Jefferies is planing to send troops to Ukraine

The US Will Send Troops | Russia Responds As Harshly As Possible. Military Summary For 2024.05.06 - ^ | Military Summary

[BEJ]

US troops in Ukraine? How serious is that? Jefferies wants that, and what will Mike Johnson say and do? Will everybody appease Joe Biden? Will Biden appease his donors like BlackRock and the Wall Street globalists? Will the globalists get their way and have American boys die in foreign lands to make them richer? Will the globalists send us, courtesy of Joe Biden, into a fiery Apocalypse?

Maybe that is Joe's idea of “If I go down… so will America.” God knows what goes through his mind, if anything natural and decent.

[BEJ]

What is the lie again? Military Summary said: “The USA will have to send troops to Ukraine, the leader of the Democrats in the House of Representative. According to Jeffries, this scenario will have a high probability if the Ukraine front falls.”

If you take the time to watch 60 Minutes, Jeffries says exactly that. Here is the link to 60 Minutes:

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/democrat-leader-jeffries-pro-putin-faction-in-gop-delayed-ukraine-aid/

So don’t start screaming whatever you’re screaming before you get the facts.

[BEJ]

Amen to that!

[M Kehoe]

No.

5.56mm

[BEJ]

According to the 60 Minutes, Jeffries says there is a significant likelihood if Ukraine falls.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/democrat-leader-jeffries-pro-putin-faction-in-gop-delayed-ukraine-aid/

[ansel12]

Didn’t you read post 22? Listen to the interview and examine the transcript.

He didn’t say what you claim, we see this over and over, a public figure will say that if we don’t support Ukraine as we are with aid and the Russians take Ukraine then they will invade a NATO country and we will be forced to fight .

The propagandists on FR always translate it to say that so and so says Americans will be sent to fight in Ukraine.

[Fresh Wind]

Well TV generals, let’s move fast
Your big chance has come at last
Gotta go out and get those Reds
The only good Ruzzian is one who’s dead
And you know that peace can only be won
When we’ve blown ‘em all to kingdom come

[BEJ]

This is what Jeffries says on 60 Minutes: “We can’t let Ukraine fall because if it does, there is a significant likelihood we will have to get into the conflict. Not simply with our money but with our service women and service men.”

!) I don’t see how that statement goes against what Military Summary has said.

2) I don’t see how America will not get involved, because Ukraine will lose the war and fall.

Yes, there is a likelihood America will not get involved. But according to Jeffries and the situation, Ukraine now finds itself in, of not winning the war… that likelihood is remote.

[ansel12]

Here is what he said.
“we can’t let Ukraine
fall because if it does then there’s a
significant likelihood that America will
have to get into the conflict not simply
with our money but with our service
women and our servicemen WE CAN EITHER STOP RUSSIA IN UKRAINE BY CONTINUING OUR MILITARY AND ECONOMIC SUPPORT OR WE CAN FACE A CHALLENGING SITUATION WHERE VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA ARE ABLE TO OVERUN UKRAINE AND THEN THREATEN NATO ALLIES”
(snip)
“are we to believe
that in the face of this kind of
consistent aggression that he’s only
going to stop in Ukraine of course not
let’s not believe his words let’s
believe his deeds and his deeds
suggests that he wants to recreate the
Soviet Union and that means threatening
NATO allies which as a logical
consequence will bring American troops
in to the
fight”

---

Here is that portion of the transcript.
“we can’t let Ukraine
fall because if it does then there’s a
significant likelihood that America will
have to get into the conflict not simply
with our money but with our service
women and our servicemen
we can either stop Russia in Ukraine by continuing our
military and economic support or we can
face a challenging situation where
Vladimir Putin and Russia are able to
overrun Ukraine and then threaten NATO
allies no doubt that that’s Putin’s goal
we have no doubt that if Vladimir Putin
is successful in Ukraine he won’t stop
Vladimir Putin went into Georgia but
said it was only about Georgia
but he didn’t stop in Georgia then he
went into Crimea but then it turns out
that it wasn’t only about Crimea because
he invaded the
entirety of Ukraine are we to believe
that in the face of this kind of
consistent aggression that he’s only
going to stop in Ukraine of course not
let’s not believe his words let’s
believe his deeds and his deeds
suggests that he wants to recreate the
Soviet Union and that means threatening
NATO allies which as a logical
consequence will bring American troops
in to the
fight”

[Gaffer]

Just a what-if.....What if Biden does commit US troops to fight in UKR......what if he declared martial law and then suspended elections..... sound familiar?

[BEJ]

Thanks for that, but I don’t see your point. He is talking about facing the situation of Putin over running Ukraine. And what does he say just prior to this point? That they may have to send in troops. So, that is it, that is how they are going to face Putin and Russia. They will send in troops. When? When Russia over runs Ukraine. And it won’t be that far off...

[ansel12]

He never said anything about sending troops into Ukraine.

It was a conversation about the vote and he was pointing out the same thing everyone has said whose words get twisted here on FR.

We can continue supporting Ukraine as we are with aid or it is very likely that Russia will continue on after conquering Ukraine and invade a NATO country forcing American soldiers to fight Russia.

[realcleanguy]

So in order to win, Woke troops will be deployed. As a vet, I have no idea how this is going to work. Will the men all decide they are women? Be offended by getting dirty or eating MRE’s? Whine about the color of their boots?

[BEJ]

You’re right, he did say sent troops to Ukraine, he said to the conflict. The conflict can be in Ukraine if Russia is still fighting or, if Russia won, then the conflict is on the border of Ukraine. It is not a big difference — American troops will still be entering Ukraine.

[BEJ]

You’re right, he didn’t say sent troops to Ukraine, he said to the conflict. The conflict can be in Ukraine if Russia is still fighting or, if Russia won, then the conflict is on the border of Ukraine. It is not a big difference — American troops will still be entering Ukraine.

[ansel12]

OMG, you are hopeless.

[BEJ]

I’m simply pointing out that “conflict” and “Ukraine” are synonymous. Sending service men and women to a “conflict”, while talking about Russia, means sending them to Ukraine. Where else is there a conflict? Why is this such a problem with you?

[ansel12]

This is too bizarre, I was wondering who the audience was for these fake propaganda videos, now I know.

[BEJ]

There is nothing fake. Military Summary has said the same thing Jeffries has said. He paraphrased it, and with accuracy.

I hope you are not one to think conflict and Ukraine are worlds apart: that if you send troops to a conflict, you are not necessarily meaning Ukraine. I mean, Jeffries uses both in a previous statement: “we can’t let Ukraine
fall because if it does then there’s a
significant likelihood that America will
have to get into the conflict...” So, when he is talking about conflict, he means Ukraine. There is no debating the context. I hope this is clear as mud to you.

[ansel12]

If he had said what you think he said it would be huge news and all over mainstream media as a major going to war now statement.

But it won’t be, and after the propaganda guys have milked their fake headlines for their gullible audience, then it will fade away.

[BEJ]

You’ll find that he did say that which I quoted, ironically, just before the in caps sentences you sent me. Look at his very first sentence in the speech that you sent me.