Free Republic 3rd Quarter Fundraising Target: $85,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $84,076
98%  
Woo hoo!! And now less than $1k to go!! We can do this!! Thank you all very much!

Keyword: kagantruthfile

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Does Elena Kagen have a $20 million commitment to destroying the American Republic?

    05/01/2012 4:52:27 PM PDT · by IbJensen · 158 replies
    Yahoo Answers ^ | 4/24/2012 | Alan M Gottlieb
    What would you say if you learned that a member of the highest court in the land has spent the last 30 years openly advocating for the destruction of the US Constitution and even went so far as to accept $20 million from Shariah Law proponents to accomplish her goal? That Supreme Court Justice is Elena Kagan. The year after Ronald Reagan entered the Oval Office with the goal of restoring America to greatness; Elena Kagan penned a telling and disturbing senior thesis titled "To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933." In that body of work, Kagan...
  • Elena Kagan Article Archive

    11/22/2011 10:13:18 AM PST · by Nachum · 1 replies
    Nachumlist.com ^ | 11/22/11 | Nachum
    Elena Kagan Mania Elena Kagan: The Justice Who Knows Too Much (audio)Senate GOP Leaders To Holder: Your Kagan Testimony 'Belied By The Facts'Sessions Demands Written Testimony from Holder on Kagan and ObamacareSessions presses Holder on Justice Kagan's involvement with health law“A Pattern of Socialist Associations” – Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee, Elena Kagan (the Early Years)Kagan emails lead to calls for inquiry over her involvement in ObamacareFlashback: Elena Kagan's brother was a radical socialist (communist?)- and she thanks him Kagan to Tribe on Day Obamacare Passed: ‘I Hear They Have the Votes, Larry!! Simply Amazing.’Judge Blocks Release of Recusal-Related Emails Kagan...
  • The New Dichotomy

    08/31/2010 9:33:48 PM PDT · by citizenredstater9271 · 7 replies
    An insight into how liberals and conservatives differ not just in politics but also ways of thinking.
  • Harry Reid claims vote for Kagan out of 'concern for 2nd Amendment

    08/13/2010 2:18:39 PM PDT · by Copernicus · 16 replies
    Examiner.com ^ | 08/13/10 | Anthony G. Martin
    Advocates for keeping Harry Reid, D-Nevada, in the U.S. Senate based upon the flaws of his opponent, Republican Sharron Angle, are hard-pressed to defend the Senate majority leader over his rather frequent unintelligible gibberish. The latest example is Reid's defense of his vote in favor of Leftwing extremist Elena Kagan for the U.S. Supreme Court. Reid claims his vote for Kagan was 'out of concern for the Second Amendment.' The outrageous nature of such a claim is evidenced by the fact that Kagan is on record stating she has 'no sympathy' for those who support gun rights, despite her claims...
  • Why Kagan Shouldn't be Confirmed - Supports the Continuation of Legal Abortion

    08/08/2010 12:46:13 AM PDT · by citizenredstater9271 · 19 replies · 1+ views
    Youtube ^ | Fr. Frank Pavone
    http://www.PriestsForLife.org Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests For Life, gives very clear reasoning on why Elena Kagan should not be confirmed to the Supreme Court. In this video, he uses the words of the abortionist themselves, documented in Supreme Court testimony, to describe the procedure that Elena Kagan herself, supports: "The friction causes the fetus to tear apart. For example, a leg might be ripped off the fetus as it is pulled through the cervix." (This is from the Supreme Court's 2007 abortion decision.) Abortionist Martin Haskell said, under oath, "We would attack the lower extremity first, remove, you...
  • Out Of Thin Air

    08/05/2010 5:40:14 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 26 replies
    IBD Editorials ^ | August 5, 2010 | Investors Business Daily staff
    Same-Sex Marriage: A federal judge decides marriage is a constitutional right and overturns California's Proposition 8 forbidding such unions. The issue is headed to a Supreme Court that Elena Kagan will be sitting on. The imperial judiciary has struck again, with Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California's Proposition 8, passed in November 2008 with 52% of the vote, on the grounds that the voter-approved law was a violation of gay couples' civil rights. Walker's ruling follows a Massachusetts federal judge's ruling last month that the state's married gay couples, also established by judicial fiat, were being wrongly...
  • Shariah Comes to the Supreme Court: Elena Kagan’s Decisions

    08/04/2010 11:49:25 AM PDT · by COUNTrecount · 12 replies
    Big Peace ^ | Aug. 4, 2010 | Christine Brim
    The Senate should not confirm Elena Kagan, because her views render her the first Supreme Court Justice who actively favors the introduction of Shariah law into national Constitutions and legal systems. To excuse themselves for voting for her confirmation, Senators of both parties have told themselves this vote for Kagan’s confirmation will result in a harmless swap: the substitution of one liberal justice for another. The reality is far more threatening and unprecedented in American history. A vote to confirm Elena Kagan’s nomination will bring a liberal, pro-Shariah justice to our highest Court. And if she is confirmed, her behavior...
  • Complaint Filed Against Kagan at Supreme Court

    07/30/2010 1:27:32 PM PDT · by Sopater · 76 replies · 3+ views
    Christian News Wire ^ | July 30, 2010
    WASHINGTON, July 30 /Christian Newswire/ -- Larry Klayman, the founder of corruption watchdog Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch public interest law groups, has filed a complaint before the U.S. Supreme Court at the behest of pro-life organization Declaration Alliance, asking that the high court disbar Elena Kagan.  Kagan, while she was an Associate White House Counsel in the Clinton administration, falsified an expert medical report, prepared by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). In this report, ACOG had originally found that partial birth abortion was in fact not medically necessary to save the life of a woman, but Kagan changed...
  • Kagan's Snowe job on gun rights - Obama nominee is a threat to the Second Amendment

    07/29/2010 10:47:28 AM PDT · by neverdem · 24 replies · 1+ views
    Washington Times ^ | July 28, 2010 | Masthead Editorial
    The more it looks like the Senate will confirm Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, the more gun owners should worry. Yesterday, Sen. Olympia J. Snowe of Maine became the fourth Republican to stand behind President Obama's nominee on the phony basis that Ms. Kagan supports gun rights. Mrs. Snowe explained in a press release that, "as a longtime, ardent supporter of Second Amendment rights, it was critical that [Solicitor] General Kagan stated during her testimony that the precedents set by the Supreme Court in the Heller and McDonald cases - which upheld a personal right to possess a firearm...
  • Kagan also disqualified by ignorance of Ninth Amendment - ALAN KEYES

    07/27/2010 9:40:05 PM PDT · by EternalVigilance · 28 replies · 1+ views
    Loyal to Liberty ^ | July 27, 2010 | Alan Keyes
    Speaking of unalienable rights, the GOP’s handling of the Kagan nomination thus far offers new evidence that the Party’s current leadership remains obtusely indifferent to the tragic watershed Kagan’s nomination represents for the American republic. In response to a question by from Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, she refused to support the fundamental notion that all people have unalienable rights. With the deceitful pseudo-cleverness now characteristic of those hostile to the principles of the Constitution, she pretended that as a Supreme Court justice she would be obliged to deal only with the rights enumerated in the Constitution. Of course this seemingly...
  • Why We Must Carry the Fight Forward to Stop Elena Kagan

    07/20/2010 11:46:30 AM PDT · by Syncro · 10 replies
    Move America Forward ^ | July 20, 2010 | Staff
    Why We Must Carry the Fight Forward to Stop Elena Kagan  Move America Forward For our troops, we must fight to keep Kagan off the highest bench in the land Today will be a historic day for our nation as the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to either send  Elena Kagan to the next step in her appointment process, or send her back to the office of Solicitor General, where she currently resides. Win or lose tomorrow, we must continue the fight to keep activist judges like Kagan, who don’t respect our military or our mission to defeat radical...
  • Kagan Partial-Birth Abortion Role 'Seriously Compromised' Federal Court Testimony: Report

    07/16/2010 4:22:48 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 14 replies · 1+ views
    LifeSiteNews ^ | 7/16/10 | Kathleen Gilbert
    WASHINGTON, D.C., July 16, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Americans United for Life (AUL) has issued a report shedding new light on Kagan's role in manipulating key medical testimony on partial-birth abortion, saying that she failed to admit her actions in Senate confirmation hearings and calling on lawmakers to investigate. It was revealed last month that an amendment to a statement issued by the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists on partial-birth abortion, which Kagan is believed to have added, tampered with medical testimony that proved crucial to later litigation. "Because of the lack of other reliable scientific data, the ACOG Policy...
  • What Would Elena Do?

    07/15/2010 11:30:10 AM PDT · by AccuracyAcademia
    American Journalism Center ^ | July 15, 2010 | Emily Jaroma
    What Would Elena Do? Emily Jaroma, July 15, 2010 The debate regarding whether international law should play a contributing role in deciding Supreme Court cases has sparked national interest and concern. This is due to the fact that there has been a recent tendency by Supreme Court Justices to refer to or cite international law when dealing with a domestic court case. This leads many to ask, What is Elena Kagan’s view on the role of international law in domestic cases? The very fact that President Obama appointed Kagan to serve on the Supreme Court does provide some information on...
  • Kagan Sought to Twist another Medical Statement on Partial-Birth Abortion: AUL

    07/14/2010 3:55:24 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 9 replies
    LifeSiteNews ^ | 7/14/10 | Kathleen Gilbert
    WASHINGTON, D.C., July 14, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In addition to altering testimony on partial-birth abortion by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, documents suggest U.S. Supreme Court candidate Elena Kagan acted similarly with a policy statement by the American Medical Association, Americans United for Life (AUL) has reported.LifeSiteNews.com reported June 30 that memos from Kagan's service in the Clinton administration reveal that she authored language that twisted ACOG's original statement, which declared that the group "could identify no circumstances under which this procedure ... would be the only option to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.”...
  • NRA Opposed To Kagan Nomination To U.S. Supreme Court {With Warning to Senators!}

    07/12/2010 9:35:19 AM PDT · by drpix · 22 replies
    nraila.org ^ | 7/12/10 | LaPierre & Cox
    There may be no vote a United States Senator casts that is more important than a vote to confirm a nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now that the Court has clearly stated that the Second Amendment is a fundamental, individual right that applies to all law-abiding Americans, NRA members and gun owners expect a nominee to the Court to fully support, defend and preserve that freedom. - -clip - - She should not serve on any court, let alone be confirmed to a lifetime seat on the highest court in the land. The NRA is strongly opposed to the...
  • If You Oppose Elena Kagan - Sign Here

    06/30/2010 6:22:58 PM PDT · by GVnana · 19 replies · 2+ views
    Elena Kagan is an awful choice for the United States Supreme Court. She lacks the experience, she lacks the intellectual capacity for the job, and worst she is a liberal judicial activist - and NOT a constitutional conservative. One of the hallmarks of the Tea Party movement has been a return to the proper constitutionally-defined role of the government. And Elena Kagan has shown NO understanding that the job of a Supreme Court Justice is to interpret the Constitution. She is the worst kind of activist liberal judge - and she must be rejected. Please join the Tea Party Express...
  • Kagan: Harvard Law's $476 million dean

    07/07/2010 11:57:26 AM PDT · by opentalk · 17 replies · 1+ views
    AP ^ | July 7, 2010 | SHARON THEIMER
    One talent Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan displayed in her career climb could create unique ethics questions for her as a justice: the ability to persuade Harvard Law School alumni and other wealthy donors to give hundreds of millions of dollars, more than meeting a daunting fundraising goal that came with her job as dean. The $476 million total Kagan reached for the "Setting the Standard" campaign was a record not just for her university but for all law schools....Kagan's prolific fundraising sets her apart from the current Supreme Court justices. ... If Kagan is confirmed to the court as...
  • Kagan’s Explanation

    07/01/2010 3:21:30 PM PDT · by neverdem · 4 replies · 1+ views
    National Review Online ^ | June 30, 2010 | Shannen Coffin
    I was unable to watch Kagan’s explanation of her role in the ACOG policy statement live, but I understand from Ed Whelan’s excellent coverage that she essentially brushed off the issue (as I predicted here she would), explaining that she was merely helping ACOG state more clearly what the evidence before it already showed.   As I explained, however, there are reasons to doubt that. First, the ACOG task force — formed specifically and solely for the purpose of studying the medical efficacy of the procedure — met for two full days in October 1996, and the result of their collective...
  • Kagan disses natural rights, Declaration of Independence

    07/01/2010 3:26:42 PM PDT · by bjorn14 · 19 replies · 1+ views
    rushlimbaugh.com ^ | July 1, 2010
    This is a question from Tom Coburn yesterday. He asked her about the whole business of natural rights. She's not sure! She is not sure on the Declaration of Independence. Yesterday Tom Coburn (R-OK): "Do you agree that the natural right of resistance and self-preservation -- the right of having and using arms for self-preservation and defense. He didn't say that was a constitutional right. He said it's a natural right. I'm asking with you: Do you agree with that?" KAGAN: Senator Coburn, t-t-to be honest with you, I -- I -- I don't have a view of what are...
  • NRA-ILA Exec. Dir. Chris Cox Responds to Internet Rumors

    07/01/2010 5:17:42 PM PDT · by neverdem · 45 replies · 2+ views
    NRA-ILA ^ | June 30, 2010 | Chris Cox
    ·11250 Waples Mill Road ·   Fairfax, Virginia 22030    ·800-392-8683 NRA-ILA Exec. Dir. Chris Cox Responds to Internet Rumors Wednesday, June 30, 2010 The NRA has received a number of questions about blog posts that claim I issued a “gag order” to NRA board members on the nomination of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court.  This is absurd and wrong.  This claim shows complete ignorance of how the NRA operates.  NRA staff, including everyone (myself included) at the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, work for the NRA Executive Vice President, who in turn works for the NRA board, which in turn...
  • Kagan’s reflexive bias will disfigure the USSC’s impartial appearance - ALAN KEYES

    07/01/2010 9:37:24 PM PDT · by EternalVigilance · 2 replies
    Loyal to Liberty ^ | July 1, 2010 | Alan Keyes
    During the debate over legislation to ban partial birth abortion in the 1990s “the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said an expert panel it commissioned could find no medical reason why the partial-birth abortion procedure would ever be used to protect a woman’s life or health.” In a memo to President Clinton, Elena Kagan wrote that publication of the ACOG’s findings “would be a disaster — not the less so (in fact more so) because ACOG continues to oppose the legislation.” In her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Kagan admitted that she was the author of handwritten notes...
  • SHOCKING: Kagan's Princeton Thesis Cited German Socialist Who Endorsed Nazis

    07/02/2010 12:34:17 AM PDT · by RobinMasters · 51 replies · 2+ views
    Human Events ^ | JULY 1, 2010 | Human Events
    Elena Kagan's senior thesis at Princeton University, recounting the history of socialist politics in New York City, cited the theories of an influential German Marxist who notoriously switched allegiances to Nazism after Adolf Hitler attained power. Werner Sombart was widely recognized as an academic proponent of Marxism and was once praised by Karl Marx's colleague Friedrich Engels as the only German professor who understood Marx's Das Kapital. During World War I, however, Sombart endorsed Germany's "heroic" war against the "capitalist spirit" represented by England. In 1934, Sombart published Deutscher Sozialismus, which advocated the "total ordering of life" as an expression...
  • Why Kagan Is Unqualified -- and Dangerous

    07/02/2010 2:15:21 AM PDT · by Scanian · 9 replies · 1+ views
    The Ameruccan Thinker ^ | July 02, 2010 | Selwyn Duke
    Despite being thoroughly unqualified to occupy the bench, Elena Kagan will most likely be confirmed to the Supreme Court. This is because most of our hundred senators are almost as unqualified to judge a judge as she is to be one. What is the proper criterion to apply? Well, a simple analogy illustrates the point best. Let's say you needed to hire a football referee. If he said that he was a "pragmatic" referee, who viewed the rule book as "living" and thus would interpret the rules to suit the "times," would he be your man? Since it's the job...
  • Kagan would need to recuse herself on 15% of cases.

    07/02/2010 3:55:59 AM PDT · by bjorn14 · 23 replies
    foxnews.com ^ | July 1, 2010 | Shannon Bream
    Though there has been plenty of partisan bickering during this week's confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, there is at least one issue raising concerns on both sides of the aisle. There are questions about how many cases Kagan would have to sit out if she's confirmed, and just how willing she would be to do that. As Solicitor General, the government's top lawyer before the high court, Kagan has been involved with a number of cases that will show up during the Supreme Court's fall term. On Tuesday she testified, "I think that there are probably about...
  • Hyper-Partisan Elena Kagan’s Road to the High Court

    07/02/2010 5:51:12 AM PDT · by Wolf13 · 5 replies
    Human Events ^ | 7-2-10 | Gary Bauer
    In introducing his last Supreme Court nominee 13 months ago, President Obama gushed forth like an out-of-control oil spill about what he saw as Sonia Sotomayor’s main qualification—her “wisdom accumulated from an inspiring life's journey.” Obama lavishly praised her “distinguished career,” which included having worked “at almost every level of our judicial system.” All this courtroom time, he assured us, provided Sotomayor “with a depth of experience and a breadth of perspective that will be invaluable as a Supreme Court justice.” “Walking in the door,” he continued, “she would bring more experience on the bench and more varied experience on...
  • How to get a not so stealth anti-Constitutionalist confirmed onto the Supreme Court

    07/02/2010 7:13:49 AM PDT · by Alaphiah123 · 2 replies
    Creating Orwellian Worldview ^ | 7/2/10 | Alaphiah
    Barry Hussein Soetoro is an anti-Constitutionalist President. He has so much as said so himself. So he needs an ally on the Supreme Court, someone who shares his views—views such as the Constitution is a flawed document and flawed individuals wrote the Constitution. As such, the Constitution’s relevance for a new progressive era is questionable at best and just hopelessly archaic at worst. I think that we can say that the Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that is carried on until this day and the framers had that same blind spot. And I don’t think that...
  • Will Hatch's Facts About Kagan Get Through?

    07/02/2010 9:05:17 AM PDT · by CaroleL · 8 replies · 2+ views
    TalkingSides.com ^ | 07/02/10 | CaroleL
    Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) has announced he will vote against current Solicitor General Elena Kagan's confirmation to the United States Supreme Court. Saying Ms. Kagan does not live up to the judicial philosophy that "the law must control the judge; the judge must not control the law," Senator Hatch will join at least several other Republicans in officially opposing her lifetime appointment to the high court. While this news will most likely have no effect on Ms. Kagan's confirmation, Senator Hatch's statement does give the mainstream media at least one more chance to do their job with regard to President...
  • Hatch Opposes Kagan’s Nomination

    07/02/2010 1:23:50 PM PDT · by GOP_Lady · 61 replies · 2+ views
    The Wall Street Journal ^ | 07-02-10 | Mary Lu Carnevale
    <p>Sen. Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) announced this morning that he’s opposing Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court.</p> <p>“Qualifications for judicial service include both legal experience and, more importantly, the appropriate judicial philosophy,” he said in a statement. “The law must control the judge; the judge must not control the law. I have concluded that, based on evidence rather than blind faith, General Kagan regrettably does not meet this standard and that, therefore, I cannot support her appointment.”</p>
  • Kagan the Pagan (Michael Savage editorial)

    07/02/2010 3:15:19 PM PDT · by fishtank · 26 replies · 1+ views
    Kagan The Pagan "Among Jewish People There Is A Type That Jews Themselves Call A Bagel And Lox Jew. Kagan The Pagan Is A Bagel And Lox Jew. What Does This Mean? It Means A Person Of Jewish Descent Who Mocks Her Own Religion. ...."
  • A Veteran Puts Kagan to Shame

    07/02/2010 6:12:37 PM PDT · by Nachum · 40 replies · 1+ views
    power line ^ | 7/2/10 | John
    It is a remarkable fact that President Obama has nominated to the Supreme Court a woman who, as dean of Harvard Law School, discriminated against military recruiters in violation of federal law. Remarkable, but true. Yesterday, our friend Pete Hegseth testified in opposition to Kagan's confirmation at the invitation of Republican members of the Judiciary Committee. I find it interesting that his perspective--no doubt representative of most Americans--is one that the Democratic members did not think it necessary to consider as part of the confirmation hearing. Pete stated this part of the case against Elena Kagan eloquently:
  • Is Elena Kagan Morally Blind?

    07/02/2010 11:50:12 PM PDT · by neverdem · 46 replies
    American Thinker ^ | July 03, 2010 | James Lewis
    Elena Kagan has now admitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee that as a Clinton lawyer in 1997, she fraudulently revised an official medical opinion by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The medical society was going to publicly reveal that "its panel of experts found no circumstances in which the (partial birth abortion) procedure was the only option for saving the life of the woman." In a secret internal memo, she wrote that "This, of course, would be a disaster[.]" Kagan therefore secretly revised the language so the final statement in 1997 claimed that the partial-birth abortion "may be...
  • Kagan dodges and weaves on natural rights

    07/03/2010 7:02:33 AM PDT · by kbennkc · 7 replies · 1+ views
    Washington Examiner ^ | 2 JUL 10 | Examiner Editorial
    Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is getting some flak because under questioning by Sen. Tom Coburn she refused to recognize "natural rights" outside of the U.S. Constitution, presumably including those mentioned in our Declaration of Independence. The Oklahoma Republican then asked Kagan if she believes American citizens have "a fundamental right" to own firearms for self-defense, which he noted the great English jurist William Blackstone described as a "natural right." Kagan responded by saying, "To be honest with you, I don't have a view of what are natural rights independent of the Constitution." Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Kagan-dodges-and-weaves-on-natural-rights-97608954.html#ixzz0scxeC1U8
  • A MUST SEE! Dennis Prager on Kagan and America and the importance of this November's election

    07/03/2010 7:53:29 AM PDT · by AnotherDayInParadise · 3 replies
    Dennis Prager Q&A at the University of Denver. Watch the video.
  • A POSTCARD TO THE GOP SENATORS

    07/05/2010 4:43:55 PM PDT · by katyinhawaii · 13 replies
    Me | 07-04-2010 | Me
    Here's the content of my postcard to all 41 GOP Senators: If you vote to confirm Kagan you are helping in the demise of our Civil Societ, way of Life and Country. Kagan is a political hack and a Chicago Clone and Crony of Obama who has no respect for the Declaration of Independence or the 2nd Amendment and needs to be FILIBUSTERED! NO to Kagan NO to Cap & Trade NO to Amnesty NO to VAT STOP SPENDING Please honor me with a reply. Signed....
  • Coburn and Kagan on Natural Rights

    07/03/2010 9:47:02 PM PDT · by Neil E. Wright · 8 replies
    Reason ^ | July 2, 2010 | Jacob Sullum
    Coburn and Kagan on Natural Rights Jacob Sullum | July 2, 2010 The day after he unusuccessfully pressed Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan to define the limits of the Commerce Clause, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) unsuccessfully pressed her to take a position on natural rights: Coburn: Do you believe it is a fundamental, pre-existing right to have an arm to defend yourself?Kagan: Senator Coburn, I very much appreciate how deeply important the right to bear arms is to millions and millions of Americans. And I accept Heller, which made clear that the Second Amendment conferred that right upon individuals, and...
  • A Socialist on the High Court? Part One

    07/05/2010 5:46:22 PM PDT · by statestreet · 25 replies
    Right Side News ^ | July 5, 2010 | Cliff Kincaid
    Elena Kagan's controversial "Final Conflict" thesis on socialism was written in 1981 when she was 21 years old. Professor Harvey Klehr, an expert on the socialist and communist movements, told me that while he sensed "a lurking sympathy" in the document for the left-wing of the Socialist Party, he didn't find a "red flag" that would derail her nomination. Kagan's thesis covered the rise and fall of the socialist movement in New York City from 1900-1933. Clearly, however, the socialist movement has risen again, under the cover of the "progressive" tradition that includes not only the President who appointed Kagan...
  • Fruits, Vegetables, Liberals

    07/05/2010 9:14:29 PM PDT · by stolinsky · 4 replies
    www.stolinsky.com ^ | 07-06-10 | stolinsky
    To Kagan, the Constitution is not our foundational document, from which we learn the basic structure and functions of our government. Kagan, and liberals like her, do not start with the Constitution, then determine whether what they propose is permissible. Instead, they go in the opposite direction. They start with their leftist, statist agenda, then try to find a part of the Constitution that − by some stretch of the imagination − might seem to justify what they want to do. Sen. Coburn concluded, holding up a copy of the Constitution, “The guys who wrote this never, ever fathomed that...
  • Kagan Hearings - Is It A Dog And Pony Show, Or A Dog And Phony Show?

    07/06/2010 6:11:15 AM PDT · by joeclarke · 4 replies · 2+ views
    JoeClarke.Net ^ | 07/06/2010 | JoeClarke.Net
    As Senators [Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota] joke about whether Elena Kagan had seen or not the latest teen-sex-vampire movie Eclipse, or "what did you do on Christmas" [Lindsay Graham, S. Carolina], there are more serious things to think about Elena Kagan. Orrin Hatch even informed Elena Kagan that "hell is not boring." Ha Ha Ha. Like: Why did she forge an opinion into a scientific document written by the American medical community which falsely stated that live birth abortion “may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of...
  • ‘Commerce Clause’ Totalitarians

    07/06/2010 7:53:38 AM PDT · by opentalk · 8 replies
    Jewish World Review ^ | July 6, 2010 | Arnold Ahlert
    (Congress shall have the power: ) "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;" — Article 1, Section 8, United States Constitution Take a good, long look at the above "commerce clause," my fellow Americans. As far as the American left is concerned, it is the vehicle by which tyranny can imposed on the citizenry of the United States. Too strong a contention? Not at all. Our Democratically- controlled Congress has made it clear that "commerce" is a term so flexible it can be "regulated" — even when it literally doesn't exist....
  • Republicans to Democrats:Confirm your Partisan Judicial Nominee along Party line.

    07/06/2010 8:01:19 AM PDT · by Alaphiah123 · 14 replies · 1+ views
    Creating Orwellian Worldview ^ | 7/6/10 | Alaphiah
    59-41 That’s all you need to know regarding the Elena Kagan confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Those are the numbers by which she most likely will be confirmed, unless of course some Republican Senator doesn’t get it and decides to cast his or her vote with Democrats to confirm her. (see article) By “doesn’t get it,” I’m referring to why Kagan was selected by president Soetoro. Kagan is the Progressive’s attempt to politicize the Supreme Court. If you haven’t noticed by now Barry Hussein Soetoro and Democrats have politicized everything—every aspect of government and...
  • When Kagan Played Doctor: Elena Kagan's partial-birth abortion scandal.

    07/06/2010 4:03:36 AM PDT · by dixjea · 7 replies
    Slate ^ | July 3, 2010, | By William Saletan
    Fourteen years ago, to protect President Clinton's position on partial-birth abortions, Elena Kagan doctored a statement by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Conservatives think this should disqualify her from the Supreme Court. They understate the scandal. It isn't Kagan we should worry about. It's the whole judiciary. Kagan, who was then an associate White House counsel, was doing her job: advancing the president's interests. The real culprit was ACOG, which adopted Kagan's spin without acknowledgment. But the larger problem is the credence subsequently given to ACOG's statement by courts, including the Supreme Court. Judges have put too much...
  • Another Confirmation Convert

    07/06/2010 12:09:35 PM PDT · by bs9021 · 1 replies · 1+ views
    Accuracy in Academia ^ | July 6, 2010 | Bethany Stotts
    Another Confirmation Convert Bethany Stotts, July 6, 2010 Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan indicated during her recent Senate confirmation hearings that, if confirmed, she would not give international law “independent precedential weight” in her court rulings. However, at a recent Heritage Foundation event, “Outsourcing Law? International Law and Its Importance in the Kagan Hearing,” held several days earlier, the speakers expressed their concern that, as with Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan might attempt a “confirmation conversion,” making statements which belie her previous actions. “Indeed, during her confirmation process, Judge Sonia Sotomayor assured the Judiciary Committee that in her view, citations to...
  • A Socialist on the High Court? Part Two

    07/06/2010 4:53:18 PM PDT · by statestreet · 3 replies
    Accuracy in Media (AIM) | JULY 6, 2010 | CLIFF KINCAID
    The alleged “failure of American radicalism,” perhaps appropriate for a paper that covers 1900-1933 and written in 1981, is not so apparent these days. As a student, Obama Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was so interested in the socialist movement that she wrote a thesis about its history in New York City from 1900-1933. But the history of the Progressive Party, which ran FDR’s former vice president Henry Wallace as its presidential candidate in 1948, helps bring the subject up to date and explains the current direction of the Democratic Party. The Progressive Party was controlled by the Communist Party...
  • Video--Elena Kagan extolled the virtues of a Nazi socialist

    07/06/2010 7:16:25 PM PDT · by Copernicus · 8 replies · 1+ views
    Examiner.com ^ | 07/05/10 | Anthony Martin
    Obama Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is uniquely unqualified for a seat on the high court...... However, Kagan's penchant for showing us, piece by piece, exactly who her heroes have been through the years opens up a frightening profile of this person who is set to gain a seat on the Supreme Court for life. Human Events published an article on July 1 that catalogs Kagan's praise of Socialist Nazi endorser Werner Sombart. Atlas Shrugs follows up with commentary on this fact.
  • Would Kagan allow Catholic Church To Recruit at Harvard,Even Though It Bans Female Priests?

    07/06/2010 11:36:55 AM PDT · by massmike · 14 replies · 5+ views
    cnsnews.com ^ | 07/06/2010 | Matt Cover
    When asked whether Harvard Law School would have banned recruiters from the Catholic Church because the Catholic Church does not allow female priests, Supreme Court nominee did not directly answer the question but said that all employers needed to sign a form that said they did not discriminate on the bases of “gender and sexual orientation.”
  • The Constitution Is the Precedent (Jim DeMint opposing Kagan)

    07/06/2010 2:47:58 PM PDT · by Clintonfatigued · 15 replies
    U.S. Senator Jim DeMint ^ | June 29, 2010 | Jim DeMint
    When a president and a Congress collude to pass and sign into law unconstitutional power grabs, bailouts and takeovers there is only one immediate backstop: the Supreme Court. Every branch of government has an obligation to preserve, defend and uphold the Constitution, and if the legislative and executive branches overstep their boundaries, the judicial branch can stop then. On the other hand, if the Supreme Court doesn't say "no" when the other two branches go too far, there is no tax that can't be levied, no mandate that can't be imposed, no regulation that can't be instituted and no industry...
  • Kagan's Cakewalk

    07/03/2010 1:16:57 PM PDT · by La Enchiladita · 12 replies
    IBD ^ | July 2, 2010 | Staff
    ...What were Americans thinking in November 2008? Did they think they had just voted to put in motion the Supreme Court appointment of someone who has never served as a judge, whose paper trail is as thin as it is indicative of extremism, and whose career as a political hack betrays a well-honed opportunism? Clearly, most of those voting for president were thinking of other things, such as the state of the economy and taking part in the historic election of our first black president. But if Solicitor General Kagan's free ride through a Democrat-dominated Senate proves anything, it's that...
  • Girl Talk! Klobuchar to Kagan: Let’s Talk ‘Twilight’

    07/02/2010 5:43:57 AM PDT · by keep your powder dry · 12 replies · 1+ views
    She doesn't think the Government is restrained by the Commerce Clause, She thinks partial birth abortions are OK, and she does not think we have gun rights, she's anti-military etc.... It's come to this. It is a sad, sad day, when the case they are discussing upon the hearing of "someone who's an intellectual heavyweight who's going to give Roberts a run for the money", is Edward v Jacob. [video at link]
  • Evasion and Double Talk in Kagan Confirmation Hearings

    07/01/2010 4:48:29 AM PDT · by keep your powder dry · 12 replies
    ...and just yesterday she claimed (again by question dodging), that the Gov't is not bound by the commerce clause... ... Is this the kind of person we want serving on the Supreme Court? During her time in the Clinton White House Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan worked to undermine opposition to the barbaric practice of partial birth abortion. She was able to get a contact at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to insert a few lines in a report that was later used as the basis for legal challenges to a state ban on the practice. National...
  • Jill Stanek: Exposed! Kagan's partial-birth abortion scheme

    06/30/2010 4:02:00 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 16 replies · 1+ views
    WorldNetDaily ^ | 6/30/10 | Jill Stanek
    The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology is well-known in pro-life circles to be radically pro-abortion. For instance, ACOG supports the most heinous of all abortion practices, partial-birth abortion. When in 2007 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the partial-birth abortion ban of 2003, ACOG released an indignant statement, which read, in part: "Today's decision … is shameful and incomprehensible to those of us who have dedicated our lives to caring for women," said Douglas W. Laube, MD, MEd, ACOG president. "It leaves no doubt that women's health in America is perceived as being of little consequence. "... The Supreme...