Posted on 05/22/2021 2:26:11 AM PDT by ransomnote
I just read through the PBS article posted here:
The powerful technology behind the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines
PBS ^ | April 2, 2021 | Isabella Isaacs-Thomas
The medical oligarchs must be panicking to start this kind of whitewash so late in the game and it's too little, too late, after too many lies. The weaponized CDC never bothered to tell the public anything, because their tyranny is less complicated if the public is completely unaware of what they are doing.
The weaponized CDC intentionally chose the wrong companies to produce the vaccines. Those who are sensitive about my use of 'weaponized' may want to argue instead that the CDC was merely being incompetent.
The following excerpt describing the CDC's 'top choices' for production of the 'vaccines' is taken from Christian Eliot's article titled 18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine (deconstructingconventional.com)
The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are/have either:
Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).
Are both (Johnson & Johnson).
Moderna had been trying to "Modernize our RNA" (thus the company name)--for years, but had never successfully brought ANY product to market--how nice for them to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.
In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death--see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and opioids as a few examples.SNIP:
Johnson & Johnson has lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2019 (For what it's worth, J&J's vaccine also contains tissues from aborted fetal cells, perhaps a topic for another discussion)
Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history. They have lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. You can check out their rap sheet here. Maybe that's why they are demanding that countries where they don't have liability protection put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits.
Astra Zeneca has similarly lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. Here's one. Here's another...you get the point. And in case you missed it, the company had their covid vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots, and they completely botched their meeting with the FDA with numbers from their study that didn't match.
Oh, and apparently J&J (whose vaccine is approved for "Emergency Use" in the US) and Astrazenca (whose vaccine is not approved for "Emergency Use" in the US), had a little mix up in their ingredients...in 15 million doses. Oops.
FReeper Grey_Whiskers found bankruptcy filings for Moderna which indicated they were over a billion dollars in debt. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, these were the CDC's standout 'winners' with which to experiment on the world.
There are many examples of CDC incompetence, if one can't accept that they are serving the interests of our enemies. Surely the world hasn't entirely forgotten that, after whipping up fear about Covid-19, the CDC raced to produce millions of contaminated Covid-19 tests.
C.D.C. Labs Were Contaminated, Delaying Coronavirus Testing, Officials Say
"Early on, the F.D.A., which oversees laboratory tests, sent Dr. Timothy Stenzel, chief of in vitro diagnostics and radiological health, to the C.D.C. labs to assess the problem, several officials said. He found an astonishing lack of expertise in commercial manufacturing and learned that nobody was in charge of the entire process, they said.
Problems ranged from researchers entering and exiting the coronavirus laboratories without changing their coats, to test ingredients being assembled in the same room where researchers were working on positive coronavirus samples, officials said. Those practices made the tests sent to public health labs unusable because they were contaminated with the coronavirus, and produced some inconclusive results.
In a statement on Saturday, a spokeswoman for the F.D.A., Stephanie Caccomo, said, “C.D.C. did not manufacture its test consistent with its own protocol.”"
So if experience, brilliance and integrity were not used to select Moderna and Pfizer, what was the criteria which ended up selecting these two inappropriate choices for 'America's Experiment on Humans?'
Reading the PBS article, one can be forgiven for believing that the 'powerful' technology succeeded. Sadly, one would be wrong.
Through the miracles of deflection and editorial prowess, the PBS article conceals the fact that the mRNA vaccines are built on failed technology that never made it past animal trials because, well, 100% the animals (cats) in the 2005 and 2012 survived vaccination, acquired antibodies and the died when exposed to the virus.
I was chastised for overlooking mouse trials. I located material on mRNA mousetrials and learned that all the mice were sacrificed (killed) two days after exposure to Covid so that scientists could examine their lungs for signs of Covid-19. (hint: mouse lungs contained heavy infection).
The last time a vax hawker claimed there were successful animal trials marked the breaking point for my patience on this iterative subject. I demanded they provide links to successful human or animal trials prior to the Covid-19 'vaccine rollout' or concede that there are none. No link was forthcoming. All researchers I read/watch say there is none. Links or it didn't happen.
The current lipid coating PBS is excited about is suspected by some to be highly toxic. If so, it might help explain the unacceptable levels of reactions like anaphylaxis, death etc. observed following vaccination.
If it comforts anyone to know, the CDC claims it reviews all the deaths in VAERS to see if any of the deaths following vaccination were caused by the 'vaccines' or if they arose from other conditions and circumstances.
More realistic persons will want to note that the CDC, for the first time ever, utilized FDA doctors lacking needed training and experience, whom it did not identify by name, to 'review' the medical content in a private period of time deemed far too short to be feasible, according to Dr. Peter McCullough and others.
COVID Vaccine Killing Huge Numbers, Warns Leading Doctor – Liberty Sentinel [32 minute video]
PBS is demonstrating malevolent journalism when it distorts the failed history of the mRNA 'vaccines' saying, "...— are the first of their kind to be used at this scale, this historic moment would not be possible without the decades of research that came before it."
The mRNA's never protected anyone from any other disease. They simply killed/sickened too many animals during the trials to knowingly use on people. That is, unti the CDC/FDA/NIH were corrupted and became an arm of our enemies foreign and domestic.
The distorted, defensively writen text by Paul Duprex should be evaluated in light of the fact that the University of Pittsburg, where Duprex directs Vaccine Research, is listed as a partner of the CDC Foundation here:
Our Partners: Organizations | CDC Foundation
According to Paul Duprex, "Rather than tinkering with the virus or its parts, this platform harnesses the “beauty of our biology” to deliver protection, said RNA virologist Paul Duprex, who directs the University of Pittsburgh Center for Vaccine Research. These vaccines teach the body to remember one of the coronavirus’ defining features — its spike protein — and prompt the creation of antibodies that can prevent it from infecting cells."
A person of conscience might struggle make statements for which they have no real proof, as proof is defined within the medical community. The 'vaccine' trials that Moderna and Pfizer are still going through are too small and too short, lack rigor and objectively, and utilize the inaccurate PCR test to determine whether someone is sick or not.
Duprex speeks about vaccines 'teaching' the body to remember...when the truth is the body cannot forget. The injection of 'vaccine' content bypasses feedback loops to go directly to ribosomes and order the productions of trillions of spike proteins without end. By that, I mean there is no 'off' button.
If the person has an allergic/anaphylactic reaction to the spike protein, no one can stop their bodies from continuing to produce the spike proteins indefinitely. There is some research making it past the gatekeepers now suggesting that the spike protein itself may be toxic, a particularly concerning detail as it can cross the blood-brain barrier.
When unable to supply an answer to a probing question, Fauci and others say something like, 'You have to remember, T-cell immunity is poorly understood.' At this point, I'm routinely stunned into silence. The vax hawks, including CDC 'partner' University of Pittsburg's Duprex all extoll the safety of the vaccine for which too little is known or understood.
Fauci and others driving the push toward vaccine passports, declaring the vaccines 'FDA approved' without standard evaluation, and mandatory vaccination, are exhorting children and pregnant women to have the 'shot', even though they've never been tested on those cohorts.
No one supporting the universal appliation of an experimental product with a history of failure willingly discusses adverse reactions to the 'products' greater than 'sore arm, chills, fever, headache etc.' But, the CDC's VAERS database is replete with cardiac arrests, paralysis, anaphylaxis, stroke, TCP etc. The overall picture in VAERS right now suggests the CDC is throttling the publishing of data to it's database where the public can see it.
Thankfully, some researchers and analysts are stepping into the breach. Below, Dr. April Rose walks through trends in the data that should give us all pause; ignore the CDC, they don't care.
PHD RESEARCHER ANALYZES VAERS DATA AND CONCLUDES COVID SHOTS ARE CAUSING DEATH AND SERIOUS INJURIES
The PBS article goes on to state: "Around 20 years ago, the work of two researchers — Drew Weissman and Katalin Karikó — helped overcome two primary barriers that had been standing in the way of utilizing mRNA technology: an inflammatory effect on the body that made test animals ill, and the fragile nature of the molecule itself, both of which hindered its utility."
That's half true, in a tragic way. They never solved the problem that caused the animals in the prior vaccine product trials.
In 2005, they discovered that they could protect their 'vaccine' from being destroyed by the human immune system (wise system, that) by encapsulating the mRNA in a lipid pouch. As I've said, the pouch itself appears to be a problem for some receiving the vaccine. But take a moment to consider that the human body initially identified the vaccine as a pathogen until they concealed it in a pouch. What could possibly go wrong?
Geert Vanden Boscche and others believe that the 'safe delivery' of the 'vaccine' mRNA to body cells sets the stage for life-alterning (or ending) conditions like ADE, sepsis, autoimmunity etc. due to the uncontrolled production of spike proteins for an unknown length of time, and without long-term studies to show how they impact human health.
The trillions of spike proteins resulting from 'vaccination' attach to body cells and recall the body is trained to 'remember them' as pathogens. This process has the capacity to place a immunological target on all body cells, including heart, lung, brain, liver, nerve cells etc.
The PBS article further asserts, "Only now, amid a devastating pandemic, has this technology reached mainstream prominence. “Given the choice, I would have rather avoided this past year,” Weissman said. “But we didn’t, and now RNA is going to be our future.”"
In terms of population statistics, and setting aside the agonizing loss of loved ones to Covid-19, it wasn't a 'devastating year' last year, however the MSM and medical leadership have labored to convince us it was. The average death rate from Covid-19 is really .2%. That number could have been so much smaller, had Fauci and the CDC allowed or 'authorized' the use of safe, FDA Approved, time-tested HCQ/AZ, Ivermectin etc. Imagine how many senior citizens died needlessly because deep state governors forced nursing homes to accept patients sick with Covid-19, while denying residents visits from healthy family members.
Pfizer's trials didn't include pregnant women, children, medically fragile persons or those with specific co-morbidities. Yet Pfizer found their trial cohort had a .93% chance of becoming ill with Covid-19 (remember, they used an invalid test to identify Covid). Pfizer reported that .05 % of the group not vaccinated was diagnosed with covid (diagnosis requires a positive PCR and at least one symptom of repiratory illness, which means it could be the flu etc.)
But I digress. So Pfizer's 90% effective rate is calculated by comparing the .93% of the unvaccinated who became ill, with the .05% of the vaccinated who became ill during a 2 month time period. Perhaps if the trial had lasted longer more of the vaccinated group would have time to become ill. Perhaps that's part of the reason why the trials were so short.
The mRNA 'vaccines' have already shortened the future of many. Let's stop the 'trimming back' of longevity and quality of life with further experimentation on the global population. Let's learn from Israel's ordeal before we let the medical apparatus pressure more people into taking the vax.
Let's avail ourselves of the numerous safe, effective treatment protocols proven to cut the rate of death among the most vulnerable by 85%. Early treatment is essential; Covid is much harder to defeat once it becomes advanced. This means planning ahead saves lives.
Early Treatment Protocols (Collection of Covid-19 resources, treatment and prophylactic protocols)
Ping
To skip directly to the PBS article, here’s the link.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3961386/posts
| A Misleading C.D.C. Number We have a special edition of the newsletter on a misleading C.D.C. statistic. (masks) | ||
05/11/2021 3:02:47 PM PDT · by dynachrome · 15 replies NYT ^ | 5-11-21 | David Leonhardt | ||
The CDC said outdoor transmission was probably less than 10%. The New York Times points out that figure is far too high, "In truth, the share of transmission that has occurred outdoors seems to be below 1 percent and may be below 0.1 percent, multiple epidemiologists told me."
SNIP
"Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year. (The actual worldwide number is around 150.) It’s both true and deceiving."
Very well stated and informative. Thank you for the work.
thanks for all of your work, ‘note.
I also want to thank you
Nice work.
I also found it problematic that Paul Duprex said, “These vaccines teach the body to remember one of the coronavirus’ defining features — its spike protein — and prompt the creation of antibodies that can prevent it from infecting cells.” Beyond merely remembering, these vaccines induce the cell to produce this foreign protein. If there is some kind of feedback loop to stop it eventually, I’d like to read about it, but so far, I haven’t found anything.
Hidden in plain sight. Thanks for the post Ransomnote, and all the time and effort producing it.
the CDC patented these death machines which exude
viral parts from the victims.
this was treason.
why is it acceptable, murderous TREASON????
crimes against humanity with plausible deniability and indemnification. what a wicked web they weave...
CORRECTED: Pfizer's trials didn't include pregnant women, children, medically fragile persons or those with specific co-morbidities. Yet Pfizer found their unvaccinated trial cohort had a .93% chance of becoming ill with Covid-19 (remember, they used an invalid test to identify Covid). Pfizer reported that .05 % of the group [deleted] vaccinated was diagnosed with Covid (diagnosis requires a positive PCR and at least one symptom of repiratory illness, which means it could be the flu etc.)
4/8/2021, 11:16:55 AM · by yelostar · 54 replies
ourgreaterdestiny.org ^ | January 7, 2021 | ourgreaterdestiny
I pretty clear on the 'deceiving' part, but a little foggy on the 'true' part.
What am I missing?
20,000 seems way different than 150.
150 is “fewer” than 20,000 - so it is a true statement.
Sharks can’t count
...they don’t have fingers or toes.
BTTT
What connection does Thalidomide have with the vaccine-producing companies? Wasn’t that produced by an obscure German company?
Thank you for the hard work.
“Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year. (The actual worldwide number is around 150.) It’s both true and deceiving.”
I pretty clear on the ‘deceiving’ part, but a little foggy on the ‘true’ part.
What am I missing?
20,000 seems way different than 150.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. It’s poorly written, but I used it anyway because of the novelty of NYT criticizing CDC.
150 attacks is ‘fewer than 20,000’
Ridiculously fewer than 20K.
Myeah, that’s the point they’re making. They could have just stuck with The CDC lied, and this just in, water is wet.
Interesting read !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.