<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: partyoftreason</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/partyoftreason/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:33:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>MELANIE MORGAN: Follow The Money: Towards Treason (Dems Junket on Saddam&#x26;#x27;s Dime Undermines USA)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992663/posts</link>
<description> Follow the Money: Towards Treason Written by Melanie Morgan &#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0; Wednesday, 26 March 2008 And now for our trip in today&#x26;#x27;s Way Back Time Machine.Let&#x26;#x27;s visit Iraq, shall we? That&#x26;#x27;s where three United States Congressmen&#x26;#xA0;traveled in 2002, in the days before the Bush administration launched a war to depose Saddam Hussein, sparking a huge controversy.&#x26;#xA0; Following Ben Bradlee&#x26;#x27;s excellent advice to Woodward and Bernstein during the Watergate era to &#x26;#x27;follow the money&#x26;#x27;, the Associated Press has learned that Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x27;s secret agents financed the trip towards treason.&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xA0; &#x26;#x22;An indictment unsealed in Detroit accuses Muthanna Al-Hanooti, a member of a...</description>
<author>MelanieMorgan.Com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992663/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Big Problem For Democrats (Joseph Farah On Democrats&#x26;#x27; Defeatism Alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1876916/posts</link>
<description>I don&#x26;#x27;t know if this is a precipice from which there is any return for the party of Pelosi and Reid. These are turncoats in the truest form of the word. These are people who are secretly &#x26;#x96; and, now, not so secretly &#x26;#x96; praying for, hoping for and acting in the best interests of victory for Osama bin Laden and his cohorts who would chop off their heads just as fast as they would chop off yours and mine. Imagine political power meaning so much to you that you would sell out your own country &#x26;#x96; perhaps even the...</description>
<author>Worldnetdaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1876916/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>America Responds To Tragedy (Melanie Morgan Mentions Free Republic Alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1875628/posts</link>
<description>The grand finale of this effort will be a giant pro-troop rally in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, Sept. 15, 2007. A coalition of pro-troop organizations will team up to amass a giant crowd of proud, patriotic Americans who will send a message that the American people support our troops and their missions, and we won&#x26;#x27;t stand for surrender to the terrorists. Here&#x26;#x27;s a list of just some of the participating organizations that have pledged their support of this effort: # Move America Forward # Gathering of Eagles # Eagles Up # FreeRepublic.com # Protest Warriors # Victory Caucus # OpposeReid.com...</description>
<author>Worldnetdaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1875628/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 05:44:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reid: Pull Troops or We Won&#x26;#x92;t Pay Them</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1869516/posts</link>
<description>If Majority Leader Harry Reid can&#x26;#x92;t start pulling troops out of Iraq, he doesn&#x26;#x92;t want to start paying them any more either. After an amendment to begin withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq within 120 days failed to receive the 60 votes needed to proceed, Reid set the entire defense authorization bill aside. By doing so, he shelved a 3.5 percent pay raise for all uniformed service personnel, $4 billion in equipment upgrades and a new program to treat traumatic brain injuries. To increase pressure on Republicans to support the measure, sponsored by Sen. Carl Levin (D.-Mich.) and Sen. Jack Reed...</description>
<author>TownHall.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1869516/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SURRENDER BY ANY OTHER NAME ...(Ann Coulter)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1756538/posts</link>
<description>How did we go from winning the war in Iraq to losing overnight? Was this decided by the same committee that changed &#x26;#x22;Peking&#x26;#x22; to &#x26;#x22;Beijing&#x26;#x22;? These word changes are a fortiori evidence that liberals are part of a conspiracy. On what date did &#x26;#x22;horrible&#x26;#x22; and &#x26;#x22;actress&#x26;#x22; vanish from the English language to be replaced with &#x26;#x22;horrific&#x26;#x22; and &#x26;#x22;actor&#x26;#x22;? Who decided that? (Meanwhile, I&#x26;#x27;m still writing &#x26;#x22;Puff Daddy&#x26;#x22; in my nightly dream journal when everybody else has started calling him &#x26;#x22;Diddy.&#x26;#x22;) When did &#x26;#x22;B.C.&#x26;#x22; (before Christ) and &#x26;#x22;A.D.&#x26;#x22; (anno Domini, &#x26;#x22;in the year of the Lord&#x26;#x22;) get replaced with &#x26;#x22;BCE&#x26;#x22; (before...</description>
<author>AnnCoulter.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1756538/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:21:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Treasonous] Incoming Chairmen Ready to Investigate</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1754672/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;The emerging plans to grill administration officials on the conduct of the war are part of a pledge for more aggressive congressional oversight on issues such as prewar intelligence, prisoner treatment at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, and the government&#x26;#x27;s use of warrantless wiretaps.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>The Washington Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1754672/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:42:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>To Democrats, It&#x26;#x92;s Still &#x26;#x93;The President&#x26;#x92;s Stupid,&#x26;#x94; Stupid</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1751039/posts</link>
<description>The Democrats must be feeling pretty good about things right now. They have waged a one-note campaign about the stupidity of George W. Bush since he won the 2000 election and their victory in the 2006 midterms finally, to them, validated their most passionate &#x26;#x93;position.&#x26;#x94; To the victors go the spoils so let&#x26;#x92;s see what the Democrats have reaped: Donald Rumsfeld is gone and Robert Gates has replaced him. This will result in not an iota of change in policy, as the secretary of defense is there to carry out the president&#x26;#x92;s vision, and the president is in no mood--thank...</description>
<author>ChronWatch</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1751039/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:47:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will you take my hand, or spit on it? ZOT it!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1735125/posts</link>
<description>Full disclosure, I&#x26;#x27;m a democrat, so get over it. I&#x26;#x27;m not here to insult you, and I&#x26;#x27;m certainly not here to gloat. I&#x26;#x27;m not here to trade barbs, undermine Free Republic, or infiltrate your ranks. I&#x26;#x27;ll be honest ? I disagree with most FReepers on almost every issue. So, why am I posting a new thread? Because I ? we ? need you. We at Democratic Underground and Daily Kos, and all of the lefty blogs you love to hate, and who love to hate you. We need you to acknowledge that if there&#x26;#x27;s one thing we&#x26;#x27;re learning about our...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1735125/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:53:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#x26;#x27;t Tread On Our Military (David Limbaugh: Hey Rats, Our Country&#x26;#x27;s Motto Is &#x26;#x22;Don&#x26;#x27;t Tread On Me&#x26;#x22;)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731336/posts</link>
<description>I honestly don&#x26;#x27;t believe Kerry was joking when he warned students they better stay in school lest they wind up in Iraq, nor do I believe, based on his initial reaction of indignation, that he was sincere in the apology that he was browbeaten into giving. Those questions aside, the more important point is that Kerry&#x26;#x27;s statement has had the effect of placing the Democrats&#x26;#x27; approach toward defense, the war on terror and the military under a microscope, and nothing could be worse for them &#x26;#x96; politically. That Kerry doesn&#x26;#x27;t share a high opinion of our military is born out...</description>
<author>Worldnetdaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731336/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Democrats Want America To Fail (Melanie Morgan On Teaching Republicans A Lesson Is Stupid Alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731332/posts</link>
<description>The comments made by Sen. John Kerry this week, disparaging the intelligence and abilities of U.S. troops serving in Iraq, were revolting. But they hardly were surprising. The latest remarks by Kerry follow those by his colleague, Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin in June 2005 when he compared American troops to &#x26;#x22;Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime &#x26;#x96; Pol Pot or others &#x26;#x96; that had no concern for human beings.&#x26;#x22; There are two motivations for cut-and-run Democrats to make outrageous comments like these. One is that they are so unprincipled in their quest for power that they will...</description>
<author>Worldnetdaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731332/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Its Official: Terrorists Are For The Democrats (The Jihad Wants You To Vote For Pelosi&#x26;#x26;Reid Alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731331/posts</link>
<description>There&#x26;#x27;s been a lot of speculation this campaign season about who our terrorist enemies might actually want to see win the elections next Tuesday. Thanks to the courageous and enterprising work of WND&#x26;#x27;s Jerusalem bureau chief, Aaron Klein, we don&#x26;#x27;t have to speculate anymore. Some of the senior leaders of terrorist organizations in the Middle East have spoken out &#x26;#x96; given their endorsements, if you will &#x26;#x96; on the record. And the winners of their support are &#x26;#x85; the Democrats. Why isn&#x26;#x27;t this surprising? Because deep in our hearts, we knew it all the time. It makes perfect sense, doesn&#x26;#x27;t...</description>
<author>Worldnetdaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731331/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thank You, John Kerry ( Joseph Farah Urges Americans To Vote To Defeat Democrats Alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1729738/posts</link>
<description>Thank you, John Kerry, for reminding me and the rest of America what an evil alternative you and your party represent for this country. I take a backseat to no one in my disgust for the failure of this president and the Republican Party in addressing some of the critical issues facing America &#x26;#x96; border security, controlled immigration, government spending, etc. So disenchanted was I &#x26;#x96; and I&#x26;#x27;m sure I speak for millions of other Americans &#x26;#x96; that I have been less than enthusiastic about next Tuesday&#x26;#x27;s election. I asked myself: Does it really make a difference which party governs?...</description>
<author>Worldnetdaily.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1729738/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:36:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party of the Rich: Limousine liberals are upgrading to Lear jets</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1728477/posts</link>
<description>The GOP has historically been the party of both Main Street and Wall Street. But over the past decade, the plutocrats have increasingly become Democrats. Billionaires for Bush are increasingly outnumbered by billionaires who hate Bush. And Republicans in limousines are being outpaced by Democrats in...</description>
<author>National Review Online</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1728477/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What Osama Wants</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1726409/posts</link>
<description>A total withdrawal from Iraq would play into the hands of the jihadist terrorists. As Osama bin Laden&#x26;#x92;s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, made clear shortly after 9/11 in his book &#x26;#x93;Knights Under the Prophet&#x26;#x92;s Banner,&#x26;#x94; Al Qaeda&#x26;#x92;s most important short-term strategic goal is to seize control of a state, or part of a state, somewhere in the Muslim world. &#x26;#x93;Confronting the enemies of Islam and launching jihad against them require a Muslim authority, established on a Muslim land,&#x26;#x94; he wrote. &#x26;#x93;Without achieving this goal our actions will mean nothing.&#x26;#x94; Such a jihadist state would be the ideal launching pad for future...</description>
<author>New York Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1726409/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Woodward: Laura Wanted Rumsfeld Out (barf alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1711290/posts</link>
<description>(CBS) Veteran Washington reporter Bob Woodward writes in his new book of fierce efforts inside the White House to get rid of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, a revelation that has caused a tremendous amount of concern at the White House. In Mike Wallace&#x26;#x92;s interview with Woodward, to be broadcast on 60 Minutes this Sunday, Oct. 1, at 7 p.m. ET/PT, the reporter also claims that Henry Kissinger is among those advising Mr. Bush. Woodward writes that several people inside the White House have pushed to oust Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. The ranks of those calling for Rumsfeld&#x26;#x92;s resignation included the...</description>
<author>CBS</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1711290/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vote for Your Favorite Dem Leader!</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698559/posts</link>
<description>Vote for Your Favorite Dem Leader!</description>
<author>America Weakly</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698559/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>War protestors assemble outside the Municipal Auditorium(2 dozen)
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698509/posts</link>
<description>Horn honks and catcalls were heard but, to their chagrin, war protestors assembled outside Municipal Auditorium Saturday generated limited public interest or participation. &#x26;#x93;I don&#x26;#x27;t know how we do it, but we need to get more people involved,&#x26;#x94; John Stanford, 81, told about two dozen fellow war opponents on hand. The fiery WWII vet has attended weekly protests on Main Plaza since just after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Five years later, turnout has dwindled from dozens to just a few each Thursday at 4 p.m., but Stanford&#x26;#x27;s anger over the war shows no sign of subsiding. &#x26;#x93;All of us have...</description>
<author>San Antonio Express-News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698509/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Sep 2006 19:32:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>John Kerry Speech - Real Security for America</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698457/posts</link>
<description>Real Security for All Americans As prepared for delivery. September 9, 2006 Faneuil Hall, Boston The war on terror that was brought home to the Casey family on a sunny autumn morning that suddenly turned into midnight five years ago, also brought home for all of humanity the stark reality that we are in a fateful contest between forces of evil and hate and the defenders of progress and hope. The outcome will determine whether our children live in freedom or fear. This is a clash between humanity&#x26;#x27;s best ideals and the darkness of superstition and oppression. And this is...</description>
<author>email</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698457/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Americans must confront their axis of idiots and the media</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1695262/posts</link>
<description>Jimmy Carter, you&#x26;#x92;re the father of the Islamic Nazi movement. You threw the Shah under the bus, welcomed the Ayatollah home and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage. You&#x26;#x92;re the Runner-in-Chief. Bill Clinton, you played &#x26;#x93;ring around the Lewinsky&#x26;#x94; while the terrorists were at war with us. You got us into a fight with them in Somalia, and then you ran from it. Your weak-willed responses embolden the killers. Each time you failed to respond adequately they grew bolder, until 9/11. John Kerry, dishonesty is your most prominent attribute....</description>
<author>BrookesNews.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1695262/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>History favors Democrats in Congress races</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1695766/posts</link>
<description>History favors Democrats in Congress races By Donald Lambro THE WASHINGTON TIMES The race for Congress and the nation&#x26;#x27;s governorships bolted from the Labor Day starting gate yesterday, with voter-preference polls tightening between the parties in an election that both sides said will be even closer by November. Historically, the party that holds the White House usually loses seats in Congress in a second term, and campaign strategists in both parties expected Democrats to make gains in the House and Senate -- while two top election forecasters predicted they will win 15 or more seats that will give them majority...</description>
<author>Washington Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1695766/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Not God&#x26;#x27;s Party (Barf alert)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1695347/posts</link>
<description>When Democratic Party leaders &#x26;#x22;found God in the 2004 exit polls,&#x26;#x22; as Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne Jr. likes to say, no one expected instant results. Many of the party&#x26;#x27;s early efforts to attract religious voters, after all, were scattershot and not a little awkward. No one knew quite what the &#x26;#x22;faith staffer&#x26;#x22;&#x26;#x97;a new breed of legislative aide&#x26;#x97;was supposed to do, and random-seeming insertions of Bible verses into floor speeches came off as Tourette&#x26;#x27;s syndrome for Democrats. In the longer run, though, the new focus on forming relationships with religious communities and voters has been the right move for a...</description>
<author>Slate</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1695347/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Democrats thinking ahead to possible victory this fall (hahahaha)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692782/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON - If Democrats win one or both houses of Congress in November&#x26;#x27;s elections, as polls suggest is increasingly likely, President Bush&#x26;#x27;s Washington will change dramatically. Democrats will press to get out of Iraq. They&#x26;#x27;ll mount investigations into the Bush administration&#x26;#x27;s record that could rival those of Presidents Nixon in Watergate and Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky affair. They&#x26;#x27;ll push a boatload of social-welfare legislation, such as raising the minimum wage, that reflects their pent-up priorities, while blocking the Republican agenda on social issues such as gay marriage, abortion and religion. Those are some of the top plans that Democrats...</description>
<author>MontereyHerald</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692782/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Democrats take fire at Rumsfeld</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692780/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON - Democrats chastised Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld for questioning the historical grasp of those who criticize the Bush administration&#x26;#x27;s handling of war, accusing him Wednesday of engaging in &#x26;#x22;dangerous business.&#x26;#x22; Several members of Congress had been urging Rumsfeld&#x26;#x27;s to resign long before he asserted to the American Legion on Tuesday that war opponents displayed the kind of thinking that delayed military action against Adolf Hitler&#x26;#x27;s Nazi Germany. Rumsfeld said the world faces &#x26;#x22;a new type of fascism.&#x26;#x22; And he warned against repeating the pre-World War II mistake of appeasement. His speech in Salt Lake City, in which he...</description>
<author>AP</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692780/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:05:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sen. Clinton Gets Face-Off With Rumsfeld</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1677091/posts</link>
<description>New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was headed for a public showdown Thursday with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld after he reversed course at the last minute and said he would testify before a Senate committee. Clinton, D-N.Y., had criticized Rumsfeld in a letter and at a hearing Wednesday for choosing not to appear at a public hearing before the Armed Services Committee on Thursday. Clinton is a member of the committee. The senator, who has not called for Rumsfeld&#x26;#x27;s resignation, as have other Democrats, was strikingly critical of his track record Wednesday. Before he reversed course, she wrote to...</description>
<author>AP</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1677091/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Real Agenda [NY Slimes Barf Alert]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1666569/posts</link>
<description>It is only now, nearly five years after Sept. 11, that the full picture of the Bush administration&#x26;#x92;s response to the terror attacks is becoming clear. Much of it, we can see now, had far less to do with fighting Osama bin Laden than with expanding presidential power. Over and over again, the same pattern emerges: Given a choice between following the rules or carving out some unprecedented executive power, the White House always shrugged off the legal constraints. Even when the only challenge was to get required approval from an ever-cooperative Congress, the president and his staff preferred to...</description>
<author>NY Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1666569/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>