<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: newyorktimes</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/newyorktimes/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:22:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Selected CRU Emails, Part II: Independence of the Press?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394006/posts</link>
<description>In looking through the Hadley CRU emails, I remembered that there was a Mr. Revkin of the New York Times who reported on climate events. So I decided to run *his* name through the search engine. I came up with a dozen emails, which I reproduce here in their entirety, with maybe a couple of comments at the end. ************************* 1096382684.txt From: Andy Revkin To: Tim Osborn Subject: Re: mann&#x26;#x27;s thoughts Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:44:44 -0400 that is a useful way to look at it. again, takeaway msg is that mann method can only work if past variability...</description>
<author>EastAngliaEmails.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394006/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Tale of Two Leaks: New York Times bashed Palin, But Won&#x26;#x27;t Touch ClimateGate</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393881/posts</link>
<description>The ClimateGate email leak has demonstrated in full force a glaring double standard in the mainstream media&#x26;#x27;s coverage of leaked information. Too often, liberal media outlets jump at the chance to damage conservative figures by publishing sensitive information, but refuse to publish such information if it discredits or hinders the left&#x26;#x27;s efforts. As Clay Waters reported yesterday, Andew Revkin, who writes for the New York Times&#x26;#x27;s Dot Earth blog, refused to publish emails from Britain&#x26;#x27;s East Anglia Climate Research Unit showing efforts to manipulate climate data and marginalize global warming skeptics. Said Revkin, &#x26;#x22;The documents appear to have been acquired...</description>
<author>Newsbusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393881/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:41:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why the New York Times is a lousy newspaper. It&#x26;#x27;s not because it&#x26;#x27;s liberal&#x26;#x85;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2393606/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x85; it&#x26;#x92;s because it&#x26;#x92;s just plain dumb. As in always stating the obvious, as in always a beat behind, as in always adopting a tone of &#x26;#x93;We&#x26;#x92;re the nursery school teachers and you&#x26;#x92;re the class of inattentive four-year-olds we have to educate.&#x26;#x94; Take today&#x26;#x92;s front page headline: &#x26;#x93;Experts Say Iran Uses Death Penalty as Way to Intimidate Opposition&#x26;#x94; (the title is shortened online). Really! I never would have guessed. Yesterday, with not much to do and a cup of coffee to finish, I leafed listlessly through the New York Times magazine, stopping at an article entitled &#x26;#x93;Leveraging the Obama Brand&#x26;#x94;....</description>
<author>Telegraph Blogs (U.K.)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2393606/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Pit Bull in the China Shop (NY Times&#x26;#x27; Frank Rich&#x26;#x27;s review of Palin&#x26;#x27;s book is as expected)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2392318/posts</link>
<description>AT last the American right and left have one issue they unequivocally agree on: You don&#x26;#x92;t actually have to read Sarah Palin&#x26;#x92;s book to have an opinion about it. Last Sunday Liz Cheney praised &#x26;#x93;Going Rogue&#x26;#x94; as &#x26;#x93;well-written&#x26;#x94; on Fox News even though, by her own account, she had sampled only &#x26;#x93;parts&#x26;#x94; of it. On Tuesday, Ana Marie Cox, a correspondent for Air America, belittled the book in The Washington Post while confessing that she couldn&#x26;#x92;t claim to have &#x26;#x93;completely&#x26;#x94; read it. &#x26;#x93;Going Rogue&#x26;#x94; will hardly be the first best seller embraced by millions for talismanic rather than literary ends....</description>
<author>New York Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2392318/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>THE TRUTH ABOUT SARAH&#x26;#x27;S RUBY SLIPPERS:  THERE&#x26;#x27;S NO PLACE LIKE THE WHITE HOUSE</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2391420/posts</link>
<description>Somewhere in New York, a design genius turned out her light and breathed the long sigh of one no longer burdened by a terrible secret, a secret that had helped ruin the reputation of an amazing woman, a woman she had really liked.</description>
<author>TheCypressTimes.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2391420/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New York Times News Service To Cut Jobs and Relocate [to NON-union shop]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2385244/posts</link>
<description>The New York Times News Service will lay off at least 25 editorial employees next year and will move the editing of the service to a Florida newspaper owned by The New York Times Company, the newspaper and the Newspaper Guild said Thursday... The plan for the news service calls for The Gainesville Sun, whose newsroom is not unionized and has lower salaries, to take over editing and page design. Ms. McNulty said new jobs would be created at The Sun to handle the work.</description>
<author>ny times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2385244/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NYT Gives False Impression That Catholic Medal of Honor Winner Was Muslim</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2382536/posts</link>
<description>Andrea Elliot&#x26;#x92;s front page article in the November 9 New York Times played up the thousands of Muslims in the U.S. military and how their &#x26;#x93;service...is more necessary and more complicated than ever before,&#x26;#x94; but gave the false impression that a Medal of Honor winner named near the end of her piece was a Muslim himself, when he was actually Catholic.... Near the end of the article, Elliot changed the subject ever so slightly that it might have gone unnoticed. The reporter quoted Captain Erich Rahman, an Iraq war veteran and Bronze Star winner: &#x26;#x93;Too many Americans overlook the heroic...</description>
<author>NewsBusters.org</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2382536/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NYT Wants You To Know: Percentage-wise, Hasan Was Hardly Ever Homicidal</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2382037/posts</link>
<description>Check out the headline from on the front page of the hard-copy New York City edition of today&#x26;#x27;s New York Times: After Years of Growing Tension, 7 Minutes of Bloodshed The article reports that Nidal Malik Hasan began feeling disgruntled with the Army as far back as 2004. Let&#x26;#x27;s see, there are 525,948 minutes in a year. If Hasan&#x26;#x27;s been feeling &#x26;#x22;tension&#x26;#x22; for about five years, that makes about 2,629,740 tension-filled minutes. And during that entire period, he only engaged in a homicidal rampage for seven minutes. I mean, come on, he was only a murderer for some tiny, tiny...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2382037/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:31:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Healthcare: Who Are the Know-Nothings?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2380142/posts</link>
<description>As Tuesday&#x26;#x92;s vote revealed, Americans are strongly devoted to individualism, one happy aspect of which is that they are possessed of an abhorrence to being told what to think, a truth that explains why people are drawing their own conclusions regarding this question: Which Americans are behaving with anti-intellectual, hateful ignorance in the debate regarding the Obama/Pelosi/Reid healthcare bills making their way through Congress? To answer that question, common sense folks begin by stipulating some of what is currently known about the bills, for example &#x26;#x97; The final version will be advertised as costing $1 trillion over the next decade....</description>
<author>The New Media Journal</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2380142/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Did White House pressure NYT into changing Dover story?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2375122/posts</link>
<description>Originally, the New York Times reported on President Barack Obama&#x26;#x92;s visit to Dover AFB and the arrival of fallen serviceman by explaining that the White House wanted Obama to be seen as concerned and aware of the sacrifices made in America&#x26;#x92;s war policies: A small contingent of reporters and photographers accompanied Mr. Obama to Dover, where he arrived at 12:34 a.m. aboard Marine One. He returned to the South Lawn of the White House at 4:45 a.m. &#x26;#x3C;&#x26;#x85;&#x26;#x3E; The images and the sentiment of the president&#x26;#x92;s five-hour trip to Delaware were intended by the White House to convey to the...</description>
<author>Hot Air</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2375122/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New York Times: Is Reid&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x27;doctors&#x26;#x27; fix&#x26;#x27; defeat a harbinger of things to come?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2368331/posts</link>
<description>Democrats lost a big test vote on health care legislation on Wednesday as the Senate blocked action on a bill to increase Medicare payments to doctors at a cost of $247 billion over 10 years. The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, needed 60 votes to proceed. He won only 47. And he could not blame Republicans. A dozen Democrats and one independent crossed party lines and voted with Republicans on the 53 to 47 roll call. The Medicare bill has become a proxy for larger issues in the debate over legislation to overhaul the health care system.</description>
<author>Patriot Room</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2368331/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Liberal Bias is Killing the New York Times</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2368044/posts</link>
<description>The path towards irrelevancy and future insolvency taken by The New York Times continues at a frenetic pace. Democracy Now! is reporting that the publication has announced the elimination of another 100 newsroom positions, or about eight percent of the paper&#x26;#x92;s news staff, due to declining advertising revenues and circulation numbers that are in freefall.</description>
<author>NewsRealblog</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2368044/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Politico and NY Times Pimp for Media Matters, Smear Rush Limbaugh Over &#x26;#x22;Kill Yourself&#x26;#x22; Comment</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2367095/posts</link>
<description>Leftist Democratic Party front group Media Matters put a hit out on Rush Limbaugh this afternoon. Politico and Paul Krugman at the New York Times pimped the Media Matters character assassination of Rush to the political world. They take his comments out of the context of illustrating liberal hypocrisy to paint him as a violent person.This is a perfect example of how the Democratic party and the media work hand in glove to attack conservatives and try delegitimize them in the public arena.First Politico, then Krugman, then Rush and at the end a response from Revkin.Glenn Thrush Pimping for Media...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2367095/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>More Woes for the NY Times</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2366882/posts</link>
<description>I read the news that the New York Times is going to cut another unexpected 100 staffers from it&#x26;#x92;s &#x26;#x93;news room&#x26;#x94;. While sad that these organizations are continuing to bleed staff I find it curious that none of the solutions to the tanking of the newspaper included any sort of recognition that perhaps the brain surgeons behind most every story that emanates from that crap hole of a newsroom are so ideologically one sided that half the nation wouldn&#x26;#x92;t read them unless paid to do so. It&#x26;#x92;s called &#x26;#x93;expanding your reach&#x26;#x94;.</description>
<author>Watcher of Weasels</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2366882/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confessions of an ACORN Whistleblower</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2366299/posts</link>
<description>How This Reluctant Whistleblower Decided to Tell All The more I spoke about Obama and the Democrats part in the ACORN scandal, the more I drifted away from the ACORN 8. I never thought that their mission was bad, but ACORN&#x26;#x92;s subversive nature is rooted in pay for play politics and if one is to clean house, it has to be across the board. I was proud when Marcel appeared on Glenn Beck but often dismayed at the picture she painted of ACORN. Yes, the members are great people, but they do not need an ACORN to help them. Local...</description>
<author>Hot Air</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2366299/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Happy Days are here again! NY Times says recession over (Searches manure pile and finds the pony)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2365096/posts</link>
<description>Well, if it&#x26;#x27;s in the Times, it must be true, right? Floyd Norris: Over all, the surveys indicate that the manufacturing sectors of China, Taiwan, South Korea and India had begun to grow by April, but that the United States did not follow suit until August. In Europe, France is reporting growth, and Britain is hovering near the midpoint, indicating the deterioration has stopped but growth has not yet begun. Although the German government estimates that its gross domestic product rose in the second quarter, the manufacturing survey indicates continued weakness in that country. New orders and production have turned...</description>
<author>American Thinker</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2365096/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Reality Moment 
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2364429/posts</link>
<description>Britain has hit its reality moment. The Brits are ahead of us when it comes to public indebtedness and national irresponsibility. Spending has been out of control for longer and in a more sustained way. But in that country, the climate of opinion has turned. There, voters are ready for a politician willing to face reality. And George Osborne, who would become the chancellor of the Exchequer in the likely event that his Conservative Party wins the next election, has aggressively seized the moment. In a party conference address earlier this month, Osborne gave the speech that an American politician...</description>
<author>New York Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2364429/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Times Co. Will Hold On to Boston Globe</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2362735/posts</link>
<description>After months of hunting for a buyer, The New York Times Company said on Wednesday that it had decided not to sell The Boston Globe, the newspaper it threatened last spring to close because of mounting losses. The Globe did not draw high bids, and the company chairman, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., said last month that the paper&#x26;#x92;s finances had improved enough that the company no longer believed it had to sell if the offers were not attractive enough. Executives said this year that the paper was on track to lose $85 million in 2009, before making painful cost cuts that...</description>
<author>NY Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2362735/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pelosi&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;Smack-Down&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2357811/posts</link>
<description>Earlier this week the National Republican Congressional Committee released a statement on Nancy Pelosi&#x26;#x27;s sudden departure from her insistence that the war in Afghanistan was the &#x26;#x22;real central front&#x26;#x22; in the war on terror: &#x26;#x22;If Nancy Pelosi&#x26;#x92;s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place.&#x26;#x22; Nancy Pelosi and her fellow democrats responded like, well... liberals. They ignored the facts and made an emotional appeal. They ignored the first part of the statement, and played up the meaningless ending. In short, Pelosi...</description>
<author>Patriot Room</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2357811/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mormons in the Eyes of the New York Times</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2356707/posts</link>
<description>In an occasional column, The Mormon Media Observer will look at the times when Mormons and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have made news in the New York Times. Here&#x26;#x27;s a sample of front page headlines and stories since the 1970s: SNIP Mormon church strikes down ban against blacks in priesthood, June 10, 1978 (one of the few stories that have led the Times&#x26;#x27; front page) &#x26;#x22;The 148-year-old policy of excluding black men from the Mormon priesthood was struck down by the church&#x26;#x27;s leaders yesterday. &#x26;#x22;Spencer W. Kimball, president of the 4.2 million members of the worldwide...</description>
<author>Mormon Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2356707/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Support for Public Option Waning... at the New York Times?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2352771/posts</link>
<description>Has the New York Times finally seen the writing on the wall and decided to take what it can get and avoid further political damage to the Obama administration? It looks that way. Today&#x26;#x27;s edition features this article by Nelson Schwartz on the Swiss model, the only European plan that does not feature a fully government-run health care option: Swiss Health Care Thrives Without Public Option Like every other country in Europe, Switzerland guarantees health care for all its citizens. But the system here does not remotely resemble the model of bureaucratic, socialized medicine often cited by opponents of universal...</description>
<author>Patriot Room</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2352771/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:22:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ACORN Story Shows How Internet Reporting Is Beating the New York Times</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2350541/posts</link>
<description>In a meeting of New York conservative activists earlier this month, Andrew Breitbart received a raucous standing ovation for doing something many conservatives never dreamed possible. He beat The New York Times.As video upon video were released showing ACORN employees eagerly helping two conservatives (Hannah Giles and James O&#x26;#x27;Keefe) set up prostitution as a legitimate business, file false tax statements and engage in the trafficking of underage illegal immigrants, much of the major media remained silent. For conservatives, the rationale was simple: the major media were uninterested in exposing an organization linked with President Barack Obama. There may have been...</description>
<author>US News &#x26; World Report</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2350541/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:30:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New York Times Publishes Bi-Weekly Article from &#x26;#x91;The Onion&#x26;#x92;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2349625/posts</link>
<description>What else could it be when the Time&#x26;#x92;s new ombudsman Clark Hoyt prints a laughable correction account story about having been scooped and downright embarrassed multiple times by conservative bloggers on some of the years biggest stories concerning scandal of the liberal Democrat (i.e. OBAMA) persuasion. (H/T Michelle Malkin) Be prepared, the ombudsman column is a bi-weekly event and from what we can tell it reads exactly like the made up stories from The Onion.</description>
<author>Watcher of Weasels</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2349625/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michelle Malkin:  A welcome message for the NYT&#x26;#x2019;s new &#x26;#x201C;opinion media monitor&#x26;#x201D; (ACO</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2349383/posts</link>
<description>Even when the Fishwrap of Record is admitting how out of touch it is, its editors still can&#x26;#x92;t get the story right. Hapless ombudsman Clark Hoyt writes in his Sunday column that his paper was guilty of unnecessarily politicizing a legitimate breaking story and suffering &#x26;#x93;slow reflexes:&#x26;#x94;</description>
<author>michellemalkin.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2349383/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Fresh Look at Nebraska Man (how the evos used this fraud to change American education policy)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2348145/posts</link>
<description>Wolf and Mellett in their Talk origins paper, The Role of &#x26;#x91;Nebraska man&#x26;#x92; in the creation-evolution debate,[1] claim Nebraska man was a careless mistake by an honest scientist. However, the evidence suggests that Osborn deliberately overstated the find because the theory of evolution was centre stage in a struggle for control of education policy in America...</description>
<author>Journal of Creation</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2348145/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>