<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: norton</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/norton/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:19:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Computer Tech Question: If I have Norton Anti-virus, do I also need SpySweeper?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1929641/posts</link>
<description>Okay, a question for you techies out there. I just renewed my Norton Anti-virus system and the renewal for my SpySweeper is coming up as well. Is it necessary to have SpySweeper also? If Norton Anti-Virus is sufficient then it doesn&#x26;#x27;t make sense to renew SpySweeper. Some have said they might even be interfering with each other. So to renew or not to renew SpySweeper? That is the question.</description>
<author>Self</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1929641/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why is my computer slowing down?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1766007/posts</link>
<description>My computer used to be really zippy. 1 1/4 gig Ram, fast processor, etc. But then I installed symantic and that slowed it somewhat. Then all the Windows updates. Now it&#x26;#x27;s actually pretty slow, sometimes. Anyone else have this problem?</description>
<author>me</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1766007/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:12:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Today&#x26;#x27;s Norton antivirus: unusable by normal humans</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1725325/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;When you have a few minutes,&#x26;#x22; my father asked me on the phone last night, &#x26;#x22;could you help me with my antivirus stuff?&#x26;#x22; The trial version of Norton AntiVirus 2006 on his three-month-old Lenovo laptop was expiring, and he was bit confused by the upgrade warning, so he wanted me to help him through the transition. One of the options was to upgrade to Norton AntiVirus 2007, for $39 (after the $10 promotional coupon he got in e-mail). Sounded good to me. &#x26;#x22;Sure,&#x26;#x22; I said. &#x26;#x22;It should only take a few minutes.&#x26;#x22; I took control of his computer via LogMeIn...</description>
<author>Alpha, the CNet Blog</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1725325/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>National Archives Indian Records Discarded</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1489109/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON - Federal officials are investigating how National Archives documents of interest to Indians suing the Interior Department were found discarded in a trash bin and a wastebasket. The discovery came to light on Sept. 1, when Archives staff noticed federal records in one of the trash bins behind the National Archives Building near the Capitol. They notified the Archives&#x26;#x27; inspector general, Paul Brachfeld, whose staff recovered the documents. They found at least a portion of the documents were Bureau of Indian Affairs records dating to the 1950s, according to Jason Baron of the Archives&#x26;#x27; Office of General Counsel, in...</description>
<author>ap on Yahoo</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1489109/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Keep Yer Paws Off Your PC: Preventing End-Users from Installing Applications</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1691995/posts</link>
<description>Recently, I overheard an IT professional complaining about her users. Veronica&#x26;#x27;s company has 300 employees, many of whom would have been called &#x26;#x22;paper pushers&#x26;#x22; in an earlier era. Some of those employees download software and install it on their computers, and it often causes havoc for the support staff. Veronica&#x26;#x27;s specific rant was about screensavers (some of which carry a payload of spyware, making it a security issue as well as a support problem), but it could have been any sort of application. Veronica had looked at a $10,000 hardware solution, but even that required 10 hours a week for...</description>
<author>ITBusinessnet</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1691995/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hilarious Stephen Colbert interview of Eleanor Holmes Norton</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674510/posts</link>
<description>This is really funny stuff. I don&#x26;#x27;t think Eleanor is playing along, I think she really is getting angry during this interview. Either way, it is very entertaining. Here&#x26;#x27;s the link: Colbert Interview</description>
<author>Comedy Central, via YouTube</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674510/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:13:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Huge Security Flaw Found in Leading Anti-Computer Virus Software</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638721/posts</link>
<description>A gaping security flaw in the latest versions of Symantec&#x26;#x27;s anti-virus software suite could put millions of users at risk of a debilitating worm attack, Internet security experts warned May 25. Researchers at eEye Digital Security, the company that discovered the flaw, said it could be exploited by remote hackers to take complete control of the target machine &#x26;#x22;without any user action.&#x26;#x22; &#x26;#x22;This is definitely wormable. Once exploited, you get a command shell that gives you complete access to the machine. You can remove, edit or destroy files at will,&#x26;#x22; said eEye Digital Security spokesperson Mike Puterbaugh.</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638721/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:25:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Geographic affirmative action
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600142/posts</link>
<description>The ink was barely dry on Gale Norton&#x26;#x27;s resignation as secretary of the Interior when the talk began that Norton, who once served as attorney general of Colorado, would have to be replaced by another Westerner. Such sentiments were confirmed when President George W. Bush announced last week that he would nominate Dirk Kempthorne, governor of Idaho, to replace Norton.</description>
<author>Denver Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600142/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:12:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft flagged Symantec software as spyware</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1578013/posts</link>
<description>Microsoft has corrected a mistake in its anti-spyware product that flagged some Symantec security tools as malicious software. The problem occurred after Microsoft pushed out an update for Windows AntiSpyware last Thursday night. The updated software identified a Windows registry key set by the Symantec products as belonging to password stealing malicious software known as Bancos, Microsoft and Symantec said in a joint statement Monday. On detection of the registry keys, Windows AntiSpyware alerted the user and suggested deletion of the keys. &#x26;#x22;The deletion of these registry keys will cause all versions of the SAV (Symantec AntiVirus) and SCS (Symantec...</description>
<author>Cnet</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1578013/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft Anti-Spyware Deleting Norton Anti-Virus</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576965/posts</link>
<description>Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s Anti-Spyware program is causing troubles for people who also use Symantec&#x26;#x27;s Norton Anti-Virus software; apparently, a recent update to Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s anti-spyware application flags Norton as a password-stealing program and prompts users to remove it. According to several different support threads over at Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s user groups forum, the latest definitions file from Microsoft &#x26;#x22;(version 5805, 5807) detects Symantec Antivirus files as PWS.Bancos.A (Password Stealer).&#x26;#x22; When Microsoft Anti-Spyware users remove the flagged Norton file as prompted, Symantec&#x26;#x27;s product gets corrupted and no longer protects the user&#x26;#x27;s machine. The Norton user then has to go through the Windows registry and delete multiple...</description>
<author>Washington Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576965/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Critical bug found in anti-virus software</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546069/posts</link>
<description>A critical software bug has been discovered in several of the most widely used anti-virus programs. It could be exploited to take control of a computer or to steal information, according to an analysis produced by the independent security analyst who made the discovery. The glitch affects 39 different Symantec products - including both home and enterprise versions of its anti-virus software. It resides within the Symantec anti-virus library, which is used by all of the packages. The analyst, Alex Wheeler, discovered that a critical error occurs when the Symantec anti-virus library decompresses files from &#x26;#x22;RAR&#x26;#x22; format for analysis Symantec...</description>
<author>New Scientist  news service</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546069/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Norton: Latest Character is like the U.S.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1494809/posts</link>
<description>Edward Norton says his latest role as an arrogant British doctor out to change the world is a little like today&#x26;#x27;s America. &#x26;#x22;In fact, the United States today keeps on making the same sort of mistakes,&#x26;#x22; Norton was quoted as saying by the Chinese-language newspaper Shanghai Morning Post. &#x26;#x22;We force those methods we think are useful on a few countries, hoping to make a few changes. The good thing is that, in the movie, I realize my mistakes in the end,&#x26;#x22; the 36-year-old actor said in the interview, published Friday.</description>
<author>AP</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1494809/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Help: Symantec blocks a UK Conservative site</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1436377/posts</link>
<description>I manage a conservative web site in the UK known as SterlingTimes (not dissimilar to FreeRepublic). The site has been blocked by a content filter owned by an American corporation known as Symantec. The content filter is known as &#x26;#x22;Parental Control&#x26;#x22;. Does any one know the process by which an American corporation can assign as British conservative message board as &#x26;#x22;intolerant&#x26;#x22;? http://www.sterlingtimes.com</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1436377/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just Installed Norton.  Cannot bring up spam folders in Outlook. What am I doing wrong this time</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385735/posts</link>
<description>I just upgraded my Norton. I had Norton antispam working quite well a while back and then it disappeard. No more spam bar on the outlook. I just had to upgrade my subscription and I assumed that the spam bar would come back but no dice. I installed some ms updates aabout the same time the spam bar disappeared. How do I get my norton antispam to work fully. Yes, I know this isnt breaking news. But it is midnight and I didnt want to go into the hole of darkness without an answer.</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385735/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 04:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>My Norton is driving me nuts</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1383656/posts</link>
<description>I&#x26;#x27;ve had to uninstall and then reinstall my Norton Internet Security 2004, a total of four times in the last two weeks. I am at my wits end, which for me, isn&#x26;#x27;t too far a journey. Any help on what could possibly be wrong would be greatly appreciated.</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1383656/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Symantec (Norton) details flaws in its antivirus software</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1373918/posts</link>
<description>Symantec has reported glitches in its antivirus software that could allow hackers to launch denial-of-service attacks on computers running the applications. In a notice posted on its Web site this week, Symantec detailed two similar vulnerabilities found in its Norton AntiVirus software, which is sold on its own or bundled in Norton Internet Security and Norton System Works. The flaws, which could lead to computers crashing or slowing severely if attacked, are limited to versions of the software released for 2004 and 2005. The Information-Technology Promotion Agency of Japan, a government-affiliated tech watchdog group, identified the first instance of the...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1373918/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lt. Gov. Norton says she won&#x26;#x27;t run for governor (Colorado)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353128/posts</link>
<description>Colorado Lt. Gov. Jane Norton ended speculation that she would run for governor in 2006, saying today she had no plans to do so. Norton, a Republican who served as executive director of the state Department of Public Health and Environment for four years before joining Gov. Bill Owens&#x26;#x27; ticket in 2002, had been mentioned as a possible candidate. She did not elaborate on her decision. Republican state Treasurer Mike Coffman has formed an exploratory committee for the office, and University of Denver President Marc Holtzman, a Republican, has said he will leave the school by the end of this...</description>
<author>The Denver Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353128/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2005 04:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anybody have problems installing Norton System Works on AMD sysstem?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1352696/posts</link>
<description>Tried for a weekend to install NSW on an AMD system running XP Pro. No go. Spent hours on the phone with Symantec. No good. Installed Ghost. Installs fine; errors out when run. I thought by now AMD systems would be fully compatible; evidently I was wrong. &#x26;#x22;Fully contemptible&#x26;#x22; might be more appropriate. Any suggestions? I am thinking of pitching it and going back to intel. --Boris</description>
<author>Boris</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1352696/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Fatal Blow to Shrinkwrap Licensing?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1305593/posts</link>
<description> A Fatal Blow to Shrinkwrap Licensing? By Ed Foster, Section Columns Posted on Mon Dec 20th, 2004 at 08:02:57 AM PDT In January 2003, California resident Cathy Baker walked into her local CompUSA store to return copies of Windows XP and Norton AntiVirus she&#x26;#x27;d purchased there. When trying to install the programs, she had of course been confronted by all the obnoxious terms in the Windows and NAV End User License Agreements. Instead of clicking OK, she took them back to the store for a refund, as the EULAs said she was supposed to do if she refused to...</description>
<author>The Gripelog</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1305593/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Free Republic is a crime! (so says Symantec/Norton anti virus)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1302902/posts</link>
<description>Norton Internet Security has blocked access to this restricted site. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Site: http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/latest?ao=1 Blocked categories: Crime If you think this web site is incorrectly categorized, visit the Symantec Internet Security Center to report it.</description>
<author>vanity</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1302902/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Symantec labels China censor-busting software as Trojan</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1215867/posts</link>
<description>Symantec has labelled a program that enables Chinese surfers to view blocked websites as a Trojan Horse. Upshot? Users of Norton Anti-Virus cannot access Freegate, a popular program which circumvents government blocks, the FT reports. Freegate has 200,000 users, Dynamic Internet Technology (DIT), its developer, estimates. It lets users view sites banned by the Chinese government by taking advantage of a range of proxy servers assigned to changeable internet addresses. But a recent update to Symantec&#x26;#x27;s AV definition files means the latest version of Freegate is treated as malware and removed from systems protected by Norton. Short of disabling Norton...</description>
<author>The Register (U.K.)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1215867/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Statement by Colorado Lt. Gov. Jane Norton (R-CO)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1201216/posts</link>
<description>DENVER, CO &#x26;#x96; Colorado Lt. Gov. Jane Norton (R-CO) today issued the following statement: &#x26;#x93;Coloradans aren&#x26;#x92;t going to believe John Kerry&#x26;#x92;s misleading campaign trail promises on health care in light of his pledge to repeal the President&#x26;#x92;s Medicare reforms, which save seniors money on prescription drugs. By wanting to turn back the President&#x26;#x92;s guarantee of affordable prescription drugs, Kerry is ignoring the priorities of Colorado seniors for the sake of his own political advantage. &#x26;#x93;Kerry&#x26;#x92;s out of the mainstream Senate record includes votes against additional funding for state Medicaid programs--including more than $1 billion for Colorado--and votes against a $25...</description>
<author>George W. Bush</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1201216/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Still swindling the Indians
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114040/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON (SH) - No matter who is running the Interior Department - Republicans, Democrats or a hybrid of both - they can&#x26;#x27;t seem to get it right with Native Americans, leaving one to believe that the nation&#x26;#x27;s integrity got buried at Wounded Knee alongside Crazy Horse&#x26;#x27;s heart. Ever since the U.S. 7th Calvary of Custer fame (or infamy, whichever side one is on) massacred a harmless bunch of Ghost Dancers and their women and children at that now-sacred site, officially ending 30 years of armed hostility toward the Indians, the government has maintained a policy of corruption that even the...</description>
<author>Bakersfield Californian</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114040/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Apr 2004 00:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Schaffer First GOP Candidate in Colo.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1096485/posts</link>
<description>DENVER - Former Rep. Bob Schaffer on Friday became the first Republican candidate in the race to replace retiring GOP Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell. Schaffer made the announcement just hours after Reps. Scott McInnis and Tom Tancredo joined a growing list of Republicans who declined to run. Schaffer said a formal announcement would come next week. &#x26;#x22;I&#x26;#x27;ve filed and I have an organization that I&#x26;#x27;ve put together, an exploratory team and a team that is getting larger,&#x26;#x22; he said. &#x26;#x22;I see nothing that discourages me.&#x26;#x22; Schaffer was elected to the House of Representatives in 1996 and served three terms, stepping...</description>
<author>The Associated Press</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1096485/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>King Kerry</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1075960/posts</link>
<description></description>
<author>http://www.terpsboy.com/blogarchives/000566.html</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1075960/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>