Free Republic 1st Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $58,647
72%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 72%!! Thank you everyone!! God bless.

Keyword: marioapuzzo

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Evasion: Another Obama Eligibility Case Reaches U.S. Supreme Court; Jesters (Mario Apuzzo)

    03/07/2014 6:51:22 AM PST · by Seizethecarp · 37 replies
    BirtherReport.com ^ | March 7, 2014 | George Miller
    The Vermont Supreme Court (VCS) having found that my Rule 40 Request for Reargument failed to present misinterpretation of material facts or law sufficient to compel them to reconsider their judgment - Mario Apuzzo, Esq. of Jamesburg, New Jersey and Counsel Press, LLC. of NYC and Washington filed my Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS )today (March 6th, 2014). The principal issues for review are: 1- mootness, the VSC having ruled that the case at hand had become moot with the passage of time despite numerous rulings by SCOTUS that issues relating to elections...
  • The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause

    04/03/2012 3:34:45 PM PDT · by rxsid · 5 replies
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 4/2/2012 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause By Mario Apuzzo, Esq. April 2, 2012 What is hilarious is how John Woodman, who claims to be a conservative Republican, is running around the internet proclaiming that he has saved the United States, its Constitution, and not only putative President Barack Obama, but also Republicans, Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Bobby Jindal (all three were not born to citizen parents, both of whom are citizens of the United States at the time of their birth) from the “Birthers.” He adds that he has proven that Attorney Leo...
  • Natural Born Citizen Not Same as Natural Born Subject

    In feudal or monarchical constitutional theory, individuals were the subjects of a monarch or sovereign, but the republican constitutional theory of therevolutionary and post-revolutionary period conceived of the individual as a citizen andassigned sovereignty to the people. The distinction between citizens and subjects is reflected in Chief Justice John Jay’s opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia, [2 U.S. (2 Dall.)419 (1793)the first great constitutional case decided after the ratification of the Constitution of 1789: [T]he sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation, and the residuary sovereignty of each State in the people of each State . ....
  • Atty Mario Apuzzo will be on the Peter Boyle Radio Show...[Wed. 9, March, 10 AM EST]

    03/08/2011 10:32:38 PM PST · by Red Steel · 13 replies
    Obama Release Your Records ^ | Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 8:59pm
    I want to throw a huge hat tip to radio show host Peter Boyles for his superb, non-stop coverage of Obama's constitutional eligibility and Obama's social security number problem. Out of all the radio show hosts in the country he's hammered the issue the most. I encourage all to tune in to his live show or browse his show podcasts and listen to the many shows that have been broadcast to millions.  Atty Mario Apuzzo will be on the Peter Boyle Radio Show on KHOW 630 in Denver CO - Wednesday 9 Mar 2011 @ 10 a.m. EST. The topic...
  • The Citizenship Status of Our 44 Presidents

    02/17/2011 9:38:56 PM PST · by jdoug666 · 25 replies
    Before It's News ^ | 2/15/2011 | Mario Apuzzo
    A famous Holmesian dictum provides that "a page of history is worth a volume of logic."
  • U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

    11/23/2010 9:43:51 PM PST · by Errant · 354 replies · 2+ views
    World Net Daily ^ | November 23, 2010 | Brian Fitzpatrick
    WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open? The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean...
  • Kerchner v Obama DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010 (re: Barry's eligibility)

    11/08/2010 12:57:34 PM PST · by rxsid · 195 replies · 2+ views
    www.supremecourt.gov ^ | 11/08/2010 | SCOTUS
    No. 10-446 Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: October 4, 2010 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.: (09-4209) Decision Date: July 2, 2010 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010) Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed. Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.Nov 8...
  • Respondents Waive Right to Respond..Petition-Writ of Cert.to(SCOTUS)..Kerchner etal v Obama etal

    11/06/2010 2:43:29 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 45 replies
    Full title Respondents Waive the Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit ### There is new activity on the U.S. Supreme Court Docket today with an effective date on the docket of 3 Nov 2010. Document HERE.1. The Respondents named in our Petition have waived their right to respond. 2. The Western Center of Journalism has filed a motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of our petition. To read the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed...
  • The True Meaning and Interpretation of Article II "natural born Citizen

    11/04/2010 8:01:39 PM PDT · by STE=Q · 52 replies
    Post & Email ^ | Nov. 4, 2010 | Jedi Pauly
    I wish to undertake a critical analysis of the incomplete works of attorneys Orly Taitz, Phil Berg, and Mario Apuzzo, concerning the meaning and definition of "natural born Citizen" within the political context and intent of Article II. It is my contention that none of the attorneys working on exposing the illegal usurper known as Barack Obama have described any valid theory of law that properly explains why Obama cannot possibly qualify to be President under Article II. I will show what I believe are their mistakes and limitations and expose their incomplete efforts as failed hypotheses rather than valid...
  • Vanity: Mario Apuzzo's BC case is docketed at SCOTUS (O must respond by Nov 3?)

    10/26/2010 8:22:49 PM PDT · by Frantzie · 27 replies
    Vanity - Apuzzo blog | 10-26-2010 | Frantzie
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 25, 18, and 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010. [Update 13 Oct 2010: Kerchner v Obama - Supreme Court Activity]
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner

    10/01/2010 10:41:23 AM PDT · by STARWISE · 203 replies
    Complete title: Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit _______________________________________________ *snip* Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC, on behalf of plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lehigh County, PA; Lowell T. Patterson, Burlington County, NJ; Darrell J. LeNormand, Middlesex County, NJ; and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., Middlesex County, NJ. Plaintiffs are challenging the recent decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, which affirmed the dismissal by District...
  • Judges evade Obama birth-certificate query

    07/25/2010 5:29:54 PM PDT · by RobinMasters · 162 replies · 11+ views
    WND ^ | July 25, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    Judges on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals suddenly have abandoned plans to assess damages against an attorney whose clients are challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president after he argued that if there was to be punishment, he would have the right to know whether the defendants could have mitigated their injury by publicly releasing Obama's birth documentation. The decision came from Judge Dolores Sloviter in the Kerchner vs. Obama case handled by attorney Mario Apuzzo. The court had ordered Apuzzo to explain why defense costs shouldn't be assessed against him for the "frivolous" appeal. However, her newest...
  • Podcast:Les (Naiman)welcomes Mario Apuzzo and Commander Charles Kerchner (3rd Circ appeal 6-29-10)

    06/28/2010 5:56:01 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 9 replies
    Podcast: Cmdr Charles Kerchner, Mario Apuzzo
  • Kerchner v. Obama Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument

    06/15/2010 10:48:31 AM PDT · by rxsid · 322 replies · 3,665+ views
    puzo1.blogspot.com ^ | 6/15/2010 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq
    "Tuesday, June 15, 2010 The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument The Third Circuit Court of Appeals which sits in Philadelphia has notified me today by letter dated June 15, 2010 that there will not be any oral argument on the Kerchner appeal to that Court. The case will be submitted on the briefs on Tuesday, June 29, 2010. Our presence is therefore not required. The Court also informed me that the Third Circuit Panel that will decide the appeal will be comprised of...
  • The Post & Email’s exclusive interview with Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo

    06/10/2010 4:40:58 AM PDT · by 1234 · 10 replies · 229+ views
    The Post & Email ^ | Jun. 9, 2010 | Sharon Rondeau
    ...I heard you on Dr. Kate’s radio program the other night, and it caught my attention when you said that you believe that your case will end up at the Supreme Court despite the fact that the Third Circuit is scheduled to hear your appeal. Could you expound on that?...Yes. If the Third Circuit affirms the District Court’s decision to dismiss the case for lack of standing and political question, then the Kerchner plaintiffs will file a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. It does not mean that the court will necessarily hear the case because you’re essentially...
  • An Article II “natural born Citizen” Is Not the Same...

    05/19/2010 12:12:23 PM PDT · by patlin · 40 replies · 830+ views
    A “natural born subject” under English common law could never renounce his or her allegiance. Mannie Brown explained the “old common-law doctrine Nemo potest exuere patriam by quoting Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case: “Ligeance is a true and faithful obedience of the subject due to his Sovereign. This ligeance and obedience is an incident inseparable to every subject; for as soon as he is born he oweth by birth-right ligeance and obedience to his Sovereign.” Mannie Brown, Expatriation of Infants, University of Toronto Press 97 (1939). But as we have seen above, in his 1799 citizenship law Jefferson wrote that...
  • The Nonsense Published by Our Nation’s Editors Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President

    05/14/2010 3:03:17 PM PDT · by Red Steel · 21 replies · 725+ views
    A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers ^ | Wednesday, May 12, 2010 | Mario Apuzzo
    As an example of the nonsense that is produced by our nation’s editors regarding the Obama eligibility issue, one can read the story entitled, Taking Issue With the Birthers, written by Daily Titan Opinion Editor, Skylaw Smith, and posted on May 9, 2010, at the Daily Titan at: http://www.dailytitan.com/2010/05/09/taking-issue-with-the-birthers/comment-page-1/#comment-15663. Mr. Smith’s opinion article is factually inaccurate and highly biased. Mr. Smith attempts to ridicule the efforts of those who question where Obama was born, people that he calls “extremists and conspiracy theorists,” by equating their Obama birthplace inquiry to one involved in a “college level thesis of human genetics.” But...
  • The Court and Congress Expected the Other to Resolve the Obama Eligibility Question

    04/17/2010 2:34:13 PM PDT · by STARWISE · 38 replies · 1,580+ views
    On Thursday, April 15, 2010, Hon. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was giving testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the issue of the composition of the United States Supreme Court. The hearing was broadcast on C-Span. Subcommittee Chairman, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-NY (now the most senior Member of Congress of Puerto Rican descent), and he were having a pleasant exchange. Rep. Serrano was explaining to Justice Thomas how he feels “a little uneasy” despite much of the dismay of his friends on the “left” about having a hearing for the Supreme Court because of the respect that he...
  • Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Motion-for-Leave-to-File-Supplemental-Appendix

    04/11/2010 7:34:10 AM PDT · by Elderberry · 21 replies · 1,074+ views
    Scribd ^ | 4/10/2010 | Mario Apuzzo
    . We explained in Appellants’ Opening Brief and Reply Brief that while the issue before the Court is one of standing and political question, the merits of plaintiffs’ claims are important to the showing that plaintiffs must make to prove that they have standing. The importance of the merits of plaintiffs’ claims is made evident by the recent state court decision in Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). We realize that the Ankeny case is a state court decision and not binding on the federal courts. We nevertheless cite to it...
  • 3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case

    04/08/2010 7:00:00 PM PDT · by Man50D · 68 replies · 1,955+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 08, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    A federal court case that argues President Obama probably is not even a U.S. citizen, much less a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution of the chief executive officer, has been scheduled by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for June 29. In a letter dated yesterday to Mario Apuzzo, the attorney representing plaintiff Charles Kerchner and others, the clerk of the court said the case has been "tentatively listed on the merits on Tuesday, June 29, 2010." The notice said there is a possibility the case would have to be moved, and the court "will...