 |
It's better to be five-oh-one. Now everyone will see your name first . . . |
Posted on 04/20/2007 11:50:28 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
I've never posted a straight Vanity before.
But I am sick and tired of this good conservative, generally religious site being overrun by people posting "I'd hit it", whenever a picture of a good-looking girl is displayed.
It's demeaning, it's immoral, and I guess I'm just a prude but announcing to the world that you'd like to have sex with a woman based on her picture, like she was some object, hardly seems like the appropriate attitude on a conservative political site.
But rather than post in response to any particular person, I figured I'd just vent here where everybody could see and make fun of me.
So go ahead. I thank you for whatever indulgence you have given me in this rant.
Back to your regularly scheduled oggling and hitting.
500.
I had to do it, yo.
|
It's better to be five-oh-one. Now everyone will see your name first . . . |
With muscles like that, a stint in the ROK Army and a black belt?! Don't delude yourself. LOL! He could beat anyone up if he needed to do so.
SO what you are saying is, He’d hit it good?
Yes, literally...
and figuratively.
Salma is hot, but she has a big attitude problem. I remember seeing an interview with her a couple of years ago in which she whined about women in Hollyweird being sex objects, etc. Now excuse me, if you wear cleavage-baring dresses like that on national tv and in movies then YOU, Salma, are embracing and yes EXPLOITING the sex object role and making millions of dollars off it. Spare us the hypocrisy of exploiting yourself for big money and then whining about it. There are zillions of other ways to live your life that don’t involve baring and shaking your “assets” for millions..........
Bump for later research to determine if this is a worthwile thread.
It appears from your commentary that you wouldn't. I can respect that.
“Curse You, Curse You, Oberon......”
She’s another woman I admire.
You will never find a thread more worthwhile of your time and effort.
If you don’t believe me, just read all the comments.
:-)
Pardon me, but while I realise my thread has been hopelessly hijacked, and is now teetering on the precipice between the "hot girls picture thread" and the "byj thread", I still will protest.
The concerns of this thread are, and always will be, NOT "would you or wouldn't you", but rather "should you or shouldn't you".
The thread is hijacked, but I'm still driving.
I guess I'm the one guilty of the latter, if for no other reason than it seems the women who may be reading/lurking aren't putting up any photos of their own.
The concerns of this thread are, and always will be, NOT "would you or wouldn't you", but rather "should you or shouldn't you".
What ever happened to "look but don't touch"? It seems you think we shouldn't even look and admire God's handiwork.
Are we there yet?
How should I know? I’m driving, but we were hijacked after all.
:-)
You see, none of them are the one I'm married to. =]
Wow. Over 500 comments. I’d have a swelled head if it wasn’t for that other post at about the same time that got over 18,000 responses in the same time frame.
At least I can say that no Freepers died in the making of this thread.
I’m guessing that some people will find that more funny than others.
Daaa-aaad, I gotta go to the baaaaaathroom.
I think that ended for me 24 years ago, when I got married.
:-)
Seriously, the "should or should not" allows one to look at others and admire God's handiwork. It merely suggest one should not reduce the judgment of that handiwork to the mere objectified public proclamation of your desire to have "relations" with that handiwork.
A concept that unfortunately has not gained much traction in the past 500 comments :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.