<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: northvietnamese</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/northvietnamese/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:48:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>An American Traitor: Guilty As Charged [Jane Fonda]
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420218/posts</link>
<description> An American Traitor: Guilty As Charged By Henry Mark Holzer and Erika HolzerFrontPageMagazine.com | June 10, 2005For three decades Jane Fonda obfuscated, distorted and lied about virtually everything connected with her wartime trip to North Vietnam: her motive, her acts, her intent, and her contribution to the Communists&#x26;#x92; war effort.&#x26;#xA0; With the aid of clever handlers, she so successfully suppressed and spun her conduct in Hanoi that many Americans didn&#x26;#x92;t know what she had done there, and, more important, the legal significance.&#x26;#xA0;Three years ago, our book, &#x26;#x93;Aid and Comfort&#x26;#x94;: Jane Fonda in North Vietnam (McFarland &#x26;#x26; Co.), laid bare...</description>
<author>Frontpagemagazine</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420218/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A New Yorker Kind of Guy (He worked for Time, spied for the Communists, and helped kill Americans)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1419317/posts</link>
<description>If you wanted to see the perfect example of the ethical and moral collapse of the Mainstream Media, you could not do better than a long article in the New Yorker of May 23, 2005. The article is entitled, &#x26;#x22;The Spy Who Loved Us.&#x26;#x22; Written by a teacher at the University of Albany, named Thomas Bass, it&#x26;#x27;s about a man named Pham Xuan An. Now very old, An was -- among many other things -- a correspondent in Saigon during the Vietnam War for Time magazine. He was apparently considered a particularly brilliant and well-informed correspondent and very well liked...</description>
<author>The American Prowler</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1419317/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jun 2005 05:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AMERICA IS BETTER OFF For LOSING VIETNAM WAR (More Tom Henderson Baloney)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1403551/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;Sit down to a steaming bowl of pho on a bustling Hanoi boulevard. Kick back on a languorous boat ride down the Mekong Delta. Swim at a secluded highlands waterfall. Welcome to Vietnam.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;This is from a travel brochure from 2005. It&#x26;#x27;s certainly not from an Army recruiting poster from 1965.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>Lewiston Morning Tribune (Idaho)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1403551/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 15:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The War We Could Have Won - (historical truths about the Vietnam War)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1395515/posts</link>
<description>THE Vietnam War is universally regarded as a disaster for what it did to the American and Vietnamese people. However, 30 years after the war&#x26;#x27;s end, the reasons for its outcome remain a matter of dispute. The most popular explanation among historians and journalists is that the defeat was a result of American policy makers&#x26;#x27; cold-war-driven misunderstanding of North Vietnam&#x26;#x27;s leaders as dangerous Communists. In truth, they argue, we were fighting a nationalist movement with great popular support. In this view, &#x26;#x22;our side,&#x26;#x22; South Vietnam, was a creation of foreigners and led by a corrupt urban elite with no popular...</description>
<author>NEWYORKTIMESONLINE.COM</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1395515/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2005 00:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kerry visit rallies party

</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1395158/posts</link>
<description>He displayed the same bright smile and wore a sharply tailored suit. And when he took the microphone, the crowd erupted into cheers of &#x26;#x22;Kerry! Kerry!&#x26;#x22; But it wasn&#x26;#x27;t exactly clear last night whether Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts was yesterday&#x26;#x27;s news or tomorrow&#x26;#x27;s candidate. In town for a Democratic fund-raiser to help pay some of the roughly $2 million in costs the party has incurred in its legal fight over Christine Gregoire&#x26;#x27;s election as governor, Kerry joked about his loss last fall, which came when Ohio&#x26;#x27;s electoral votes swung to President Bush.</description>
<author>Seattle Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1395158/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2005 13:55:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jane Fonda on Viet Nam - Drudge Report</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1375203/posts</link>
<description>JANE FONDA REGRETS THE &#x26;#x22;BETRAYAL&#x26;#x22; HER PHOTO ON A NORTH VIETNAMESE ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUN SYMBOLIZED - &#x26;#x22;60 MINUTES&#x26;#x22; SUNDAY</description>
<author>Drudge Report</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1375203/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Navy Stripped Kerry Of Security Clearance!!!!!!  Unauthorized Contacts With Enemy Agents!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243912/posts</link>
<description>Kerry Lost Security Clearance! Just spoke with reporter friend in DC. She is talking with former USN ONI types who worked on DOD/USN investigation that resulted in total loss of Kerry&#x26;#x92;s Navy security clearance. Kerry had been granted a Top Secret by the Navy on October 11, 1967 based on a routine background investigation by Office of Naval Intelligence. A top secret clearance was required for his work at that time. Obtaining and holding a security clearance of any level, especially TS or above, requires certain terms, obligations, commitments and conditions from the holder. One of the most important is...</description>
<author>DC Reporter</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243912/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mystery Surrounds Kerry&#x26;#x27;s Navy Discharge - required  review by board of officers</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243546/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;An official Navy document on Senator Kerry&#x26;#x27;s campaign Web site listed as Mr. Kerry&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;Honorable Discharge from the Reserves&#x26;#x22; opens a door on a well kept secret about his military service.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;The document is a form cover letter in the name of the Carter administration&#x26;#x27;s secretary of the Navy, W. Graham Claytor. It describes Mr. Kerry&#x26;#x27;s discharge as being subsequent to the review of &#x26;#x22;a board of officers.&#x26;#x22; This in it self is unusual. There is nothing about an ordinary honorable discharge action in the Navy that requires a review by a board of officers.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>New York Sun</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243546/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>