[pgkdan]

Just a warning to be wary of Dr. Shiva. He may have some valid analysis on a few issues, but he has been rather critical of Trump recently, going so far as to suggest that Trump is part of the swamp. It seems to me that he’s pretty arrogant and self absorbed - more interested in steering the MAGA movement rather than being a part of it.

Agreed...plus, I'm wary of anyone purporting to be part of MAGA who still has an active account on FB, Twitter or You Tube.

[RitaOK]

A really good point well taken, pg.

It’s a given that Q warned about who was whom, regarding anyone’s [*presumptions*] who wears the black or white hat. I think it will become clearer.

Theoretically, there are individuals considered to be sketchy at best, or loons at worst that turn out to be bang-on with Truth.

See Dan Crenshaw and Dr. Shiva. Sketchy?

See *Johnheretohelp and *Simon Parkes. Loons?

Regardless, does it have to mean these being deemed “loons” are so wholly one dimensional (in the traditional sense of the word) they must be destroyed, or can Never Ever be in proximity to the bang-on Truth?

Getting the nose out of joint over source(s) other than our own is a peeve. is proving to step on possibilities and hive minds and suppresses.

We’ve lost a few over it in fact, along the way. It’s a good thing to re-examine.
Besides, we accept or reject sources as we please, anyway. 😁

[numberonepal]

There’s plenty of MAGA on all those platforms and growing.