Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DarthVader

If it is scheduled for expensive disposal then it is not part of our war stocks, it is an expensive burden waiting for disposal.

Having it used against Russia and reducing their capabilities is a double money saving win, our junk is destroyed avoiding our costly disposal regulations and at the same time reducing the threat it was built for.

It’s like it actually got used in the war we were going to use it for but we aren’t actually having to be in that war.

As far as storage, we seem to have high storage standards for ammunition.


33 posted on 04/11/2024 12:36:27 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

We seem to have high standards. I’ve seen a few instances where we have had bunkers explode with older ordnance in it.

We are getting dangerously close in this situation where it can get out of control and a global conflict can start. Shades of the beginning of WW2 can be seen here.

Our military is not in very good shape right now as many news articles are reporting and I’ve had conversations that affirms them. Time for us to pull back and defuse this situation.


34 posted on 04/11/2024 12:49:18 PM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson