Posted on 05/21/2023 10:39:46 AM PDT by proust
“Trump calls ex-staffer Alyssa Farah Griffin a ‘sleazebag,’ ‘loser’”
Trump was the best at picking “sleazebags” and “losers” for his administration.
What is she? Number 312?
I wouldn’t be shocked, because I’ve done it myself.
He erases the appeal of many positive things with so many cringeworthy statements and lack of ability of patience or forethought.
From Bill Barr re Trump, “He does not have the discipline. He does not have the ability for strategic thinking and linear thinking, or setting priorities or how to get things done in the system...
I think if we keep acting like we’re in church with these folks they are going to bar the doors and burn the joint down.
They are acting like we are at war, I think it is high time we figure that out.
We can go back to worrying about being polite when we have won.
You think Ron has the backbone to stand up to the same attacks he is guaranteed to get that Trump has had to endure these past 6 years?
Don't forget, the Democraps and the MSM gave Nixon Watergate.
Reagan had the Iran/Contra affair.
Bush had the Valerie Plame bullshit covert CIA affair
And Trump had Russian collusion and everything else the Democraps and MSM could throw at him.
You think Ron is going to get a pass?.....LOL!
No. I am not a fool. But Ron is likable and he crystallizes his conservatism plainly and succinctly.
Sure, defend foul language and expletives all you want. FR doesn’t approve. The Left is especially fond of vulgar and obscene language.
No, I was a f-ing prison guard for 25 years, and put up with as many morons there, as are on FR.
Gosh, sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between the guards and the inmates.
“That “stuff in the middle” would not happen”
But it is important though right? If we are truly seekers of truth?
“would not happen without the first thing”
I hired a ‘tard once. He had a good resume and interviewed well. It is irrational to require prescience from a person and even more irrational to make the lack of it a critique.
This is the left’s angle right now. Give a person a group of 3000, 95% of which happen to be scoundrels, and then make a critique of the guy’s choices.
It is quite likely that these people are being paid or blackmailed to turn on Trump.
After what we have seen over the last decade, to give ANY credibility, comfort, or benefit of any doubt whatsoever to an enemy of Trump indicates there is a serious problem with our reasoning ability.
It’d be easier for trump to praise those who he didn’t insult. The list would be very short.
HEY BILL BARR, getting things done within the system……..SPIT, open your stinking RINO eyes and look at our damn nation, Trump couldn’t even get the DAMN WALL DONE, with control of BOTH HOUSES, SCREW YOUR DAMN SYSTEM!!!!
Two terms at least.
Totally agree!
Not defending anything, just suggesting it is in the noise floor compared to the signals of interest.
HIS conservatism is RINO conservatism, the SCUM RINO NEOCONS don’t give a damn about conservatism in FL. DeSantis ends up as POTUS he will be another Bush BANK ON IT! He has taken ALL their money and these damn globalists OWN HIM NOW!!!
RDS is being bankrolled by the globalists. They intend to get their money’s worth out of him.
I don’t need to know any more than that.
you are correct. They have not even started on DeSantis, they will.
Somehow I don't think that Trump sat down with, and interviewed every Tom, Dick, Harry, Mary, or Alyssa that worked at The White House. I'll blame his Chief of Staff, and anyone else assigned to interviewing people, and bringing staff on board. The Chief of Staff is responsible for "Selecting senior White House staffers and supervising their offices' activities." Trump had four Chiefs of Staff: Reince Priebus, John Kelly, Mick Mulvaney, and Mark Meadows in four years. They failed him miserably. Obama had five Chiefs of Staff in eight years.
> It is quite likely that these people are being paid or blackmailed to turn on Trump. <
We obviously disagree on a few points. But I’ve often wondered about what you mentioned above. Presidents disappoint people. It’s natural, and will happen.
But you don’t see the staffers who worked for Clinton, Bush, and Obama squawking near like what we see with Trump. So, yeah. Maybe something’s up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.