Keyword: reidsnuclearreaction

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • LIVE Senate Filibuster Thread ~ Day 4

    05/23/2005 8:14:11 AM PDT · by OXENinFLA · 2,343 replies · 54,840+ views
    C-span ^ | 5-23-05 | US Senate
    Senate Debate on Nominations Today the Senate resumes debate on the nomination of Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen to the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. The Senate will conduct its first roll call vote of the week at 5:30pm. Follow the C-SPAN networks & C-SPAN Radio for the debate on Senate rules & judicial nominations. MON., 11:30AM ET, C-SPAN2 -------------------- ORDERS FOR MONDAY, MAY 23, 2005 -- (Senate - May 20, 2005) [Page: S5714] GPO's PDF --- Mr. CORNYN. I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate completes its business today, it stand in adjournment until 11:30 a.m....
  • Why Democrats Are The Radicals On Filibustering

    05/23/2005 8:58:22 AM PDT · by rmgatto · 15 replies · 847+ views
    Captain's Quarters ^ | 5-23-05 | Captain Ed
    Byrd changed the filibuster rules four times during his tenure as Majority Leader, abetted in at least one instance by former VP Walter Mondale, who now writes silly op-eds about the danger of such maneuvers to the Republic... No one expects the GOP to eliminate the filibuster for legislation. Legislation originates within the Senate and is therefore an internal process, and the Senate is well within its power to regulate debate on its own terms for that purpose. However, the confirmation of executive appointments and treaties involve the power and responsibilities of the executive branch, and the Senate does not...
  • "Democrats Filibuster - Women and Minorities Hardest Hit" (lib media's glory days gone forever!)

    05/23/2005 12:42:32 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 4 replies · 1,005+ views
    THE RANT.US ^ | MAY 23, 2005 | MR. SMITH
    One of Rush Limbaugh's favorite jokes is about how God has a press conference to warn humanity that the world will end the next day. The headlines vary according to style. New York Daily News has "We're Gone!" in huge type. Wall Street Journal says "Markets to Close Early." Washington Post runs "World Will End - Women and Minorities Hardest hit." For decades, liberal activists and Democrat pollsters have finely tuned their rhetoric through focus groups, polls and so forth and it's curious that they don't see what's looming for them on the election horizon. Contrary to their protestations, their...
  • Breaking the Filibuster is Not Enough

    05/23/2005 8:07:26 AM PDT · by RightConservative · 2 replies · 222+ views ^ | 05-23-05 | Justin Darr
    Once in America the liberal agenda and its radical programs advanced unopposed. Liberals held sway over the elected branches of government, and over the course of decades, infected the judiciary system with cadres of like minded liberals who held their goals of forcibly restructuring American society superior to the welfare and will of the people. Faced with an uncaring and unresponsive government, America’s conservative majority turned to the only tool left for them to affect government change, the ballot box. Now, as the Conservative Revolution has swept Republicans into majority positions in the Federal and preponderance of state governments, liberals...
  • Not Activist Enough: The Left's real problem with Priscilla Owen.

    05/23/2005 1:18:51 PM PDT · by xsysmgr · 2 replies · 771+ views
    National Review Online ^ | May 23, 2005 | Jonathan H. Adler
    Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen has become one of President Bush’s most controversial judicial nominees. First nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit over four years ago, she has been blocked by Senate Democrats who charge she is a “judicial activist” and too extreme for the federal bench. An exceptionally qualified judge, she is now at the center of the fight to end the judicial filibuster. Barring a last-minute deal, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist will use the vote on her nomination to force a change in Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster of...
  • Frist schedules Senate ‘all-nighter’ on judges

    05/23/2005 11:10:50 AM PDT · by QQQQQ · 111 replies · 6,601+ views
    MSNBC ^ | May 23, 2005 | Tom Curry
    Cots were brought into the Capitol Monday as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist scheduled an all-night session stretching into Tuesday to dramatize the debate over President Bush’s judicial nominees and the filibusters that Democrats have used to block votes on 10 of them. The Senate debated the nomination of appeals court hopeful Priscilla Owen for four days last week and is set to vote on a motion to end the Owen debate on Tuesday. Opening debate Monday morning, Frist reminded Democrats that he has offered them 100 hours of debate on each judicial nomination, an offer they rejected. In Tuesday's...
  • Transcript Of Howard Dean On Meet The Press

    05/22/2005 1:32:44 PM PDT · by echoBoomer · 15 replies · 1,539+ views
    NBC ^ | May 22, 2005 | NBC News, Meet The Press
    MR. RUSSERT: Let's go right to it. The Republicans say on Tuesday that if the Democrats do not stop filibustering their judicial appointments made by President Clinton--President Bush, they will change the rules for the filibuster. What will that change mean? DR. DEAN: I think the change will be dreadful for American democracy, and I think it's going to be, frankly, very bad for the Republican Party. One of the great geniuses of American democracy, unlike most of the democracies in the world that minority rights are protected, 48 percent of us didn't vote for President Bush, but we still...
  • Frist Said to Have 'Nuclear Option' Votes

    05/22/2005 9:36:11 AM PDT · by wagglebee · 190 replies · 4,123+ views
    NewsMax ^ | 5/22/05 | Carl Limbacher
    Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist reportedly has the votes to enforce the so-called "nuclear option" against judicial filibusters instigated by Democrats, despite claims to the contrary by Minority Leader Harry Reid. After a Thursday meeting with Senate Democrats, Reid boasted he was ready for the coming battle. "It was one of the most pleasant experiences of my entire life," he told reporters. "We walked out of there so united. We talked about what's going to happen after Tuesday," when the filibuster showdown is expected to come to head. But according to New York Times columnist David Brooks, Reid was blowing...
  • Senate Filibuster battle is wolf in Sheep's Clothing (Vanity)

    05/21/2005 7:11:41 AM PDT · by contemplator · 29 replies · 856+ views
    contemplator | 5/21/5 | Contemplator
    I am constantly amazed at the evolution of debates. There is a definite and identifiable pattern of fighting battles using ‘proxy’ arguments. The current Filibuster situation is an example of an argument being fought by proxy. The argument here really has nothing to do with Senate traditions and constitutional rules, the 500 lb. gorilla in the middle of the room which no one wants to recognize is named Abortion. Certain issues are simply to hot to handle, and neither side wants to approach them directly. What each side tends to do is hold their position in abeyance until they are...
  • LIVE SENATE THREAD: Day 3 - Judicial nominations - Cloture coming today? C-span 2 - 9:45am EST

    05/20/2005 4:32:53 AM PDT · by ken5050 · 1,828 replies · 43,717+ views
    C-span 2
    Good morning fellow Freepers and political junkies. It's day three of the Senate debate on judicial nominations, the filabuster, and will the GOP stick to its guns? The hot rumor this mornign is that Warner and Sheets are working together on a compromise..Gawd..
  • The rules of the Senate are in these lawmakers' hands

    05/19/2005 4:02:18 PM PDT · by ricks_place · 21 replies · 646+ views
    The Hill ^ | 5/19/05 | editors
    The rules of the Senate are in these lawmakers' hands Centrists yesterday sought a deal to deflect the "nuclear" end to filibusters of judicial nominees. Continued impasse will mean "one of the most important [votes] in the history of this institution," says Sen. Specter. GOP Sens. McCain, Chafee and Snowe openly oppose the nuclear option. But Democrats still need three more GOP defectors, more if they lose anyone from their own ranks .........snip
  • Nominated but not confirmed [Vanity]

    05/19/2005 2:15:18 PM PDT · by Catholic and Conservative · 2 replies · 195+ views
    Today and yesterday, two articles in the Tribune by Jill Zuckman stated: "Since Bush took office, he has made 218 judicial nominations and the Senate has confirmed 208 of them." That leaves 10 nominees that were not confirmed, by Ms. Zuckman's count. However, it can be easily verified that the following 17 individuals were nominated to circuit courts by President Bush during the 107th or 108th Congress, but never confirmed: Claude Allen, Terrence Boyle, Janice Brown, Miguel Estrada, Richard A. Griffin, Thomas B. Griffith, William Haynes, Brett Kavanaugh, Carolyn Kuhl, David McKeague, William Myers, Susan Neilson, Priscilla Owen, Charles W....
  • Byrd knows 'Hamanization' from experience

    05/19/2005 3:34:11 PM PDT · by Jean S · 25 replies · 806+ views
    The Hill ^ | 5/19/05 | Byron York
    Are you worried about the increasing presence of religion in our nation's political discourse? Do you fret about the influence of the religious right? If so, what did you make of the scene in the United States Senate last week, when a leading politician took to the floor to announce: I speak as a born-again Christian. HEAR ME, ALL YOU EVANGELICALS OUT THERE! HEAR ME! Your first reaction might be that the Family Research Council has finally taken over. Somebody protect the Constitution. But don't worry. The speaker of those lines was not James Dobson, or Pat Robertson, or Jerry...
  • Judicial Slugfest Could Cause Bruising

    05/19/2005 3:43:33 PM PDT · by SmithL · 19 replies · 620+ views
    LA Times ^ | 5/19/5 | Ronald Brownstein
    <p>WASHINGTON -- Both political parties have begun the showdown over judicial nominations in a weakened position, facing low approval ratings for their performance in Congress that compound the political risks in the confrontation.</p> <p>Few strategists expect any of the arguments over the GOP's bid to thwart Senate filibusters to sway many voters in the 2006 elections. But many analysts believe the conflict could increase and solidify the public antagonism toward Washington surfacing in polls — especially if the dispute, as is likely, deepens Capitol Hill's partisan acrimony and impedes action on problems more tangible to voters, from gasoline prices to Social Security.</p>
  • A Likely Script for The 'Nuclear Option'

    05/18/2005 12:23:36 AM PDT · by RWR8189 · 26 replies · 1,055+ views
    Washington Post ^ | May 18, 2005 | Mike Allen and Jeffrey H. Birnbaum
    The "nuclear option" will have a long fuse. If all goes as planned, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) will rise after several days of debate beginning today over one of President Bush's judicial nominees and call for an end to Democrats' delaying tactics. The presiding officer will then rule in his favor. Democrats will protest the ruling and ask for a vote to overturn it. The Republican leader will seek to table that appeal. If Frist and the GOP majority prevail, a long tradition of filibustering will be narrowed and a new precedent will be set allowing the Republicans...
  • Judicial Filibuster: Democrats' Clintonian Definition of What a 'Vote' Is.

    05/19/2005 8:20:58 AM PDT · by tame · 13 replies · 1,062+ views ^ | May 19, 2005 | Sherry and Steven Eros
    Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid speaking for the perfectly unified Senate Democrats advanced their argument during Wednesday morning’s U. S. Senate debate on the first of several planned resubmissions of President Bush’s nominees to appellate court judicial posts, that of Priscilla Owen. The showdown over Owen will shortly be followed by the resubmission of the nomination of Justice Janice Rogers Brown and other Bush nominees to the federal appellate bench. Reid’s presentation was overflowing with misinformation, misleading statements and outright deception. But one intentional distortion was so outrageous that it stands out as bolder and more duplicitous than all the...
  • (DAY-2) LIVE U.S. SENATE "Nuclear" THREAD: for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST

    05/18/2005 10:21:08 PM PDT · by davidosborne · 3,737 replies · 86,188+ views ^ | |
    Text Credit to Ken5050: DAY-1 THREAD Welcome, all you Freepers, to the continuing C-span soap operas about judicial nominations. "The Guiding SEARCHLIGHT, " "As the SENATE Turns, "One NOMINATION to Live" "GERIATRIC Hospital" (for all you Byrd and Lautenberg fans out there). Follow along with us, as the Dems raise the level of histrionics, bloviation, pontification, and all around bad acting to new highs, er, lows...
  • March 7,1975 Senate Votes Easier Cutoff Of Filibuster; Democrats change filibuster with 56 votes

    05/18/2005 9:28:02 PM PDT · by TheEaglehasLanded · 40 replies · 1,814+ views
    Washington Post Archive ^ | March 8, 1975 | Spencer Rich
    The Senate approved a historic change in the filibuster rule last night after seven weeks of angry debate. It voted 56 to 27 to reduce the number of senators needed to cut off a filibuster from two-thirds of those present and voting to a permanent "constitutional" threefifths (60 senators).
  • LIVE SENATE THREAD: "Nuclear Wednesday" for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST

    05/18/2005 5:48:45 AM PDT · by ken5050 · 3,045 replies · 78,652+ views
    C-span 2 ^ | May 18, 2005
    Welcome, all you Freepers, to the continuing C-span soap operas about judicial nominations. "The Guiding SEARCHLIGHT, " "As the SENATE Turns, "One NOMINATION to Live" "GERIATRIC Hospital" (for all you Byrd and Lautenberg fans out there). Follow along with us, as the Dems raise the level of histrionics, bloviation, pontification, and all around bad acting to new highs, er, lows...
  • In the Senate, 'DefCon 1' Nears

    05/17/2005 6:29:50 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 28 replies · 1,005+ views
    NewsMax ^ | 5/17/05 | Vincent Fiore
    In the Senate this week, what promises to be a contentious culmination to what Republican Senator Trent Lott originally coined the "nuclear option" will almost certainly take place. Majority Leader Bill Frist will call for a vote on Texas Nominee Priscilla Owens, first nominated by President Bush to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2001. At that point, the Senate chamber will have gone to what might be described as DefCon 1. The term "DefCon," short for Defense Condition, is the chief operating procedure of NORAD, or North American Air Defense, located in the Cheyenne Mountains of Colorado....
  • The Constitutional Truth About Filibusters - (historical fact makes liars out of Reid & Dems)

    05/17/2005 4:36:17 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 8 replies · 918+ views
    On the filibuster issue, the Democrats are anything but protectors of the Constitution. They are anything but principled defenders of time-honored constitutional values. Instead, they are simply following the only political strategy they seem to know - using deception and outright falsehoods to cast themselves as the oppressed, innocent victims of tyrannical Republicans. Under the Democratic scenario, Republican efforts to end the filibustering of judicial nominees amounts to an unprovoked assault on the minority party. What this claim of victimhood ignores is that Democrats are the ones who started the war. For the past four years, they have been filibustering...
  • Poll says Reid doing good job; splits on Senate judicial stalling

    05/17/2005 1:08:37 PM PDT · by QQQQQ · 28 replies · 995+ views
    Las Vegas Sun ^ | May 17, 2005 | AP
    Slightly more than half the Nevada residents in a new poll say Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid represents the state well, but they are split on whether Reid and the Democrats should block confirmation of presidential judicial nominees. Fifty-one percent of registered voters surveyed statewide last week for the Las Vegas Review-Journal said they disapprove of Democratic party plans for a Senate filibuster of Bush's judicial nominees. One in four Democrats surveyed joined the 51 percent disapproving of Reid's plan for limitless debate to stall votes on presidential judicial nominations. Forty-two percent of Nevadans said they approved of Reid's efforts....
  • Have Dems Forgotten Separation Of Powers?

    05/17/2005 3:30:23 PM PDT · by RWR8189 · 6 replies · 601+ views
    Chicago Sun-times ^ | May 16, 2005 | Mary Laney
    Some of my more liberal friends have expressed displeasure with certain columns I've written -- one going so far as to accuse me of becoming Phyllis Schlafly, the conservative woman who became famous in Illinois years back due to her staunch opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. I told him that he was wrong, that I am still in favor of the ERA being passed someday, that I went to both of my children's graduations (unlike Schlafly, the pro-family conservative who missed her daughter's), and that I still love him, despite the fact he suffers from an affliction that causes...
  • What They Are Saying: Democrat Judicial Obstructionism

    05/17/2005 3:35:02 PM PDT · by RWR8189 · 350+ views
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Danny Diaz 202-863-8614 [Little Rock] Arkansas Democrat-Gazettes’ Bradley Gitz: “[The Filibuster] Has Never Been Used To Prevent An Up-Or-Down Vote On Appellate Court Nominees Who Have Been Approved By The Senate Judiciary Committee ... What The Democrats Are Doing In The Senate Is, Therefore, A Departure From The Senate ‘Tradition’ They Claim Republicans Are Recklessly Jeopardizing.” (Bradley Gitz, “Protecting Judicial Activism,” [Little Rock] Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 5/5/05) “For Democrats, The Word ‘Extremist’ Applies Only To Judges Who Feel Bound By The Constitution And The Intentions Of Those Who Crafted It, Never To Those Who Treat It As...
  • LIVE Senate thread: C-span 2 - 2:15PM EST..what's going to happen today with the judges?

    05/17/2005 11:11:55 AM PDT · by ken5050 · 542 replies · 15,626+ views
    c-soan 2
    Dem senators held a presser this morning, as did Frist. What will happen today when the Senate convenes at 2:15? Opening time is reserved for the majority and minority leaders? They may set the will those who speak later as if in morning business..The Senate will vote on the Highway Bill, but since Frist has said that a nomination will be called up tomorrow, expect to see some prepping the battlefield today, and some Dem posturing and whining?
  • The Dems' Post-Nuclear Nightmare: The problem of Janice Rogers Brown.

    05/17/2005 9:32:16 AM PDT · by xsysmgr · 28 replies · 3,415+ views
    National Review Online ^ | May 17, 2005 | Peter Kirsanow
    To Democrats, Janice Rogers Brown is the scariest nominee to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in the history of the republic. Since her nomination nearly two years ago, she has been the subject of the most vitriolic and persistent attacks ever leveled against a nominee to the federal bench other than Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. The black sharecropper's daughter, born in segregated Alabama, has been excoriated as a closet member of the Ku Klux Klan who, at least according to the Senate minority leader, would like nothing better than to return America to "Civil War days." Left-leaning...
  • Breaking the Rules: The Framers intended no more than a Senate majority to approve judges.

    05/17/2005 10:17:00 AM PDT · by xsysmgr · 23 replies · 1,586+ views
    National Review Online ^ | May 17, 2005 | Clarke D. Forsythe
    The sharpening debate in the U.S. Senate over whether Democrats can block President Bush’s judicial nominations by filibuster raises the basic question of the scope of the Senate’s constitutional role to give “Advice and Consent.” What does it mean for the Senate to give “Advice and Consent” for federal judges? Many people question whether changing the rules to allow only a majority vote for confirmations is proper, or even constitutional. However, the text of the Constitution, the record of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, and Supreme Court decisions all concur to show that the Constitution intended no more than...
  • Reid's Nuclear Option Device is primed for launch from Jackass Flats NV (nuke test site)

    05/16/2005 8:25:15 PM PDT · by TeleStraightShooter · 264+ views
    Maurby v Madison ^ | 2005.5.16 | TeleStraightShooter
    Jackass Flat Nevada in located in Area 25 of the Nevada Nuclear Test Site. Jackass Flats was the site selected for testing nuclear REACTORS. That's excatly what Reid's "Nuclear option" is, a shutDownTheSenate REACTION to Frist's tried and true constitutional "Byrd option". Byrd tested and proved it's effectivness against (D) filibusters 4 times in 1979. Evidently Reid had his option stored away and primed for launch from Jackass Flats. Question is: Did he test it out? - or - Will it prove to be a colossal dud?
  • Expel Sen. Reid

    05/16/2005 9:50:34 PM PDT · by smoothsailing · 54 replies · 1,438+ views
    The Pittsburgh Tribune Review ^ | 05/17/05 | Editorial
    Expel Sen. Reid Tuesday, May 17, 2005 Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is using the politics of personal destruction to redefine McCarthyism. Mr. Reid, a Nevada Democrat, announced on the Senate floor Thursday that he continues to oppose judicial nominee Henry Saad because of "a problem" in the highly confidential FBI report regarding the Michigan judge. "All you need to do is have a member go upstairs and look at his confidential report from the FBI, and I think we would all agree that there is a problem there," Reid said. Even Mr. Saad is not allowed to see his...
  • Nuclear? No, Restoration

    05/17/2005 1:40:16 AM PDT · by kingattax · 6 replies · 470+ views ^ | May 16, 2005 | Charles Krauthammer
    WASHINGTON -- Four years ago this week, President Bush nominated Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen to the federal bench. Four years later, she and six other circuit court nominees remain unconfirmed and unvoted upon because of Democratic filibusters. This technique is defended by Democrats as traditional and rooted in history. What a fraud. The only example that comes close is Lyndon Johnson's nomination in 1968 of (sitting) Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas to be chief justice. But this case is muddied by the fact that (a) Fortas was subject to conflict of interest and financial impropriety allegations, (b) he...
  • Lincoln Chaffee -- Gutless Wonder RINO to Oppose Nuke Option!

    05/17/2005 5:41:19 AM PDT · by CWW · 39 replies · 1,196+ views
    "Chafee breaks with party on upcoming filibuster vote; The senator says he'll oppose changing procedure to cut off debate if a compromise can't be reached on judicial nominees" Wow, Big Surprise Here -- NOT!
  • Filibuster Vote Appears Imminent (McCain to vote against the rule change!)

    05/17/2005 6:22:19 AM PDT · by areafiftyone · 99 replies · 2,220+ views
    CBS News ^ | 5/17/05 | Associated Press
    Setting the stage for a politically charged showdown, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist announced he will press for confirmation beginning next week of President Bush's long-stalled appeals court nominees, seeking to strip Democrats of their ability to block final votes. Fearing consequences that could last for years, moderate senators in both parties are trying to stop this filibuster showdown, reports CBS News Capitol Hill Correspondent Bob Fuss. "It is time for 100 senators to decide the issue of fair up-or-down votes for judicial nominees after over two years of unprecedented obstructionism," Frist's office said in a statement. Two women, Priscilla...
  • Breakinh!-- McCain Admits He Does Not Have Votes for RINO Filibuster "Compromise"!

    05/17/2005 7:11:09 AM PDT · by CWW · 135 replies · 3,825+ views
    Reuters ^ | 05-17-05 | cww
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - On the eve of a high-stakes showdown, a key lawmaker said on Tuesday it was unclear if a group of bipartisan U.S. senators could strike a deal on President Bush's contested judicial nominees. "It's hard to say. There's a lot of cross-pressures. There's a lot of activity on both extremes of the political spectrum," Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, told CNN. "We'll know more today." The Senate is to begin what's expected to be several days of debate on Wednesday on two of the seven appeals court candidates blocked by Democrats during the last Congress and...

    05/17/2005 7:53:20 AM PDT · by katieanna · 96 replies · 3,777+ views
    CSpan 2 Live Presser. Lieberman, Dorgan, Baucus FRIST/REID TALKS HAVE FAILED. SHOWDOWN IMMINENT.
  • Showdown Over Filibusters Appears Imminent

    05/17/2005 8:44:28 AM PDT · by TexasAg1996 · 18 replies · 745+ views ^ | 05/17/2005 | Associated Press
    My favorite quote in this article was: "The goal of the Republican leadership and their allies in the White House is to pave the way for a Supreme Court nominee who would only need 50 votes for confirmation rather than 60," the number of senators needed to maintain a filibuster blocking a confirmation vote, Reid said. Ok, but you've always needed only 50 votes (well, 50 + the VP tie breaker) to confirm a judge. He's basically just admitted that the goal of the Republicans is to let a judge be confirmed by majority vote. Duh. Most of us with...
  • Reid Says Showdown Imminent in Senate

    05/16/2005 3:33:25 PM PDT · by RWR8189 · 58 replies · 1,610+ views
    Associated Press ^ | May 16, 2005 | DAVID ESPO
    Democratic Leader Harry Reid declared an end Monday to compromise talks with Republican leaders over President Bush's controversial judicial nominees, saying their fate along with the future of long-standing filibuster rules will be settled in a showdown on the Senate floor. "I've tried to compromise and they want all or nothing, and I can't do that," Reid told reporters after a private meeting with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn. "The leader's door remains open to Senator Reid," Frist's spokeswoman, Amy Call, said in reply. With Democrats threatening to block confirmation votes on several of Bush's appeals court nominees, Frist...
  • Hatch claims "Frist has the votes if needed!"

    05/17/2005 9:02:54 AM PDT · by smokeman · 60 replies · 2,029+ views
    Orrin Hatch Talks to Beltway Buzz05/17 11:52 AMJust spoke with Utah Senator and former Judiciary Committee Chair Orrin Hatch. I began by asking Senator Hatch if he thinks the votes are there to pass an end to judicial filibusters. Hatch said, “Frist can get the votes if he wants it. The votes are there.” On the attempted compromise over filibusters led by Senators John McCain and Ben Nelson, Hatch said, “You never know. McCain is working as hard as he can and he has some help.” Hatch says if there isn’t a vote to end judicial filibusters or if that...