<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: medialies</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/medialies/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:39:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Did Someone At A McCain Rally Really Call For Obama To Be Killed? (as FRANK RICH says!)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103881/posts</link>
<description>Frank Rich of the NYTimes. Why is this man lying? Reading the New York Times and expecting the truth is like going to a brothel and expecting to find true love.&#x26;#xA0; Reading NYTimes columnist Frank Rich and expecting anything other than&#x26;#xA0;dishonest, partisan hyperventilating is even dumber. But when it comes to a serious issue like&#x26;#xA0;allegations of death&#x26;#xA0;threats against Sen. Obama, I&#x26;#x27;d like to think that Rich or his&#x26;#xA0;NYTimes editors might have some sense of journalistic responsibility.That&#x26;#x27;s how much of a Pollyanna I am.In his column today, Rich writes about fears of assassination attempts against Sen. Obama and the decision of...</description>
<author>Michael Graham</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103881/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I Am An Idiot Freeper and I Believe the Media Lies</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2103767/posts</link>
<description>It is very sad the number of people on this forum who fell for the lies of the liberal media and consider it as the golden truth. They believe their biased polls, they believe all the fabricated doom and gloom scenarios that the media unleash each minute, they now believe the lies that McCain is fighting with Palin over the style of campaigning, they believe that is all over and we cannot win. Yet those are the same people who make fun for what they like to call &#x26;#x93;sheeple&#x26;#x94; and say that they are controlled by the media but in...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2103767/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:07:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media: Palin&#x26;#x27;s perfectly legal firing of trooper was &#x26;#x22;unlawful&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103069/posts</link>
<description>The media is obviously partisan towards the left. Analysis proves it, it&#x26;#x27;s obvious to the observer, and surveys show that most Americans know it to be true.The degree to which the MSM has gone openly, nakedly pro-Obama is, however, truly striking. They are now more obviously in the tank than ever before in modern memory. The most recent example is exceptionally disgusting, even for them.The findings of the Palin &#x26;#x22;Troopergate&#x26;#x22; probe allowed the press to feel as though they should use the opportunity to come out with headlines like . . .and Unlawfully? UNLAWFULLY?Check out this analysis by Bill Dyer....</description>
<author>Modern Conservative</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103069/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stanley Kurtz:  CNN Coverup Ayers for Obama (Lying their pants off about NR!)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2098058/posts</link>
<description>A CNN article on Sarah Palin&#x26;#x92;s criticism of Barack Obama&#x26;#x92;s relationship to unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers actually cites National Review as one of the publications supposedly debunking Palin&#x26;#x92;s point. How CNN can cite National Review this way is a mystery to me. Maybe we&#x26;#x92;ll have to set up an NR &#x26;#x22;truth squad.&#x26;#x22; I was very briefly on CNN immediately after the McCain campaign called for me to be given access to UIC library. A CNN reporter interviewed me, and almost every question was an attempt to challenge the significance of the Obama-Ayers link. I answered every query in detail. When...</description>
<author>The Corner @ National Review</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2098058/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fact Check: Is Obama &#x26;#x27;Palling Around With Terrorists&#x26;#x27;? (CNN Lies for Obama)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2098017/posts</link>
<description>The Statement: Republican vice presidential candidate Gov. Sarah Palin said Saturday, October 4, that Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama is &#x26;#x22;someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect that he&#x26;#x27;s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country.&#x26;#x22; Get the facts! The Facts: In making the charge at a fund-raising event in Englewood, Colorado, and a rally in Carson, California, Palin was referring at least in part to William Ayers, a 1960s radical. In both appearances, Palin cited a front-page article in Saturday&#x26;#x27;s New York Times detailing the working relationship between Obama and Ayers.SNIPCNN&#x26;#x27;s review of...</description>
<author>CNN</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2098017/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:29:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Big Lie: That Ayers Is Just Obama&#x26;#x27;s Neighbor</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2097786/posts</link>
<description>CNN made a special late night call to Paul Schneider at home and asked if the Ayers controversey is a legitimate issue. Schneider kept saying it was &#x26;#x22;nothing new&#x26;#x22; (not answering the question) and then quickly mentioned that Ayers does &#x26;#x22;live in Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s neighborhood&#x26;#x22;. After that it was all about political charges becoming more severe closer to an election. They thanked Schneider for taking their call. I swear you could hear the fear in Schneider&#x26;#x27;s voice. Of course he knew he wasn&#x26;#x27;t answering the question, and that the controversy over Ayers has nothing to do with just living in...</description>
<author>CNN</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2097786/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boston Globe Leads With a Lie &#x26;#x97; Debunked Palin Rape Kit Story Again</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2097389/posts</link>
<description>I would urge someone close to members of the editorial board of the Boston Globe to let them know that the world is not flat, the moon is not made of green cheese, and Elvis is, indeed, dead. I say this because obviously the Boston Globe is way behind the times in discovering facts that debunk rumors and it&#x26;#x92;s clear they have no capacity to do any research. I mean, they must not be paying attention to reality because in today&#x26;#x92;s editorial, the Globe again raises the thoroughly debunked claim that Sarah Palin charged rape victims for their rape kits...</description>
<author>MensNewsDaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2097389/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:44:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Apple Denies Steve Jobs Heart Attack Report: &#x26;#x22;It Is Not True&#x26;#x22; (CNN lied Stock died)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096635/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Citizen journalism&#x26;#x22; apparently just failed its first significant test. A CNN iReport poster reported this morning that Steve Jobs had been rushed to the ER after a severe heart attack. Fortunately, it appears the story was false. We contacted an Apple spokeswoman, who categorically denied it. CNN&#x26;#x27;s iReport kept the report up until at least 10:15 AM, about 20 minutes after we published Apple&#x26;#x27;s denial. The story has since been removed. CNN&#x26;#x27;s iReport, Original Story Steve Jobs was rushed to the ER just a few hours ago after suffering a major heart attack. I have an insider who tells me...</description>
<author>www.alleyinsider.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096635/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN Can&#x26;#x27;t Count; Palin-Bashing Reporter Says Palin Has Only Done Three Interviews</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096750/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;I like being able to answer these tough questions without the filter, even, of the mainstream media kind of telling viewers what they&#x26;#x27;ve just heard.&#x26;#x22;Gov. Sarah Palin at last night&#x26;#x27;s vice presidential debate.Who can blame her? The mainstream media, liberal pop culture and weak-kneed Republicans have been ripping her to shreds over her interviews with ABC News&#x26;#x27; Charles Gibson and CBS News&#x26;#x27; Katie Couric--two heavily edited interviews--while ignoring her other interviews.CNN&#x26;#x27;s Jonathan Mann kicks off the Palin-bashing this morning with an article entitled, Has Sarah Palin Become a Problem?.In the article Mann writes: By CNN&#x26;#x27;s count, Biden has done nearly...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096750/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:04:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Soledad O&#x26;#x27;Brien Focus Group Sham</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096811/posts</link>
<description>I did a Google search and this link reaffirms my tought after seeing this last night. The split in a hand vote posed by O&#x26;#x27;Brien was nearly identical at quick glance. If anything, it may have favored one candidate or the other by no more than two hands. O&#x26;#x27;Brien said something like, &#x26;#x22;Well, it&#x26;#x27;s certainly clear by the show of hands in this room that Joe Biden won tonight&#x26;#x27;s debate.&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>The Atlantic</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096811/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:00:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN Flubs Factcheck on Obama&#x26;#x27;s Pledge to Meet with A&#x26;#x27;Jad</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096983/posts</link>
<description>CNN reports that it&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;misleading&#x26;#x22; to say that Barack Obama pledged to meet with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: &#x26;#x22;While Obama has said he wouldn&#x26;#x27;t rule out meeting with any foreign leader, he never specifically said he&#x26;#x27;d meet with the Iranian president.</description>
<author>Weekly standard.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096983/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 21:27:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CBS Poll: More Uncommitted Voters Saw Biden As Winner (Poll by the Complete Bull Sh** network)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096359/posts</link>
<description>UPDATED CBS News and Knowledge Networks have conducted a nationally representative poll of 473 uncommitted voters to get their immediate reaction to tonight&#x26;#x27;s vice presidential debate. After the first presidential debate, a similar survey showed that more uncommitted voters identified Barack Obama as the winner Final numbers from tonight&#x26;#x27;s poll have yet to come in, but we do have some early results. (These numbers may change as more respondents complete the survey.) They suggest that once again more voters have responded favorably to the Democratic candidate. Forty-six percent of the uncommitted voters surveyed say Democrat Joe Biden won the debate,...</description>
<author>CBS.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2096359/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:04:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Boston Globe Shamelessly Lies About Palin (The Day The Truth Died)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095616/posts</link>
<description>The headline on the Boston Globe-Democrat&#x26;#x92;s editorial page, &#x26;#x93;Wasilla Made Rape Victims Pay,&#x26;#x94; says it all. All wrong. The Globe-Democrat yesterday asserted as fact that &#x26;#x93;during her tenure as mayor of Wasilla, the town started charging rape victims or their insurers for rape kits.&#x26;#x94; But the truth is that there is no record of a rape victim ever being charged for a rape kit by Wasilla; there&#x26;#x92;s no evidence Mayor Palin knew about the policy or took any action on it either way; and no record of a victim&#x26;#x92;s insurance company being charged by the town. How does an alleged...</description>
<author>Boston Herald</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095616/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Politico Is Spreading Blatant Lies About Rush!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2094191/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Rush Limbaugh opened his show today by piling on top of House Republican leadership for claiming that a crucial number of their members voted against the bailout package because of a partisan speech that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) gave before the roll call. &#x26;#x93;C&#x26;#x92;mon guys. Can ya grow up?&#x26;#x94; he said. &#x26;#x93;There were a whole lot of reasons for House Republicans to vote against this thing yesterday.&#x26;#x94; [See update II below.]&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>Politico</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2094191/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Did Katie Couric Lie About What Kissinger Said After Palin Interview?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2091652/posts</link>
<description>Ms. Couric reminded the governor that she recently met with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who supports direct diplomacy with both countries. &#x26;#x93;Are you saying Henry Kissinger is na&#x26;#xEF;ve?&#x26;#x94; Ms. Couric asked. Ms. Palin replied, &#x26;#x93;I&#x26;#x92;ve never heard Henry Kissinger say, &#x26;#x91;Yeah, I&#x26;#x92;ll meet with these leaders without preconditions being met.&#x26;#x92; &#x26;#x94;</description>
<author>One might think so after Kissinger supports McCain</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2091652/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:30:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x26;#x27;s Lying Tax Statistics</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086510/posts</link>
<description>I just watched a CNN &#x26;#x22;comparison&#x26;#x22; of taxes. They flashed a bunch of false numbers on the screen which essentially implied that Obama would cut taxes for the middle class, raise them only on the rich. Standard stuff. But, I am not an economist. It&#x26;#x27;s all I can do to balance my checkbook. Can anyone out there clarify the tax issue in a simple way? We all know that Obama will raise taxes in a big way. But is the best way to refute the two most commonly heard Obama lines? (1) I&#x26;#x27;ll cut takes for 95% of all Americans...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086510/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:11:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kurtz: Don&#x26;#x92;t trust Washington Post reporting</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086089/posts</link>
<description>Howard Kurtz issues a rather amazing analysis of John McCain&#x26;#x92;s ad connecting Franklin Raines to Barack Obama. The Washington Post media analyst calls the basis of the McCain ad a &#x26;#x93;disputed premise&#x26;#x94; &#x26;#x97; despite his own newspaper&#x26;#x92;s reporting on the Raines-Obama relationship: Analysis: This John McCain ad is based on a disputed premise. There&#x26;#x92;s no dispute that Obama has no background in economics &#x26;#x97; but then, neither does McCain, which makes this an odd charge for the Arizona senator to hurl. Fannie Mae did collapse, requiring a government takeover, and Raines, its former chairman, paid $25 million in April to...</description>
<author>hotair</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086089/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama&#x26;#x27;s Panic</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2084070/posts</link>
<description>Seldom has there been a larger contrast between the style of a candidate and the strategy of his campaign. Barack Obama is cool, firm and permanently unruffled. It is precisely this quality of steadiness that has made him seem a credible prospective president with the thinnest of r&#x26;#xE9;sum&#x26;#xE9;s. But Obama&#x26;#x27;s campaign is rootless, reactive and panicky. At every stage since securing the nomination, it has seemed fearful of missteps and unsure of its own organizing principle. So it has invariably adopted the Democratic conventional wisdom of the moment. Obama&#x26;#x27;s first major decision was his running mate. He could have reinforced...</description>
<author>Wa. Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2084070/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:19:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newsweek issues correction on Palin social issues story</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2083946/posts</link>
<description>Katie Paul at Newsweek alerted me that Newsweek printed a correction to their story claiming that Palin cut funding for teen mothers and the state WIC program. I blogged about it here and had extensive conversations with Alaska officials about the claims. Ms. Paul was also diligent to work with Alaska officials to correct the story once I made her aware of the facts. Here is the correction (at the end of page 2): Clarification (updated Sept. 11, 2008) : A number of readers have challenged the assertion in this story that Gov. Palin &#x26;#x93;cut by 20 percent the funding...</description>
<author>WThrockmorton.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2083946/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Lying King</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2082386/posts</link>
<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWP5ljQV79s</description>
<author>Youtube</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2082386/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:14:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN Conjures Up Palin Travel &#x26;#x27;Scandal&#x26;#x27; That Never Was</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081860/posts</link>
<description>Did you know that Sarah Palin has never been to Mongolia? Yeah, and despite the fact she never claimed to have visited there, we are making a big deal about it because of the impression she left only in our fervid imaginations that she did indeed visit Mongolia. Think that was ridiculous? Well, guess what? That is exactly what CNN is doing with a manufactured scandal that Sarah Palin never visited Iraq. The problem for CNN is that Palin never claimed to have visited Iraq. Here is her answer in the recent ABC interview with Charles Gibson about her foreign...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081860/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gingrich Criticizes Media for Anti-Religion Elitism; Chastises ABC&#x26;#x27;s Gibson</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081619/posts</link>
<description>When Sarah Palin said U.S. soldiers were on a &#x26;#x91;task from God,&#x26;#x27; former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, a historian, knew exactly what she was saying. She was quoting President Abraham Lincoln. The day after a September 11 interview with Palin, the Republican nominee for vice president, aired on ABC&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;World News with Charles Gibson,&#x26;#x22; Gingrich blasted the media for its historical ignorance. He then pointed out Gibson&#x26;#x27;s interview as a specific example. ...more (w/video)...</description>
<author>Newsbusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081619/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chris Matthews Lied About Sarah Palin/Gibson Interview on Hardball</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081520/posts</link>
<description>http://www.mikefrancesa.com/wordpress/?p=1129I can&#x26;#x27;t take it anymore, why do I watch. Matthews just blatantly lied about this part of the interview: The bias continues, here is what Chris Matthews said on Friday&#x26;#x92;s edition of Hardball: Chris Matthews: What did you make her of answer when she was asked four times by Charlie Gibson, what would you do if the government of Israel&#x26;#x85;.called us up and said we are ready to hit Iran, we think we got the bead on where their nuclear facilities are, we want some help with AWACS, some intelligence, we want some radar, we want some refueling help. And...</description>
<author>www.mikefrancesa.com/wordpress</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2081520/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gibson intentionally misquoted and edited out Palin challenge of her quote</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080528/posts</link>
<description>GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, &#x26;#x22;Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.&#x26;#x22; Are we fighting a holy war? PALIN: You know, I don&#x26;#x27;t know if that was my exact quote. GIBSON: Exact words. </description>
<author>ABCNEWS</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080528/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reports that Track Palin vandalized school buses aren&#x26;#x27;t true, says pal (Enquirer to accuse tomorrow)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2079687/posts</link>
<description> Despite snowballing reports and rumors, Sarah Palin&#x26;#x27;s eldest son, Track, was not part of the gang of four teenagers who criminally vandalized 44 Alaska school buses in 2005, a key culprit told The News. &#x26;#x22;Track wasn&#x26;#x27;t with me. Track had nothing to do with it,&#x26;#x22; participant Deryck Harris, 20, said Wednesday in an exclusive interview.Citing an anonymous judicial source, the Anchorage radio station 1080 KUDO was the first to report last week that Track Palin was the unidentified 16-year-old delinquent who not only trashed the buses but also swiped the bottle of alcohol that fueled the teen rampage. The...</description>
<author>The New York Daily News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2079687/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:57:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>