Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

This was posted earlier. THINK about what this is saying and what it suggests.

Pfizer intentionally produced “special” vaccines for it’s employees. ALL other vaccines were for a lack of a better word substandard. This alone could explain the iron clad legal protection Pfizer demanded from governments. I would assume any legal protection would be void if it was found out “special” batches existed.

So was this a grand plot to exterminate a large portion of the human race or pure unadulterated greed? I say GREED. Conspiracies are hard to keep under wraps and the truth comes out. GREED just depends on a small core of liars feeding off the fear they self promoted. Politicians are both STUPID and GREEDY so they were easy to manipulate.

Say all this true, what should be the recourse? This core of Pfizer management was supported and encouraged by someone, Bill Gates, the WEF, Soros, who knows. Waterboard Pfizer employees. Someone will talk. We need to find Pfizer’s benefactors, then exterminate them all.

This almost sounds like a plot for a mission impossible movie.


7 posted on 05/11/2024 8:02:03 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OHPatriot

The people investigating peddled the vaccine and posted pics of them getting the shot. Congress.


8 posted on 05/11/2024 8:17:11 AM PDT by OakOak (Misinformation Campaign on your TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: OHPatriot

Those “iron clad agreements” would fall apart in court in the face of proven fraud! The trick is to prove that the basis of agreements were based on fraud or knowledge of it by the Pharmaceutical companies in question.


17 posted on 05/11/2024 10:08:44 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (A horrible historic indictment: Biden Democrats plunging the world into war to hide their crimes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: OHPatriot

I don’t disagree with what you said. There’s just not enough information. Pfizer’s got some ‘splainin’ to do.

My instinct tells me that the serious, professional scientists inside Pfizer thought that there were serious flaws, inadequacies and or questions regarding the jabs. At a minimum, they were new, based on unproven tech; and the trials were poorly designed with poor endpoints, insufficient follow up, and poorly executed. At worst they didn’t trust the method of action wouldn’t produce horrible side effects. Or, perhaps there were just questions about how and where it was being mass produced - different from how it was made in the small lab batches. My guess is they didn’t want it because they are serious scientists and didn’t trust much of, or even all of it because every usual scientific investigative new drug research protocol was thrown out the window on this thing. They are not business people or politicians so the roll out was out of their hands, but the jab itself and the mandates that they had to take it were unsettling.

So like others here said, Pfizer likely tried to quell an internal revolt by giving them a “different” batch. Maybe a batch made inside Pfizer’s lab using a different process, or maybe saline as some said, or something else that made them shut up and comply.

Pfizer needs to come clean about all of this but good luck with that. As you said, if their so-called iron clad immunity contracts were based on fraud and deception it could get thrown out.


18 posted on 05/11/2024 11:32:05 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson