Free Republic 2nd Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $83,146
94%  
Woo hoo!! And now less than $4.9k to go!! We can do this. Thank you all very much! God bless.

Keyword: roevwade

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Finding searchers: Pregnancy centers buy Google real estate to reach abortion-minded women

    01/18/2010 7:43:40 AM PST · by rhema · 6 replies · 279+ views
    WORLD ^ | January 30, 2010 | Emily Belz
    Type "morning after pill" in Google's search box. The top result: Planned Parenthood. But above the search results are three "sponsored" results: One is OptionLine.org, a site that tells women they have choices aside from abortion, a site sponsored by pregnancy center networks. The largest demographic of women considering abortions is between the ages of 16 and 24, a group that will turn first to the internet for information before opening the yellow pages or responding to billboards on the highway. And when it comes to a matter as private as pregnancy and abortion, women are even more likely to...
  • Eyewitnesses: Ultrasound technology is among the reasons that more Americans are becoming pro-life

    01/15/2010 7:36:43 AM PST · by rhema · 15 replies · 725+ views
    WORLD ^ | January 30, 2010 | Alisa Harris
    NEW YORK—On weekdays Chris Kan, 28, wears nice slacks and a pressed button-up shirt to work in the sky-scraping world of New York finance. On the weekends, he puts on sneakers, gym pants, and a sweatshirt, goes to the Midtown Pregnancy Support Center—located in an office building close to Grand Central Station—and sits down with people in crisis. The office building's lobby, torn up for renovation, is hung with plastic tarps and cluttered with ladders, but the center itself, seven floors above, is peaceful. Its whole floor is painted like a baby's nursery in light blue and yellow, with softly...
  • Romney: "I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country." (FLASHBACK 10/26/1994)

    12/28/2009 6:37:53 AM PST · by rabscuttle385 · 194 replies · 2,828+ views
    The Boston Globe | 1994-10-26
    (snip) On abortion and religion ROMNEY: I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it. . . . I think the low point of this race was when my opponent and their family decided to make religion an issue in this campaign. Brought it out, attacked me for it. I think that's a mistake. I think...
  • ROE V. WADE AND THE PERSONHOOD AMENDMENT

    11/07/2009 5:16:37 AM PST · by Patriot1259 · 351+ views
    TheCypressTimes.com ^ | 11/07/2009 | Terry L. Brown
    This movement was begun by Personhood USA. Its strategy is to introduce “Personhood” initiatives in every state in the Union. It is currently active in 32 states including my home state of Montana. This movement strikes fear into the hearts of pro-abortionists because they understand, perhaps better than some pro-life groups and individuals who are reticent in their support of it, the ramifications a “Personhood” amendment would have upon the legality of abortion if it became a part of the state’s constitution.
  • ‘Law and Order’ Tackles Abortion ("Stunning")

    10/27/2009 5:22:08 PM PDT · by pillut48 · 40 replies · 1,617+ views
    Big Hollywood Blog/Breitbart ^ | 10-27-09 | Guy Benson
    ...But last week’s episode marked a dramatic departure from the familiar, biased trope. After detective Bernard makes a few forceful pro-life points in an impromptu squad car debate with his partner, ADA Cutter jumps into the fray. He professes his pro-life views and refutes a condescending response from his pro-choice colleague (Rubirosa) by citing the “turning tide” of public opinion and mentioning that most Americans now consider themselves pro-life. Apparently Mr. Cutter’s been checking the latest Gallup stats. Rubirosa replies by pointedly referring to those who share Cutter’s views as “anti-choice,” at which point the reliably liberal District Attorney, Jack...
  • Roe V Wade : The right to choose ........ Organ Sales?

    08/23/2009 1:59:03 AM PDT · by Halfmanhalfamazing · 8 replies · 534+ views
    Now, I did a little bit of digging, and here's what I came up with. According to our president: Obama Statement on 35th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade Decision =========="Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, it's never been more important to protect a woman's right to choose. Last year, the Supreme Court decided by a vote of 5-4 to uphold the Federal Abortion Ban, and in doing so undermined an important principle of Roe v. Wade: that we must always protect women's health. With one more vacancy on the Supreme Court, we could be looking at...
  • Stifling Health Choice

    08/18/2009 4:43:15 AM PDT · by WhiteCastle · 3 replies · 416+ views
    Investor's Business Daily ^ | May 19, 2009 | Investors Business Daily staff
    Health Care: Lost in the kerfuffle about a pro-choice president being honored at the University of Notre Dame was the damage the Freedom of Choice Act might do to the nation's health care.Specifically, how many Catholic hospitals will close and how many Catholic doctors will quit if it becomes law? According to the Catholic Health Association, Catholic institutions make up 13% of the nation's nearly 5,000 hospitals, and employ more than 600,000 people. CHA says one of every six Americans hospitalized in the U.S. are cared for in a Catholic hospital. A lot of federal funds flow through the nation's...
  • Harris Poll Shows Strong Shift to Pro-Life Position on Abortion, Roe v. Wade

    08/11/2009 2:37:48 PM PDT · by julieee · 6 replies · 491+ views
    LifeNews.com ^ | August 11, 2009 | Steven Ertelt
    Washington, DC -- A new national Harris poll finds a strong shift towards the pro-life position on abortion and reveals the shift is seen among members of both political parties. The poll also finds a majority of African-Americans and Hispanics oppose the Roe v. Wade decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions. http://www.LifeNews.com/nat5347.html
  • Populations We Don’t Want Too Many Of? (The disturbing remarks of Justice Ruth Ginsburg)

    08/04/2009 6:44:06 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 14 replies · 1,300+ views
    The Bulletin ^ | 8/4/2009 | Warren Throckmorton and Paul Kengor
    As Sonia Sotomayor was readying for her confirmation hearings, The New York Times Magazine cast a loving gaze toward the lone female Supreme Court justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In so doing, the Times inadvertently shed light on some remarkable thinking by Justice Ginsburg. Those thoughts are so bracing that they ought to upstage the abortion questions surrounding the Sotomayor nomination. Ginsburg long ago declared her support for Roe v. Wade. Now, however, she has declared something more. When the subject in her interview with the Times’ Emily Bazelon turned to abortion, Ginsburg said, “Reproductive choice has to be straightened out....
  • ‘Jane Roe’ To Nancy Pelosi: 'Don’t Put Abortion in Heath-Care Reform Bill’

    07/29/2009 7:07:09 AM PDT · by markomalley · 5 replies · 492+ views
    Cybercast News Service ^ | 7/29/2009 | Marie Magleby
    (CNSNews.com) - Norma McCorvey, the “Jane Roe” of the infamous 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion on demand in the United States, protested the health-care reform bill on Capitol Hill Tuesday because it proposes federal funding for abortions. “No abortion is to be paid for with tax-funded dollars,” McCorvey, now a pro-life activist, told CNSNews.com after the protest. “It’s against the laws of God. Roe versus Wade is a bad law and I’m sorry that I ever did it.” McCorvey, joined dozens of other protestors in the office of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to speak out against...
  • Justice Ginsburg In Context (Assails pro-eugenics stance)

    07/17/2009 12:37:16 PM PDT · by markomalley · 3 replies · 490+ views
    Washington comPost ^ | 7/17/2009 | Michael Gerson
    There was a scandal this week concerning the Supreme Court, though it didn't concern the nomination of its newest member. (snip) Justice Ginsburg: "Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae -- in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion." A statement like this...
  • "Roe" of Roe v. Wade Arrested for Protesting Hearing of Pro-Abortion Supreme Court Nominee

    07/14/2009 7:28:42 AM PDT · by Pope Pius XII · 3 replies · 349+ views
    Lifesitenews.com ^ | 13 July 2009 | Kathleen Gilbert
    Norma McCorvey, the "Roe" of Roe v. Wade who now is a leading opponent of abortion, was arrested for disrupting the hearing of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor today along with several other pro-life protesters. Sgt. Kimberly Schneider of the Capitol Police said McCorvey and one other protester were charged with unlawful conduct for disrupting Congress, making a total of four arrests related to abortion protests during the hearing, reports the Washington Post. McCorvey had at first stayed outside the Hart Senate Office building with a small group of pro-life activists protesting Sotomayor's confirmation. She then gained admittance to the...
  • Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a Question of Eugenics

    07/15/2009 11:01:44 AM PDT · by rhema · 19 replies · 783+ views
    Jewish World Review ^ | July 15, 2009 | Jonah Goldberg
    Here's what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in Sunday's New York Times Magazine: "Frankly I had thought that at the time (Roe v. Wade) was decided," Ginsburg told her interviewer, Emily Bazelon, "there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of." The comment, which bizarrely elicited no follow-up from Bazelon or any further coverage from the New York Times — or any other major news outlet — was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion. Ginsburg was surprised when the Supreme Court in 1980 barred taxpayer...
  • Pro-Life Group Disputes Sotomayor's View That Roe v. Wade is "Settled Law"

    07/14/2009 4:18:55 PM PDT · by WhiteCastle · 2 replies · 395+ views
    CNSnews.com ^ | July 14, 2009 | Melanie Hunter-Omar
    Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday that she considered Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court case that legalized abortion, to be “settled law”...Dr. Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, said Roe is “anything but settled law.”“This question of Roe as settled law goes to a central point in the testimony we’ll be providing on Thursday morning: Roe is not settled law,” Yoest said in a statement
  • Ginsburg Originally Thought Roe v. Wade to Limit 'Populations We Don’t Want to Have Too Many Of'

    07/10/2009 7:08:21 PM PDT · by lewisglad · 76 replies · 6,311+ views
    Cybercast News Service ^ | 7/10/09 | by Christpher Neefus
    In an interview to be published in Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she thought the landmark Roe v. Wade decision on abortion was predicated on the Supreme Court majority's desire to diminish “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” In the 90-minute interview in Ginsburg’s temporary chambers, Ginsburg gave the Times her perspective on Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s first high court nomination. She also discussed her views on abortion. Her comment about her belief that the court had wanted to limit certain populations through abortion came after the interviewer...
  • Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg: I Thought Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations

    07/09/2009 11:11:12 AM PDT · by Pope Pius XII · 75 replies · 2,146+ views
    Lifesitenews.com ^ | July 9, 2009 | Kathleen Gilbert
    WASHINGTON, D.C., July 9, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg seems to have made a stunning admission in favor of cleansing America of unwanted populations by aborting them. In an interview with the New York Times, the judge said that Medicaid should cover abortions, and that she had originally expected that Roe v. Wade would facilitate such coverage in order to control the population of groups "that we don't want to have too many of." The statement was made in the context of a discussion about the fact that abortions are not covered by Medicaid, and...
  • Justice Ginsburg: I Thought Roe v. Wade Was to Get Rid of Undesirables....

    07/09/2009 4:53:27 AM PDT · by IronKros · 26 replies · 1,642+ views
    World Net Daily ^ | July 08, 2009
    In an astonishing admission, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she was under the impression that legalizing abortion with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members of the populace, or as she put it "populations that we don't want to have too many of." Question: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women? Ginsburg: Yes, the ruling about that surprised...
  • Desmond Hatchett fathers 21 children by 11 women before turning 30 (and guess who pays????)

    05/31/2009 5:22:33 AM PDT · by Red in Blue PA · 66 replies · 2,697+ views
    Telegraph ^ | 6/1/2009 | Staff
    Details of Desmond Hatchett's remarkable family emerged when he was taken to court by the authorities in Knoxville, Tennessee, for failing to keep up with maintenance payments. He had four children in a single year – twice. Mr Hatchett, who works in a minimum wage job, said that he was not trying to break a record and has no plans to have any more children. He insists that he knows all of their names, ages and birthdays. "I'm done. I'll say I'm done," he told WVLT local television. "I didn't intend to have this many. It just happened." Knox County...
  • Would Sotomayor overturn Roe?

    05/28/2009 12:31:53 PM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 16 replies · 667+ views
    hotair.com ^ | May 28, 2009 | Ed Morrissey
    When President Obama first selected Sonia Sotomayor as his choice to replace David Souter on the Supreme Court, a few conservatives wondered if Obama might not get his own version of Souter — a judicial appointment who went in the opposite direction than presumed. That seemed like wishful thinking for conservatives with almost no power to deflect her confirmation, but the New York Times says the notion has appeared on the Left as a concern. Given her lack of a track record, some of the people who first cheered the nomination now want some guarantees that Sotomayor will uphold Roe:...
  • Pres. of Catholic Citizens of IL, Mary Anne Hackett, addresses Americans For Life rally

    05/24/2009 9:19:22 AM PDT · by Daniel T. Zanoza · 1 replies · 217+ views
    RFFM.org ^ | May 23, 2009 | Mary Anne Hackett
    EDITOR'S NOTE: On Friday, May 22nd, 2009, Mary Anne Hackett, President and CEO of Catholic Citizens of Illinois [www.catholiccitizens.org/] and former president of the Illinois Right to Life Committee [http://www.illinoisrighttolife.org/] was one of those who gave a speech at the First Annual Americans For Life [http://www.americansforlife.com] Rally and March in downtown Chicago. Below is the text of Mrs. Hackett's words to the gathering.--Daniel Zanoza, RFFM.org Executive Director "The Order Has Been Given Dooming Millions of Innocent Unborn to Death" by Mary Anne Hackett Today is a memorial for the 50 million innocent, voiceless, unborn babies who have been killed by...