of the right wing website Free Republic, which has moderated comments, meaning a grown up is supposed to read them and delete the crazier ones. But Thompson&#x26;#x91;s folks waited as long as three days removing a comment thread devoted to the racist rage of a disturbing large number of his posters, possibly some of the same people who had previously conducted polls on the site on how best to topple the freely elected government of the United States. After President Obama&#x26;#x91;s daughter appeared in a t-shirt with a peace sign on it at the...</description>
<author>MSNBC</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2292614/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x3C;i&#x26;#x3E;USA Today&#x26;#x3C;/i&#x26;#x3E; Gets Homeschool Story Wrong</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2273065/posts</link>
<description>On May 28, 2009 USA Today published a story based on a report from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), which is part of the Federal Department of Education, titled &#x26;#x93;The Condition of Education 2009.&#x26;#x94; The headline of the USA Today story was &#x26;#x93;Profound shift in kind of families who are homeschooling their children.&#x26;#x94; A few days later the title was changed to &#x26;#x93;More higher-income families are homeschooling their children.&#x26;#x94; Regrettably, among other problems with the article, USA Today made one blatant error and one very misleading claim. The blatant error is USA Today&#x26;#x92;s statement that homeschoolers are increasingly...</description>
<author>Homeschool Legal Defense Administration (HSLDA)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2273065/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CBS: Meet Iran&#x26;#x27;s George W. Bush (Ahmadinejad)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2271604/posts</link>
<description>Ahmadinejad plays to the rural constituency almost exclusively. His own family migrated to Tehran from the provincial village of Aradan, and--as embarrassing as Tehranis find his rural accent, clothes, and demeanor--to villagers, the presence of one of their own in high office is nothing short of empowering. Ahmadinejad has literally handed out money in the provinces, even printing extra currency to do so. He has the undying loyalty of many of these villagers, and he is going to need it.</description>
<author>&#xA9; 2009, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2271604/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Surprise!  Leftist Media Elite Was All Wrong on Afghanistan (Why Surprised?&#x26;#x3C;--Me)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/597625/posts</link>
<description>The quick and decisive victory in the Afghanistan war left some of the most celebrated liberals among the media elite scurrying for cover after having been egregiously wrong in declaring that the war was going badly in its earliest phases. Take PBS&#x26;#x27;s Dan Schorr for example. Just six days after the U.S. increased its air attacks on the Taliban defenses the old liberal advocate pontificated that &#x26;#x22;This is a war in trouble,&#x26;#x22; during the PBS &#x26;#x22;Weekend Edition&#x26;#x22; show on October 27. That was then. Now he&#x26;#x27;s trying to explain his goof. Schorr told the Wall Street Journal&#x26;#x27;s Matthew Rose &#x26;#x22;I ...</description>
<author>NewsMax</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/597625/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Feherty under fire for joke</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2247964/posts</link>
<description>PONTE VEDRA BEACH, Fla. -- CBS Sports golf analyst David Feherty came under sharp criticism Saturday for a joke he wrote in a Dallas magazine article that suggested American soldiers would be just as likely to knock off House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Leader Harry Reid as they would Osama bin Laden.</description>
<author>espn</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2247964/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News Shepherd Smith comes Unglued - PUTZ!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2237754/posts</link>
<description>Shepherd Smith of Fox News needs to take some time off; the stress is OBVIOUSLY getting to him. Shep demonstrated college student naivete and narrow-mindedness regarding necessary war tactics used to protect Americans from our enemies, particularly those who strike us first and want our destruction and demise.</description>
<author>The Daily Change</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2237754/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WaPo Business Columnist Tells David Gregory Taxes Are Going Up</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2232911/posts</link>
<description>As Tea Parties ensued from coast to coast last week, the Obama administration and their media minions depicted attendees as not understanding that the new president has decreed taxes will be going down for 95 percent of Americans. On Sunday&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;Meet the Press,&#x26;#x22; Washington Post business columnist Steven Pearlstein let the cat out of the bag: Tea Partiers are right. Taxes are going up. This revelation occurred after host David Gregory said to the Post&#x26;#x27;s Pulitzer Prize winner, &#x26;#x22;There may be doubts about President Obama, but he is cutting taxes.&#x26;#x22; Pearlstein responded: That&#x26;#x27;s right. And the level of taxation, overall...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2232911/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NY Times Gives Tax Day Tea Parties the Kiss-off</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2231605/posts</link>
<description>It was predictable that The New York Times would take one of two approaches to the nationwide Tax Day Tea Parties on April 15 &#x26;#x97; ignore them completely or downplay them. It chose the latter. In a story yesterday, it tried to portray the phenomenon as a partisan project, driven by conservative personalities at FOX and CNBC. In reality, it was grassroots groups like American Family Association that had more to do with the largest anti-tax protests in U.S. history. The Times listed a few of the smaller rallies, to make the Tea Parties seem piddling &#x26;#x97; &#x26;#x93;200 rain-soaked participants&#x26;#x94;...</description>
<author>Boycott The New York Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2231605/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN Reporter at Chicago Tea Party: It&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;Anti-CNN...Promoted By the Right-Wing...Fox&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2230123/posts</link>
<description>CNN correspondent Susan Roesgen could barely get through her live shot at the Chicago tea party this afternoon. Over shouts of, &#x26;#x22;You&#x26;#x27;re not a reporter,&#x26;#x22; Roesgen quickly wrapped up an interview with an attendee, then said, &#x26;#x22;I think you get the general tenor of this. It&#x26;#x27;s anti-government, anti-CNN since this is highly promoted by the right-wing conservative network Fox.&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>TVNewser</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2230123/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x26;#x27;S Heidi Collins: Monstrous Spending Bill &#x26;#x27;Is a Hold-Over From the Last Administration&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200966/posts</link>
<description>On this morning&#x26;#x27;s CNN Newsroom, anchor Heidi Collins gave Barack Obama some cover by characterizing the omnibus spending bill, larded with thousands of earmarks, as left over from the Bush administration: A controversial $410 billion spending bill hits a snag in the Senate. This is the bill we&#x26;#x27;ve been talking about with about $8 billion in earmarks. Republicans and a few Democrats are mad about all that pork barrel spending. That led members from both parties to push President Obama to veto the bill. Senate majority leader Harry Reid says the measure will be opened up for changes next week...</description>
<author>NewsBusters.org</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200966/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rachel Maddow Wants Trials for &#x26;#x22;Criminal&#x26;#x22; Bush Officials; Presumes Innocence for Terrorists
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2139792/posts</link>
<description>Alas, lamented lefty pundit Rachel Maddow of Air America Radio and MSNBC, President-elect Obama may pursue a 9/11 commission-type inquiry into alleged crimes of the Bush administration instead of full-blown show trials. Maddow also demonstrated her odd predilection toward condemning Bush officials as guilty who&#x26;#x27;ve yet been charged with anything, much less convicted, while wringing her hands over the fate of horribly misunderstood terrorists such as Salim Hamdan, bin Laden&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;driver.&#x26;#x22; Here&#x26;#x27;s what Maddow said on her radio show Monday, initially referring to the death of a high-level al Qaeda operative in Pakistan -- And hey, remember the other war?...</description>
<author>Newsbusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2139792/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Time for Him to Go (Moonbat columnist needs to read the Constitution)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2137054/posts</link>
<description>Thanksgiving is next week, and President Bush could make it a really special holiday by resigning. Seriously. We have an economy that&#x26;#x92;s crashing and a vacuum at the top. Bush &#x26;#x97; who is currently on a trip to Peru to meet with Asian leaders who no longer care what he thinks &#x26;#x97; hasn&#x26;#x92;t got the clout, or possibly even the energy, to do anything useful. His most recent contribution to resolving the fiscal crisis was lecturing representatives of the world&#x26;#x92;s most important economies on the glories of free-market capitalism. Putting Barack Obama in charge immediately isn&#x26;#x92;t impossible. Dick Cheney, obviously,...</description>
<author>New York Slimes</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2137054/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:58:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fiction as fact.  Hoaxing of MSNBC the latest media fiasco
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2132647/posts</link>
<description>This is lesson No. 1 from the latest journalistic fiasco: the hoaxing of MSNBC by a pair of aspiring filmmakers, Eitan Gorlin and Dan Mirvish, who created Martin Eisenstadt, a fictional adviser to Republican presidential nominee John McCain. This faux adviser, MSNBC reported, had admitted that he was the McCain aide who told Fox News that GOP vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was so ignorant she believed Africa was a country. It turned out that this was only the latest hoax by Gorlin and Mirvish. The fictional Eisenstadt&#x26;#x27;s call for the construction of a casino in Baghdad&#x26;#x27;s Green Zone was picked...</description>
<author>San Diego Union Tribune</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2132647/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Video: MSNBC falls for Palin/Eisenstadt hoax</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129669/posts</link>
<description>Specifically, this hoax. I&#x26;#x92;d love to throw stones at them and TNR, but people on our own side were taken in too. Guys? The post at Shakespeare&#x26;#x92;s Sister revealing the hoax is linked on the first page of the Google results for &#x26;#x93;Martin Eisenstadt.&#x26;#x94; Remember these goofball viral &#x26;#x93;ads&#x26;#x94; for Giuliani? Anything look familiar? The &#x26;#x93;Harding Institute for Freedom and Democracy&#x26;#x94;? Named after one of America&#x26;#x92;s worst presidents, whose term in office lasted two years with zero foreign policy accomplishments? Dude? Click the image to watch.</description>
<author>Hot Air</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129669/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:57:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NY Daily News Hamill Implies Democrats Defecting To McCain Are Racist</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2118114/posts</link>
<description>It is no surprise the media is going full throttle on the racism issue in this final week of the campaign. There seems to be concern among liberals that usual democratic voters will pull the lever for John McCain. NY Daily News writer Denis Hamill wrote an article today illustrating his concern that his white liberal contemporaries were defecting to McCain. Hamill emphasizes in each example that these Democrats are voting McCain because of Obama&#x26;#x27;s race. (my emphasis added): But we&#x26;#x27;re nervous. We&#x26;#x27;re Jewish and I spoke to my parents down in Florida today. They&#x26;#x27;re voting for McCain.&#x26;#x22; &#x26;#x22;Because he&#x26;#x27;s...</description>
<author>newsbusters.org</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2118114/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NATO responsibilities equate to &#x26;#x22;attacking Russia&#x26;#x22; to Democrats?!?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2082216/posts</link>
<description>Anyone watch CNN Late Edition today (September 14, 2008) - the Democratic governor on the panel equated Palins comments that that if a NATO member was attacked the US would fulfill their responsibilities to defend was condemned as advocating a military attack on Russia!!! Is Obama advocating that the US no longer be in the business of defending freedom and democracy anymore?? Is NATO truely just a piece of paper to them to discard? So much for the free world standing together after 50 years of the NATO treaty. I hope McCain attacks this sentiment big time; how can any...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2082216/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bush Doctrine? Palin Got It, Gibson Didn&#x26;#x27;t</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081341/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of &#x26;#x27;anticipatory self-defense.&#x26;#x27; &#x26;#x22; &#x26;#x97;New York Times, Sept. 12Informed her? Rubbish. The Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong. There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration &#x26;#x97; and the one Charlie...</description>
<author>IBD Editorials</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081341/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wikipedia: Bush Doctrine = &#x26;#x22;various related foreign policy principles&#x26;#x22; [LISTS AT LEAST FOUR]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080404/posts</link>
<description>The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of United States president George W. Bush, created in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. 1) The phrase initially described the policy that the United States had the right to treat countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups as terrorists themselves, which was used to justify the invasion of Afghanistan. 2) Later it came to include additional elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a threat to the security...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080404/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:35:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is it still too soon for jokes about Sept. 11? (MSNBC article)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080147/posts</link>
<description>At a Friars Club roast of Hugh Hefner three weeks after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, comedian Gilbert Gottfried not only pushed the envelope, he set it on fire. He was at the podium, about to launch into the abundantly filthy &#x26;#x93;Aristocrats&#x26;#x94; joke that inspired an entire documentary film, when he mentioned that he had tried to get a direct flight &#x26;#x93;but they said they have to stop at the Empire State Building first.&#x26;#x94;</description>
<author>MSNBC.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080147/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:42:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN Duped by Sarah Palin Bikini Photoshops</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078504/posts</link>
<description>CNN got duped! The supposed photo of Sarah Palin in an American flag bikini holding a rifle is a proven photoshop.</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078504/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>