Free Republic 4th Quarter Fundraising Target: $85,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $24,155
28%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 28% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: marcott

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Global Warming Alarmists Continue To ‘Hide The Decline'

    04/06/2013 11:11:48 AM PDT · by Starman417 · 14 replies
    Flopping Aces ^ | 04-06-13 | Curt
    It's interesting that over the years the skeptics who didn't believe "the science was settled" on man-made global warming were raked over the coals. They were called heretics and compared to 9/11 twoofers. But now they don't seem so crazy. OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. ...The mismatch between rising greenhouse-gas emissions and not-rising temperatures is among the biggest puzzles in climate science just now. It does not mean...
  • Uh oh, there be grafting in Marcott et al ( Marcott's reconstruction of Mann's Hockey Stick...)

    03/20/2013 10:10:50 AM PDT · by Ernest_at_the_Beach · 9 replies
    Watts Up With That? ^ | March 19, 2013 | by Anthony Watts
    Skiphil writes in comments:“…there are some interesting developments in the “Marcott curve” which puts more of the circus in jeopardy. In addition to a new post on CA detailing changes in the core top record, there is this very significant comment on a prior thread which deserves some serious exploration:”Jean S on “Marcott’s main plot (Figure 1A)” Hah! There is some additional fun in Marcott’s main plot (Figure 1A). Mann’s hockey stick there is the global EIV-CRU from Mann et al. (2008), which means that there is no actual reconstruction post 1850, since it’s the Reg-EM produced EIV reconstruction! So...
  • McIntyre finds the Marcott ‘trick’ – How long before Science has to retract Marcott et al?

    03/16/2013 8:36:10 PM PDT · by Ernest_at_the_Beach · 12 replies
    Watts Up With That? ^ | March 16, 2013 | by Anthony Watts
    Steve McIntyre has made what I can only describe as a stunning discovery as to why there is a sharp uptick in the main Marcott et al graph being touted by the media from its publication in Science.It seems the uptick in the 20th century is not real, being nothing more than an artifact of shoddy procedures where the dates on the proxy samples were changed for some strange reason.McIntyre writes: The Marcott-Shakun Dating ServiceMarcott, Shakun, Clark and Mix did not use the published dates for ocean cores, instead substituting their own dates. The validity of Marcott-Shakun re-dating will...