<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: kerryism</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/kerryism/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:13:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Kerryism (Victor Davis Hanson comments brilliantly on Kerry flap)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1729874/posts</link>
<description>Kerryism [Victor Davis Hanson] Kerry surely must be one of the saddest Democratic liabilities around. Some afterthoughts about his latest gaffe, which is one of those rare glimpses into an entire troubled ideology: (1) How could John Kerry, born into privilege, and then marrying and divorcing and marrying out of and back into greater inherited wealth, lecture anyone at a city college about the ingredients for success in America? If he were to give personal advice about making it, it would have to be to marry rich women. Nothing he has accomplished as a senator or candidate reveals either much...</description>
<author>Corner</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1729874/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>THE TROOPS ANSWER KERRY (PHOTO) &#x26;#x22;HALP US JON CARRY - WE R STUCK HEAR N IRAK&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1730016/posts</link>
<description></description>
<author>620 WTMJ Newsradio</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1730016/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>V A N I T Y - Need help with sKerry quote from debates</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240469/posts</link>
<description>I apologize for the vanity. I was reading a CNN review of the debates. If the quote they attribute to Kerry is correct, then it is a smoking-gun bombshell. During the repartee regarding Supreme Court appointments, did sKerry really say &#x26;#x22;I would look for someone who would interpret the Constitution according to the law&#x26;#x22; Excuse me?!?!Ah, Lurch, it is supposed be the other way around.Can this be confirmed????Semper Curious</description>
<author>The town-hall debate</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240469/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 01:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>