<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: tamoxifen</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/tamoxifen/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:20:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Osteoporosis drug as effective as tamoxifen: study</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1616802/posts</link>
<description>Canadian Press Toronto &#x26;#x97; An osteoporosis drug has been found to reduce the incidence of invasive breast cancer in high-risk, post-menopausal women as effectively as tamoxifen, the medication considered the gold standard for warding off the disease over the last two decades. In a head-to-head study, both tamoxifen and raloxifene were found to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer by almost 50 per cent compared with placebo &#x26;#x97; but raloxifene had far fewer serious side-effects. &#x26;#x93;This is good news for women,&#x26;#x94; Dr. Leslie Ford of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, told a teleconference Monday to announce the results of...</description>
<author>Globe and Mail</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1616802/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>BREAST CANCER: NEWS TOO GOOD</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1376316/posts</link>
<description>WHAT if there was growing evidence that an already-existing drug, taken daily, might dramatically reduce the risk of breast cancer? Shouldn&#x26;#x27;t that be more newsworthy than fund-raising walkathons done in the quixotic pursuit of a simple cure? More noteworthy than the latest lab test which classifies an environmental chemical as a rodent carcinogen? U.S. scientists, led by Harvard&#x26;#x27;s Dr. Peter Goss, this week began recruiting women at high risk of breast cancer to participate in a study of what may well be just such a drug. That &#x26;#x22;chemical prevention&#x26;#x22; of cancer has come so far will be a shock to...</description>
<author>NY Post</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1376316/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:50:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Treatment Is Seen to Cut Breast Cancer Recurrence</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1095256/posts</link>
<description>Drugs that completely block estrogen can lower the risk of breast cancer recurrence in postmenopausal women after surgery, according to the latest study to suggest that some women can improve their chances of recovering from breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors. The study followed more than 4,700 women who took tamoxifen, the most common treatment for preventing recurrences of breast cancer. But women who switched to the estrogen-blocker exemestane two and a half years later cut their chances of developing another tumor by a third. Taking exemestane, which is sold under the brand name aromasin by Pfizer, also provided better protection...</description>
<author>NY Times</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1095256/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>