Posted on 05/17/2024 5:25:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Video of meteorologist predicting severe Texas weather two days before it occurs and showing the Doppler beams ionizing the atmosphere. The Doppler radar towers put in a couple of decades ago have ten times the power going to them required for weather forecasting. The order of magnitude of power is for weather control.
“Are you assuming that electromagnetic waves created by radar cannot be amplified by quantum time reversal?”
Even amplified, radar waves are not ionizing radiation. Do your home work and quit listening to looks.
Trinity College and University:
APL/RPL CERTIFICATION
APL refers to the Accreditation of Prior Learning and is a system whereby individuals can gain recognition for knowledge and experience they have achieved throughout their lifetime. APL/RPL certification is not an academic certification, but is a certificate based on your knowledge and experience.
“If it was quantum time reversal and not just signal reversal, how would that change things? “
QTR is impossible at these energy levels.
“Are you assuming that electromagnetic waves created by radar cannot be amplified by quantum time reversal?”
Physical impossibility.
Okay now you’re just getting ridiculous. Quantum time reversal over vast geographical expanses? EM waves propagate and are either deflected, diffracted, refracted or reflected. And as they propagate they spherically diverge over a steradian losing power. Whatever experiments that may have been done are minutiae on the scale you’re playing with on this. Done now.
I’m looking further into Bearden.
That said, I can’t help but notice that a bunch of what is in the Wikipedia article that you referenced is by a Martin Gardner, whose degree is in philosophy but who fancies himself a science writer. I guess he’s therefore qualified to say what physicists consider a joke? The wikipedia page for him left out basic information about him and read as though it was written strictly by his fans. The contrast between that wiki “fan” page and the one for Bearden could not have been more stark. Seems a bit hypocritical that Bearden’s degrees would be such an issue and Gardner’s such a non-issue, given that Gardner is considered an expert on how qualified Bearden is or isn’t. Just an observation.
I’ve had some real-life experience with the “skeptics” Gardner aligns himself with. I trust them as far as I can throw the whole lot of them. The point is always to disprove anything that supports faith in God, even if science has to be butchered to do so. It’s not an epistemology that I trust.
I read (or partially-read) the criticisms of Bearden’s actual work that are posted in that Wikipedia page you referenced. My understanding of the math is limited, but it seems to me that one of the criticisms involves the difference between what Maxwell included in his theory, versus what Heaviside ended up with, which Bearden discusses in his presentation. The other one was published in “Random Operators and Stochastic Equations” and I was not able to find any information on whether that had been peer-reviewed.
We have the eyewitness testimony of the whistleblower in Iceland and also direct confirmation from the military regarding Directed Energy Weapons. Bearden is not the only person who is saying that these kinds of technologies exist.
Why does the government think you’re wrong?
“That said, I can’t help but notice that a bunch of what is in the Wikipedia article that you referenced is by a Martin Gardner”
None of it is by Gardner. There is one reference to Gardner.
“Why does the government think you’re wrong?”
They don’t. And quit using causality to make your circular arguments.
“I’ve had some real-life experience with the “skeptics” Gardner aligns himself with. I trust them as far as I can throw the whole lot of them.”
Which ones?
Gardner’s admirers included such diverse individuals as W. H. Auden, Arthur C. Clarke, Carl Sagan, Isaac Asimov, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, and the entire French literary group known as the Oulipo.[55][56][37][57] Salvador Dalí once sought him out to discuss four-dimensional hypercubes.[58] David Auerbach wrote: “A case can be made, in purely practical terms, for Martin Gardner as one of the most influential writers of the 20th century. His popularizations of science and mathematical games in Scientific American, over the 25 years he wrote for them, might have helped create more young mathematicians and computer scientists than any other single factor prior to the advent of the personal computer.”[59] Colm Mulcahy described him as “without doubt the best friend mathematics ever had.”[
“We have the eyewitness testimony of the whistleblower in Iceland and also direct confirmation from the military regarding Directed Energy Weapons. Bearden is not the only person who is saying that these kinds of technologies exist.”
The existence of DEWs is common knowledge. Here is a youtube video from our GAO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1toVupe_R8
You’re BS and wrong. And your deductions and conclusions are wrong too
Well I guess that settles it then.
Good work, scientist.
Ohs nos directed energy weapons😮
We’ve had them in one form or another for 20+ years now. It was all research in the feasibility of using them to shoot down ballistic missiles.
I have more of a scientific background than you for sure. 8 years working high powered long range communications for the AF, degrees from NATS in electrical engineering and 30+ years working in RF, Propagation, antennas for an applied research institute. Even taught antennas and propagation for a while.
That’s why it’s so difficult to discuss things like this with people that latch on so some weird event and label it as some conspiracy technology based on some misnomer gobbledygook words and think it real. I already gave you a few possible reasons for weather reactions like that and they just blew right past you like a fine howdy doo...
They could simply be the return seen from a PRF switch from high, to mid, to low density, giving a ‘return from all ranges.’ They are only very momentary.
Hmmm.
Bearden is problematic, as he was academically dishonest by claiming a degree that was awarded by a diploma mill. That calls in question his character and integrity.
Good luck.
The one that looks like your mother
The one that looks like your mother
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.