<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: obambi</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/obambi/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:01:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>White House: Failed plane attack an attempted act of terrorism(Obama told 3 HOURS AFTER PLANE LANDS)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2415162/posts</link>
<description>A White House official said the incident was an attempted act of terrorism. The FBI is investigating and President Obama, celebrating Christmas in Hawaii, was told of the incident about three hours after the plane landed, officials said. Obama has told White House officials that all appropriate measures be taken to increase security for air travel, a spokesman said. Nevertheless, officials said, they are not prepared to raise the terrorism alert level, currently at orange -- or the second-highest of five levels -- for domestic and international air travel.</description>
<author>Washington Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2415162/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Liberals Vow to &#x26;#x27;Spank&#x26;#x27; Obama for Sending More Troops to Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2395406/posts</link>
<description>Liberals Vow to &#x26;#x27;Spank&#x26;#x27; Obama for Sending More Troops to Afghanistan President Obama is days away from announcing a new Afghan strategy, but his immediate battle could come from liberals within his own party who are vowing to &#x26;#x22;spank&#x26;#x22; the president for committing tens of thousands of more troops to the eight-year conflict. President Obama is days away from announcing a new Afghan strategy, but his immediate battle could come from liberals within his own party who are vowing to &#x26;#x22;spank&#x26;#x22; the president for committing tens of thousands of more troops to the eight-year conflict. In a prime-time speech Tuesday...</description>
<author>FOX</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2395406/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thank You For Posting All Of The &#x26;#x22;Obama Wins....&#x26;#x22; Threads</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2359033/posts</link>
<description>Thank you!</description>
<author>FreeRepublic.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2359033/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>OBAMA &#x26;#x3C;strike&#x26;#x3E;FINDS&#x26;#x3C;/strike&#x26;#x3E;IS THE HOLY GRAIL!!! (VANITY)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2358921/posts</link>
<description>The title speaks for itself</description>
<author>Self</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2358921/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Top French general: Iran intervention not viable</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2336798/posts</link>
<description>The head of the French military says military intervention is not a viable option to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear capability.</description>
<author>ap</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2336798/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama to McCain on Iran: &#x26;#x27;I&#x26;#x27;m the president&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2280791/posts</link>
<description>In a wide-ranging midday press conference, President Obama took on Republican critics of his stance on Iran, directly targeting former rival Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and saying, &#x26;#x22;I am the president of the United States.&#x26;#x22; Obama, who has been accused by McCain and other Republicans of being too timid throughout the unrest following Iran&#x26;#x27;s presidential elections, has gradually taken a firmer stance in the days following the election. . . . . . &#x26;#x22;The Iranian people can speak for themselves,&#x26;#x22; Obama said in the James S. Brady Briefing Room. &#x26;#x22;That is precisely what has happened these last few days. In...</description>
<author>The Hill, Washington, DC</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2280791/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wanted: &#x26;#x27;Hope&#x26;#x27; for Iran: Rarely in U.S. history has a foreign policy been so repudiated by events.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2273765/posts</link>
<description>....In Cairo two weeks ago, Mr. Obama trumpeted &#x26;#x22;my commitment . . . to governments that reflect the will of the people.&#x26;#x22; He also lamented that &#x26;#x22;the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government.&#x26;#x22; Yet here is his administration disavowing the first of these commitments while acquiescing in the overthrow -- before it can even be installed -- of another democratically elected Iranian government. Now a presidency that&#x26;#x27;s supposed to be all about hope is suddenly in cynical realpolitik mode -- the only &#x26;#x22;hope&#x26;#x22; it means to keep alive being a &#x26;#x22;grand bargain&#x26;#x22;...</description>
<author>WSJ</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2273765/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:51:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>US Concerned (Iran, North Korea&#x26;#x27;s) &#x26;#x27;Salvo Strategy&#x26;#x27; Could Overwhelm Missile Defenses</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2263107/posts</link>
<description>U.S. concerned salvo strategy could overwhelm missile defenses WASHINGTON &#x26;#x97; U.S. officials said Iran and North Korea are focusing on the use of sustained fire to overcome Israeli and US missile defense systems. The officials said the development of ballistic missile defense systems must protect against missile salvos. &#x26;#x22;An additional concern is North Korea&#x26;#x27;s and Iran&#x26;#x27;s repeated demonstrations of salvo launches, indicating large ballistic missile attack raid sizes must be considered in developing the BMDS [ballistic missile defense system],&#x26;#x22; U.S. Missile Defense Agency director Patrick O&#x26;#x27;Reilly said.</description>
<author>Geostrategy Direct</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2263107/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just 21% Favor GM Bailout Plan, 67% Oppose</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2262139/posts</link>
<description>Only 21% of voters nationwide support a plan for the government to bail out General Motors as part of a structured bankruptcy plan to keep the troubled auto giant in business. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 67% are opposed to a plan that would provide GM with $50 billion in funding and give the government a 70% ownership interest in the company. Even when presented with the stark choice between providing government funding or letting GM go out of business, only 32% of voters support the bailout. Most voters (56%) say it would be better to...</description>
<author>Rasmussen Reports</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2262139/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CHECK, PLEASE!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2244329/posts</link>
<description>CHECK, PLEASE! Steyn on the World Tuesday, 05 May 2009 HAPPY WARRIOR from National Review At the Royal Opera House in Covent Garden, they&#x26;#x92;re premiering a new ballet about a young French boy who&#x26;#x92;s befriended by a giant helium-filled balloon. Any balletomanes at the US embassy might be forgiven for assuming it to be some hastily concocted metaphor to Euro-American harmony in the Age of Obama: a lithe young Continental prancing around the stage enraptured by his dazzling bag of gas. But, as it happens, The Red Balloon is an adaptation of some fey French movie from the Fifties, when...</description>
<author>National Review and Steynonline</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2244329/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2009 06:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x91;Five of Four&#x26;#x92;: Obama Mangles Spanish in Cinco de Mayo Salute at White House (video)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2244240/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Welcome to Cinco de Cuatro&#x26;#x97;Cinco de Mayo at the White House.&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>Associated Press</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2244240/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2009 02:19:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michael Barone: Moving Towards Europe -- but Do Americans Want to Go?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2240111/posts</link>
<description>Ninety-nine days in, with 1,362 days to go, and we can see with some clarity the trajectory on which Barack Obama wants to take the United States. To put it in geographical terms, he wants to move us some considerable distance toward Europe. This is apparent in the budget he has presented for the next fiscal year and its projections for the years to come. Government spending is scheduled to rise as a percentage of the economy. This will be accomplished by raising taxes and, even more, by borrowing that will double the national debt in five years and nearly...</description>
<author>realclearpolitics.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2240111/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:25:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>HELL HATH NO FURY, I cannot take any more.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2227092/posts</link>
<description>Please, can someone sound the horns and line up the emails and phone numbers. Who does BAMBI THINK HE IS THAT HE CAN FLY IN A PIZZA MAKER 850 MILES. THIS TICKS ME MORE THAN THE FREAKING BOWING. Please help, someone with sense please. My brain is fried on this.</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2227092/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wait Until ZERO Starts Campaigning in AF One (Vanity)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2205301/posts</link>
<description>You ain&#x26;#x27;t seen nothin&#x26;#x27; yet. Just wait until Zero goes on the campaign trail in our airplanes! Damn the carbon footprint, damn the cost, damn the time! This will turn into one of the most flagrant abuses of power and privlidge EVER seen in the history of any country! Have vetrans pay medical costs for injuries, mothball a carrier and air group, stop the F-22 and on and on...but gotta have those 18 new helos for the pres. What a POS this creep is!</description>
<author>Self</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2205301/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title> 
Obama musters campaign army for economic fight 
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2203086/posts</link>
<description>US President Barack Obama mustered his powerful campaign army on Monday, calling on his millions of supporters to lobby on behalf of his budget and economic plan. The appeal to back the president was made in an email and video sent out by &#x26;#x22;Organizing for America,&#x26;#x22; the organization which morphed out of Obama&#x26;#x27;s campaign machinery to push his agenda when he entered the White House. In the video, Mitch Stewart, the director of Organizing for America, urged the president&#x26;#x27;s supporters to take part in the &#x26;#x22;Organizing for America Pledge Project.&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>Breitbart</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2203086/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:50:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Entrepreneur-in-chief? (Barf Alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2201654/posts</link>
<description>Entrepreneurs have a mindset and orientation to work their way through uncertainty by taking action. &#x26;#x22;Making things happen&#x26;#x22; is the hallmark of an entrepreneur, and it defines our 44th president.</description>
<author>Market Watch</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2201654/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Mar 2009 01:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Deception at Core of Obama Plans</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200860/posts</link>
<description>True, Obama&#x26;#x27;s tricks come festooned with strings of zeros tacked onto the end. But that&#x26;#x27;s a matter of scale, not principle. All presidents do that. But few undertake the kind of brazen deception at the heart of Obama&#x26;#x27;s radically transformative economic plan, a rhetorical sleight of hand so smoothly offered that few noticed.</description>
<author>Real Clear Politics</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200860/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 19:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Upper-Income Taxpayers Look for Ways to Sidestep Obama Tax-Hike Plan</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2199023/posts</link>
<description>But Gary Schatsky, a financial advisor and the president of NY-based Objectiveadvice.com, said that reducing your income won&#x26;#x27;t help a great deal because of the way the country&#x26;#x27;s tax system is set up. &#x26;#x22;Just going over $250,000 doesn&#x26;#x27;t mean it impacts your tax liability for every dollar before that,&#x26;#x22; said Schatsky, &#x26;#x22;It impacts you at the margin.&#x26;#x22; Marginal or graduated tax systems like the one in the U.S. means only the money earned over a certain amount -- $250,000 in the case of Obama&#x26;#x27;s proposal -- will be taxed at an increased percentage.</description>
<author>ABC</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2199023/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama &#x26;#x27;ready to drop shield plans for Russian help on Iran&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2197663/posts</link>
<description>MOSCOW, March 2 (RIA Novosti) - Washington has told Moscow that Russian help in resolving Iran&#x26;#x27;s nuclear program would make its missile shield plans for Europe unnecessary, a Russian daily said on Monday, citing White House sources. U.S. President Barack Obama made the proposal on Iran in a letter to his Russian counterpart, Dmitry Medvedev, Kommersant said, referring to unidentified U.S. officials. Iran&#x26;#x27;s controversial nuclear program was cited by the U.S. as one of the reasons behind its plans to deploy a missile base in Poland and radar in the Czech Republic. The missile shield has been strongly opposed by...</description>
<author>RIA Novosti</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2197663/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:48:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>obambi&#x26;#x27;s two week report card</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2196567/posts</link>
<description>A buddy sent this. Not checked all of it but it sounds aobut right. OBAMA One Big A__ Mistake America &#x26;#x93;Americans grew tired of being thought to be stupid by the rest of the world, so they went to the polls and removed all doubt.&#x26;#x94; OBAMA&#x26;#x92;S TWO-WEEK RECAP 1, The American people elect a black president with a total of 42 days experience as a U S Senator from the most politically corrupt state in America whose governor is ousted from office. The President&#x26;#x27;s first official act is to close Gitmo and make sure Terrorists civil rights are not violated....</description>
<author>Self</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2196567/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Declares War on Investors, Entrepreneurs, Businesses, And More</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196542/posts</link>
<description>Raising the marginal tax rate on successful earners, capital, dividends, and all the private funds is a function of Obama&#x26;#x92;s left-wing social vision, and a repudiation of his economic-recovery statements. Ditto for his sweeping government-planning-and-spending program, which will wind up raising federal outlays as a share of GDP to at least 30 percent, if not more, over the next 10 years.</description>
<author>CNBC</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196542/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Mar 2009 05:04:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Calls His Budget Sweeping, Needed Change</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196412/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON &#x26;#x97; President Obama described his expansive budget proposal on Saturday as &#x26;#x93;a threat to the status quo in Washington&#x26;#x94; and cast himself as a populist crusader willing to do battle with special interests to expand health care, curb pollution and improve education.</description>
<author>New York Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196412/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama strikes back at budget critics</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196330/posts</link>
<description>President Obama on Saturday struck back aggressively at critics of his $3.6 trillion budget proposal, casting himself as a populist crusader whose &#x26;#x22;sweeping change&#x26;#x22; has angered Washington&#x26;#x27;s entrenched special interests, and promised to fight them. &#x26;#x22;I realize that passing this budget won&#x26;#x27;t be easy. Because it represents real and dramatic change, it also represents a threat to the status quo in Washington,&#x26;#x22; Mr. Obama said in his weekly video and radio address. Mr. Obama&#x26;#x27;s language was combative and confrontational, as he promised to fight for &#x26;#x22;American families.&#x26;#x22; &#x26;#x22;I know these steps won&#x26;#x27;t sit well with the special interests and lobbyists...</description>
<author>The Washington Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196330/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:04:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama banks on pollution reductions</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2194914/posts</link>
<description>President Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s first budget includes $15 billion a year for renewable energy programs and an ambitious plan to raise $646 billion from a carbon reduction proposal. &#x26;#x22;Because our future depends on our ability to break free from oil that&#x26;#x27;s controlled by foreign dictators, we need to make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy,&#x26;#x22; Mr. Obama said Thursday morning. &#x26;#x22;That&#x26;#x27;s why we&#x26;#x27;ll be working with Congress on legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the production of more renewable energy.&#x26;#x22; The plan uses money from a cap-and-trade program &#x26;#x97; which would allow companies to...</description>
<author>The Washington Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2194914/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:52:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama: U.S. &#x26;#x27;will emerge stronger&#x26;#x27; from crisis</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2193189/posts</link>
<description>President Obama will pledge Tuesday night that the nation &#x26;#x22;will rebuild, we will recover,&#x26;#x22; as he delivers an address to a joint session of Congress and with a nervous nation watching at home. &#x26;#x22;While our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this: We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before,&#x26;#x22; Mr. Obama will say, according to excerpts of his remarks. In lofty language, Mr. Obama is expected to promise a new path forward...</description>
<author>The Washington Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2193189/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>