<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: prop98</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/prop98/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:52:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The mystery of Prop. 98 (California Educational Funding)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2044792/posts</link>
<description>What accounts for the respect given to the education funding guarantee? For one thing, Proposition 98, despite all its problems, has served the useful purpose of enshrining the most important public policy issue -- education -- as the state government&#x26;#x27;s top priority. Second, there&#x26;#x27;s widespread fear on the part of state politicians of challenging the teachers union and the rest of the education lobby. But there&#x26;#x27;s still another story behind the silence: The multiple formulas of Proposition 98 are so complex that they&#x26;#x27;re difficult to understand, even more difficult to explain -- and, for those who want to know how...</description>
<author>LA Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2044792/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CA: Proponents of Prop. 98 Respond to Election Outcome (re: Eminent Domain Abuse)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2026219/posts</link>
<description>Proponents of Prop. 98 Respond to Election Outcome Vow to Work on Legislative Solution to End Eminent Domain Abuse Sacramento, CA - Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, issued the following statement on the outcome of the Election. &#x26;#x22;Since the U.S. Supreme Court&#x26;#x27;s Kelo v. New London decision in 2005 more than 40 states have passed reforms that would prohibit government from profiting by seizing private property and giving it to politically connected developers. Prop. 98 was the only measure on the ballot that addressed the Kelo decision by providing comprehensive protections to all private property and...</description>
<author>Yes On Prop 98 website</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2026219/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Voters cranky as economy sours</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2025336/posts</link>
<description>As California voters go to the polls today in a low-turnout primary, those who bother to show up aren&#x26;#x27;t likely to be happy. With a teetering economy and an unpopular war, only 17 percent of voters in a new state Field Poll believe the country is headed in the right direction, the most dour view in 16 years. With state government facing burgeoning debts and lawmakers debating sweeping cuts or tax hikes, only 23 percent believe California is on the right track, the worst rating in five years. &#x26;#x22;It is hard to feel kindly about elected representatives and politicians in...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2025336/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Props 98 or 99 - Look!  Over There! @ CaliforniaRepublic</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024626/posts</link>
<description>Sleight-of-hand relies heavily on misdirection and distraction. The Proposition 99 campaign tries the same trick on voters, attempting to get Californians to look only where it wants, while ignoring the most important issues in eminent domain reform. Proposition 99 was crafted because Proposition 98 had qualified for the ballot with a good chance of winning, backed by many documented abuses of emotionally appealing &#x26;#x93;little guys&#x26;#x94; steamrollered by the politically powerful&#x26;#x97;i.e., to defend the beneficiaries of eminent domain abuse against real reform. 99 does nothing to restrict eminent domain to justifiable public uses. It &#x26;#x93;protects&#x26;#x94; only owner-occupied primary residences, while undermining...</description>
<author>CaliforniaRepublic</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024626/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2008 03:52:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Props 98 or 99 Rent Control Ruse @ CaliforniaRepublic</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024624/posts</link>
<description>The June ballot is bringing rent control back into the spotlight. Proposition 98 would protect all Californians from abuses of eminent domain and phase out rent control. Proposition 99 is a decoy measure which would override Proposition 98 if it attracted more votes, written by beneficiaries of eminent domain abuse, that the Legislative Analyst concluded involved so little reform that it &#x26;#x93;is not likely to significantly alter current land acquisition practices.&#x26;#x94; Proposition 99 offers precious little protection. It wouldn&#x26;#x92;t protect farmland, churches, businesses or rental properties from eminent domain abuse. It wouldn&#x26;#x92;t restrict the almost unlimited purposes for which eminent...</description>
<author>CaliforniaRepublic</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024624/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2008 03:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Props 98 or 99 - Reform or Reform Killer? new @ CaliforniaRepublic</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024621/posts</link>
<description>Protecting Californians from eminent domain abuses headlines our June ballot. There are two Propositions--98 and 99--that address the issue. However, both are portrayed as real reform by backers and as misleading scams by opponents, making it hard for voters to sort through the assertions. Given both propositions&#x26;#x92; backers claim they intend to rein in government eminent domain abuses at the expense of property owners, the best approach is to ask which &#x26;#x93;reforms&#x26;#x94; would be most effective at restricting them. If the intent is to limit abuses, would we want to protect owners of all property&#x26;#x97;homes, farms, churches, businesses and rental...</description>
<author>CaliforniaRepublic</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024621/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2008 03:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>{Eminent Domain/Rent Control} Prop. 98 failing, 99 a toss-up - Field Poll</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2022966/posts</link>
<description>In the battle over two state propositions on Tuesday&#x26;#x27;s ballot that would restrict government seizure of private property, nearly a majority of California voters support the more limited Proposition 99 while giving thumbs down to Proposition 98, which would abolish rent control, according to a Field Poll released today. A survey of 660 likely voters conducted May 17-26 found 48 percent favoring Prop. 99, with 30 percent opposed and 22 percent undecided, according to the poll results. Those supporting Prop. 98 stood at 33 percent, with 43 percent opposed and 24 percent undecided. Field Poll Director Mark DiCamillo said he&#x26;#x27;d...</description>
<author>San Francisco Chronicle</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2022966/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Editorial: Reject both Proposition 98 and Proposition 99
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2019703/posts</link>
<description>Both would load up the state constitution to attack a problem that just doesn&#x26;#x27;t exist - It&#x26;#x27;s back. Yet another initiative &#x26;#x96; Proposition 98 &#x26;#x96; is on the ballot masquerading as &#x26;#x22;eminent domain&#x26;#x22; reform and trying to scare people with the prospect that their homes might be &#x26;#x22;taken&#x26;#x22; by the government.Yet Proposition 98 is really about a sweeping agenda to lard up the California Constitution to end forever the ability of local governments to enact rent control or affordable housing ordinances, to set rules that set liquor store hours or to require developers to pay fees to build schools.In Sacramento,...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2019703/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes on 98, No on 99</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018646/posts</link>
<description>In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Connecticut city&#x26;#x27;s right to seize through eminent domain the waterfront homes of long-time residents for private development. The court held that, like the construction of schools and roads, economic development itself constitutes a &#x26;#x22;public use&#x26;#x22; under the Fifth Amendment. Both liberals and conservatives were outraged. As dissenting Justice Sandra Day O&#x26;#x27;Connor wrote, &#x26;#x22;The specter of condemnation hangs over all property. Nothing is to prevent the state from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory.&#x26;#x22; Some 40 states responded by passing...</description>
<author>San Francisco Chronicle</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018646/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:02:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#x26;#x27;t Count on Prop. 99</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018185/posts</link>
<description>The U.S. Supreme Court created a huge political backlash when it ruled that local governments could use eminent domain to seize private property and transfer it to other private owners for &#x26;#x22;economic development.&#x26;#x22; Since the Kelo ruling in 2005, 42 states have enacted limitations on eminent domain &#x26;#x97; not always effective ones. But like lawmakers in many other states, some California officials are trying to block real eminent domain reform. On June 3, Californians will vote on Proposition 99, a ballot initiative sponsored by groups representing cities, counties, redevelopment agencies and other pro-condemnation interests. It purports to protect property rights...</description>
<author>The Cato Institute</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018185/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:03:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ballot battle is all about the money</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018089/posts</link>
<description>Both sides allege tainted funds in duel over Propositions 98, 99. In the June 3 ballot showdown over governments&#x26;#x27; power to take private property, both sides agree on one thing: Their opponents rely on tainted money that reveals their true motives.One side gets much of its money from landlords and mobile home park owners that stand to benefit from Proposition 98&#x26;#x27;s ban on rent control.The other side opposes Proposition 98 and supports a far less restrictive initiative, Proposition 99. Much of its campaign money comes from local government groups that resist major curbs on their use of eminent domain. Both...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018089/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Peter Schrag: Initiative-industrial complex: Stalking rent control</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2015885/posts</link>
<description>Thirty years ago, when Howard Jarvis drove Proposition 13 to a lopsided victory at the California polls, the old curmudgeon expended a fair amount of invective trying to prove that he was a real populist and not just a running dog for the Los Angeles Apartment Owners Association. He was in fact employed by the apartment owners and his campaign was based there. But his argument was borne out by the fact that his shrewd direct mail campaign generated many thousands of small contributions from elderly homeowners fearful that they&#x26;#x27;d lose those homes to escalating property taxes. Many became members...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2015885/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Calif. ballot measures address property-right concerns</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2013799/posts</link>
<description>SACRAMENTO, (AP) -- Barbara Gonzel has lived in a two-bedroom duplex in northwest Los Angeles for 13 years, protected from the region&#x26;#x27;s soaring housing costs by the city&#x26;#x27;s rent-control ordinance. That could change, and Gonzel could find herself paying hundreds of dollars more in monthly rent, if voters approve one of two property rights initiatives on the June 3 primary election ballot. One of the measures, Proposition 98, is supported by landlords and business owners and contains a provision that would phase out local rent-control ordinances for apartments, duplexes and mobile home parks. It also would eliminate tenant-protection rules that...</description>
<author>AP via SFGate</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2013799/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 23:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Differing views on measure to end rent control</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2012468/posts</link>
<description>Hundreds are expected to descend on San Francisco&#x26;#x27;s Civic Center Plaza today to protest a June ballot measure that would end rent control across the state and, many argue, would push thousands of people from their homes through evictions or rising prices. But the measure&#x26;#x27;s backers say rent control is a failure and that approval by voters ultimately would mean more apartments and lower rents. Proposition 98 was written as a restriction on eminent domain that would prohibit the government from taking property for the benefit of a private party. Opponents say it would do far more: define &#x26;#x22;private&#x26;#x22; and...</description>
<author>San Francisco Chronicle</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2012468/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2008 14:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CA: Big Government types and Prop 99</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2009014/posts</link>
<description>Big Government types and Prop 99 All you really need to know about the two eminent domain propositions on the June 3 ballot, 98 and 99, is that Proposition 99 is being touted by politicians and other government types as the real solution to government intrusion on private property ownership. Among them are the usual suspects, including California Sen. Dianne Feinstein and California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, both of whom believe in Big Government, and both of whom describe Proposition 98 as a hindrance to solving such state problems as water quality and supply. Feinstein, in a release at the end...</description>
<author>Victorville Daily Press</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2009014/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The View - Yes on Prop. 98/No on Prop. 99 - The Battle to Restore Private Property Rights</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2009013/posts</link>
<description>The View - Yes on Prop. 98/No on Prop. 99 - The Battle to Restore Private Property Rights Since California has failed to join more than 40 states in reforming its eminent domain statutes, a diverse group of business, farm and taxpayer organizations have taken a leading role in restoring private property protections for California business property by qualifying Proposition 98, the California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act, for the June 2008 ballot. It is well documented that business owners are the most common victims of eminent domain abuse because of local governments&#x26;#x27; appetite for sales tax revenue to...</description>
<author>California Real Estate Journal</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2009013/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:57:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Schwarzenegger opposes eminent domain measure
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2007155/posts</link>
<description>Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced Friday that he will oppose an initiative on the June 3 ballot to restrict governments&#x26;#x27; ability to use eminent domain to seize property. Schwarzenegger said he was opposing Proposition 98 in part because it might block the building of water projects crucial to farmers and residential users. &#x26;#x22;Eminent domain is an issue worth addressing,&#x26;#x22; Schwarzenegger said in a prepared statement. &#x26;#x22;However Proposition 98 would undermine California&#x26;#x27;s ability to improve our infrastructure, including our water delivery and storage.&#x26;#x22; ... Proposition 98 bans the use of eminent domain to transfer property to a private party, and would phase...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2007155/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Editorial: Prop. 98 protects private property rights</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2004935/posts</link>
<description>Editorial: Prop. 98 protects private property rights June election is coming: Vote yes on Prop. 98, for real eminent-domain reform, and no on Prop. 99, which is designed to stop such reform. The campaigns for Propositions 98 and 99 on the June 3 ballot are getting heated, and it would be no surprise if most California voters are confused by the two eminent domain-related measures. As often occurs in political campaigns, one side or the other misrepresents the purpose of its initiative. For instance, Prop. 99&#x26;#x27;s supporters claim that the measure will stop eminent domain abuses that have become well...</description>
<author>Orange County Register</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2004935/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mobile home park residents rally against measure banning rent control</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1990740/posts</link>
<description>A serene landscape of oaks, grassy swales and lazy creeks in Citrus Heights provides an unlikely backdrop for a nasty statewide battle over one of the last bastions of affordable housing.Two years ago, many of the residents of Lakeview Village Mobile Home Park fought for a local ordinance that would cap rents in the 500-home Citrus Heights park as new owners imposed a steep increase.They lost. Now a statewide initiative on the June ballot would make it impossible for Citrus Heights, or any other jurisdiction in California, to impose rent controls on apartments or mobile home parks. The stated purpose...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1990740/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:56:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dan Walters: Low turnout expected in California&#x26;#x27;s June primary</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1990716/posts</link>
<description>One consequence of the state&#x26;#x27;s first February presidential primary election &#x26;#x96; unintended, perhaps, but a consequence nevertheless &#x26;#x96; will almost certainly be an extraordinarily low voter turnout for the June 3 regular primary. Primary elections generally see subpar turnouts, in part because independents have almost no motivation to vote. But June&#x26;#x27;s election will be especially devoid of motivation &#x26;#x96; no presidential contest or any other statewide candidate duel, only a handful of meaningful legislative or congressional primaries and just two statewide ballot measures, both of which deal with the very arcane issue of property seizures by local governments. We&#x26;#x27;ll have...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1990716/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dan Walters: Budget gap spotlights public school funding</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983866/posts</link>
<description>Inevitably, every debate about California&#x26;#x27;s deficit-riddled budget morphs into a fight over how much money we should be spending on public schools and how that money should be spent. It&#x26;#x27;s happening again as the Capitol&#x26;#x27;s political figures wrestle with a deficit that&#x26;#x27;s worse than usual and as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposes &#x26;#x96; semiseriously &#x26;#x96; a $4.8 billion whack in state aid to schools. This month, as required by law, local schools are sending tentative layoff notices to thousands of teachers who would lose their jobs under the governor&#x26;#x27;s proposals. Democratic legislative leaders are insisting that they will absolutely refuse to...</description>
<author>Sacramento Bee</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983866/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Governments&#x26;#x27; ability to seize property at stake on June ballot[CA][Eminent Domain][Prop 98 &#x26;#x26; 99]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1979005/posts</link>
<description>While most developers were eyeing property in suburbia in the 1980s, Moe Mohanna was staking his claim on some rundown buildings a few blocks from the state Capitol. The Sacramento landlord began fixing up nine storefronts along K Street in an area frequented by vagrants. His properties are at the heart of the city&#x26;#x27;s plans to revitalize its business district. After years of failed negotiations to rehabilitate, exchange or buy Mohanna&#x26;#x27;s buildings&#x26;#x97;which the city says violate health and safety codes&#x26;#x97;Sacramento&#x26;#x27;s redevelopment agency recently moved to condemn and seize his property. &#x26;#x22;We&#x26;#x27;ve done all of these things, and they are chasing...</description>
<author>AP</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1979005/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2008 01:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CA: Proposition 98 vs 99: Competing Initiatives regarding Property Rights</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978816/posts</link>
<description> Propositions that are on the June 3, 2008 Statewide Direct Primary Election Ballot Initiative Constitutional AmendmentProposition 98 1248. Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Constitutional Amendment. Proponents: Doug Mosebar, Jon Coupal and Jim Nielsen Bars state and local governments from condemning or damaging private property for private uses. Prohibits rent control and similar measures. Prohibits deference to government in property rights cases. Defines &#x26;#x93;just compensation.&#x26;#x94; Requires an award of attorneys fees and costs if a property owner obtains a judgment for more than the amount offered by the government. Requires government to offer to original owner of condemned property...</description>
<author>California Secretary of State</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978816/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CA: School nightmare looms (facing mid-year spending cuts of $1 billion or more)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942651/posts</link>
<description>SACRAMENTO -- California schools could face painful mid-year spending cuts of a $1 billion or more as a weakening economy lowers tax revenue forecasts, reducing the Proposition 98 school-funding guarantee. Non-partisan Legislative Analyst Liz Hill said last month that school funding in the current year was about $400 million above the Proposition 98 guarantee. She suggested that lawmakers look at cutting the &#x26;#x22;over-appropriation&#x26;#x22; as one way to begin closing a huge budget shortfall now reportedly estimated by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to be about $14 billion over the next 18 months. Hill&#x26;#x27;s estimate was made when the shortfall was believed to...</description>
<author>San Diego Union - Tribune</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942651/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Schwarzenegger to push his &#x26;#x27;good ideas&#x26;#x27; - won&#x26;#x27;t revisit union dues, education funding</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718265/posts</link>
<description>Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vowed Wednesday to pursue some of the &#x26;#x22;good ideas&#x26;#x22; rejected by voters in last year&#x26;#x27;s special election but promised that he will not revive controversial efforts to control union dues or change the state&#x26;#x27;s voter-approved education funding formula. In a wide-ranging interview with The Chronicle&#x26;#x27;s editorial board Wednesday, Schwarzenegger also said he did not regret stumping for President Bush in 2004, and he denied assertions that he has been inconsistent as governor and veered from a conservative agenda in 2005 to a Democratic one this year. When asked how he would describe himself, he said he was...</description>
<author>San Francisco Chronicle</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718265/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:04:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>