I can't count the number of times I've read on FR that libertarians should work within the Republican party. See what that gets us.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Equality 7-2521
I believe his rationale is that libertarians generally agree with liberals about more issues than they do with conservatives. Of course, Ive never debated that point because I agree with it.I knew there was a reason I've never identified myself as a libertarian.
2 posted on
05/23/2007 9:08:37 AM PDT by
EndWelfareToday
(Live free and keep what you earn. - Tancredo or Hunter)
To: Equality 7-2521
It’s been clear to me for about 20 years that Libertarians have more in common with Liberals than they do with Conservatives. I have no time for them.
3 posted on
05/23/2007 9:08:39 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: Equality 7-2521
Conservatives get their backs up on some of the libertarian positions, like drugs & prostitution.
However, if the government would get out of the business of alleviating the consequences of poor choices and bad behavioral decisions, the problems would take care of themselves,
and conservatives would get their way - reduction of immoral behaviors and decisions (through attrition).
The reason that morals ARE morals is that they have the best record of causing a desirable outcome. When we use the government to “fix” an undesirable outcome, there’s no reason (consequence pressure) for the undisciplined to be moral.
4 posted on
05/23/2007 9:10:17 AM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Equality 7-2521
Libertarianism is the politics of the adolescent, as well as the perpetual adolescent who happens to be 40 years old.
5 posted on
05/23/2007 9:11:42 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(P!ss off an environmentalist wacko . . . have more kids.)
To: Equality 7-2521
It seems the Republicans of today love massive government and staggering deficits. When I was growing up, this was not so. How did this travesty happen?
To: Equality 7-2521
BullFeces. I was a Liberal who became Libertarian, who then became Conservative because I realized that the conservatives were Right, libertarian-wise, on more things that really matter and that Government can really control, than Liberals.
10 posted on
05/23/2007 9:20:50 AM PDT by
Paradox
(In the final analysis, its mostly a team sport, Principles cast off like yesterdays free agents.)
To: Equality 7-2521
Fine. Work within the Democrat part and see what THAT gets you...
Personally, I have grown up and figured out that Libertarians are about perpetual childhood, with nothing mattering more than their personal wants...
15 posted on
05/23/2007 9:24:37 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
To: The_Eaglet
Please ping the Ron Paul list.
To: Equality 7-2521
Libertarians are useless, and the fact that Ron Paul ran as one speaks volumes about them.
17 posted on
05/23/2007 9:26:54 AM PDT by
DesScorp
To: Equality 7-2521
Libertarians are not one group. There are left-libertarians (generally pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-war, pro-criminal, pro-feminism, weakly pro-capitalism/third-way, anti-religion, pro-legislation of
immorality, etc), and there are right-libertarians (pro-gun, pro-life (as a liberty), strongly pro-capitalism, against government mandated religion, against pro or con special government recognition of gays, etc). The two camps agree on support of free speech, support of political freedom/suffrage, and both are pro-privacy and against police-state powers. A third camp, the anarcho-libertarians (opposed to the libertarian minarchist/small-government tradition), roam the political wilderness and have little influence (think Murray Rothbard).
The two major camps parted ways in the 60's, with one camp aligning with the liberals, the other camp aligning with the conservatives. As for organizations, the Cato institute is representative of the group within the fusionist conservative coalition, and the ACLU is representative of the left-libertarian camp aligned with democrats. As for most visible proponents, Samuel Edward Konkin III (author of "The New Libertarian Manifesto", BIH) was a left-libertarian, while Milton Friedman (RIP) was representative of the right-libertarian group.
Right libertarians should continue to work with the Republican party, despite the growth of nanny-state, big government tendencies of late (temporary I hope). Left libertarians are in a far more precarious position; IMO, most Democratic resistance to recent government expansion is fake, rooted in partisanship only - if it was Hillary doing it, the party establishment would be cheering her on.
19 posted on
05/23/2007 9:31:50 AM PDT by
M203M4
(What I wanna see is a pro-war ("kill the bastards") Ron Paul. Pacifism is suicide.)
To: Equality 7-2521
Im Throwing Down a Libertarian Gauntlet Sounds like "Initiation of Force" to me ...
21 posted on
05/23/2007 9:33:49 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Equality 7-2521
In genereal:
A libertarian is someone who is more conservative than liberal and is noted by positions that generally mean "less government is better government."
A Libertarian (notice the capital L) is a liberal who wants to dress his liberalism up as libertarianism and, thus, be taken seriously by anyone to the right of Michael Moore and Joseph Stalin.
Very important to know the difference. I consider myself to be a social conservative with some libertarian (small l) tendencies. But I think the Libertarian party is staffed by borderline nutbars; I wouldn't vote Libertarian party any more than I would dim party because they are so similar when you get down to it. The Libertarian party just has better window dressing for their liberalism.
25 posted on
05/23/2007 9:44:27 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(Isaiah 10:1 - "Woe to those who enact evil statutes")
To: Equality 7-2521
Years ago I used to subscribe to
Liberty, Reason and a couple of other Libertarian rags. As they slowly drove off the edge of the cliff, especially
Liberty with their "how many libertarians can dance on the head of a pin" stuff, I edged out of the room and returned to my conservative roots.
Sorry, bud, no takers here.
26 posted on
05/23/2007 9:44:28 AM PDT by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: Equality 7-2521
To: Equality 7-2521
I believe his rationale is that libertarians generally agree with liberals about more issues than they do with conservatives. Of course, Ive never debated that point because I agree with it. Bull. Libertarians are about freedom, property rights & personal responsibility. Leftists hate those things.
42 posted on
05/23/2007 10:15:02 AM PDT by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: Equality 7-2521
It is “liberal” to advocate for a small central government with limited and narrowly-defined powers? That was the definition of the terms about 200 years ago, but it certainly is not the modern meaning of the word.
To: Equality 7-2521
Working OUTSIDE the GOP gets DEMOCRATS elected...that BULL*HIT about there being no difference is just that: B.S.
Libertarians are NOT going to get elected in numbers to control ANYTHING...so they are the dems best friend by getting a few less republicans elected.
And they call this being “principled”.
To: Equality 7-2521
Libertarianism when it translates into isolationism and protectionism can cause huge consequences and the Constitution in the hands of the Libertarians becomes a document blind to the cause of justice.
To: Equality 7-2521
Im Throwing Down a Libertarian Gauntlet. I'm Picking it Up Off the Floor and Putting it Back in the Garage.
Stop Throwing Things On The Foor and Go Clean Your Room.
What Are You Doing in the Bathroom All Day? Give Someone Else a Chance!
129 posted on
05/23/2007 12:43:40 PM PDT by
Silly
(http://www.sarcasmoff.com)
To: Equality 7-2521
It shows their big tent to be a reverse TARDIS How many people even know what the TARDIS is?
Time and Relative Displacement in Space = TARDIS.
Doctor's Who's Time Machine was the size and shape of a British Police Telephone Call-in Booth on the outside but internally incorporated volume from other time and space dimensions so that it had the area and rooms of a grand palace.
137 posted on
05/23/2007 1:46:58 PM PDT by
higgmeister
(In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson