Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’m Throwing Down a Libertarian Gauntlet.
The Flada Blog ^ | May 23, 2007 | Ed Snyder

Posted on 05/23/2007 9:05:49 AM PDT by Equality 7-2521

I’m Throwing Down a Libertarian Gauntlet.

by Ed Snyder May 23rd, 2007

My brother has told me several times that, as a libertarian, I should be far more sympathetic to the ideas of liberalism than to those of conservatism. I believe his rationale is that libertarians generally agree with liberals about more issues than they do with conservatives. Of course, I’ve never debated that point because I agree with it. It’s just that some of the conservative issues always seemed to rank higher on my “personal issues” list than those of liberals. After almost 7 years of a so-called neocon in the Executive and 12 years of conservatives controlling Congress, my opinions have changed.

It’s not that I don’t still find conservative issues regarding liberty more important, it’s just that I don’t find very many real conservatives holding office. The whole feigned outrage with the most conservative member of Congress after the last debate drives this home. It brings the lying hypocrisy of the neocons right out into the light for the whole world to see. It shows their “big tent” to be a reverse TARDIS–that is, it looks much bigger on the outside than it really is on the inside. Read the rest of this entry »


(Excerpt) Read more at blog.flada.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bloggers; paulbearers; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-204 next last
To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

It shouldn’t be happening at all. And when you combine the Drug War with RICO property seizures you have some very perverse incentives...
BTW, Donald Scott was the guy murdered for his land.


101 posted on 05/23/2007 11:42:04 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

And we would be better off chucking those millions of alcoholics in the pokey, right?


102 posted on 05/23/2007 11:42:38 AM PDT by fod (We are dancing on a volcano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
How about you teach your kids right from wrong? Worked for me. Worked great right up until the 1960's you morons stopped teaching kids things like "morality" and "responsibility".

It isn't the government job.

Plus, you try and sell my kids drugs I'll take it the same as if you were trying to poison them. Do that, and you get to meet Gladys.

Again, a self correcting problem.

103 posted on 05/23/2007 11:45:03 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: fod
We were somewhat successful in substantially reducing, but not totally killing the "historic neighborhood" restrictions on homeowners and thier property rights.

Wow... Congrats! I'm in for some interesting local fights when I get back up to MN as well. DFL socialists are everywhere up there. Time a few of them got some heartburn. ;-)

104 posted on 05/23/2007 11:46:29 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

An armed playground is a polite playground.


105 posted on 05/23/2007 11:47:27 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Of course! How silly of me.


106 posted on 05/23/2007 11:47:40 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Evil never sleeps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
It is true that libertarian notions work well within a society that is already fundamentally moral to begin with. The Founders had the luxury of living in a profoundly moral and religious society, among people who knew the value of self-restraint. In such circumstances, government intervention is generally redundant and therefore unnecessary.

And John Adams also clearly told us that the American system of government would not work for a people that was not religious. So I guess, in a bank shot kind of way, you're right just not the way you thought you were.
107 posted on 05/23/2007 11:48:06 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Isaiah 10:1 - "Woe to those who enact evil statutes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

The only movement that is looks exactly like the Founders is the libertarian movement. Why “conserve” when you could be LIKE the Founders except their faith in deitism and masonicism.


108 posted on 05/23/2007 11:52:07 AM PDT by X-Ecutioner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
I agree that freedom and liberty will not work in the confines of a welfare state. Overhauling drug laws without a significant reductions of the welfare/entitlement state would be foolish.

I was part of an attemt to kill off a historic neighborhood/ restriction of property rights locally. We framed it strictly as an intrusion on homeowners and what they could do to thier own property.

Of course we did not hide the fact that many of us were libertarians...the letters to the editor speaking against us came down to us using this issue as a means to install crack shacks and cathouses...it back fired on them to a certain extent, and the ones that went of topic were taken to task for doing so...it ended up being a good public relation coup for the local liberty lovers, and yes you can fight city hall...

take care,

109 posted on 05/23/2007 11:53:24 AM PDT by fod (We are dancing on a volcano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Equality 7-2521

Libertarianism when it translates into isolationism and protectionism can cause huge consequences and the Constitution in the hands of the Libertarians becomes a document blind to the cause of justice.


110 posted on 05/23/2007 11:56:21 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fod
And we would be better off chucking those millions of alcoholics in the pokey, right?

Nope - not my point at all. These MILLIONS of people wouldn't be alcoholics if alcohol were illegal. Alcohol would be too hard to obtain. But with easy access, hey, anybody can become an alcoholic. But I guess that's their legal right - to become alcoholics, if they so choose. Right? Same with cigarettes. Same with anything. Make it legal and provide easy access to it - anybody can become addicted to anything. And even with the substances that are illegal, the pro-drug people seem to have no trouble finding them, or selling them to your children.

111 posted on 05/23/2007 11:56:52 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Evil never sleeps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
And John Adams also clearly told us that the American system of government would not work for a people that was not religious.

His actual words were as follows:

"We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."

In the context of this discussion, the upshot of Adams's statement is precisely as I said: the moral foundations come first -- and only then can a libertarian society be formed.

The converse is not true: you cannot achieve the idealized libertarian society simply by getting rid of government and letting people act however they wish, in hopes that paradise would be attained by attrition. If that were possible, Mogadishu and Watts would be garden spots ... but they're not.

112 posted on 05/23/2007 12:00:23 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I don’t think the framers of the Declaration of Independence had the drug culture in mind when they wrote that, do you?


113 posted on 05/23/2007 12:02:50 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Evil never sleeps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
One of the reasons prohibition ended was the unfettered and unregulated access of a certain product which was in demand, which in turn fueled a lucrative criminal underground.

sound familiar?

"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded."
--Abraham Lincoln (1809-65), U.S. President. Speech, 18 Dec. 1840, to Illinois House of Representatives

114 posted on 05/23/2007 12:07:30 PM PDT by fod (We are dancing on a volcano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
How about you teach your kids right from wrong? ... Worked great right up until the 1960's you morons stopped teaching kids things like "morality" and "responsibility". It isn't the government job.

By "you morons" I assume you mean schools, which, in case you've forgotten, ARE run by the government. Schools used to teach morality and manners, etc. Now they are pushing the opposite agenda - immorality, homosexuality, day of silence, abortion, etc. So, yes, at this point, it is no longer the job of government to teach morals. It is incapable of doing that anymore.

115 posted on 05/23/2007 12:13:49 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Evil never sleeps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

I won’t say that libertarianism doesn’t have isolationist tendency’s but where did you pull protectionism from? That’s like a commie supporting free trade.


116 posted on 05/23/2007 12:16:04 PM PDT by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
I don’t think the framers of the Declaration of Independence had the drug culture in mind when they wrote that, do you?

No,but they were famailiar with licentious behavior and morals...

What it boils down to is: how many exceptions to liberty do you want to come up with?

if you want to wrap yourself up in bubblewrap and strap on an air filter to leave the house, great!

Sorry, but freedom is messy and you won't always agree with your neighbor or how he lives and what he consumes. Freedom is not being free from things that offend. A lot of tolerance as well as compassion is needed. Force of law does not stop stupid, self damaging, behaviors.

117 posted on 05/23/2007 12:19:46 PM PDT by fod (We are dancing on a volcano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The converse is not true: you cannot achieve the idealized libertarian society simply by getting rid of government and letting people act however they wish, in hopes that paradise would be attained by attrition. If that were possible, Mogadishu and Watts would be garden spots ... but they're not.

Your post clarified your position, and I'd have to say you're right, overall. The only question we have to answer is what we're going to do about it.

That's a good bit of wisdom from Adams, as well. That's why I have it on my FR page for quick reference.
118 posted on 05/23/2007 12:20:55 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Isaiah 10:1 - "Woe to those who enact evil statutes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Equality 7-2521

Ayn Rand was a good pragmatist, which is not what the Libertarians are about.


119 posted on 05/23/2007 12:21:57 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
So, yes, at this point, it is no longer the job of government to teach morals. It is incapable of doing that anymore.

It never was, nor was it even intended to. As our present predicament amply demonstrates.
120 posted on 05/23/2007 12:22:19 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Isaiah 10:1 - "Woe to those who enact evil statutes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson