There’s been alot of deflection and personal attacks against Dr. Dan Stock as it seems the Karens and obedient government robots would rather do this than challenge the information he provided.
Dr. Stock will be censored and suppressed, but in vain. I think we are seeing the dam break, damn it! It is way past time for the truth to be widely exposed. But is this the truth? How can anyone say, unless the facts are discussed, debated, and proven true, or false?
Censorship, suppression of the truth, and retaliation against the new “truth tellers” is starting to fail, as this information is becoming more widespread. Make a point of highlighting it, and that may end the gaslighting of it.
Dr. Stock does not have the credentials he claimed, apparently. Never had a residency, deals in “alternative” medicine, etc.
But he says what you want to hear and he sounds good, so let’s spread the video - narrative above all.
I watched the speech, it was a great smackdown. Has he been Arrested for a Hate Crime yet?
Fauci admits Covid “vaccines” are spreading the disease
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3983903/posts
"To adress your comment, 'Gee , it's hard to believe we're 18 months into this and still having a problem', I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we're doing things that are not useful and we're getting our sources of information from the Indiana State Board of Health an the CDC, who actually don't bother to read science before they do this.
I'm a Functional Family Medicine physician, that means I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation, and everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.
So the things you should know about coronaviruses and all other respiratory viruses is they're spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask. By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive we've presented to you. It's been given to the secretary.
As a matter of fact, it quotes at least 3 studies sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.
That is why you keep struggling with this because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long, waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter, or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines, and then they cause symptomatic disease.
Because they cannot be filtered out, and because they have animal reservoirs, and this is a very important point, no one can make this virus go away.
The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs; the only thing it learned to infect was humans. That's why we were able to make that virus go away.
That will not happen with this, any more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus, adnoviral respiratory syndromes, or any thing else that has animal reservoires.
So the reason you can't do this is because you're trying to do something that's already been tried and can't be done.
Equally important, is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine, and I would hope this Board would start asking itself, before it starts taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH, and the State Board of Health, why we're doing things about this that we didn't do for the common cold, influenza or respiratory syncytial virus, and then ask yourself, 'Why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective, having a breakout in the middle of the summer, when respiratory viral syndromes don't do that?'
And to help you understand that you need to know the condition that is called, Antibody Mediated Viral Enhancement. That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals, on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak, and done in respiratory syncytial virus, where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which it can not be done right for a respiratory virus which has a very low pathogenecity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong, and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection.
And that is why you're seeing an outbreak right now, in fact in that flash drive you're going to have coming to you in the emails with six extra [transcript missing a few words here] showing that 75% of people who had Covid 19 positive, symptom cases in Barnstable Massachusetts outbreak, were fully vaccinated.
[audience applause]
Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated, any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones that I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection.
In 2014 there was an outbreak of Mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people that came down with symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy that sounds like a great argument for vaccines.
But a question you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual, 'Where did they get the disease?'
And the answer was, 'From the vaccinated individuals.'
No vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected. You shed pathogens. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don't get symptomatic from it.
So you cannot stop spread, you cannot make any of these numbers you've planned on get any better by doing any of the things you're doing, because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens.
And you can't prevent it with a vaccine because they don't do the very thing you're wanting them to do, and you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control, and the Indiana State Board of Health, are giving you very bad scientific guidance , and instead, read the articles that are coming on the email and that are on this flash drive, and listen to the people in this audience tonight, who've actually recognized that the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counter factual, and that's why you're still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going to make all of this go away , but has suddenly managed to make an outbreak of Covid-19 develop in the middle of the summer, when Vitamin D levels are at their highest.
By the way, the other thing that would be necessary for any vaccine restriction be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you having treated over 15 Covid-19 patients, that between active loading with Vitamin D, Ivermectin and Zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital, and we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D level greater than 55, your risk of Covid-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States.
And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that will show the same is true.
So if you're going to discriminate based upon vaccine you should also discriminate based on 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D level, Zinc Taste Test Response, and probably previous infection, since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from Covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all, no reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization, and suffer 2 to 4 times the rate of side-effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.
Therefore the policies you're basing on are totally counter-factual. I don't blame this board for that 'cause you are not scientists and you've thought it was reasonable to listen the CDC, NIH, and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what's on that data drive. And if anybody here on this Board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you individually if you would like, to explain the science behind this.
And if you're worried about being sued by somebody because you don't follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you, you have a free pro bono expert testimony at your disposal.
[audience applause]
I will testify in defense of this Board turning down all these recommendations, for free, at any time, at any court. Thank you."