Keyword: kerchner

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Obama Ballot Challenge Filed in PA – A Nomination Petition Objection Was Filed Today...

    02/18/2012 12:26:44 PM PST · by Seizethecarp · 33 replies · 1+ views
    CDR Kerchner's Blog ^ | February 17, 2012 | Charles Kerchner
    Obama Ballot Challenge Filed in PA – A Nomination Petition Objection Was Filed in Commonwealth Court of PA Against Obama at 10:24 AM 17 Feb 2012 It was a long and busy, but very productive day. I just returned from Harrisburg PA, our state capital, where today we filed in the Commonwealth Court of PA and with the Secretary of State office the ballot access challenge/objection to Obama being on the ballot in PA since Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally not eligible for the office he seeks. Below is a...

    05/03/2011 3:04:32 PM PDT · by patriotgal1787 · 10 replies
    Third Wave Dave ^ | May 3, 2011 | Dave Logan
    WARNING: Tonight's Andrea Shea King Show--9 PM ET--will be a full-on birther extravaganza. If this subject is too much for you to handle in normal portions, tonight's show will be a heapin' helpin' of birther craziness. For health reasons alone, I urge you not to tune in. It takes boldness to take on this type of show. You've been warned. Leading off, Attorney Gary Kreep will give us the latest on the oral arguments he gave yesterday before the Ninth Circuit. Batting clean-up, Cmdr Chas Kerchner and Attorney Mario Apuzzo will educate those listeners who were able to weather...
  • Lakin case is end of 'rule of law'

    12/30/2010 6:46:03 PM PST · by Rabin · 26 replies · 864+ views
    WorldNetDaily ^ | December 29, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    A retired military officer who pursued all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court a legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy of the Oval Office says the conviction and sentencing of an active duty officer who raised similar questions signals the end of the "rule of law" in the United States. Cmdr. Charles Kerchner's legal case, handled by attorney Mario Apuzzo, alleged that Congress failed its constitutional duty to examine the legitimacy of a successful candidate during the Electoral College vetting process on Capitol Hill. The Supreme Court ultimately decided not to hear arguments, leaving standing a lower court's dismissal.
  • A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision

    11/29/2010 4:02:48 PM PST · by STARWISE · 40 replies · 1+ views
    For Immediate Release - 29 November 2010 2:30 p.m. EST U.S. Supreme Court orders were posted at 10:00 a.m. on 29 Nov 2010. See below. Certiorari for our case was denied. The two justices appointed by Obama who had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and case did not recuse themselves even though they should have! Their recusal was called for in our petition on page 36. The two justices and the court ignored that. There were recusals declared by these two Obama appointees in many...
  • Kerchner v. Obama: SCOTUS Orders List Due Out Today (inferring it's been dismissed)

    11/28/2010 11:46:15 PM PST · by STARWISE · 48 replies
    The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit of New Jersey affirmed the District Court’s dismissal, based on lack of standing and subject matter jurisdiction, of Kerchner v. Obama, calling the case “frivolous” and issuing a Precedential Opinion. Not to be taken lightly: *** [W]hen a judge calls an argument “ridiculous” or “frivolous,” it is absolutely the worst thing the judge could say. It means that the person arguing the position has absolutely no idea of what he is doing, and has completely wasted everyone’s time. *** The case relied, belatedly, on the de Vattel theory of natural born...
  • LTC Lakin Named “Man of the Year” (by conservative website)

    11/28/2010 4:53:28 PM PST · by STARWISE · 38 replies
    Post&Email ^ | 11-28-10 | David F. LaRocque
    Friends and Patriots, The court-martial of LTC Lakin is scheduled to convene on December 14, 2010. The defendant in this case, Colonel Terry Lakin has been recognized by the web site as its 2010 “Man of the Year.” *snip* The plaintiff in each of these three cases is a present or former U.S. military officer, as follows: 1) Kerchner et al v. Obama et al, CDR Charles Kerchner USNR (ret) plaintiff, Mario Apuzzo Esq., counsel ( ); 2) Rhodes v. McDonald, CPT Connie Rhodes USA (MD, U.S. Army) plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz, counsel (; 3) Hollister et al v....
  • Kerchner v Obama DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010 (re: Barry's eligibility)

    11/08/2010 12:57:34 PM PST · by rxsid · 195 replies · 2+ views ^ | 11/08/2010 | SCOTUS
    No. 10-446 Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: October 4, 2010 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.: (09-4209) Decision Date: July 2, 2010 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010) Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed. Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.Nov 8...
  • Respondents Waive Right to Respond..Petition-Writ of etal v Obama etal

    11/06/2010 2:43:29 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 45 replies
    Full title Respondents Waive the Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit ### There is new activity on the U.S. Supreme Court Docket today with an effective date on the docket of 3 Nov 2010. Document HERE.1. The Respondents named in our Petition have waived their right to respond. 2. The Western Center of Journalism has filed a motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of our petition. To read the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed...
  • Vanity: Mario Apuzzo's BC case is docketed at SCOTUS (O must respond by Nov 3?)

    10/26/2010 8:22:49 PM PDT · by Frantzie · 27 replies
    Vanity - Apuzzo blog | 10-26-2010 | Frantzie Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 25, 18, and 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010. [Update 13 Oct 2010: Kerchner v Obama - Supreme Court Activity]
  • Petition for Writ of Cert filed with SCOTUS - Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al

    09/30/2010 7:15:17 PM PDT · by rxsid · 6 replies ^ | 9/30/2010 | cfkerchner
    "Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit JAMESBURG, NJ – (Sept. 30, 2010) - Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC, on behalf of plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lehigh County, PA; Lowell T. Patterson, Burlington County, NJ; Darrell J. LeNormand, Middlesex County, NJ; and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., Middlesex County, NJ. Plaintiffs are challenging the recent decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, which affirmed the...
  • Revolution Radio--Constitutional Crisis

    08/19/2010 3:24:52 AM PDT · by Vincent Jappi
    BligTalk Radio ^ | 8/19/2010 | Dr Kate
    Join Dr Kate as she welcomes Commander Charles Kerchner and Attorney Mario Apuzzo to Revolution Radio. Tonight's discussion includes an update on the case against Obama, thoughts about the Supreme Court's role, and next steps for Constitutionalists.
  • 3rd Circuit Affirms Kerchner Dismissal & Orders Appellants to Show Cause (Possible Sanctions)

    07/02/2010 1:23:04 PM PDT · by BuckeyeTexan · 164 replies · 3+ views
    U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ^ | 07/02/2010 | Judges: Sloviter, Barry and Hardiman
    SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell J. LeNormand, and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr. (hereafter "Appellants") filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that President Barack Obama is ineligible to hold his Office as President. They rely on Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution which provides that "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. ..." U.S. Const., art. II,...
  • Appeals panel considers whether Obama is even American

    06/29/2010 7:06:51 PM PDT · by Man50D · 161 replies · 1+ views
    Three judges on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals are beginning to review a case that alleges Barack Obama is not eligible to be president – in fact, he may not even be American. Arguments earlier had been scheduled for June 29 in the dispute, but a court order recently cancelled the hearing and instead announced the case would be decided based on the merits of the legal briefs submitted by attorneys. A document from court clerk Marcia Waldron said the case will be decided by Judge Dolores Sloviter, who was appointed by Jimmy Carter; Maryanne Trump Barry, who...
  • A One-on-One Personal Interview with Commander Kerchner Regarding his Eligibility Challenge . . .

    06/21/2010 1:27:26 PM PDT · by Faith · 32 replies · 1+ views
    The Post & Email ^ | June 21, 2010 | Sharon Rondeau
    “YOU HAVE TO STAND UP AND FIGHT THIS BATTLE” (Jun. 21, 2010) — Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired), is the lead plaintiff in the case Kerchner v. Obama & Congress, which is scheduled for review by a three-judge panel on June 29, 2010. Commander Kerchner has given The Post & Email his first public individual interview, and we are very pleased to present it in its entirety here. A resident of the State of Pennsylvania, Commander Kerchner served 33 years in the U.S. Naval Reserves as both a Commissioned Officer and an Enlisted person. He enlisted with the...
  • Kerchner v. Obama Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument

    06/15/2010 10:48:31 AM PDT · by rxsid · 322 replies · 3,665+ views ^ | 6/15/2010 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "Tuesday, June 15, 2010 The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument The Third Circuit Court of Appeals which sits in Philadelphia has notified me today by letter dated June 15, 2010 that there will not be any oral argument on the Kerchner appeal to that Court. The case will be submitted on the briefs on Tuesday, June 29, 2010. Our presence is therefore not required. The Court also informed me that the Third Circuit Panel that will decide the appeal will be comprised of...
  • Obama Eligibility lawsuits, Obama attorneys Perkins Coie Law firm Paid $ 261,206 April quarter 2010

    05/23/2010 10:49:17 AM PDT · by opentalk · 45 replies · 1,785+ views
    Citizen Wells ^ | May 22, 2010 | Citizen Wells
    Obama eligibility lawsuits, Update May 22, 2010, Obama attorneys, Perkins Coie You have witnessed the veiled attempts from the mainstream media to cover for Obama. You have heard the irrational responses from rabid Obama supporters, heavy kool aid drinkers. And still, with the help of law firms like Perkins Coie and taxpayer funded government attorneys, Obama continues to hide his birth certificate and college records. Perkins Coie has been busy. How much has the Obama camp spent on private and government attorneys? Who knows. Who cares. The important fact is that he is hiding something. Something big. Obama for America,...
  • Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Motion-for-Leave-to-File-Supplemental-Appendix

    04/11/2010 7:34:10 AM PDT · by Elderberry · 21 replies · 1,074+ views
    Scribd ^ | 4/10/2010 | Mario Apuzzo
    . We explained in Appellants’ Opening Brief and Reply Brief that while the issue before the Court is one of standing and political question, the merits of plaintiffs’ claims are important to the showing that plaintiffs must make to prove that they have standing. The importance of the merits of plaintiffs’ claims is made evident by the recent state court decision in Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). We realize that the Ankeny case is a state court decision and not binding on the federal courts. We nevertheless cite to it...
  • 3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case

    04/08/2010 7:00:00 PM PDT · by Man50D · 68 replies · 1,955+ views ^ | April 08, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    A federal court case that argues President Obama probably is not even a U.S. citizen, much less a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution of the chief executive officer, has been scheduled by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for June 29. In a letter dated yesterday to Mario Apuzzo, the attorney representing plaintiff Charles Kerchner and others, the clerk of the court said the case has been "tentatively listed on the merits on Tuesday, June 29, 2010." The notice said there is a possibility the case would have to be moved, and the court "will...
  • Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal - Activity in the Case

    04/06/2010 9:37:40 PM PDT · by rxsid · 35 replies · 1,105+ views ^ | 4/6/2010 | Charles Kerchner
    "Tuesday, April 6, 2010 Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal - Activity in the Case There has been activity in the Kerchner et al vs. Obama & Congress et al Appeal before the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia Pa. 1st: Atty Apuzzo has sent a letter on 2 Apr 2010 to the Court of Appeals requesting addition to the record of the dissertation on natural born Citizenship written by David Ramsay and published in 1789, one of the founders of our nation. 2nd: A letter dated 6 April 2010 was received today from the Court of Appeals...
  • Court told 'citizen' Obama actually may be alien

    03/25/2010 6:53:40 AM PDT · by opentalk · 135 replies · 3,855+ views
    WND ^ | March 25, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    Forget the dispute over the "natural born citizen" requirement of the U.S. Constitution for presidents, Barack Obama may not even be a "citizen," according to a new filing in a long-running legal challenge to his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office. "Under the British Nationality Act of 1948 his father was a British subject/citizen and not a United States citizen and Obama himself was a British subject/citizen at the time Obama was born," says a new filing in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Kerchner v. Obama. "We further contend that Obama has failed to even conclusively...
  • Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal Reply Brief and Oral Argument Request Filed

    03/22/2010 11:31:20 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 19 replies · 1,132+ views
    I have completed filing the Kerchner Reply Brief and Request for Oral Argument. These documents may be accessed at the indicated links. All parties have completed filing all briefs and now we just need a decision from the Court. We will now wait and see if the Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants my request for oral argument and if so when the oral argument will be. If oral argument is granted, it will take place at the United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The courthouse is located right across the street...
  • Obama’s Straw Man Defense - Kerchner v. Obama, Article II, eligibility

    03/16/2010 5:43:10 AM PDT · by opentalk · 22 replies · 2,141+ views
    drkatesview ^ | March 16, 2010 | Dr. Kate
    The appalling game-playing by Obama’s lawyers in the Kerchner vs. Obama and Congress appeal, including the Justice Department, is the kind of behavior that should draw disbarment and criminal penalties. It already makes a mockery of justice and of the Constitution we know that. But the case that Obama is ‘fighting’ is not the legal case that’s been brought against him. Too cool to prove himself, Obama has created and is shadowboxing a straw man eligibility case–one that doesn’t exist. Straw man. A fallacy in which an opponent’s argument is overstated or misrepresented in order to be attacked or refuted....
  • Obama banks on 'no standing' decision

    03/08/2010 7:17:38 PM PST · by Man50D · 49 replies · 503+ views ^ | March 08, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    One of the banks of attorneys assigned to quash demands for documentation that President Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the Oval Office is counting on a ruling that American citizens have no "standing" to demand that information. The attorneys argued in a brief submitted to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals that any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain. WND has reported on the case brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr.,...
  • Court Grants Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal (eligibility)

    02/24/2010 6:42:59 PM PST · by STARWISE · 5 replies · 385+ views
    On January 19, 2010, I filed the Appellants' Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama's alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born...
  • The Usurper and the Courts

    02/24/2010 4:30:38 PM PST · by opentalk · 9 replies · 1,037+ views
    drkateviews ^ | February 23, 2010 | drkate
    Obama is running out of tricks, and running out of room to derail the legal cases against his usurpation of the Presidency of the United States. His distaste for Americans is even more evident now: taxpayers are footing the bill while Obama uses the Justice Department against Americans, and against the Constitution. But every day, he is exposed even more, and it is only fitting that whatever past he has catches up to him in real time. He will crack with the increasing pressure, so let’s keep it up. Narcissists cannot stand to be proven wrong, but once the little...
  • Appeals court: We're listening to eligibility case (re: Kerchner v. Obama)

    02/24/2010 1:03:52 PM PST · by rxsid · 152 replies · 2,993+ views
    WND ^ | February 23, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    "Appeals court: We're listening to eligibility case Judges grant permission for lengthy filing in case challenging Obama An appeals court has indicated it is listening to arguments in a case that challenges Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office with a ruling that gives special permission for an extra-long document to be filed in the case. WND has reported on the case brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the...
  • Kerchner case will test Third Circuit court’s adherence to the Constitution

    02/15/2010 7:30:56 AM PST · by opentalk · 40 replies · 1,765+ views
    the Post Email ^ | Feb 13, 2010 | John Charlton
    Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress is without doubt a case that will go down in the history books of law, and the Appellate Brief written by Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq., is a veritable treasure trove of Constitutional Law and interpretation on the rights of We the People to petition for redress in the most important matter in our form of government, the question of the eligibility of a putative sitting president. Recently the attorneys representing Barack Hussein Obama and the U.S. Congress have admitted the formidability of the arguments mustered against their clients by requesting an extension on...
  • Obama and Congress Request and Obtain Extension of Time to File Opposition Brief to Kerchner Appeal

    02/14/2010 11:50:10 AM PST · by Man50D · 67 replies · 2,278+ views
    American Grand Jury ^ | February 13th, 2010 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    On January 19, 2010, I filed the Appellants’ Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama’s alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born...
  • What's Obama's Birther Legal Bill?

    01/31/2010 4:42:58 PM PST · by STARWISE · 140 replies · 3,379+ views
    Mother Jones ^ | 1-26-10 | Stephanie Mencimer
    Activists charge that Obama has spent millions to silence them in court. Not exactly, say the government’s lawyers. ### Is President Barack Obama spending millions of dollars to hide the truth about his citizenship? During Obama's 2008 run for the White House, his campaign and a host of other credible sources repeatedly debunked the conspiracy theory that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii, and was thus ineligible to serve as president. But this failed to quell the "birther" movement, whose acolytes have filed more than 60 civil lawsuits challenging the president's citizenship. None of these suits have gone anywhere...
  • The Real Conspiracy is the one they won’t talk about

    01/25/2010 9:05:13 AM PST · by opentalk · 100 replies · 2,994+ views
    The Postemail ^ | Jan. 24, 2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr, Lead Plaintiff
    THERE IS MUCH EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT AN AGREEMENT WAS MADE TO PUSH OBAMA AND IGNORE THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT I believe that the RNC and DNC at the highest levels in 2008 were both complicit in shutting down all discussion of Obama’s eligibility issue in the Congress, Main Stream Media, Print Press, and in the leading conservative Talk Show radio stations. I believe that the RNC and the DNC were complicit in subverting Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of our Constitution as to the eligibility requirements for the Office of the President, i.e., the person eligible for...
  • Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10

    01/20/2010 12:16:07 PM PST · by rxsid · 60 replies · 1,219+ views
    Scribd ^ | 1/20/2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
    Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 19 Jan 2010 Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant's Opening Brief in the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit appeal. The Brief was filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. See this link to download and read it: We look forward to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this matter and ordering a trial on the merits as to the Article II Constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of...
  • Obama an Unconstitutional Illegal President - 20091214 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 15

    12/14/2009 9:09:30 PM PST · by circumbendibus · 35 replies · 2,387+ views
    Advertisement ^ | 12/14/09 | Charles Kerchner
    14 Dec 2009: Obama is a usurper. Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. See this 14 Dec 2009 issue of the Washington Times National Weekly edition - pg 15. To be a "natural born Citizen" as is required in the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the person must be born in the country to parents who both are Citizens of the country when the child was born. Obama's father was a British Subject when Obama was born in 1961. Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen nor was he even an immigrant to the USA. We...
  • Obama regime has begun to fall apart

    12/05/2009 7:00:39 AM PST · by opentalk · 45 replies · 3,544+ views
    The Post and Email ^ | Dec. 4, 2009 | John Charlton
    WHEN LAWYERS LEAVE ONE AFTER THE OTHER, THERE HAS TO BE A LEGAL PROBLEM The Department of Justice announced yesterday that Deputy U.S. Attorney General, David Ogden, the second highest ranking official under Eric Holder, would resign on February 10th and return to private practice. Nia-Malika Henderson, writing for, a markedly liberal leaning site, could not deny the facts: The second-in-command at the Justice Department is leaving his post, officials announced Thursday — making him the third top Obama legal official to announce his departure in recent weeks. Deputy Attorney General David W. Ogden will return to private practice...
  • White House orders attack on Washington Times (Eligibility AD)

    12/05/2009 7:45:56 AM PST · by opentalk · 112 replies · 3,901+ views
    The Post and Email ^ | Dec. 3, 2009 | John Charlton
    As editor of The Post & Email I can now publicly confirm that our website was hacked 3 times yesterday by an Obama supporter, in conjunction with a simultaneous political attack on the Washington Times Newspaper, in Washington, D.C.. The motive for the attack was identical: The advertorial placed by Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., U.S. Navy, Retired in the Washington Times, entitled ” Obama’s Lack of Eligibility.” The advertorial contained a brief explanation why Barack Hussein Obama was still a British citizen, and why that makes him ineligible for the U.S. Presidency. It featured the classic Asian metaphor of...
  • Appeals briefs scheduled in Obama eligibility challenge

    11/29/2009 7:25:53 PM PST · by Man50D · 67 replies · 3,119+ views ^ | November 29, 2009 | Bob Unruh
    A briefing schedule has been announced by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case alleging Congress failed in its constitutional duties by refusing to investigate the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president, according to an attorney handling the challenge. Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the action in January on behalf of Kerchner, Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The case focuses on the alleged...
  • Department of Justice–Keystone Cops

    10/28/2009 9:36:13 AM PDT · by opentalk · 4 replies · 936+ views
    drkate ^ | October 28, 2009 | drkate, Charles F. Kerchner,
    The “Justice Department”, who should be defending the American People and the Constitution from usurper Obama, may have made a critical error in judgment when they filed ‘notice of Judge Simandle’s ruling in Kerchner v. Obama‘ into the California case of Barnett v. Obama. Here is the press release from Charles F. Kerchner, lead plaintiff in the Kerchner v. Obama case: The DOJ May Have Messed Up In Filing the Last Minute “Judicial Notice” of the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Case Decision into the Barnett/Keyes v Obama Case File The Department of Justice (DOJ) who is unconstitutionally defending the...
  • DOJ notifies Judge Carter re: Kerchner ruling - with thanks to Citizens Against Pro-Obama Media Bias

    10/23/2009 2:29:59 AM PDT · by STARWISE · 54 replies · 3,628+ views
    This is news .. the DOJ has officially notified CA Judge David Carter, presently reviewing his next move in the Keyes et al v. Obama et al lawsuit ... of a GA judge's decision in the Kerchner v Obama lawsuit. ______________________________________________________ It clearly shows that Judge Carter doesn’t deserve to be addressed as such the guy is looking for the easy way out while making sure not to upset the Usurper-in-Chief. I may be wrong but Carter has sold out. -David Crockett Maybe Judge Carter was waiting for Judge Simandle’s ruling granting dismissal in the Kerchner case. It came down...
  • Kerchner Eligibility Lawsuit Dismissed on Standing

    10/21/2009 9:02:35 AM PDT · by BuckeyeTexan · 289 replies · 8,250+ views
    U.S. District Court, New Jersey ^ | 10/21/2009 | Judge Jerome B. Simandle
    United States District Court Judge Jerome B. Simandle has dismissed the Kerchner v. Obama lawsuit challenging President Barack H. Obama's eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. "The Court finds that Plaintiffs Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James LeNormand, and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr. lack standing to pursue their claims and so the Court must grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss." Judge Simandle's full opinion is at the link.
  • Congress and the Media Have Placed America at Risk of being Attacked from Within

    10/19/2009 2:41:27 PM PDT · by circumbendibus · 21 replies · 1,064+ views
    A Place to Ask Questions to Get The Right Answers ^ | October 17, 2009 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    Go to URL for article on Obama eligibility.
  • Declassified FBI report exposes Communist seedbed for Obama Associates — Part I

    09/27/2009 11:29:47 PM PDT · by Red Steel · 39 replies · 3,090+ views
    The Post & Mail ^ | September 26, 2009 | John Charlton
    The Post & Email has received tonight a decclassified FBI report admitted in evidence in the case brought against W. Mark Felt and Edward S. Miller by President Jimmy Carter’s U.S. Attorney General, Mr. Griffin B. Bell. This document was obtained by an American citizen, who wished to remain anonymous, via a FOIA request. Mr. W. Mark  Felt is none other than the informant who spoke with reporters from the Washington Post, exposing the Watergate Scandal:  who went by the name “Deep Throat” a fact that points to his political neutrality in American politics.What is not know about Mr. Felt...
  • Charles Kerchner, Lead Plaintiff v Obama & Congress Lawsuit, Converts Bill Cunningham into a Birther

    08/04/2009 1:12:34 AM PDT · by Red Steel · 6 replies · 1,148+ views
    Atty Mario Apuzzo Blogspot ^ | August 3, 2009 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. CDR USNR Retired
    Charles Kerchner, Lead Plaintiff in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Lawsuit, Converts Talk Show Radio Host Bill Cunningham of 700WLW of Ohio into a Birther. Hi all. I waited 1 1/2 hours on the line but got on during the last hour of the Willie Cunningham Show out of Ohio on Sunday night, 2 Aug 2009. "Willie" Cunningham was challenging people to give him a credible explanation as to how those two birth announcements got into the Honolulu newspapers if Obama was not born in Hawaii. So I decided to try and get on the show to explain it...
  • Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Kerchner v Obama - w/Historical NBC ref)

    07/21/2009 10:25:57 AM PDT · by rxsid · 27 replies · 1,617+ views ^ | 7/21/2009 | rxsid
    Monday, July 20, 2009 Filing Announcement: Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Filed Filing Announcement: Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed his opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion To Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint/Petition Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and Alternatively to Strike the Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) and Supporting Cross-Motion for Leave Nunc Pro Tunc to File the Second Amended Complaint/Petition.A must read, it's replete with historical reference to the understanding of what the term Natural Born Citizen means.
  • Federal Judge Says Obama Lawsuit "Raises Significant Issues" (Challenging Eligibility)

    06/26/2009 5:30:33 PM PDT · by real_patriotic_american · 35 replies · 2,268+ views
    Sonoran News ^ | June 24, 2009 | Linda Bentley
    "A Himalayan Mountain of contradictory evidence" CAMDEN, N.J. – Despite Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s objection to additional time being granted for defendants to respond to the complaint filed on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner questioning President Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility, U.S. District Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider, for the District of New Jersey, granted an extension until no later than June 29. However, while Schneider noted the defendants’ failure to respond in a timely manner was not caused by neglect, he also stated, “Plaintiffs’ complaint raises significant issues necessitating that the named defendants engage competent counsel to represent their interests. Given the...
  • Update on Kerchner et als. v. Obama & Congress et als. (RE: Apuzzo)

    06/09/2009 11:05:24 AM PDT · by rxsid · 10 replies · 1,388+ views
    Mario Apuzzo ^ | 6/9/2009 | rxsid
    Tuesday, June 9, 2009 Activity in Kerchner v Obama & Congress Case - 2nd Extension of time granted to Defendants Activity in Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Lawsuit - The motion by the defendants for the second extension in time to answer, move, or otherwise respond was granted. Their new deadline is June 29, 2009. You can read the full order at the link below. When you read the order you will see that the court addressed this second request for an extension in great detail in his five page order. I will comment in more...
  • More Delays. USA/Obama Say They Need 124-Days to Answer; Congress 117 Days (re: Kerchner v Obama)

    04/28/2009 12:02:24 PM PDT · by rxsid · 35 replies · 1,787+ views
    Puzzo1 ^ | 4/28/2009 | rxsid
    Tuesday, April 28, 2009More Delays. USA/Obama Say They Need 124-Days to Answer; Congress 117 Days See the copy of the court documents electronically filed by the defendants on Monday, April 27, 2009: The lawyer for USA and Obama, Elizabeth A. Pascal, who works in the office of Ralph J. Marra, Acting United States Attorney, is now asking the Court a second time through her motion for more time to answer for the defendants. Initially, Ms. Pascal only represented the USA and Obama, whose answers or motions were initially due on April 27, 2009. Ms. Pascal requested and obtained an extension...
  • Eligibility Challengers Phil Berg, Monday 8pm ET & Mario Apuzzo, Thr.; Streaming Interviews

    03/09/2009 8:33:36 AM PDT · by unspun · 20 replies · 1,407+ views
    Investigating Obama ^ | 3-10-2009 | Arlen Williams
    The Awakening with Hanen & Arlen 3/9/2009 8:00 PM -- Streaming Link Philip Berg will be our guest and we will be discussing Hollister v Soetoro and the arrogant memorandum US District Court Judge James Robertson issued. Also, did Obama's lawyers really say the original birth certificate could be embarrassing to Obama and the Democratic Party? Why is there so much obstruction in these cases against Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama?Call-in Number, to listen, or press 1 to ask a question: (646) 727-2652 Upcoming Episodes3/10/2009 1:00 PM - Truth Farmer with Doreen3/11/2009 8:00 PM - Annie Got Her Gun with...
  • Quo Warranto: A New Hope -Military Can Now Retreat in Peace

    03/04/2009 5:05:27 AM PST · by classical artist · 10 replies · 800+ views
    Natural Born Citizen ^ | 3/3/09 | Leo Donofrio
    Today I had a five hour meeting with New Jersey attorney, Mario Apuzzo. The meeting was entirely focused on the issue of Quo Warranto. Bottom line: we’ve identified a subset of plaintiffs who have a much more viable path to standing to institute an action in Quo Warranto than active military. This subset of plaintiffs would not be exposed to possible court martial since they are not military plaintiffs. And there is no prevailing need to place this burden on the backs of our military. Our military can retreat in peace on this issue. There is a new hope with...
  • Kerchner v Obama - Summons & 2nd Amended Verified Complaint Delivered Yesterday 2/16

    02/17/2009 3:08:48 PM PST · by rxsid · 10 replies · 736+ views ^ | 2/17/2009 | rxsid
    Kerchner v Obama - Summons & 2nd Amended Verified Complaint Delivered to Process Servers Yesterday - President's Day, February 16th, 2009 Hi All, Just a quick update on the case. The wheels are in motion. The copies of the federal court Summons and 2nd Amended Verified Complaint were electronically delivered to professional legal process servers yesterday morning, President's Day, February 16th, 2009, for delivery to and official serving on the Defendants. As my client noted, an ironically befitting day and an interesting footnote for history in our goal to remove this usurper from the Oval Office.
  • Seeking Additional Plaintiffs for Kerchner v. Obama (Mario Apuzzo, Esq.)

    01/29/2009 9:18:33 PM PST · by rxsid · 4 replies · 555+ views
    Country First ^ | 1/29/2009 | rxsid
    [Quote:] "Seeking Additional Plaintiffs for Kerchner v. Obama Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:05 pm Seeking additional plaintiffs for Kerchner v. Obama who are military, not on active duty but subject to recall, or electors currently residing in the 3rd Circuit (PA, NJ, DE), who are strong supporters of our Constitution and are willing to stand up and support and defend it. Please contact Mario Apuzzo, Esq. at: or 732-521-1900. Please download and read the Amended Complaint so that you may be informed about the case pior to contacting me at: Mario Apuzzo, Esq." [End Quote]