|
Posted on 08/09/2021 7:43:50 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
A really good point well taken, pg.
It’s a given that Q warned about who was whom, regarding anyone’s [*presumptions*] who wears the black or white hat. I think it will become clearer.
Theoretically, there are individuals considered to be sketchy at best, or loons at worst that turn out to be bang-on with Truth.
See Dan Crenshaw and Dr. Shiva. Sketchy?
See *Johnheretohelp and *Simon Parkes. Loons?
Regardless, does it have to mean these being deemed “loons” are so wholly one dimensional (in the traditional sense of the word) they must be destroyed, or can Never Ever be in proximity to the bang-on Truth?
Getting the nose out of joint over source(s) other than our own is a peeve. is proving to step on possibilities and hive minds and suppresses.
We’ve lost a few over it in fact, along the way. It’s a good thing to re-examine.
Besides, we accept or reject sources as we please, anyway. 😁
Crenshaw’s Derp job is to muddy the Derp waters.
nah...that’s just me typing to quick for my own good....
B.R. I hope that they will be able to view it this way! I do not think this will be settled anytime soon.
A troll gave me a link to an interview with @JohnHereToHelp’s Dr. McGreavey, in which he said he had studied weaponized sound technology that may address the problem of ‘core beliefs’ which cannot be hypnotized out of a person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Little Jermiah: Moi? He also said this sound tech was God’s energy that was hacked by derps and that it healed his horrible scars.
ransomnote: No. I was not referring to you. When I said "troll" I was referring to someone who trolls me on Covid threads. If you have given me the same link, I don't recall seeing it, likely because I already had the link.
Dear Peteypupperdo, I don't call FReeQs trolls for disagreeing with me. I was referring the person on the forum who originally gave me the link back in June and has history of persistent posting hostility.
WWG1WGA
There’s plenty of MAGA on all those platforms and growing.
Yes
Yes, but based on the dogged, lengthy, repeated grinding on both JHTH bad and, conversely, Pence good, one may come to that conclusion.
We have been evaluating patterns in the news and on social media for years. Some patterns may even appear on this thread.
Sorry, posted before rn’s clarification https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3983425/posts?page=1405#1405
https://twitter.com/CzebotarJessie/status/1425826560867721216
Jessie Czebotar
@CzebotarJessie
The enemy is trying to SILENCE those who boldly speak truth
By our own EXPERIENCES
We TESTIFY
We VALIDATE one another
I stand with @realmadysonm
@AlthouseTom
@TaskFor26668668
@ FieldMConnell
@ TimothyHolmselth @CABeck1961
@ Adrian Wells and more
Time for the truth to unroll
10:28 AM · Aug 12, 2021·Twitter Web App
32
Okay, whew and thanks.
Petey
Sorry, posted before rn’s clarification
+++++++++++++++++++
Thank you!
Petey
Why doesn’t he bring some plain clothes security who can observe and step in when there is this type of problem? Would like to see some of these Antifa types get the crap beat out of them.
.
And take up JMcC’s mantle as ‘Maverick’
Maverick my eye. We won’t be fooled again. No no.
It’s a given that Q warned about who was whom, regarding anyone’s [*presumptions*] who wears the black or white hat. I think it will become clearer.
Theoretically, there are individuals considered to be sketchy at best, or loons at worst that turn out to be bang-on with Truth.
See Dan Crenshaw and Dr. Shiva. Sketchy?
There were warnings about Dan Crenshaw from good people but I wasn't up on the source info and left the question about him unanswered (didn't research him) since I normally don't see him.
In hindsight, I wish I kept a list when good people point out paytriots or other embeds. With a cast of thousands, it's hard to keep track.
I think it's especially tough when the moles 'blink on' (act patriotic for a long time) and then suddenly 'blink off' (attempt to undermine the audit, Trump's 2020 win, Trump) etc. Those investments in acting like a patriot are really quite convincing.
See *Johnheretohelp and *Simon Parkes. Loons?
The former is backed by Lin Wood/General McInerney.
The latter espouses sex with aliens and alien love child - a problem for our Board Owner and our thread's existance.
Regardless, does it have to mean these being deemed “loons” are so wholly one dimensional (in the traditional sense of the word) they must be destroyed, or can Never Ever be in proximity to the bang-on Truth?
No. I sometimes read content from known black hats because I want to see what they are saying (e.g., DU) But I don't post them to FR, especially if they will cause problems re the board rules and the Q thread's disputed right to exist on FR.
Getting the nose out of joint over source(s) other than our own is a peeve. is proving to step on possibilities and hive minds and suppresses.
FWIW, as you no doubt have a variety of examples in mind, I don't consider working to comply with board owner rules and try to cultivate thread survival (e.g., Simon Parkes) equivalent to getting a 'nose out of joint.'
We’ve lost a few over it in fact, along the way.
I think we naturally lose a few, actually more than a few, as people make personal decisions about what they want in a posting environment.
I can say that I've gotten pm's from some saying they will leave if I do NOT make a certain action, at the same time others are pm'ing me they will leave the thread if I take that action. How can hundreds of very different people collaborate on one thread without some deciding there's a better fit for them elsewhere?
The ones who told me I was personally responsible for the destruction of the Q thread, and damaging the Q movement, based on my weakness and cowardly refusal to 'crack down' on Q thread participants, found places that they felt were more competently organized. Seems like win-win.
I do make mistakes that cost us participants. However, I can't conceive of someone in this role not making mistakes over the course of years. We'll never know what might have been.
It’s a good thing to re-examine.
Yes. New information is always forthcoming. I know Jim Rob abhors Alex Jones, but when AJ was censored, JR re-examined and decided FR can post him because there is a priority to keep free speech.
I think some may be surprised at home much thought I continue to give such issues. THere ain't no cook book for me to follow.
I recall with chagrin laughing at those who told me the Q movement would take years to 'win' the battle. I was certain it would only be around another 6 months to The Storm...*pulls bag over head*
*lifts corner of bag* I sometimes wonder how long this would have taken if RR and Mueller had not installed the blocade...then maybe no time for Covid and multiple impeachments.
*lowers corner of bag*
*sigh*
Besides, we accept or reject sources as we please, anyway. 😁
True. As long as Jim Rob doesn't have prior policy against what we post, or maybe a history of locking a Q thread for having posted the content previously, we can even share it on thread here.
I sometimes read content and sources that would suprise people. I want to know what the black hats and shills want us to believe.
But no one gets between our personal decisions on whom to follow. Good post, Rita.
For example, I like this performance and it shocked someone into pm'ing "You sometimes surprise me".
I think she's livin' her best life (sound icon in upper right of vid window).
Fug 'em. I've lost count of haw many times mQD has scolded me for being a little too edgy. I never threatened that kind of childish nonsense. Buck up butterflies, we ain't even to the good part yet.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/07/12/barnhardt-podcast-150-holo-cough-denial/
Thank you for the Barnhardt link. I thought my eyes were wide open by now, but this is a real eye-opener. I’m going to listen to the whole 90 minutes.
Reminder to pray. 3:15 eastern. Please join together in prayer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
