<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: intelligentdesign</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/intelligentdesign/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:53:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Climategate Recalls Attacks on Darwin Doubters</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412993/posts</link>
<description>Believers in human-caused global climate change have been placed under an uncomfortable spotlight recently. That is thanks to the Climategate scandal, centering on e-mails hacked from the influential Climate Research Unit (CRU) at England&#x26;#x92;s University of East Anglia. The e-mails show scientists from various academic institutions hard at work suppressing dissent from other scientists who have doubts on global warming, massaging research data to fit preconceived ideas, and seeking to manipulate the gold standard &#x26;#x93;peer review&#x26;#x94; process to keep skeptical views from being heard. Does this sound familiar at all? To me, as a prominent skeptic of modern Darwinian theory,...</description>
<author>Human Events</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412993/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Junk Science Exposed In Evolutionary Theory</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2409952/posts</link>
<description>Millions of high school and college biology textbooks teach that research scientist Stanley Miller, in the 1950&#x26;#x92;s, showed how life could have arisen by chance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Miller, in his famous experiment in 1953, showed that individual amino acids (the building blocks of life) could come into existence by chance. But, it&#x26;#x92;s not enough just to have amino acids. The various amino acids that make-up life must link together in a precise sequence, just like the letters in a sentence, to form functioning protein molecules. If they&#x26;#x92;re not in the right sequence the protein molecules...</description>
<author>OrthodoxNet.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2409952/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How To Talk To Your Kids About Evolution and Creation</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2408121/posts</link>
<description>Problems with Evolutionary Theory Why is there a problem with evolution in the first place? Someone once asked you, &#x26;#x22;What should I believe?&#x26;#x22; Remember what you told them? Basically I said you should only believe what there is evidence for. After spending years studying evolution in bachelor&#x26;#x27;s, master&#x26;#x27;s, and doctoral programs, I can tell you that, first of all, there is evidence for small changes in organisms as they adapt to small environmental fluctuations. Second, there is evidence that new species do arise. We see new species of fruit flies, rodents, and even birds. But when the original species is...</description>
<author>probe.org</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2408121/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:35:39 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x22;EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed&#x26;#x22; I just saw the movie.
This may be a re-post.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2406092/posts</link>
<description>Thank you Ben Stein!!! This movie is a MUST SEE!</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2406092/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:26:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Books of the Year 2009 (Times Literary Supplement Selects Intelligent Design Book as one of them)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2405953/posts</link>
<description>Signature in the Cell Named One of Top Books of the Year by Times Literary Supplement Stephen Meyer&#x26;#x27;s Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design is being named one of the top books of 2009 in the prestigious Times Literary Supplement (TLS) annual &#x26;#x22;Books of the Year&#x26;#x22; issue. The selection was made by prominent philosopher (and noted atheist) Thomas Nagel at New York University. The books issue is not online yet, but the TLS website has posted a preview of Nagel&#x26;#x27;s endorsement of the book. Below is Nagel&#x26;#x27;s reason for selecting the book : Stephen C....</description>
<author>The Times Literary Supplement</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2405953/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rejecting Creation the movie: A business decision</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2405128/posts</link>
<description>Canada&#x26;#x92;s Macleans news site recently published an article titled &#x26;#x93;Darwin movie too evolved for U.S. audiences&#x26;#x94;. The article refers to the decision of US film distributors to &#x26;#x93;pass&#x26;#x94; on the film &#x26;#x93;Creation&#x26;#x94;&#x26;#x97;the dramatized story of Charles Darwin&#x26;#x92;s struggle while writing the Origin of Species. The refusal to distribute a film premiered and acclaimed at the Toronto Film Festival seems to have again roused the Canadian media&#x26;#x92;s scorn of the &#x26;#x93;backward Americans&#x26;#x94; of which&#x26;#x97;according to Gallup&#x26;#x97;only 39% believe Darwin and his evolutionary theory. It is interesting how very differently the Canadian and world media treated America during WW II when far...</description>
<author>CMI</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2405128/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does Science Have a Magisterium?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2405002/posts</link>
<description>At National Review Online, conservative curmudgeon John Derbyshire has weighed in on the Climategate scandal by encouraging conservatives not to jump on the anti-science bandwagon. I share his worry and find his advice is good so far as it goes; but I think Derbyshire&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;s defense of science might actually encourage the skepticism he wants to prevent. Most of the trouble comes from his invocation of the word &#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9C;science,&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9D; and his claim that science has a magisterium.His article is called &#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9C;Trust Science.&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9D; I&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x99;m not sure what that means. What is &#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9C;science,&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9D; and how do we &#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9C;trust&#x26;#xE2;&#x26;#x80;&#x26;#x9D; it? Imagine if someone said:...</description>
<author>The American</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2405002/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New species evolve in bursts - Red Queen hypothesis of gradual evolution undermined.
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404674/posts</link>
<description>New species might arise as a result of single rare events, rather than through the gradual accumulation of many small changes over time, according to a study of thousands of species and their evolutionary family trees. This contradicts a widely accepted theory of how speciation occurs: that species are continually changing to keep pace with their environment, and that new species emerge as these changes accrue. Known as the &#x26;#x27;Red Queen&#x26;#x27; hypothesis, it is named after the character in Lewis Carroll&#x26;#x27;s book Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There who tells a surprised Alice: &#x26;#x22;Here, you see, it takes...</description>
<author>Nature News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404674/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:27:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Biologic InstituteDesign without a Designer? (Hold onto your hat!!! Evos invite IDers to...)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404772/posts</link>
<description>Last February I mentioned the events that would commemorate the life and work of Charles Darwin in 2009. I had no idea at the time that I would be invited to participate in one of these events. But there I was, precisely 150 years after On the Origin of Species first appeared, seated with other scientists in front of a packed room that featured, among other interesting things, a life-sized model of a baleen whale. The venue was the National Museum of Natural History in Stuttgart, Germany, and the occasion was a panel discussion titled Design without a Designer? [1]...</description>
<author>Biologic Institute</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404772/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What Defines an Organism? Biologists Say &#x26;#x27;Purpose.&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404624/posts</link>
<description>David Queller and Joan Strassmann, evolutionary biologists at Rice University, recently proposed a new way to describe what makes an organism a unified whole. They defined an organism as an entity made up of parts that cooperate well for an overall purpose, and do so with minimal conflict. But how do parts like these get together, and where does purposeful behavior come from?...</description>
<author>ICR News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404624/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Environmental change via biosphere feedback mechanisms (can ID help check climate alarmists?)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404590/posts</link>
<description>With millions of eyes on Copenhagen, this seems an appropriate time to ask whether ID thinking has any relevance to understanding the Earth&#x26;#x27;s environment. Can design concepts help us weigh the diverse and often conflicting messages? I think ID is helpful, because features of the Earth&#x26;#x27;s environments and ecologies start to take on new meaning. In this blog, I am thinking particularly of negative feedback mechanisms. Human design engineers will use negative feedback to promote stability and positive feedback to amplify an input signal. They select the mechanisms they need to achieve the desired effect. By analogy, if the Earth...</description>
<author>Science Literature</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404590/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Finch Species Shows Conservation, Not Macroevolution</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404250/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x93;Darwin&#x26;#x92;s finches&#x26;#x94; are a variety of small black birds that were observed and collected by British naturalist Charles Darwin during his famous voyage on the H.M.S. Beagle in the early 1800s. Years later, Darwin argued that subtle variations in their beak sizes supported his concept that all organisms share a common ancestor (a theory known as macroevolution). The finches, whose technical name is Geospiza, have since become classic evolutionary icons...</description>
<author>ICR News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2404250/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:13:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why Richard Dawkins won&#x26;#x92;t debate William Lane Craig</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403891/posts</link>
<description>William Lane Craig is not only one of the world&#x26;#x92;s leading Christian apologists but he has actually made outstanding original contributions to philosophy. Yes, Craig publishes popular-level books. Unlike Dawkins, however, who in 20-years plus has been purely a popularizer (of Darwinian evolution, materialist science, and atheism), Craig continues to publish at the highest levels of the academy addressing scholars of the highest caliber (and gaining their respect). Dawkins, by contrast, increasingly appeals to the lowest common denominator. It&#x26;#x92;s in this light that Dawkins glib dismissal of Craig should be viewed: CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE SHORT VIDEO OF DAWKIN&#x26;#x27;s...</description>
<author>Uncommon Descent</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403891/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Can Evolution Explain Altruism in Our Children?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403445/posts</link>
<description>esearch has shown that humans like to help, even before they are old enough to have been taught how to do so. This innate characteristic distinguishes humans from their supposed closest evolutionary family member, the chimpanzee, which doesn&#x26;#x92;t demonstrate the same altruistic behavior. In studies on the subject, at only 18 months old, toddlers were observed to consistently aid unrelated adults in simple tasks such as opening a door or picking up a clothes pin. Researchers assumed then that altruism, or unselfish concern for the welfare of others, evolved early in humans. But does this conclusion necessarily follow from the...</description>
<author>ICR News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403445/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 03:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michelle Obama racism row&#x26;#x97;what&#x26;#x92;s it based on?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403370/posts</link>
<description>This recent BBC News header[1] was typical of the news headlines worldwide on the story: Michelle Obama racist image sparks Google apology Apparently, the image referred to was a photograph of Mrs Obama that had been manipulated to give her the facial features of a monkey. I say &#x26;#x93;apparently&#x26;#x94;, because the mock-up photo no longer appears as the #1 ranking on Google&#x26;#x92;s list of image search results for &#x26;#x93;Michelle Obama&#x26;#x94;.[2] It is very clear however from the news reports of the &#x26;#x93;race row&#x26;#x94;[3] that in the last days that the picture was Google-accessible, it stirred many people. Such was the...</description>
<author>CMI</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403370/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x93;The Totalities of Copenhagen&#x26;#x94;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403135/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x93;The Totalities of Copenhagen&#x26;#x94; William Dembski Bret Stevens&#x26;#x92; article today in the WSJ, &#x26;#x93;The Totalities of Copenhagen,&#x26;#x94; again shows the strong parallels between the global warming debate and the evolution debate, especially with the proclivity of AGW and evolution advocates to quash all dissent. Consider, from his piece, the following characteristics of the AGW advocates: ...</description>
<author>Uncommon Descent</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2403135/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Science Cannot Police Itself</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402899/posts</link>
<description>In his new book, The Deniable Darwin (Discovery Institute Press, 2009), published just before the ClimateGate scandal broke, mathematician David Berlinski explained that scientists should not be trusted to check themselves--no more than anyone else on the planet, and maybe less so, since grant money is involved. Now he writes on his blog, &#x26;#x22;I Told You So.&#x26;#x22; From The Deniable Darwin: My own view, repeated in virtually all of my essays, is that the sense of skepticism engendered by the sciences would be far more appropriately directed toward the sciences than toward anything else. It is not a view that...</description>
<author>Discovery News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402899/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why young-age creationism is good for science</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402578/posts</link>
<description>The current treatment of young-age creationists in the scientific community and society at large is unfair and unwise. Scientists and philosophers of science, including old-age creationists and naturalists, should respect youngage creationists as legitimate contributors to science. Young-age creationists offer to the current origins science establishment a competing rational viewpoint that will augment fruitful scientific investigation through increased accountability for scientists, introduction of original hypotheses and general epistemic improvement...</description>
<author>Journal of Creation</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402578/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>2009 Daniel of the Year (World Magazine Selects Stephen C. Meyer, Proponent of Intelligent Design)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2402180/posts</link>
<description>Stephen C. Meyer, director of the Discovery Institute&#x26;#x27;s Center for Science and Culture, fights to show that all lives have eternal value because they are the work of a Creator and not the product of chance. WORLD&#x26;#x27;s 12th annual Daniel of the Year does not save lives abroad, as Britain&#x26;#x27;s Caroline Cox and Sudan&#x26;#x27;s Michael Yerko do. Nor does he regularly save lives of the unborn, as Florida&#x26;#x27;s Wanda Cohn does through her pregnancy center work. No, Stephen C. Meyer, director of the Discovery Institute&#x26;#x27;s Center for Science and Culture, fights to show that those lives have eternal value because...</description>
<author>WORLD MAGAZINE</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2402180/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Commenter Nails the Central Issue in ClimateGate: the Rigging of Peer-Review</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402120/posts</link>
<description>The pro-global warming blog Climate Change Denial is spinning like a top. Devastated by the revelation of pervasive fraud in climate science, the warmists are clearly dazed and grasping at any tactics that might salvage their ideological hijacking of science, now laid bare. In their latest post, &#x26;#x22;Swiftboating the Climate Scientists&#x26;#x22;, they ignore the transparent scientific misconduct and fraud revealed in the highest eschalons of climate science, and accuse the skeptics of attacking climate science for base ideological motives. The term &#x26;#x22;swiftboating&#x26;#x22; alone is risible and actually revealing; warmists are nearly all leftists, still simmering over the implosion of the...</description>
<author>Evolution News &#x26; Views</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402120/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Raising the Banner for Creation Truth (according to the evos, these men and women aren&#x26;#x27;t scientists)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402077/posts</link>
<description>Dr. Henry M. Morris founded the Institute for Creation Research in 1970 with a vision to uncover and present evidence for the accuracy and authority of the Bible. For almost 40 years, ICR has distinguished itself as the leader in creation science research and education, ably assisted by the many fine scientists whom God has led to work here. These men and women have dedicated their training and skills to raising the banner for the truth of our Creator God. We would like you to meet our current on-site scientists and hear their thoughts on the purpose, significance, and importance...</description>
<author>ICR</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402077/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Illustrations of Ancient Humans Skew Facts - BTMS Gets it Wrong Again</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401905/posts</link>
<description>Museums and textbooks often use artistic renderings to estimate what a fossilized animal or plant may have looked like when it was alive. These images by &#x26;#x93;paleoartists&#x26;#x94; put flesh and faces on skeletal structures, and they can influence public perception of early human history more than the actual science&#x26;#x97;particularly in regards to human evolution.</description>
<author>Institute for Creation Research</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401905/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Evolutionary Explanations Assume Evolution Explains</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401818/posts</link>
<description>Dec 4, 2009 &#x26;#x97; The facility with which some evolutionary biologists appeal to almost magical powers of evolution to explain anything and everything is revealed in some recent science articles. Whatever needs explaining is due to evolution &#x26;#x96; evidence or not. These four examples can be considered representative of the genre...</description>
<author>CEH</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401818/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 03:20:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Global Warming Quandary Resolved</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2401741/posts</link>
<description>New research out this week has resolved a long-standing, and important, quandary about the causes of global warming. While several models point to anthropogenic CO2 and other greenhouse gases as the leading cause of global warming, the warming trends do not quite match the history of anthropogenic CO2. In fact, shrinking glaciers and other undeniable evidences of warming trace back to about the mid seventeenth century. But this predates the significant rise in anthropogenic CO2 that came later in later centuries. Now environmental researchers have solved the puzzle...</description>
<author>Darwin&#x27;s God</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2401741/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:38:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Birth control leader Margaret Sanger: Darwinist, racist and eugenicist</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401714/posts</link>
<description>Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood, the leading organization advocating abortion in the United States today. Darwinism had a profound influence on her thinking, including her conversion to, and active support of, eugenics. She was specifically concerned with reducing the population of the &#x26;#x91;less fit&#x26;#x92;, including &#x26;#x91;inferior races&#x26;#x92; such as &#x26;#x91;Negroes&#x26;#x92;. One major result of her lifelong work was to support the sexual revolution that has radically changed our society...</description>
<author>Journal of Creation</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401714/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>