<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: prewarintelligence</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/prewarintelligence/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:18:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The &#x26;#x22;Saddam Had Nothing to Do with Bin Laden&#x26;#x22; Canard</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2088877/posts</link>
<description>The Democrats&#x26;#x27; essential argument on Iraq is that Saddam had absolutely nothing to do with Bin Laden. But what this argument overlooks is that Saddam offered Bin Laden safe haven in Iraq in late 1998 and/or 1999 -- the very timeframe during which 9/11 attacks were being planned. In fact, that was the conclusion of the 9/11 Commission Report, although it was all but ignored by the mainstream media.</description>
<author>The Neocon Latina</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2088877/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bush wasn&#x26;#x27;t the only one who believed Iraq had nukes...</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2083734/posts</link>
<description>Bush wasn&#x26;#x27;t the only one who believed Iraq had nukes...</description>
<author>YouTube</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2083734/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I want to find a concise summary of justifications for invading Iraq (Vanity)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2077493/posts</link>
<description>I want to provide my spouse with a good, cocktail-party-length explanation for why we invaded Iraq. She wants to be better informed and more conversant, and while I can give her the 1/2 hour version, I need it distilled down to about 2 or 3 minutes. Otherwise, she will be lecturing her friends (which she won&#x26;#x27;t do). Care to help? To whatever the FR forum provides, I will add (because I never hear anyone else say it) that Hussein declared that he had extensive WMD after Desert Storm. He actually listed them. He later told the UN that he destroyed...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2077493/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Sep 2008 18:04:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe Biden 2008 - You Know Saddam was a threat to the US and could have hidden or rebuilt his WMDs</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2071885/posts</link>
<description>Meet the Press interview from earlier this year.</description>
<author>williamamos.wordpress.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2071885/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Flashback to 1998: U.S. Says Iraq Aided Production Of Chemical Weapons in Sudan (Iraq, WMD&#x26;#x27;s, Osama)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2067717/posts</link>
<description>The United States believes that senior Iraqi scientists were helping to produce elements of the nerve agent VX at the factory in the Sudan that American cruise missiles destroyed last week, Administration and intelligence officials said today. The evidence cited today as justification for the attack consisted of a soil sample secretly obtained months ago outside the factory, the Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries, the officials said. Publicly, the Administration has refused to describe its evidence in any detail, or to say how it was obtained. ... The connection with Iraq emerged as a key part of the Administration&#x26;#x27;s argument for why...</description>
<author>New York Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2067717/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Video- FReeper Interview Joseph Shahda translator of captured Iraqi documents: Part 1 and part 2</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2063313/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;This is an interview conducted by freeper Chris Donohoe (April15bendovr) with freeper Joseph Shahda (jveritas) about Saddam regime WMD programs and their relations to terrorism based on his translations of some captured Saddam regime documents. Also he talks about some Al Qaeda-captured documents. On the WMD issue, Joseph Shahda reveals that the documents clearly indicate that the Saddam regime opted to build the precursors required to make chemical weapons rather than the final chemical weapons product. They did this for two reasons. First because these precursors are dual-use materials and Saddam could always claim that they are used for civilian...</description>
<author>Townhall</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2063313/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tenet statement on Suskind</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2056980/posts</link>
<description>Snip-- CIA director George J. Tenet regarding the publication of &#x26;#x93;The Way of the World,&#x26;#x94; by Ron Suskind: ... the book is seriously flawed. One supposed &#x26;#x93;news&#x26;#x94; item from the book apparently asserts that British intelligence had a high-placed Iraqi source who convincingly told them before the start of the war that Iraq had no WMD and that the British relayed this to the United States. As Mr. Suskind tells it, the White House directed (and CIA allegedly went along with) burying that information so that the war could go ahead as planned. This is a complete fabrication. In fact,...</description>
<author>Politico</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2056980/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:24:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Book says White House ordered forgery</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2056952/posts</link>
<description>A new book by the author Ron Suskind claims that the White House ordered the CIA to forge a back-dated, handwritten letter from the head of Iraqi intelligence to Saddam Hussein. Suskind writes in &#x26;#x93;The Way of the World,&#x26;#x94; to be published Tuesday, that the alleged forgery &#x26;#x96; adamantly denied by the White House &#x26;#x96; was designed to portray a false link between Hussein&#x26;#x92;s regime and al Qaeda as a justification for the Iraq war. The author also claims that the Bush administration had information from a top Iraqi intelligence official &#x26;#x93;that there were no weapons of mass destruction in...</description>
<author>Politico</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2056952/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>President Bush was Right, As Evidenced by This Month&#x26;#x92;s Sale of Saddam&#x26;#x92;s Uranium and More</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2044643/posts</link>
<description>If anyone doubts the need to have ousted Saddam, a news release in the past few days should put such doubts to rest. The report is that the US has sold 550 tons of yellowcake uranium that had been found in Iraq to Cameco, a Canadian company. The uranium will now be used as fuel and poses no severe risk if properly stored and sealed. While the report contains no new information per se, it brings to the forefront pertinent facts that, while widely available, were also widely ignored. But when analyzing military and security matters, we can ill afford...</description>
<author>Canada Free Press</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2044643/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why Iraq Was Inevitable</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2043037/posts</link>
<description> &#x26;#xA0;Why Iraq Was Inevitable Arthur Herman July/August 2008 E-mail This Article to a Friend Subject: Why Iraq Was Inevitable Yes, I would like to receive periodic updates and information via e-mail from Commentary. Recipient Addresses: Separate each address with a comma. Your E-mail Address: Message: E-mail This Article to a Friend Thank You A link to &#x26;#x22;Why Iraq Was Inevitable&#x26;#x22; has been emailed to your friends. Most E-mailed articles: The Mind of Seymour HershWhy Iraq Was InevitableDictatorships &#x26;#x26; Double StandardsAre We Winning the War on Terror?Hugo Ch&#x26;#xE1;vez&#x26;#x27;s Jewish Problem According to an April 2008 poll in U.S. News &#x26;#x26;...</description>
<author>Commentary</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2043037/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:21:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The 550 Tons of Yellowcake</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042474/posts</link>
<description>For years, the media and Democrats have sold the public an understanding that Gerorge W. Bush fabricated a story that Saddam Hussein had a WMD program in order to justify invading Iraq, which invasion then becomes &#x26;#x22;based on a lie.&#x26;#x22; About 550 metric tons of yellowcake concentrated uranium were recently shipped out of Iraq. It had been part of Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x27;s nuclear program. That much was recently reported by the Associated Press . I wrote an article for American Thinker that commented on that story the day it appeared. That yellowcake stockpile pre-dated 1991, and had been under the UN&#x26;#x27;s...</description>
<author>American Thinker</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042474/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saddam&#x26;#x27;s Nukes</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042154/posts</link>
<description>Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn&#x26;#x27;t fit the media&#x26;#x27;s neat story line that Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x27;s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003.</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042154/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saddam&#x26;#x27;s Nukes</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042148/posts</link>
<description>WMD: Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn&#x26;#x27;t fit the media&#x26;#x27;s neat story line that Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x27;s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003. It&#x26;#x27;s a little known fact that, after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. found massive amounts of uranium yellowcake, the stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel, at a facility in Tuwaitha outside of Baghdad. In recent weeks, the U.S. secretly has helped the Iraqi government ship it all to Canada, where it was bought by a Canadian...</description>
<author>Investor&#x27;s Business Daily</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042148/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defense Personnel Transport Uranium Ore Out of Iraq (What was that lie again about no YellowCake?)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042113/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON, July 7, 2008 &#x26;#x96; Defense personnel have completed the transfer of 550 metric tons of Iraqi uranium ore to Canada, Defense officials said here today. The Iraqi government asked the United States to help transfer the yellowcake -- as the ore is known -- from Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center near Baghdad to its buyer in Canada, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said today. The military dubbed the movement Operation McCall, and it ended July 5. DoD&#x26;#x92;s portion of the operation involved the transfer of the ore. Yellowcake is a uranium ore that can be processed to become nuclear fuel. State...</description>
<author>American Forces Press Service</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042113/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Important WMD Reminder on Page 6</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2041999/posts</link>
<description>It was on page 6 of my daily newspaper that an important reminder of Saddam&#x26;#x92;s capacity for WMD was published: the movement in secrecy of 550 tons of &#x26;#x91;yellowcake&#x26;#x92; uranium from Iraq to Canada on July 5. 550 tons! Can they really continue their lies about no possibility of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Saddam&#x26;#x92;s Iraq? I know they will try to spin this, but can any honest person now still maintain that Saddam was not able to reconstitute his nuclear weapons&#x26;#x92; capability left to his own devices? Can any honest person continue the nonsense of &#x26;#x93;Bush lied&#x26;#x94;? Although U.N....</description>
<author>From Sea to Shining Sea</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2041999/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:51:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Iraq removes uranium left over from Saddam era (Fear Not People! Saddam Had No WMD! /s)
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041881/posts</link>
<description>BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq&#x26;#x27;s government has removed 550 tonnes of natural uranium left over from Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x27;s era and sold it to a Canadian company, government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said. The uranium, called yellowcake, had been stored in a compound at Tuwaitha, south of Baghdad, which was once the centre of Saddam&#x26;#x27;s nuclear weapons programme. A U.S. embassy spokeswoman confirmed the U.S. military helped safely ship the uranium out of the country. &#x26;#x22;The Iraqi government decided to get rid of the uranium, which amounted to 550 tonnes, because of its potentially harmful affects on Iraq and the region and because...</description>
<author>Reuters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041881/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Niger Uranium - Why the Forgeries</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041809/posts</link>
<description>Got this off some blog a while back, but the person makes some interesting observations. His central point is that, since the forgeries were such obvious fakes, were they &#x26;#x27;planted&#x26;#x27; specifically to be exposed as frauds? (i.e., not to actually convince anyone)... July 13, 2003Niger Uranium - Why the Forgeries During the lead-up to the Iraq war, documents surfaced which purported to show an attempt by Saddam to buy Niger uranium. These documents turned out to be forgeries. Nobody is asking: Why were these forgeries made and who made them?They certainly served a purpose: they cast serious doubt on any...</description>
<author>Useful Fools</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041809/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>3500 Barrels Of Yellowcake Uranium Transported From Iraq To Canada</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2041749/posts</link>
<description>550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium worth millions of dollars were shipped out of Iraq to Canada. The uranium was transported in 37 military flights in 3,500 secure barrels. Though the yellowcake had been in Iraq for some time and had been discovered by the United Nations inspectors after the first Gulf War in during the Senior President Bush&#x26;#x92;s presidency the material has finally been removed. This is a fact the Democrats don&#x26;#x92;t want publicized and the MSM will oblige.</description>
<author>Stuck On Stupid</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2041749/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Disconfirmations Disconfirmed: Saddam Had Nuke Program</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041598/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;The media have been telling us for years that Saddam had no WMD, so &#x26;#x22;Bush&#x26;#x27;s War&#x26;#x22;: was based on a &#x26;#x22;lie.&#x26;#x22; And those who believed Saddam did have WMD or WMD programs were delusional or worse.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;And multiple devices that could be used in a nuclear weapon.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>American Thinker</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041598/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>President Bush exonerated of &#x26;#x27;misleading statements&#x26;#x27; leading to Iraq war
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041581/posts</link>
<description> Return to the Article July 06, 2008President Bush exonerated of &#x26;#x27;misleading statements&#x26;#x27; leading to Iraq warVincent Gioia In 2003 newspaper columnist Robert Novak wrote his now infamous &#x26;#x22;Mission to Niger&#x26;#x22; (published on July 14, 2003) in which he mentioned an allegedly failed attempt by Saddam Hussein to purchase uranium reported by the husband of a (not so) secret CIA agent, Valerie Plame, and mentioned her by name. Mrs. Wilson&#x26;#x27;s husband, former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, stated in a number of interviews and in subsequent writings (as listed in his 2004 memoir The Politics of Truth) that members of President...</description>
<author>American Thinker</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041581/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:16:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uranium Stockpile Removed From Iraq in Secret U.S. Mission.&#x26;#x22;
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041332/posts</link>
<description>For all those naysayers about Saddam not having WMDs, I just found this headline: &#x26;#x22;Report: Uranium Stockpile Removed From Iraq in Secret U.S. Mission.&#x26;#x22; ***** Tell me what Saddam was going to do with 550 metric tons of yellowcake. He wasn&#x26;#x27;t going to use it for lawn fertilizer.</description>
<author>The Chattanooga</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041332/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jul 2008 04:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Secret U.S. mission hauls (&#x26;#x27;yellowcake&#x26;#x27;) uranium from Iraq</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041287/posts</link>
<description>Link only</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041287/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Jul 2008 01:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why Iraq Was Inevitable</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2037540/posts</link>
<description>In this light&#x26;#x97;that is, in light of what was actually known at the time about Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x92;s actions and intentions, and in light of what was added to our knowledge through his post-capture interrogations by the FBI&#x26;#x97;the decision to go to war takes on a very different character. The story that emerges is of a choice not only carefully weighed and deliberately arrived at but, in the circumstances, the one moral choice that any American President could make. Had, moreover, Bush failed to act when he did, the consequences could have been truly disastrous. The next American President would surely...</description>
<author>Commentary Magazine</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2037540/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:55:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Experts Warn of Iraq&#x26;#x27;s Improved Weapons</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/813165/posts</link>
<description>WASHINGTON (AP) - Biological weapons are among the few capabilities Iraq has improved since being defeated by a U.S.-led coalition in the 1991 Persian Gulf War, government officials say. Working under the noses of U.N. inspectors from 1991 to 1998, President Saddam Hussein&#x26;#x27;s government probably developed mobile germ warfare labs and processes to create dried bacteria for deadlier and longer-lasting weapons, U.S. officials and former weapons inspectors say. Pentagon officials say Iraq&#x26;#x27;s biological arsenal could do the most damage, physical and psychological, if it were used to retaliate immediately against a U.S. invasion rather than in later stages of battle....</description>
<author>Assoc. Press</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/813165/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2002 02:59:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In 1999, Saddam Linked To Al Qaeda ( January 1999 ABC News special )</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2036803/posts</link>
<description>One of our readers (Vince1974) reminded us of this January 1999 ABC News special on the ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda posted last year on Powerline.**************************See the Blog for the Video......***********************************When a liberal claims there never was any evidence of a connection between Saddam and al-Qaeda (like coordinating attacks in 2002 with AQ number 2 Ayman Zawahiri) don&#x26;#x92;t believe them. They simply are exposing a deadly ignorance. 3 Responses to &#x26;#x93;In 1999, Saddam Linked To Al Qaeda&#x26;#x94;</description>
<author>Strata Sphere</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2036803/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>