Free Republic 1st Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $16,195
18%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 18% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: livingconstitution

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Did Woodrow Wilson read James Madison's debate notes?

    06/24/2017 9:22:13 AM PDT · by ProgressingAmerica · 12 replies
    This is fully conjecture, but I'm convinced that the answer is yes. During the time in which Wilson was inventing the concept of the "living and breathing constitution", Wilson made the following observations: (Constitutional Government, page 55) The government of the United States was constructed upon the Whig theory of political dynamics, which was a sort of unconscious copy of the Newtonian theory of the universe [see: Newtonian government]. In our own day, whenever we discuss the structure or development of anything, whether in nature or in society, we consciously or unconsciously follow Darwin; but before Darwin, they followed Newton....
  • In the "living constitution", we see that progressives are ardently anti-science

    12/22/2016 2:22:21 PM PST · by ProgressingAmerica · 9 replies
    Specifically, the science that progressives are rejecting is Newtonian in nature. I'll explain: In the book Constitutional Government in the United States, Woodrow Wilson wrote the following:(page 57) Living political constitutions must be Darwinian in structure and in practice. Fortunately, the definitions and prescriptions of our constitutional law, though conceived in the Newtonian spirit and upon the Newtonian principle, are sufficiently broad and elastic to allow for the play of life and circumstance. To be even more specific, what Woodrow Wilson is doing as he is actively inventing the concept of the "living constitution", is holding up Darwinian science over...
  • Judicial Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions

    06/06/2016 9:26:05 AM PDT · by ProgressingAmerica · 6 replies
    Academy of Political Science | October 26, 1912 | Frank Johnson Goodnow
    Judicial Interpretation of Constitutional ProvisionsBy Frank Johnson Goodnow, October 26, 1912 WHEN the constitution of the United States was adopted at the end of the eighteenth century, the conditions to which it was intended to apply were marked by three distinguishing characteristics. The first was geographical in its nature; the second was economic; the third intellectual. In the first place, the United States for which the constitution was framed, consisted of a series of communities, lying along the Atlantic seaboard of North America, largely engaged in agricultural pursuits and occupying sparsely populated districts which as compared with their population were...
  • Liberal Supreme Court Justice Talks Candidly about Rewriting the Constitution

    04/29/2014 5:26:21 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 27 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | April 29, 2014 | KenBlackwell
    Editor's Note: Column was coauthored by Ken Klukowski. Justice John Paul Stevens doesn’t believe anyone has the right to own a gun, and admits that you would need to rewrite the Constitution to make his preference a legal reality. And that’s exactly what he thinks should happen. Throughout his 35-year tenure on the Supreme Court, Justice Stevens was a lion of the Legal Left. He was an unapologetic advocate of the “Living Constitution”— that judges should continually reinterpret the words of the Constitution in accordance with what they, and other elite members of society, decide is the evolving enlightenment of...
  • Liberals Understand The Constitution Like Justin Bieber Understands Particle Physics

    04/28/2014 4:28:13 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 28 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | April 28, 2014 | Kurt Schlichter
    Based upon Justice Sotomayor’s bizarre dissenting opinion in the recent Michigan affirmative action case, it seems she believes that government decisions made on the basis of race, something the Constitution expressly bars, are mandatory. Someone has been emanating her penumbras because, to use the legal term of art, that’s Constitutional Crazy Talk. Years ago, the liberals came up with the Political Process Doctrine. It’s the idea that if some small element of a state or local government – like a city council or a university board – is implementing policies liberals like, the people can’t use the ballot box to...
  • Soaping The Slippery Slope (who perverted our Universities)

    09/08/2012 11:44:42 AM PDT · by Broker · 9 replies
    World Magazine ^ | Aug. 25, 2010 | Marvin Olasky
    What happened to so many once-Christian colleges in the United States? Two fine books describe the decline. George Marsden's 462-page The Soul of the American University shows how once-Protestant universities became secular look-alikes. James Burtchaell's The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of Colleges and Universities from Their Christian Churches uses 868 pages to show not only how schools moved from liberal theism to secularism but how, before that, they moved from theologically conservative to liberal I'll try to give the high points of 1,330 pages in fewer than 1,330 words: Three central messages are (1) Follow the money, (2)...
  • If We Could Bottle Up Liberal Philosophy On The Constitution...

    06/26/2012 4:08:23 PM PDT · by The Looking Spoon · 2 replies
    The Looking Spoon ^ | The Looking Spoon
  • Constitutional CPR [ The Constitution, Living or Dead? ]

    09/16/2010 9:38:35 PM PDT · by fight_truth_decay · 7 replies
    Bangor Daily News ^ | 9/16/10 | Editor
    Alive or dead? Today, the 213th anniversary of the United States Constitution, that question looms large. This is especially so as the document is wielded like a sword, cleaving libertarian from progressive philosophies. Understanding the nature of the Constitution — neither underestimating its genius nor overstating its authority as inerrant — is critical. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia once said, “The Constitution that I interpret and apply is not living, but dead.” That view has been embraced by many in the tea party movement. These opponents of President Barack Obama’s agend, who thrust the federal government into many areas of...
  • Who's Your Daddies? Part 1

    05/11/2010 6:18:55 AM PDT · by Brittany Pounders · 18 replies · 528+ views
    www.LibertyJuice.com ^ | May 11, 2010 | Brittany Pounders
    I have a big problem. It shadows me daily and I think I might need help. It seems that I can’t ever walk away from a debate, specifically on a political issue that I believe strongly in… and those are numerous. One debate that particularly continues to get under my skin happens when a liberal gets backed into the corner and is forced to confront his belief against the Constitution and all that it covers and he immediately reverts to the old line, “Well, the Constitution is a living document and is meant to grow with the times.” Yet, I’ve...
  • Another Radical Judge

    11/10/2009 5:48:58 PM PST · by Kaslin · 6 replies · 909+ views
    Investors.com ^ | November 10, 2009
    Federal Bench: Yet another judicial nominee seeks to impose the "empathy" standard on the courts. He thinks judges should base rulings on a plaintiff's status, legislate from the bench and amend the Constitution. Indiana federal judge David Hamilton stands poised to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate to assume a seat on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals serving Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin. He's a former fundraiser for Acorn and a former leader of the Indiana chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. He is also another in a series of activist judges who believe the U.S. Constitution is not...
  • Edward Chen: Son Of Sotomayor

    10/29/2009 5:18:11 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 6 replies · 494+ views
    Investors.com ^ | October 29, 2009 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY Staff
    Judiciary: The nominee for a California federal district court is an ACLU activist and another advocate for the empathy standard of jurisprudence. He also has a problem with "America the Beautiful." The nomination of Edward Chen is the latest in a series of nominations of people who have no particular fondness for the traditions of law and justice. These nominees see racism everywhere, and believe the courts should be used as instruments of social justice and not to discern the intent of the Founding Fathers who wrote the U.S. Constitution. They believe their "life experience" should be the final arbiter...
  • Warden Pelosi

    11/09/2009 5:16:23 PM PST · by Kaslin · 20 replies · 1,655+ views
    Investors.com ^ | November 9, 2009
    Health Care Reform: Failure to buy health insurance in the just-passed health care bill could get you five years in jail with a $250,000 fine. How can violating a law that's unconstitutional be a felony? The passage last Saturday night of the House health care measure by a fragile 220-215 margin may well prove to be a Pyrrhic victory. In polls, townhall meetings and tea parties, Americans have shown they don't want a "reform" that costs a staggering $1.2 trillion yet fails to meet the left's desire of insuring all the uninsured. And they certainly don't want a bill that...
  • (Steny Hoyer and Dems) Shred The Constitution

    10/22/2009 8:32:14 PM PDT · by raptor22 · 30 replies · 2,255+ views
    Investor's Business Daily ^ | October, 23, 2009 | IBD Editorial Staff
    Health Reform: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer says it's constitutional to mandate insurance coverage. Congress, he insists, has "broad authority" to make us buy things to provide for the "general welfare." Democrats' Alice In Wonderland interpretation of what they consider to be a "living Constitution," where words mean what they say they mean based on political considerations, gets more bizarre by the minute. (snip) We've been down this road before. In 1994, Hillary Clinton's secretive health care task force was trying to nationalize health care. "A mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of...
  • Is Health Care Reform Constitutional?

    09/16/2009 5:56:58 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 15 replies · 1,566+ views
    IBD Editorials ^ | September 16, 2009 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY Staff
    Federal Powers: Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say the government can force people to buy health insurance? And by what authority does it prohibit the purchasing of insurance across state lines?A key part of the administration's plan to reform health care is what is called the "individual mandate" — a requirement that everyone must have health insurance either through his or her employer or purchased individually. A good chunk of the uninsured are that way of their own volition. They are young and healthy and feel they have better things to do with their money at this point...
  • Bedrock of the Constitution

    02/25/2009 12:20:09 AM PST · by parousia · 4 replies · 457+ views
    New American ^ | October 30, 2008 | Edwin Vieira, Jr.
    Understanding how the Constitution was based on the Declaration of Independence provides the knowledge needed to defend our God-given rights. Would any reasonably prudent businessman sign a proposed contract involving a large-scale venture to be conducted over many years, if the other party admitted that most of the contract's terms were undefined, that some terms were so vague as to be undefinable, and that in the future he intended to interpret all of the contract's provisions in whatever matter might suit his own purposes at that time? Obviously not. Yet this is precisely the theory of "the living Constitution" that...
  • Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Horses

    01/24/2007 6:51:22 PM PST · by neverdem · 20 replies · 590+ views
    American Thinker ^ | January 23, 2007 | Seth Cooper
    Sooner or later the Living Constitution will meet bestiality. The sex-with-animals crowd as alternative lifestyle is on display in a film which just premiered at the Sundance Festival. The "internet-based zoophile community" portrayed in the film is not sensationalized or condemned according to the account Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times. I have not seen the movie, but I have seen modern jurisprudence, which is beginning to show preliminary signs of extending its embrace of relativism to interspecies sex. In 2005, a Seattle man died in a sex incident with a stallion, and press coverage called the subject to...
  • Prisoners on floor mattresses violates constitution (LA)

    03/14/2006 10:53:47 AM PST · by NativeNewYorker · 41 replies · 650+ views
    upi via email no link | 3/14/6
    LOS ANGELES, March 14 (UPI) -- Los Angeles County faces tens of millions of dollars in damages for bedding thousands of prisoners on mattresses on concrete floors. The practice violates the Constitution and is symptomatic of serious problems in the crowded, riot-torn jail system, a federal judge tentatively ruled Monday. U.S. District Court Judge Dean D. Pregerson gave lawyers for the county, and Stephen Yagman -- representing the class of floor-sleeping inmates he estimated at up to 300,000 -- time to make additional arguments before a final ruling. Roger Granbo, assistant county counsel, pointed out the case "is still pending."...
  • Scalia jeers fans of 'living' charter

    02/15/2006 7:37:53 AM PST · by neverdem · 37 replies · 1,350+ views
    The Washington Times ^ | February 15, 2006 | NA
        PONCE, Puerto Rico (AP) -- People who think the Constitution would break if it didn't change with society are "idiots," U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says.     In a speech Monday sponsored by the conservative Federalist Society, Justice Scalia defended his long-held belief in sticking to the plain text of the Constitution "as it was originally written and intended."     "Scalia does have a philosophy; it's called originalism. That's what prevents him from doing the things he would like to do," Justice Scalia told more than 100 politicians and lawyers from this U.S. island territory.     He said that, according to his...
  • Scalia Says Opponents Are 'Idiots'

    02/14/2006 7:12:53 AM PST · by Sub-Driver · 88 replies · 2,644+ views
    Scalia Says Opponents Are 'Idiots' By JONATHAN EWING, Associated Press Writer 10 minutes ago People who believe the Constitution would break if it didn't change with society are "idiots," U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says. In a speech Monday sponsored by the conservative Federalist Society, Scalia defended his long-held belief in sticking to the plain text of the Constitution "as it was originally written and intended." "Scalia does have a philosophy, it's called originalism," he said. "That's what prevents him from doing the things he would like to do," he told more than 100 politicians and lawyers from this...
  • Enforcing a “mood”

    02/07/2006 11:43:35 PM PST · by LibertarianInExile · 9 replies · 634+ views
    The New Criterion ^ | 2/1/2006 | Robert Bork
    It ought to be a major intellectual event in constitutional law when a Justice of the Supreme Court comes forward publicly to explain his theory of judging. Explanation is needed, for by now nobody familiar with the work of the Court believes it confines its rulings to the principles of the historic Constitution. There have always been instances when the Court voted its sympathies rather than anything resembling the Constitution, but over the last half century the divergence between the document and the decisions has sharply increased. Indeed, the criticism that the Court routinely departs from the Constitution’s principles, as...