<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: securityflaw</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/securityflaw/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:14:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Microsoft Issues Zero-Day Attack Alert For Word</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1749271/posts</link>
<description>0xbl00d writes &#x26;#x22;Eweek.com is reporting a new Microsoft Word zero-day attack underway. Microsoft issued a security advisory to acknowledge the unpatched flaw, which affects Microsoft Word 2000, Microsoft Word 2002, Microsoft Office Word 2003, Microsoft Word Viewer 2003, Microsoft Word 2004 for Mac and Microsoft Word 2004 v. X for Mac. The Microsoft Works 2004, 2005 and 2006 suites are also affected because they include Microsoft Word. Simply opening a word document will launch the exploit. There are no pre-patch workarounds or anti-virus signatures available. Microsoft suggests that users &#x26;#x27;not open or save Word files,&#x26;#x27; even from trusted sources.&#x26;#x22;</description>
<author>Slashdot</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1749271/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft&#x26;#x92;s Windows Vista vulnerable to malware from 2004</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1746748/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s Vista may be vulnerable to at least three pieces of widespread malware, two of which date back to 2004 , according to security vendor Sophos,&#x26;#x22; Tom Espiner reports for ZDNet UK. &#x26;#x22;At least three well-known Internet worms -- labelled Stratio-Zip, Netsky-D and MyDoom-O by Sophos -- are able to execute on the OS, according Sophos.&#x26;#x22; &#x26;#x22;These worms comprise 39.7 percent of all malware currently in circulation, according to the security vendor. The MyDoom and Netsky variants were first detected back in 2004,&#x26;#x22; Espiner reports. Espiner reports, &#x26;#x22;These are among the first flaws found in the finalised version of Vista....</description>
<author>MacDailyNews</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1746748/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Dec 2006 04:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How To Defend Against IE&#x26;#x27;s VML Bug</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1705072/posts</link>
<description>Although Microsoft has acknowledged that in-the-wild exploits are taking advantage of an unpatched flaw in Internet Explorer, the developer has not committed to cranking out a fix before next month&#x26;#x27;s regularly-scheduled update on Oct. 10. Users who want to protect themselves now, however, do have options. Disable the vulnerable .dll: In the security advisory posted yesterday, Microsoft suggested that users can disable the vulnerable &#x26;#x22;Vgx.dll&#x26;#x22; from the command line. -- Click Start, choose Run, and then type -- regsvr32 -u &#x26;#x22;%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VGX\vgx.dll -- Click OK, then click OK again in the confirmation dialog that appears. To undo the command,...</description>
<author>TechWeb</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1705072/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Second zero-day Excel flaw emerges
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1652816/posts</link>
<description>Attack code for a new security hole in Excel has surfaced on the Internet, just as Microsoft is scrambling to respond to a separate bug in the spreadsheet program. The latest vulnerability could cause Excel to crash after a malicious file is opened, according to an alert Symantec sent to customers on Monday. The security company also said there was a risk that an intruder could commandeer a PC. &#x26;#x22;Attackers may also be able to execute arbitrary code&#x26;#x85;but this has not been confirmed,&#x26;#x22; it said. The security hole exists because Excel fails to properly check user-supplied input before copying it...</description>
<author> CNET News.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1652816/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:47:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft Releases Windows Malware Stats
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1649571/posts</link>
<description>Microsoft today gave the world a rare -- albeit conservative -- glimpse of its view on just how bad the virus and bot problem has gotten for Windows users worldwide. The data comes from 15 months&#x26;#x27; worth of experience scanning computers with its &#x26;#x22;malicious-software removal tool,&#x26;#x22; a free component that Microsoft offers Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 users when they download security updates from Microsoft. The tool has been run approximately 2.7 billion times by at least 270 million unique computers, leading to the removal of 16 million instances of malicious software from 5.7 million unique Windows-based...</description>
<author>Washington Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1649571/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:09:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft Official: Malware Recovery Not Always Possible</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1609313/posts</link>
<description>Excerpt - LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. &#x26;#x97; In a rare discussion on the severity of the Windows malware scourge, a Microsoft security official said businesses should consider investing in an automated process to wipe hard drives and reinstall operating systems as a practical way to recover from malware infestation. &#x26;#x22;When you are dealing with rootkits and some advanced spyware programs, the only solution is to rebuild from scratch. In some cases, there really is no way to recover without nuking the systems from orbit,&#x26;#x22; Mike Danseglio, program manager in the Security Solutions group at Microsoft, said in a presentation at...</description>
<author>FoxNews.com (Excerpt)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1609313/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Apr 2006 01:41:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x26;#x27;Critical&#x26;#x27; IE bug threatens PC users</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1604381/posts</link>
<description>A dangerous new exploit in Internet Explorer could put PCs and data at risk, Microsoft has admitted. The flaw, for which code has already been published on the internet, could be exploited to set an email-borne virus free on the unsuspecting public. Potential viruses could come as an attachment that conceals the code, or could possibly redirect users to a site that will unleash the code on the user&#x26;#x27;s machine, leaving the computer open to remote attack. Once the PC is being controlled by a malicious user, it can then be used to launch attacks on other PCs. Even supposedly...</description>
<author>theregister.co.uk</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1604381/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:58:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft: Vista won&#x26;#x27;t get a backdoor</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1589886/posts</link>
<description>Windows Vista won&#x26;#x27;t have a backdoor that could be used by police forces to get into encrypted files, Microsoft has stressed. In February, a BBC News story suggested that the British government was in discussions with Microsoft over backdoor access to the operating system. A backdoor is a method of bypassing normal authentication to gain access to a computer without to the PC user knowing. But Microsoft has now quelled the suggestion that law enforcement might get such access. &#x26;#x22;Microsoft has not and will not put &#x26;#x27;backdoors&#x26;#x27; into Windows,&#x26;#x22; a company representative said in a statement sent via e-mail. The...</description>
<author>Cnet</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1589886/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft Anti-Spyware Deleting Norton Anti-Virus</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576965/posts</link>
<description>Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s Anti-Spyware program is causing troubles for people who also use Symantec&#x26;#x27;s Norton Anti-Virus software; apparently, a recent update to Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s anti-spyware application flags Norton as a password-stealing program and prompts users to remove it. According to several different support threads over at Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s user groups forum, the latest definitions file from Microsoft &#x26;#x22;(version 5805, 5807) detects Symantec Antivirus files as PWS.Bancos.A (Password Stealer).&#x26;#x22; When Microsoft Anti-Spyware users remove the flagged Norton file as prompted, Symantec&#x26;#x27;s product gets corrupted and no longer protects the user&#x26;#x27;s machine. The Norton user then has to go through the Windows registry and delete multiple...</description>
<author>Washington Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576965/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Windows MetaFile Backdoor?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1559010/posts</link>
<description>This is a transcript from a show Steve Gibson did with Leo LaPorte. The link to the audio is at the above link. Also, I will excerpt a little of the relevant information here.Steve: And so, you know, because I&#x26;#x27;m a developer when I&#x26;#x27;m not being a hacker, I wanted to understand - oh, and the other thing is, I want to write a robust testing application, you know, that always works all the time. So I wanted to know, like, okay, what bytes have to be set which way, what matters, what doesn&#x26;#x27;t. Because, you know, that&#x26;#x27;s the way...</description>
<author>Security Now!</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1559010/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WMF (Windows meta file) exploit</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550547/posts</link>
<description>Looking forward to the week ahead, I find myself in the very peculiar position of having to say something that I don&#x26;#x27;t believe has ever been said here in the Handler&#x26;#x27;s diary before: &#x26;#x22;Please, trust us.&#x26;#x22; I&#x26;#x27;ve written more than a few diaries, and I&#x26;#x27;ve often been silly or said funny things, but now, I&#x26;#x27;m being as straightforward and honest as I can possibly be: the Microsoft WMF vulnerability is bad. It is very, very bad.</description>
<author>The SANS Institute</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550547/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft To Patch Windows on January 10th; Attack Spreads</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1551217/posts</link>
<description>Excerpt - NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) plans to release a patch for a new security flaw at its next scheduled update release on Jan. 10, leaving users largely unprotected until then from a rapidly spreading computer virus strain. &#x26;#x22;Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s delay is inexcusable,&#x26;#x22; said Alan Paller, director of research at computer security group SANS Institute. &#x26;#x22;There&#x26;#x27;s no excuse other than incompetence and negligence.&#x26;#x22; &#x26;#x22;It&#x26;#x27;s a problem that there&#x26;#x27;s no known solution from Microsoft,&#x26;#x22; said Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering at Symantec Corp.&#x26;#x27;s (SYMC) security response team. SANS Institute, via its Internet Storm Center, has taken the unusual...</description>
<author>Dow Jones News Service (excerpt)</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1551217/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Windows PCs face &#x26;#x91;huge&#x26;#x92; virus threat
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550822/posts</link>
<description>Computer security experts were grappling with the threat of a newweakness in Microsoft&#x26;#x92;s Windows operating system that could put hundreds of millions of PCs at risk of infection by spyware or viruses. The news marks the latest security setback for Microsoft, the world&#x26;#x92;s biggest software company, whose Windows operating system is a favourite target for hackers. &#x26;#x93;The potential [security threat] is huge,&#x26;#x94; said Mikko Hypp&#x26;#xF6;nen, chief research officer at F-Secure, an antivirus company. &#x26;#x93;It&#x26;#x92;s probably bigger than for any other vulnerability we&#x26;#x92;ve seen. Any version of Windows is vulnerable right now.&#x26;#x94; The flaw, which allows hackers to infect computers using...</description>
<author>Financial Times via Drudge</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550822/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jan 2006 23:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Potential new unpatched IE exploit ? ~ Yes...may affect other Browsers also...</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1548350/posts</link>
<description>This alert is a follow-up to a post made yesterday on our blog: http://www.websensesecuritylabs.com/blog/ Websense&#x26;#xAE; Security Labs&#x26;#x99; has discovered numerous websites exploiting an unpatched Windows vulnerability in the handling of .WMF image files. The websites which have been uncovered at this point are using the exploit to distribute Spyware applications and other Potentially Unwanted Soware. The user&#x26;#x27;s desktop background is replaced with a message warning of a spyware infection and a &#x26;#x22;spyware cleaning&#x26;#x22; application is launched. This application prompts the user to enter credit card information in order to remove the detected spyware. The background image used and the &#x26;#x22;spyware...</description>
<author>Websense Security Labs</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1548350/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Exploit Released for Unpatched Windows Flaw</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1548427/posts</link>
<description>Security researchers have released instructions for exploiting a previously unknown security hole in Windows XP and Windows 2003 Web Server with all of the latest patches applied.</description>
<author>Washington ComPost</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1548427/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft Update - Internet Explorer security fix</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1540932/posts</link>
<description>Before all you anti-MS fanboys attack my setup let me first say I am an ASP/VB web developer for an online company and require IE and MS so save the firefox/mac posts for another day. On to the problem at hand... I got the automatic update last night on my XP pro system and now my IE acts very odd. It seems to open fine but it always opens a new window no matter how I try (ie. type in an addres, using favorites). The original window stays open but it doesnt allow any interaction with it. If I try...</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1540932/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:22:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Spy Axe 3.0</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535418/posts</link>
<description>I hate vanity posts, but I am wondering if anyone in FR land knows anything about the Spy Axe 3.0 virus. It has set up shop in my toolbar and has hijacked my home page. eTrust isn&#x26;#x27;t touching it. Help?!?!</description>
<author>My PC</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535418/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UGLY SPYAXE VIRUS ALERT (VANITY)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535370/posts</link>
<description>My computer apparently picked up a virus from spyaxe.net. I have a pop-up window saying I have spyware and &#x26;#x22;it is recommended to use antispyware tools to prevent data loss.&#x26;#x22; Everytime I close the popup it pops up again. I got tired of closing it and installed it then removed it with &#x26;#x22;Add/Remove Software&#x26;#x22; in the control panel. The pop-up is back. Can anyone help?</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535370/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Dec 2005 02:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sony Rootkits: A Sign Of Security Industry Failure (List of 52 CD Titles)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1524860/posts</link>
<description>Sony&#x26;#x27;s controversial copy-protection scheme had been in use for seven months before its cloaking rootkit was discovered, leading one analyst to question the effectiveness of the security industry. &#x26;#x22;[For] at least for seven months, Sony BMG Music CD buyers have been installing rootkits on their PCs. Why then did no security software vendor detect a problem and alert customers?&#x26;#x22; asked Joe Wilcox, an analyst with JupiterResearch. &#x26;#x22;Where the failure is, that&#x26;#x27;s the question mark. Is it an indictment of how consumers view security software, that they have a sense of false protection, even when they don&#x26;#x27;t update their anti-virus and...</description>
<author>TechWeb News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1524860/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MS&#x26;#x27; Reaction to Sony&#x26;#x27;s Rootkit Raises Some Questions</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523760/posts</link>
<description>When the news first broke in the mainstream press that Windows expert and blogger Mark Russinovich (he wrote a book about Windows for Microsoft) had found that Sony&#x26;#x27;s anti-piracy efforts had gone too far and that Sony&#x26;#x27;s DRM was installing an undetectable rootkit on customers&#x26;#x27; computers which they couldn&#x26;#x27;t safely remove, the first reaction from Microsoft was guarded. They were concerned, they said, and were evaluating what, if anything, to do: Microsoft, which also ships an anti-spyware program, recently renamed &#x26;#x22;Windows Defender,&#x26;#x22; hasn&#x26;#x27;t yet decided whether it will also flag the Sony DRM software as malicious code, the spokesperson said....</description>
<author>Groklaw</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523760/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sony has infected over one-half million world wide nets incl U.S. Military</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1522663/posts</link>
<description>More than one-half million networks infected by Sony including U.S. military and various countries. Dan Kaminsky, http://www.doxpara.com/ ,is the expert who broke this and did the work. His U.S. and Europe infection maps are shown below and are frightening. Dan did a hell of a good job. Search Google News for &#x26;#x22;sony numbers trouble&#x26;#x22; for more in an excellent article today that is very worth reading.</description>
<author>Welcome to Planet Sony</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1522663/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>First Trojan Using Sony DRM Spotted</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1519576/posts</link>
<description>Virus writers have begun taking advantage of Sony-BMG&#x26;#x27;s use of rootkit technology in DRM software bundled with its music CDs. Sony-BMG&#x26;#x27;s rootkit DRM technology masks files whose filenames start with &#x26;#x22;$sys$&#x26;#x22;. A newly-discovered variant of of the Breplibot Trojan takes advantage of this to drop the file &#x26;#x22;$sys$drv.exe&#x26;#x22; in the Windows system directory....</description>
<author>The Register</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1519576/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Outlook Express tech help needed (VANITY)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1035015/posts</link>
<description>I have been receiving an email since mid-afternoon. I guess its really huge and I tried to get the program to quit, but it won&#x26;#x27;t. How do I stop this? PLEASE HELP!</description>
<author>ILBBACH</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1035015/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft makes Outlook Express U-turn</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/964813/posts</link>
<description> Just days after announcing that it planned to halt development on Outlook Express, Microsoft has been forced to change its position following internal confusion and an outcry from customers. As reported earlier this week on silicon.com Microsoft had planned to stop product development on Outlook Express, which forms part of the Internet Explorer code bundled with consumer versions of Windows. At the time Dan Leach, Office product manager, said: &#x26;#x22;The technology doesn&#x26;#x27;t go away, but no new work is being done.&#x26;#x22; Under that vision, consumers would have been directed towards the company&#x26;#x27;s MSN software, while businesses would be encouraged...</description>
<author>Silicon.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/964813/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Microsoft kills off Outlook Express</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/963573/posts</link>
<description> It might be the world&#x26;#x27;s most widely distributed e-mail client, but Microsoft has confirmed that it has no intention of further developing Outlook Express. &#x26;#x22;[Outlook Express] just sits where it is,&#x26;#x22; said Dan Leach, lead product manager for Microsoft&#x26;#x27;s information worker product management group. &#x26;#x22;The technology doesn&#x26;#x27;t go away, but no new work is being done. It is consumer e-mail in an early iteration, and our investment in the consumer space is now focused around Hotmail and MSN. That&#x26;#x27;s where we&#x26;#x27;re putting the emphasis in terms of new investment and new development work.&#x26;#x22; While Outlook Express has always been...</description>
<author>ZDNet</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/963573/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>