Keyword: oathofoffice

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • New Air Force Oath of Office: So Help Me, Me

    09/18/2014 4:55:48 AM PDT · by lifeofgrace · 11 replies
    Charting Course ^ | 9/18/14 | Steve Berman
      So help me, me. In a victory for the tombstone-dancing Military Religious Freedom Foundation (whose name implies the opposite of what they actually believe), the Air Force reversed its 2013 legal opinion requiring recruits to recite the entire Oath of Office when enlisting or receiving a commission in the U.S. Air Force.  By entire oath I mean including the part where “So help me God” is said at the end. The issue was originally raised back in 2013 when the MRFF found that the Air Force was enforcing the Federal laws requiring the entire oath as written.  I never...
  • Is A Digital Bible Less Holy? U.S. Officials Increasingly Sworn In On Tablets

    07/14/2014 5:51:21 PM PDT · by Olog-hai · 27 replies
    Fox News Latino ^ | July 14, 2014 | Hillary Vaughn
    It was called the wave of the future—the recently tapped U.S. ambassador to Switzerland was sworn in last month with her hand not on a paper Bible, but on top of a Kindle. Techies called it revolutionary and applauded Suzi Levine for making history. But she wasn’t the only one who went high-tech when she took the oath of office. A county executive from Long Island, N.Y., used the Bible app on an iPad to be sworn in last year and a few months ago a group of firefighters from New Jersey huddled around a Kindle Bible when they took...
  • Brennan's Spooky Swearing-In

    03/27/2013 5:41:38 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 21 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | March 27, 2013 | Ken Blackwell
    Editor's Note: This column was coauthored by Bob Morrison. President Obama's choice to be Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) was approved by the Senate on a vote of 63-34, with thirteen Republicans voting to confirm him. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) created quite a stir with his 13-hour filibuster against the Brennan nomination. Not until he received written assurances from Attorney General Eric Holder that U.S. citizens would not be targeted for killing by drones on U.S. soil would the doughty Kentuckian stand down. Good for him. John Brennan then proceeded to take the Oath of Office, as administered by Vice...
  • State Dept Restricting Employees From Speaking To Congress Over Benghazi

    04/30/2013 3:35:39 AM PDT · by markomalley · 36 replies
    Breitbart TV ^ | 4/30/2013
    Acting Deputy Spokesman Patrick Ventrell defended the State Department restricting access to Congress from lower-level staffers directly involved with the Benghazi investigation. Ventrell said that it was "appropriate" for the FBI and the Accountability Review Board to interview the Department employees but that Congress should only have access to their superiors. "Just as you wouldn’t have necessarily a soldier or troops called as witnesses, you have their superior officers, that’s the same practice for the State Department," Ventrell argued. Ventrell went on to say, "I think that these folks want to be able to continue their professional duties and activities,"...
  • State Dept, CIA threatening whistleblowers their careers are over if they come forward on Benghazi

    04/29/2013 8:38:46 PM PDT · by Kevin in California · 71 replies
    The Right scoop ^ | 04-29-2013
    James Rosen on Special Report tonight said that the State Dept. is not providing ‘a process’ for lawyers, being retained by whistleblowers, to get classified information on Benghazi, as we reported earlier today. But not only are they interfering with the legal representation, Victoria Toensing, one of the attorneys representing the whistleblowers, says that they have clients in both the State Dept. and CIA who are being threatened that if they come forward their careers will be over.
  • Obama: Senators decided protecting kids 'wasn't worth it'

    04/18/2013 4:00:55 AM PDT · by BarnacleCenturion · 116 replies
    seattletimes.com ^ | April 17, 2013 | NEDRA PICKLER
    WASHINGTON --A visibly infuriated President Barack Obama surrounded himself with tear-stained parents of Connecticut school shooting victims Wednesday after the Senate voted down a measure designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and declared it a "pretty shameful day for Washington." He said a minority of senators decided "it wasn't worth it" to protect the nation's children. The Senate, which is controlled by the president's own party, handed him a stinging first defeat for his second term by voting down a bipartisan compromise to expand background checks for gun buyers.
  • Sen. McCain: I ‘don’t understand’ GOP threats to filibuster Senate gun bill

    04/07/2013 1:05:12 PM PDT · by opentalk · 127 replies
    The Hill ^ | April 7, 2013 | Meghashyam Mali
    Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday expressed opposition to possible GOP efforts to filibuster a Senate gun-control measure, saying he did not “understand” the move to block debate. “I don’t understand it,” said McCain on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” “What are we afraid of? Why would we not want… if this issue is as important as all of us think it is, why not take it to one of the world’s greatest deliberative bodies… A number of GOP...
  • Brennan Takes Oath on Draft Constitution— Without Bill of Rights

    03/08/2013 4:47:17 PM PST · by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America · 54 replies
    Yahoo News ^ | March 08, 2013 | Olivier Knox
    Oh, dear. This is probably not the symbolism the White House wanted. Hours after CIA Director John Brennan took the oath of office—behind closed doors, far away from the press, perhaps befitting his status as America's top spy—the White House took pains to emphasize the symbolism of the ceremony. “There's one piece of this that I wanted to note for you,” spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at their daily briefing. “Director Brennan was sworn in with his hand on an original draft of the Constitution that had George Washington's personal handwriting and annotations on it, dating from 1787.” Earnest said...
  • Pelosi: More Gun Control Needed Because ‘We Took an Oath to Protect and Defend’ (WRONG)

    01/16/2013 3:21:52 PM PST · by jazusamo · 38 replies
    CNSNews ^ | January 16, 2012 | Elizabeth Harrington
    (CNSNews.com) – House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said action must be taken in the aftermath of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School because members of Congress took an oath to “protect and defend,” although the actual oath says to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States ….” Pelosi held a House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing on "Gun Violence Prevention: A Call to Action,” where she endorsed the gun control proposals President Barack Obama unveiled today. “Earlier this month, shortly after Newtown, all members of Congress took an oath to protect and defend the...
  • Freshman lawmaker threatens impeachment over gun rights

    01/14/2013 12:32:28 PM PST · by Ron H. · 24 replies
    The Hill ^ | Jan 14, 2013 | Jonathan Easley
    Freshman Republican Rep. Steve Stockman (Texas) on Monday said he would "seek to thwart" executive action by President Obama in regard to gun laws by any means necessary, even if it means "filing articles of impeachment." ....... Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/277021-gop-rep-threatens-obama-with-impeachment-over-gun-action#ixzz2Hz2ZtaWO
  • Obama to use 2 Bibles when he takes oath of office

    01/10/2013 1:29:47 PM PST · by dubyajam · 103 replies
    FOXNEWS ^ | January 10, 2013 | Associated Press
    President Obama is putting a symbolic twist on a time-honored tradition, taking the oath of office for his second term with his hand placed not on a single Bible, but two -- one owned by Martin Luther King Jr. and one by Abraham Lincoln.
  • Prediction for 2013: Obama Will Lie Under Oath

    01/03/2013 3:34:27 PM PST · by jazusamo · 35 replies
    CNSNews ^ | January 3, 2013 | Terence P. Jeffrey
    Chief Justice John Roberts administers the presidential oath to Barack Obama a second time on Jan. 21, 2009. (White House photo/Pete Souza) Looking back over the last four years, it is now obvious that the greatest symbolic moment of President Barack Obama's first term was the very first moment. That is when Obama placed his left hand on Abraham Lincoln's Bible, raised his right hand, and followed the lead of Chief Justice John Roberts in attempting to recite the oath that all American presidents must take, swearing to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Obama...
  • Americans may soon be permitted to RENT guns but not own them

    12/31/2012 8:49:59 AM PST · by Oldpuppymax · 99 replies
    Coach is Right ^ | 12/31/12 | Doug Book
    The widely anticipated senate bill soon to be introduced by gun-banner extraordinaire Diane Feinstein will do far more than eliminate “assault weapons” (AW’s) and “high capacity” magazines. According to a summary on the senator’s website, concealed carry license holder Feinstein–who proposed an outright ban on all handguns while packing her own for self-defense—will demand that owners of guns affected by her legislation: pay a $200 fee for EACH banned weapon owned; submit pictures, fingerprints and register AW’s with the ATF; have local law enforcement attest to the owner’s identity and specify the address at which each weapon will be kept....
  • Congressman: Rick Perry Has 'Blood On His Hands' For Supporting Second Amendment

    12/21/2012 8:26:17 AM PST · by bestintxas · 35 replies
    breitbart ^ | 12/21/12
    Congressman Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said Governor Rick Perry “had blood on his hands” for supporting the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
  • Barack Obama's Oath of Office

    01/20/2009 10:29:04 AM PST · by antonia · 68 replies · 5,301+ views
    http://www.youtube.com ^ | Jan 20, 2009 | Obama
    Barack trips on the words of his Oath.
  • Give Obama A Pass on Oath Flub?

    01/20/2009 8:49:03 PM PST · by DouglasKC · 160 replies · 4,030+ views
    FreeRepublic Exclusive ^ | 1/20/2009 | DouglasKC
    Give Obama A Pass on Oath Flub? Have you heard? Chief Justice Roberts mixed some words around in the Presidential oath that Presidents take upon assuming the office. The oath should read as follows: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." It seems that Chief Justice Roberts put the word "faithfully" in the wrong place. It was then repeated incorrectly by Mr. Obama. Should we give Mr. Obama a pass?...
  • Oath Flub merits a do-over, scholars say

    01/20/2009 10:45:44 PM PST · by America2012 · 70 replies · 3,006+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 1/20/2009 | Carolyn Lochhead
    Several constitutional lawyers said President Barack Obama should, just to be safe, retake the oath of office that Chief Justice John Roberts flubbed. The 35-word oath is explicitly prescribed in the Constitution, Article II, Section One, which says the president "shall" take the oath "before he enteron the execution of his office." It was discussed during the Constitutional Convention. Roberts misplaced the word "faithfully," at which point Obama paused quizzically, and then Roberts corrected himself, but then Obama repeated the words as Roberts initially said them. The oath reads: "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office...
  • That Was No Mistake Roberts Sent a Message to History

    01/22/2009 9:15:37 PM PST · by Sammy67 · 128 replies · 4,985+ views
    On December 5, 2008, we said: "Questions have been raised as to whether Chief Justice John Roberts could administer the oath of office to a man who he believes may not be entitled. Chief Justice John G. Roberts will have to KNOW that Barack Hussein Obama II is eligible to 'enter on the execution of his office,' before he administers the Inaugural Oath of Office.'" The Chief Justice of the United States did not make a mistake when he flubbed the oath of office. He did not want to issue the oath to Obama because of his doubts. By failing...
  • Caption Roberts re-swearing in The One

    01/22/2009 5:34:09 AM PST · by Sig Sauer P220 · 61 replies · 1,601+ views
    Drudge ^ | 1/21/09 | none
  • Caption Roberts and Obama swearing photo

    01/22/2009 9:19:01 AM PST · by FreeAtlanta · 30 replies · 1,482+ views
    drudge report | 12/22/2008 | vanity
  • Audio of Barack Obama Retaking the Oath of Office - Audio 1/21/09

    01/22/2009 8:04:19 AM PST · by Federalist Patriot · 2 replies · 299+ views
    Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | January 22, 2009 | BrianinMO
    Here is audio of President Barack Obama retaking the Presidential Oath of Office on January 21, 2009. He did so as a result of a flub that took place on Inauguration Day when Chief Justice John Roberts mixed up the words of the Oath, and Obama repeated it incorrectly. Roberts again administered the Oath at the White House on the evening of January 21, 2009. No video was allowed, but this audio has been released. . . . . (Listen to audio)
  • Obama Sworn In Again, With Right Words (No Bible Used)

    01/22/2009 5:35:08 AM PST · by icwhatudo · 37 replies · 1,816+ views
    Washington Post ^ | Thursday, January 22, 2009 | Michael D. Shear
    In golf, they call it a mulligan. A do-over. There's no formal name for what President Obama and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. did last night. After flubbing his one role on Inauguration Day -- administering the oath of office to Obama -- Roberts traveled to the White House to re-administer the oath. Just to make sure. "We decided it was so much fun . . .," Obama joked while sitting on a couch in the Map Room. Obama stood and walked over to make small talk with pool reporters as Roberts donned his black robe. "Are you ready...
  • Obama Resworn in...

    01/21/2009 7:20:00 PM PST · by PilotDave · 209 replies · 7,616+ views
    drudgereport ^ | 21 JAN 09 | Drudge
    OBAMA RE-SWORN IN At 735 pm, Roberts administred the oath of office again to obama in the map room. Robert gibbs said the wh counsel, greg craig, believes the oath was fine Tuesday, but one word was out of sequence so they did this out of a "an abundance of caution." "We decided it was so much fun..." Obama joked while sitting on a couch. Obama stood and walked over to make small talk with pool as roberts donned his black robe. "Are you ready to take the oath?" Roberts asked. "I am, and we're going to do it very...
  • Obama Sworn in... Again

    01/21/2009 7:23:11 PM PST · by MeanGreen2008 · 26 replies · 1,284+ views
    At 735 pm [Tuesday], Roberts administered the oath of office again to Obama in the Map Room. Robert Gibbs said the WH counsel, Greg Craig, believes the oath was fine Tuesday, but one word was out of sequence so they did this out of a "an abundance of caution." "We decided it was so much fun..." Obama joked while sitting on a couch. Obama stood and walked over to make small talk with pool as Roberts donned his black robe. "Are you ready to take the oath?" Roberts asked. "I am, and we're going to do it very slowly," Obama...
  • The Oath...Take 2...Good Lord, How Long Will this Go On?

    01/21/2009 6:26:53 PM PST · by bloodmeridian · 14 replies · 843+ views
    Feed Your ADHD ^ | 1/21/2009 | Dr. Dave
    Once wasn't enough for The One. After Justice John Roberts butchered delivering the oath to President Barack Hussein Obama yesterday...he had to do it again...today...in the White House. Apparently several constitutional scholars, law abiding and deriding citizens that they are, advised the president he'd potentially suffer a legal challenge (from whom, Biden?) if he didn't do it right.
  • Fox News Shep Smith --Obama Re-took Oath of Office

    01/21/2009 4:57:40 PM PST · by sbark · 109 replies · 3,994+ views
    Fox News | Shep Smith
    Just reported by Shep Smith on Fox News that Obama had to re-take the Oath of Office. 7:00pm so.....Everything he did prior to that today Legal ... Hopefully link shows up and someone adds it
  • Fox's Chris Wallace asks: Is Obama even president? (screwed up oath!)

    01/20/2009 7:46:37 PM PST · by RIghtNowAndAlways · 143 replies · 5,272+ views
    L.A. Times ^ | 1/20/09 | Scott Collins
    "Well, again, we're wondering here whether or not Barack Obama in fact is the president of the United States," Chris Wallace told Fox News viewers, well over an hour after Obama had taken the oath of office today. Fox News replayed the swearing-in moment when President Obama and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. each bobbled the words to the constitutional oath. "They had a kind of garbled oath," Wallace said. "It's just conceivable that this will end up going to the courts," Wallace speculated.
  • Obama orders feds not to cooperate with Arizona regarding reporting illegals

    06/25/2012 11:55:05 AM PDT · by pabianice · 238 replies
    Rush Limbaugh Show (live) | 6/25/12 | Limbaugh
    Just announced on Rush. On the heels of today's SCOTUS decision regarding Arizona's border protection law, Napalitano (Obama) has just notified Arizona that the federal government/ICE/DHS has been ordered not to cooperate with AZ regarding the reporting of illegals stopped in AZ.
  • Homeland Security suspends immigration agreements with Ariz. police

    06/25/2012 11:31:56 AM PDT · by Hojczyk · 167 replies
    The Washington Times ^ | June 25,2012 | By Stephen Dinan
    The Obama administration said Monday it is suspending existing agreements with Arizona police over enforcement of federal immigration laws, and said it has issued a directive telling federal authorities to decline many of the calls reporting illegal immigrants that the Homeland Security Department may get from Arizona police. Administration officials, speaking on condition they not be named, told reporters they expect to see an increase in the number of calls they get from Arizona police — but that won’t change President Obama’s decision to limit whom the government actually tries to detain and deport. “We will not be issuing detainers...
  • GOP Sen. Rubio says deportation leniency is 'welcome news'

    06/15/2012 11:02:07 AM PDT · by BradtotheBone · 146 replies
    The Hill ^ | 06/15/12 01:07 PM ET | Mike Lillis
    A GOP senator on the short list to be Mitt Romney's running mate is applauding President Obama's move to forgo deportations for some illegal immigrants. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said the more lenient policy is "welcome news" for those immigrants who will benefit, though he was quick to knock the administration for acting unilaterally. “Today’s announcement will be welcome news for many of these kids desperate for an answer, but it is a short term answer to a long term problem," the Cuban-American Rubio said in a statement. "And by once again ignoring the Constitution and going around Congress, this...
  • W.H. with the '99 percent'-ers

    10/16/2011 3:08:23 PM PDT · by ColdOne · 27 replies
    Politico44 ^ | 10/16/11 | GLENN THRUSH
    President Obama is paying close attention to the Occupy Wall Street movement - and has said he sympathizes with protesters' broad grievances - but for the first time a White House official has publicly touted the movement's "99 percent" slogan. Principal Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest, in a Sunday conference call briefing to outline details of Obama's three-day bus trip to North Carolina and Virginia, was asked if the president intended to address the growing protests that have sprouted up throughout the country and some cities in western Europe. Earnest told scribes to stay tuned, adding that it was possible...
  • Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action (Kucinich calls for Obama's impeachment)

    03/20/2011 8:30:36 AM PDT · by rabscuttle385 · 104 replies
    Politico ^ | 2011-03-20 | John Bresnahan & Jonathan Allen
    A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday. Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part. Kucinich, who wanted to bring impeachment articles against both former President George W. Bush...
  • Ronald Reagan inauguration, 30 years ago today.

    01/20/2011 12:35:24 AM PST · by Ragnar1337 · 6 replies
    Youtube ^ | 1/20/2011 | Jesse Smith
    Today's the 30 year anniversary of Ronald Reagan becoming president. America's Choir singing Battle Hymn of the Republic to Ronald Reagan during the parade.Ronald Reagan takes the oath of office.Ronald Reagan's Inaugural Address.
  • Officer refusing homosexual training program reassigned

    01/08/2011 8:45:45 AM PST · by Purrsiancat · 12 replies
    World Net Daily ^ | January 7, 2011 | Brian Fitzpatrick
    "From now on I'll be a staff officer without a bunch of people working under me, so I won't have the moral conflict with having to enforce this new policy on them. "...the state is actually standing by my position." The officer, who formerly commanded a battalion-sized unit, has strongly held religious beliefs that homosexual behavior is morally wrong, and he thinks the military will be damaged severely if it implements the Obama administration's plan to allow homosexuals to serve openly....many of the men under his command share his views. "The only real argument the senators made for repealing DADT...
  • Presidential Candidates Submit Handwritten Copy of Constitution

    09/10/2010 5:41:57 AM PDT · by Cowman · 14 replies
    The Blaze ^ | September 9, 2010 | Jonathon M. Seidl
    Proposal: Presidential Candidates Submit Handwritten Copy of Constitution Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:27pm by Jonathon M. Seidl What if the president had to hand-write a copy of the Constitution before he took office? That’s the question Dr. David Corbin and Dr. Matthew Parks of The King’s College-New York City are asking. Corbin is an associate professor of politics, while Parks is the assistant provost. According to them, the presidential oath “to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States” is one that should be taken very seriously. But “you can’t do this if you don’t know...
  • Were You Lying Then or Are You Lying Now?

    07/18/2010 12:05:40 AM PDT · by jbjd · 6 replies
    jbjd ^ | 07.17,10 | jbjd
    ...We might generously assume the 62 freshman legislators were so green when they took office they didn’t know the difference between a paid political advertisement and a proffer of proof, notwithstanding 15 are lawyers. But can they have reached the second half of the 2nd session of the 111th Congress and still think these two are the same? Have they ignored ongoing correspondence from constituents documenting members of the Democratic Party, including their Speaker, who signed these Certifications of Nomination, refuse to identify documents that were the basis for their determination Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen? Even in...
  • Obama Blasts Pending Arizona Immigration Law: "Irresponsibility"

    04/23/2010 11:42:23 AM PDT · by Mind Freed · 25 replies · 734+ views
    President Obama used a naturalization ceremony in the Rose Garden to lash out at the Arizona Legislature for passing a bill requiring proof of legal status and empowering state and local police to stop people based on a suspicion of being illegal immigrants. Obama called for comprehensive immigration reform and said Washington's failure to act has bred a climate of fear and retribution in some border states. He singled out the Arizona bill - which would make it crime to be in the state without documentation - now before Republican Gov. Janice Brewer. The governor has until Saturday to decide...
  • Kirk staffers upset at early Brown oath (ROFL!)

    02/04/2010 7:14:42 PM PST · by STARWISE · 86 replies · 2,430+ views
    Politico ^ | 2-4-10 | Erika Lovley
    As Sen. Scott Brown sweeps into his new office, it’s the end of the line for several of Sen. Paul Kirk’s staffers who are being ushered out of jobs a week earlier than expected. Kirk staffers weren’t talking today, but friends and colleagues of the group say some of the staffers were upset by the accelerated swearing in date. One Democratic colleague said the “carpet was pulled out” from preparations for a day that already promised to be emotional. Kirk’s office had worked for weeks to turn over the beloved Russell 317 office suite to Brown by Feb. 11, welcoming...
  • Current Candidate List - Restore the Constitution Effort (FR Alliance)

    10/25/2009 7:28:53 AM PDT · by Jeff Head · 25 replies · 893+ views
    RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION EFFORT ^ | 24 Oct 2009 | Jeff Head
    As an update to FreeRepublic members interested in the progress of the Restore the Constitution Effort, aka, The Independent American Movement for Constitutional Restoration (IAM-CR), and which is a FreeRepublic Alliance site, the following is a list of candidates who have sworn or affirmed that they will support the Constitutional Principles established by the Independent American Movement for Constitutional Restoration (IAM-CR), and whom the mebers of that organization have sworn or affirmed in turn to support (more candidate names will be added as they take this oath or affirmation): -------------------- CANDIDATE LIST --------------------CT: US Senate - Vincent Forras (IND)ID : Governor -...
  • Free Republic establishes alliance with the "Restore the Constitution" effort

    10/17/2009 9:46:24 AM PDT · by Jeff Head · 166 replies · 6,559+ views
    FreeRepublic Alliance Links ^ | October 17, 2009 | Jeff Head
    We are pleased to announce that FreeRepublic and Jim Robinson have established an Alliance Link to the Restore the Constitution effort, The Independent Movement for Constitutional Restoration (IAM-CR). The premise for IAM-CR is simple: We intend to amass a voting block of millions of Americans who are sworn to focus on Constitutional Principle first and foremost in their voting and who will vote for and elect the thousands of candidatires we find and enlist who are sworn to support fundamental Constitutional Principle. We invite all members of FreeRepublic to review our twelve constitutional principles and then JOIN US and...
  • Show it, step down, or be removed by force

    07/22/2009 7:22:24 PM PDT · by Grig · 213 replies · 4,499+ views
    Why don't he Joint Chiefs go to Obama and say "Sir, you must either present a valid full form birth certificate, step down, or we will remove you from office by force." Isn't it their duty to do something like that? Isn't their accepting orders from Obama potentially carrying out illegal orders?
  • Shocking video of NY Democrat sitting through the Pledge of Allegiance

    06/29/2009 8:34:51 PM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 20 replies · 1,529+ views
    YouTube ^ | June 23, 2009
    Video of NYS Senate Democrats sitting defiantly through the Pledge of Allegiance in protest after losing political control of the Chamber to Republicans. Only one courageous Senator tried to stand to honor the flag, but he was immedaietly pulled down into his seat by fellow Democrats. The video is from WCBS-2 TV on 6/23/09, taped during a "special session" of the Senate called by Democrat Gov. David Paterson in an effort to end a three-week walkout by Democrats that has brought government to a screeching halt. Grim-faced Democrats refused to acknowledge even their presence in the Chamber, failing to answer...
  • All enemies, both <b>FOREIGN and DOMESTIC!</b>

    04/11/2009 4:23:17 AM PDT · by leprechaun9 · 20 replies · 678+ views
    Tenth Amendment Center ^ | March 23, 2009 | Robert Bearce
    The Enemy Within Many of our public officials have broken their oath of office. They affirm or swear that they will support the Constitution and defend it “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” There is the foreign threat of Marxist subversion and aggression. More dangerous, however, are the domestic enemies - individuals whose actions and attitudes are corrupting the Constitution. Those individuals include some of the very government officials sworn to uphold the Constitution. Actions by the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal government have proven that many officeholders apparently do not understand the Constitution. If they do...
  • Secret second oath or lack of organization?

    01/22/2009 5:01:13 PM PST · by redhotright · 15 replies · 842+ views
    http://redhotright.blogspot.com/ ^ | 2009-01-22 | Red-Hot Right
    I asked a question earlier today regarding Obama's second oath-taking and the lack of a Bible. I had several good responses, including some which noted that the Constitution does not indicate that a Bible should be used, and one person even pointed out that the second President, John Adams, may have used a law book instead of the Bible. So, to those who gave thoughtful responses... Thank you. However, now I have another question... And don't get me wrong, this is just a question. I'm not trying to bash Obama. Fox News is reporting that the second swearing-in ceremony seems...
  • Is he really the president yet?

    01/22/2009 7:21:16 AM PST · by redhotright · 13 replies · 743+ views
    http://redhotright.blogspot.com/ ^ | 2009-01-22 | Red-Hot Right
    OK... So everyone knows that Obama screwed up while taking the oath of office. And most people know by now that he took the oath a second time, just to be sure (as did two previous Presidents - Chester Arthur and Calvin Coolidge). But did he screw it up the second time also?
  • MSNBC: Obama Retakes Oath of Office

    01/21/2009 4:49:27 PM PST · by lewisglad · 135 replies · 4,172+ views
    MSNBC ^ | 1/21/09
    just announced, I guess he did get a do-over after all
  • President Obama’s Oath

    01/21/2009 10:07:34 AM PST · by AuH2ORepublican · 34 replies · 1,271+ views
    AuH2ORepublican's Blog ^ | January 21, 2009 | AuH2ORepublican
    Tuesday, a few minutes after noon Eastern Standard Time, the world watched as Barack Obama took the oath of office as President of the United States of America. Since such event, President Obama has formally submitted to the Senate nominations for Cabinet officers and will likely issue several executive orders in the next few days. However, due to what we all saw take place during the swearing-in ceremony, those actions by the President may well be unconstitutional. Before you continue, please note that this piece is not about President Obama not meeting the constitutional qualifications to become president under the...
  • What Chew You Talkin' 'Bout Willis?

    01/20/2009 12:29:12 AM PST · by DoughtyOne · 6 replies · 914+ views
    01/20/09 | My own thoughts...
    You and I have been assured that January the 20th, 2009 is a day like no other. It's supposed to be a historic day. The promise of change is in the air. The individual to be sworn in to be the President of the United States is being cannonized by the media. This historic day changes everything, I am assured. Tom Hanks is just thrilled. So are many other "beautiful people". HBO has devoted many hours to the Commander in Chief Elect. The red carpet is being rolled out by major media outlets, the Democrat party, the citizens of the...
  • Federal Judge Clears the Way for Obama to Use "So help me God" in Oath of Office - Video 1/19/09

    01/19/2009 2:26:54 PM PST · by Federalist Patriot · 9 replies · 309+ views
    Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | January 19, 2009 | BrianinMO
    Here is a discussion about the use of "So help me God" in the Presidential Oath of Office that took place today on Fox News. A federal judge has cleared the way today for the words to be used in the Oath of Office. An atheist had sued to keep Obama from being able to use the words. The discussion on the video also talks about the use of ministers such as Rick Warren to pray at the inauguration. At least there is still one federal judge with some common sense left in his head. . . . . ....
  • Quaker teacher fired for changing loyalty oath

    02/29/2008 8:06:30 AM PST · by SmithL · 21 replies · 361+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 2/29/8 | Nanette Asimov
    California State University East Bay has fired a math teacher after six weeks on the job because she inserted the word "nonviolently" in her state-required Oath of Allegiance form. Marianne Kearney-Brown, a Quaker and graduate student who began teaching remedial math to undergrads Jan. 7, lost her $700-a-month part-time job after refusing to sign an 87-word Oath of Allegiance to the Constitution that the state requires of elected officials and public employees. "I don't think it was fair at all," . . .