<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: susanestrich</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/susanestrich/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:46:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Susan Estrich Writes Surprisingly Frank Remembrance of Ted Kennedy</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2325599/posts</link>
<description>Susan Estrich worked for a number of years on the staff of Senator Ted Kennedy. Of course, she has some warm memories about working for him. However, in contrast to the almost uncritical lionization of Kennedy by such outlets as the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times as well as by Evan Thomas of Newsweek, Estrich was able to look at her former boss, warts and all, in a surprisingly frank remembrance in her column. She did not attempt to bury his faults as you can see in this critique of his speaking style: The first time I wrote...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2325599/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich: Obama QAHCAA Health Care Plan &#x26;#x27;Almost Laughable&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2294684/posts</link>
<description>It is one thing for conservatives to criticize President Obama&#x26;#x27;s QAHCAA (Quality, Affordable Health Coverage for All Americans) health care plan but now even a number of liberals are attacking it as unworkable. We recently saw skepticism emanating from Morning Joe&#x26;#x27;s Mika Brzezinski and now fellow liberal, Susan Estrich, is expressing deep doubt that any such plan is economically feasable. Estrich kicks off her column with a sarcastic look at the &#x26;#x22;success&#x26;#x22; of Obama&#x26;#x27;s stimulus plan: The stimulus program must really be succeeding in Washington, D.C. Government is hiring; people are working. In fact, if news reports are to be...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2294684/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich Warns Democrats About Dangers of Attacking Rush Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2198998/posts</link>
<description>Susan Estrich is worried. Very worried. She believes that the current coordinated Democrat strategy of attacking Rush Limbaugh is completely counterproductive. And she&#x26;#x27;s right: He talks for hours every day. He gets paid to talk. Just talk. Doing it well is no small thing; witness the number of people who have tried to be him, or be the NOT-him, and failed. But he doesn&#x26;#x27;t have to build a coalition. He doesn&#x26;#x27;t need the votes of the other side to earn his check. He doesn&#x26;#x27;t have to write the legislation, convince Olympia Snowe, raise money to keep the lights on, put...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2198998/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich Sounds Smitten With &#x26;#x27;First Dude&#x26;#x27;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086421/posts</link>
<description>They say love conquers all and this might just be the case with Susan Estrich. The normally liberal columnist seems to be absolutely smitten with Todd Palin. Her recent column sounds more like a love note to him than a political analysis: First Dude. That&#x26;#x27;s what they call him in Alaska. It&#x26;#x27;s OK. Todd&#x26;#x27;s Ok. Whatever. He smiles at Greta Van Susteren. Not a touch of noblesse. More like plan old politesse. I always laugh a little when I see people who are very much not ordinary Americans in any respect (pay, fame, education or overall wealth, for starters) try...</description>
<author>NewsBusters</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2086421/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Top Dem Estrich: 30% of Clinton Backers Could Vote for McCain/Palin</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2073866/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Many question Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s experience and are now recoiling a little bit at some of the tactics.&#x26;#x22; Video at link</description>
<author>BreitBart/Fox News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2073866/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich: Obama Needs to Make Nice on All Sides</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2053962/posts</link>
<description>Spare me the true believers. I don&#x26;#x92;t mean the people who support Barack Obama for president. I support Barack Obama for president. I mean the people who worship him to the point that anyone who says anything raising questions about the inevitability of his rise to sainthood, much less the perfection of him and his wife and his campaign, is deserving of damnation. I wrote a column last week about how the Obama campaign needed to guard against the arrogance that many people tell me they have detected in dealing with them. I didn&#x26;#x92;t condemn the candidate. I didn&#x26;#x92;t say...</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2053962/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:54:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vote for the Miserable Failure ( perils of Susan Estrich )</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1923566/posts</link>
<description>Think you&#x26;#x27;ve got problems? Consider the perils of Susan Estrich. Divorced, she has to eke out a living as a lawyer to support her two children. The demands of that job mean she doesn&#x26;#x27;t get to see the kids as often as she likes. She is overweight and lacks the discipline to exercise regularly. Her house is a mess, and unethical rug cleaners wrecked her living-room floor. Wait, it gets worse. Her nanny lacks medical insurance because the application form is too confusing for Estrich to fill out. Estrich herself has health care, but complications from a recent surgical procedure...</description>
<author>wsj</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1923566/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Left, Right, Wrong</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1914672/posts</link>
<description>LOS ANGELES &#x26;#x97; The other day, liberal talk radio host Randi Rhodes was reportedly out walking her dog when she fell and hit her head. She didn&#x26;#x92;t remember what happened, which led at least one of her colleagues, and countless bloggers, to speculate that she had literally been a victim of the Right-wing hit machine. Not so, as it turned out. No one hit her, Right wing or otherwise. She fell. The colleague who had ranted about the Right attacking her apologized and took it all back. End of story? Not quite. The next day, I appeared on Hannity and...</description>
<author>FOWNews.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1914672/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Spewing Hate on the Internet, Anonymous, With No Accountability (look at Estrich!)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1883650/posts</link>
<description>How much did this transformation cost her? Yes, this really is the same person. Spewing Hate on the Internet, Anonymous, With No Accountability Sunday , August 12, 2007 By Susan Estrich Most mornings, my assistant goes through my e-mail before I do, culling out the ones that are simply vicious, vindictive and mean, so I don&#x26;#x92;t have to see them. Our rule is that threats get reported to the police, while mere ugliness just gets deleted. But once in a while, I get up early or she gets in late, and I make the mistake of clicking on messages I...</description>
<author>fox news</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1883650/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>But Can Hillary Clinton Win?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1862960/posts</link>
<description>Once upon a time, not so long ago, there were two frontrunners in the race for the presidency. On the Democratic side, it was Hillary Rodham Clinton; &#x26;#x22;the rock star and the rest&#x26;#x22; was the title of one memorable National Journal assessment of the race. On the Republican side, it was John McCain. We Democrats were actually pretty worried about McCain. He was old, but he didn&#x26;#x27;t seem it; what he seemed was experienced, independent, his own man, the one candidate in the Republican field who had the advantage of having gone through the process before. It seemed sufficiently inevitable...</description>
<author>FOXNews.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1862960/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:11:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blue Streak: Ann Coulter, Again</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1859496/posts</link>
<description>Ann Coulter is at it again. As the author of one of the anti-Godless books (mine is called &#x26;#x22;Soulless&#x26;#x22;), I suppose I should be happy, but I would happily sacrifice book sales to elevate the political discourse. To be honest, I had almost concluded that Ann had disappeared, at least from my radar screen, and if that meant less interest in my answering her outlandish charges, it was a small price to pay. No such luck. The occasion for Ann&#x26;#x27;s return to white-hot prominence is strictly commercial. Her paperback edition of &#x26;#x22;Godless,&#x26;#x22; the book that made headlines by ridiculing 9/11...</description>
<author>FOXNews</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1859496/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hello, India (Funny piece on credit cards and outsourcing)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1845021/posts</link>
<description>It should have taken five minutes. OK, maybe 10. I got my latest bill from Chase Credit Cards, and it included two things I&#x26;#x27;d never noticed before. One was a fee for $39, which was labeled my &#x26;#x22;Rewards Program Fee.&#x26;#x22; I never knew Chase had a rewards program, much less one I paid a fee to participate in. I certainly don&#x26;#x27;t remember signing up, or agreeing to another fee to encourage me to use their card. There was also a &#x26;#x22;Flexible Rewards Summary,&#x26;#x22; telling me that in addition to the 39 points I would get for paying the fee, I...</description>
<author>Creators Syndicate</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1845021/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:29:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FReep early and FReep often, to paraphrase Al Capone via hillary</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1803201/posts</link>
<description> FReep early and FReep often, to paraphrase Al Capone via hillary by Mia T, 3.19.07 s of this morning, thanks in large measure to the efforts of FReepers, there are over 20,600 view of the YouTube video (VOTE SMART: A WARNING TO ALL WOMEN ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON). Now is our chance to get the message out about the clintons&#x26;#x27; rape and predation 1... and about the clintons&#x26;#x27; willful terrorism failure. 2 By viewing the video, by commenting, and by voting, you will help to keep this very crucial message out front. So FReep early and FReep often, to paraphrase...</description>
<author>YouTube</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1803201/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>All About Ann (Coulter) [Susan Estrich Barf Alert!]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799936/posts</link>
<description>The girl has the knack. Hats off to Ann Coulter for playing us like a piccolo. Yes, she&#x26;#x27;s done it again. Fools r we. A week ago, she was almost invisible, lying low since taking on the 9/11 widows. The only news about her seemed to be related to that pesky problem she had in Florida figuring out where to vote. You know how it is in Florida. Haven&#x26;#x27;t you noticed? They&#x26;#x27;re out to get tall, thin blondes. But that was before she compared former Democratic Senator and current presidential candidate John Edwards to a you-know-what. The nastiest word you...</description>
<author>Creators.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799936/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 06:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bush&#x26;#x27;s Monica (BARF!)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1781989/posts</link>
<description>The war is George Bush&#x26;#x27;s Monica Lewinsky. It is his undoing &#x26;#x97; the public playing out of his fatal flaws, and the reason his second term will come to naught. It is the product of this president&#x26;#x27;s arrogance and insecurity, as surely as an affair with an intern was the reflection of Bill Clinton&#x26;#x27;s needs and denial. But unlike the last president&#x26;#x27;s foolish affair, which he paid for dearly, we pay for this one. The difference between sex and war is the difference between a mistake even his wife can come to laugh about, and one that is an abiding...</description>
<author>Creators Syndicate</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1781989/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Duke Justice Demands Nifong&#x26;#x27;s Removal (Susan Estrich on DukeLax</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1755455/posts</link>
<description>his is not the way the system is supposed to operate. Prosecutors are supposed to be out for justice, not blood; committed to the truth, at all costs, not winning, without more. Prosecutors aren&#x26;#x92;t just morally obliged but legally required to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. Prosecutors aren&#x26;#x92;t just one side in a battle. You can&#x26;#x92;t come across the smoking gun covered with fingerprints on it &#x26;#x96; come across it because you have the power of the state to collect all the evidence &#x26;#x96; and then decide to ignore it because they don&#x26;#x92;t match the fingerprints of the...</description>
<author>FoxNews</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1755455/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich Says Funding Jihad Is A Religious Right - Defending Terrorist Charity</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1717691/posts</link>
<description>From the Worcester Country (MA) Telegram &#x26;#x26; Gazette: Two high-profile lawyers join Islamic charity caseOct 10, 2006First Amendment issues in case will be arguedBy Kevin Keenan TELEGRAM &#x26;#x26; GAZETTE STAFFWORCESTER&#x26;#x97; A pair of nationally recognized lawyers have been retained to argue First Amendment issues in a criminal case involving an Islamic charity and two of its officers who are charged with misrepresenting the charity&#x26;#x92;s work.Susan R. Estrich, a lawyer, author and media pundit, who managed Michael S. Dukakis&#x26;#x92; 1988 presidential campaign, and Harvey A. Silverglate, a noted Cambridge criminal defense lawyer, entered appearances Thursday as counsel for Emadeddin Z. Muntasser...</description>
<author>Sweetness &#x26; Light</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1717691/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why can&#x26;#x27;t liberals come up with original ideas?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1717213/posts</link>
<description> &#x26;#xA0; &#x26;#xA0; &#x26;#xA0; OK, who body doubled for Susan?</description>
<author>Amazon.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1717213/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:53:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SOULLESS: Ann Coulter and the Right Wing Church of Hate</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1712965/posts</link>
<description>Lefty sow Susan Estrich, attorney to Leona Helmsley, Claus von Bulow, and Michael Milken, now snorts for your attention in an incalculably tasteless and repulsive way. Her new book, SOULLESS - designed to look EXACTLY like Coulter&#x26;#x27;s GODLESS - claims not only to excoriate Ann but also &#x26;#x22;cast(s) a light on &#x26;#x27;the Anns&#x26;#x27;, &#x26;#x27;wannabes&#x26;#x27; like Michelle Malkin and Glenn Beck&#x26;#x22;. On the cover, Estrich stretches the seams of a black cocktail dress and sneers knowingly at the camera. Yep, the book looks just like Ann&#x26;#x27;s, and she&#x26;#x27;s dressed up to look like a bloated, wrinkly version of Ann... Except for...</description>
<author>Harper Collins</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1712965/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich: &#x26;#x22;Constitution Protects Reporters&#x26;#x27; Right to Publish Top Secret Info&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654547/posts</link>
<description>Susan Estrich just summed-up the Left&#x26;#x27;s attitude toward today&#x26;#x27;s NY Times&#x26;#x27; publishing top secret info on the Justice Department&#x26;#x27;s bank record monitoring of terrorists&#x26;#x27; financing: &#x26;#x27;The US Constitution absolutely protects a reporter&#x26;#x27;s and a paper&#x26;#x27;s right to publish top secret military information.&#x26;#x27; Further: &#x26;#x27;One of the reasons Bush is low in the polls is that the president has lost the respect of the press.&#x26;#x27; This is the party that plans to retake Congress. Utterly clueless and angry enough to destroy us for spite.</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654547/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gov. Schwarzenegger, the Comeback Kid</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1628396/posts</link>
<description>Arnold Schwarzenegger is one lucky fellow, which is to say he&#x26;#x92;s smart enough not to make the same mistakes twice. If I were a betting woman in this bluest of blue states, I&#x26;#x92;d put my money on the Terminator to win re-election, no small feat when you consider that every single other statewide office here is held by a Democrat. Let me make my biases clear at the outset. I&#x26;#x92;m a Democrat, but I don&#x26;#x92;t have a horse in this race. I&#x26;#x92;ve known Phil Angelides, one of his opponents, since 1988, when he was an early supporter of my presidential...</description>
<author>FoxNews</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1628396/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 May 2006 02:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Helen Thomas Sick of [snip] Democrats</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1601228/posts</link>
<description>Helen sez - &#x26;#x22;Too many democrats being moderate democrats&#x26;#x22;, calls most democrats &#x26;#x22;Republican Lite&#x26;#x22;.(Less Filling, Tastes Bad) &#x26;#x22;They are behaving like Republicans, caving in to them and they have no &#x26;#x22;plan&#x26;#x22;&#x26;#x22; . Susan says the democrats, like Richard Nixon, have a &#x26;#x22;Secret Plan&#x26;#x22;, which means no plan at all. Helen agreed and wants to use the phrase. Helen and Susan bashing moderate and conservative democrats, insulting their manliness and are saying they are afraid to engage the President.</description>
<author>KGO Radio 81 San Francisco</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1601228/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? OR IS HE STILL ON THE CLINTON PAYROLL?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1538675/posts</link>
<description> IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? OR IS HE STILL ON THE CLINTON PAYROLL? by Mia T, 12.12.05 Pirro, he said, also fell into the trap of making a central issue of her campaign that Clinton harbors presidential ambitions and won&#x26;#x27;t finish a second term, a claim that, even if true, doesn&#x26;#x27;t seem to matter much to most New Yorkers. Jeanine to disa-Pirro from race vs. Hil ( Pirro Dropping Out of Race Against Hillary )NY Daily News | 12/12/05 | JOE MAHONEY &#x26;#xA0; Former President Bill Clinton&#x26;#x27;s thesis, articulated on &#x26;#x22;Meet the Press,&#x26;#x22; is that &#x26;#x22;large&#x26;#x22; figures in their...</description>
<author>The Hill, NY Daily News</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1538675/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY:Bill O&#x26;#x27;Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1510303/posts</link>
<description> THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY: Bill O&#x26;#x27;Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy by Mia T, 10.27.05 &#x26;#xA0; (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) the principal being more worthless even than its phantom proxy, both alike unsubstantial, and the former shapeless to boot --Samuel Taylor Coleridge &#x26;#xA0; or the most part, missus clinton operates in absentia, by proxy. You rarely see her. You almost never hear her. (Think of it as the hillary! 2000 &#x26;#x27;listening tour&#x26;#x27; extended ad nauseam.) And in those rare instances where she does actually speak, the &#x26;#x27;event&#x26;#x27; is always prearranged,...</description>
<author>The O&#x27;Reilly Factor, Bill O&#x27;Reilly, Susan Estrich, Real Rape</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1510303/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Susan Estrich Comes To The Defense Of Harriet Miers</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509118/posts</link>
<description>What could be more ridiculous than to have the confirmation of a Supreme Court justice turn on her answer to a questionnaire filled out in 1989 when she was running for the Dallas City Council? Does that really determine whether she is qualified to serve on the nation&#x26;#x27;s highest court? It proves almost nothing about her, and everything about her critics. Harriet Miers has yet to speak publicly, but her critics have clearly shown their hand. The opposition to the Miers nomination has nothing to do with qualifications and everything to do with ideology, narrowly defined. Conservatives wanted one of...</description>
<author>Creators Syndicate Inc.</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509118/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>