SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Elections  Obama  ACORN  TalkRadio  CopyrightList  Rally  WalterReed  TeaParty  TeaPartyExpress  TeaPartyRebellion  MarchOnDC  FreeperConvention  Donate 

Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Keyword: wardsofthestate

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • House of Lords Limits Parents' Right to Hit Children

    07/05/2004 2:24:24 PM PDT · by sarcasm · 12 replies · 504+ views
    The New York Times ^ | June 5, 2004 | ALAN COWELL
    ONDON, July 5 — The House of Lords, the upper house of Parliament, resolved today to limit, but not forbid, the right of parents to hit their children, changing a 144-year-old law that gave parents the right to strike children as "reasonable chastisement" for misbehavior.The vote represented a victory for Prime Minister Tony Blair, who opposes an outright ban on hitting and supported an alternative proposal for physical punishment that caused neither physical nor mental harm.For those who oppose punishing children by hitting them, the debate surrounding the vote was part of a campaign to secure for children the same...
  • Dad Investigated for Taking Son Off Meds

    06/08/2004 11:29:20 AM PDT · by Dan Evans · 83 replies · 813+ views
    ABC News Online ^ | June 7, 2004 | Bryan Robinson
    When Chad Taylor noticed his son was apparently experiencing serious side effects from Ritalin prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, he decided to take the boy off the medication. Now, he says he may be accused of child abuse. In February, 12-year-old Daniel began displaying some symptoms that his father suspected were related to the use of Ritalin. "He was losing weight, wasn't sleeping, wasn't eating," Taylor told ABC News affiliate KOAT-TV in New Mexico. "[He] just wasn't Daniel." So Taylor took Daniel off Ritalin, against his doctor's wishes. And though Taylor noticed Daniel was sleeping better and his appetite...
  • Top court to rule on 'spanking law' (Canada Recall, SC_of_C sets the trend for SCOTUS).

    01/26/2004 10:50:15 AM PST · by gobucks · 67 replies · 379+ views
    CNEWS ^ | Jan 24, 2003 | Jim Brown
    OTTAWA (CP) - The Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide whether a parental smack on a childish bottom - a disciplinary measure specifically permitted by federal law for more than a century - is a violation of the Charter of Rights. The high court has scheduled this Friday as judgment day in a constitutional challenge mounted by children's rights advocates who want the so-called spanking law struck down. "We're looking forward to the decision," says lawyer Paul Schabas. "It's been a long battle." Schabas and co-counsel Cheryl Milne represent the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law,...
  • Brits move to outlaw parental spanking

    11/16/2003 8:00:49 AM PST · by Cincinatus' Wife · 86 replies · 3,547+ views
    Washington Times ^ | November 16, 2003 | UPI
    <p>LONDON, Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Britain's government is moving toward outlawing the spanking of children, even if it is done by parents in their own home.</p> <p>Officials plan to tack an amendment onto the Child Protection Bill to outlaw parental spanking because too many parents cover up abuse by claiming their children's bruises are the result of normal discipline, the Sunday Observer reported.</p>
  • Making Children "Wards of the State"

    05/30/2003 7:00:59 AM PDT · by steplock · 56 replies · 1,269+ views
    Arkansas Publik Skulz ^ | 30 May 2003 | Margaret Brogley
    MAKING CHILDREN WARDS OF THE STATEDate: Friday, May 30 @ 06:09:27 Topic Letters to Editor THREE- AND FOUR-YEAR OLD KINDERGARTEN: MAKING CHILDREN WARDS OF THE STATE Margaret Brogley 5/30/03 Dear Editor: Has your state or community begun promoting the enrollment of three- and four-year-old children? The Van Buren/Fort Smith area has -- big time. Our daily newspaper, the Southwest Times Record, 5/19/03, had a huge article about it and was so convincing that I wanted to rush right down to enroll the three- and four-year-olds that I donąt have for fear I would miss a good thing! The title...