Prayer  SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Elections  Obama  ACORN  TalkRadio  CopyrightList  Rally  WalterReed  TeaParty  TeaPartyExpress  TeaPartyRebellion  ManhattanDeclaration  MarchOnDC  FreeperConvention  Donate 

Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794
2010 Q1 FReepathon. Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $9,428
10%  
Woo hoo!! The first 10% is in!! Thank you all very much for your support!!

Keyword: infiniband

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Infiniband for the Masses

    01/30/2008 5:09:48 AM PST · by ShadowAce · 5 replies · 710+ views
    ClusterMonkey ^ | 27 January 2008 | Jeff Layton
    The Linux cluster world is moving towards InfiniBand for many reasons: bandwidth, latency, message rate, N/2, price/performance, and other factors that affect performance and price. But usually it's focused on larger systems, many times greater 64 nodes up to multiple thousand nodes. At that same time the reasons for moving to InfiniBand are still valid for smaller clusters, particularly performance, but the economics are not. Basically InfiniBand is just too expensive for smaller systems and usually does not make sense from a price/performance perspective. But that has just changed... The Rise of InfiniBand InfiniBand has made a remarkable rise in...