Posted on 08/09/2021 7:43:50 AM PDT by ransomnote
That’s great.
---------------------------------------------------------<br>
Flippy; I know, but my lawn went dormant and will come back to life and I will have to start mowing again!
Tomatoes will start to split, the figs too! On the positive side, the pole beans just planted should all sprout! So mostly good.
Good morning! :)
Do you know if there is a transcript of that video available?
Take FiVe: General Paul E. Vallely & General Thomas Mclnerney
His Glory
1 week ago
https://vimeo.com/583106874
intel
depop
I want to know who set Lindell up. Many of you are not asking the right questions.
Although I did not see all of the presentations from the 3 days cannot see any reference to PCAPS even being mentioned, much less covered?
I also assumed (perhaps erroneously) the the 5 mil challenge was for someone to prove the CPACS false yet no mention of them and no explanation as to why not?
CodeMonkeyZ hinted in the days prior to the symposium that there may be a problem with the CPAPS, still no explanation why?
If one ignores Mikes ramblings a lot of good information was presented in the three days but I'm left with 2 troublesome questions:
1. Mike told everyone, especially the media, to tune in at 7 PM the first night for a blockbuster announcement. Big build up to this. Then after being late to podium when he did show up no mention of the big announcement and no explanation as to why not? The AG in Col raided the Mesa election office as the election officals were in route, did this sidetrack his announcement? Why no explainations from Mike, not even a "But Wait"?
2. No mention of PCAPS? This appeared to be a big deal, showed China hacked the election, why was this not part of the symposium, and why no explanation as to this omission? Was the CPACS information Mike received fake of false? Was Mike told to stand down on further discussion of CPACS becausing of timing, waiting to the big reveal?
(Stolen!)
The storm is close, if not here already.
Perfect
Good points.
Mark
Mike said that witness bailed out, went to reporters instead, and media said it diluted that electronic China trail.
Mike was then attacked in the ribs and gut and the schedule and show still went on, jam-packed as promised and delivered.
To your important question, I did hear Mike say, “We have it all, anyway”. He also said he has had it since January.
What will become of that statement remains to be seen.
He promised a Reveal, and how closely his packets-evidence are tied to that witness who fled is a mystery, but when Mike recovers he will tell all.
I thought Mike said he had the packets separately and then came his announcement of the whistle blower with more China linked evidence?
I'm not a fan of FDR and I've never thought his Four Freedoms were in the same category as the Declaration of Independence or the Gettysburg Address but he was right when he said "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself."
Half the country is gripped by fear and pose a danger to us all. What will break its hold on them?
He also made a comment, at the start of Day-2 about a “...poison pill inserted...”
It may mean that, if activated, all the PCAPS would be corrupted.
Could have been courtesy of the “bailed witness”, nefarious access badges, dunno.
It might could be isolated and worked around?
I’d start here?
Q1839
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.136
Aug 10 2018 13:44:55 (EST)
PACKET HDQ-7309217392
Q
Agreed re the questions. My own personal curiosity is strongest regarding Question #1. A lot of people said the world-changing announcement was postponed to Thurs., but what parts of Day 3 I saw didn’t mention anything about any announcement. I’d think there would at least be a mention on the various boards, but as far as I could tell, there was nothing. Not taking anything away from the astounding job the Symposium and its speakers did; it’s just odd to have so much hype and anticipation, without an announcement being made or even referenced.
Regarding the PCAPS? No telling. I’ll agree wholeheartedly, however, that what Tina from CO did was both very very big, and very very brave. Particularly the images captured. Maybe, in the interests of time, Mike was obliged to go with one OR the other (Tina or the PCAPS), and he decided that since the PCAPS would be more tech-oriented, Tina’s narrative would be easier for more people to take in and understand.
Just my $.02. Definitely not intending to make any “declarations” or “pronouncements”.
wonder if anyone has thought to use these and noise & heat guns to disburse blm/antifa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.