Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BunnySlippers
I think you're right. Guess I forgot that one. Will add them to the list.
Thanks,
Jim
22 posted on 04/05/2004 4:06:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
fox news is okay tho right? This is worse than Canada. Well, actually it's just like Canada's refusal to let Fox broadcast here. Same principal. The CRTC has total control of the airwaves here and they make sure that NOTHING Conservative gets in. They are all a bunch of commies. Is it just FR they are picking on? If it is, we've got them scared. Anyway, where there's a will, there'a a way.
211 posted on 04/09/2004 3:18:04 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

this is part and parcel of the OUTLAW NAPSTER FILE SHARING and the RIAA suits, alongside the digital copyrights act. A COMMON CAUSE craze amongst liberals and conservatives.

SEVERAL decades ago, the "copyright" issue went all the way to the supreme court over making "copies" of music via audio cassette tapes. Then the issue of vhs recordings of rented videos went the same route, and the "my copyright means I am god over your ability to use my materials" crowd--- LOST again. You can legally, with the moral sanction of the law of the land and the Supremes, make a copy of any movie you want, regardless... onto a VHS tape.

With the advent of the digital age, and the ability to transfer ANY form of data; movies, music, press copy, newswire feeds and etc... an opportunity was found, whereby a NEW kind of copying could be regulated, legislated, criminalized, prosecuted... or even taxed.

This law, the digital millenium copyright act, has; along with a cadre of similar laws and enforcement techniques; been successfully used, to stifle, constrain and prosecute issues of free speech. IT was authored and championed by conservatives. And we lost our right to free and unrestricted speech, via a perversion of the fair use doctrine... that is being applied to conservative websites primarily.

We are seeing it's misapplication, and a host of other "copyright" law, perversions... all to stop downloading of music, that has NOT been proven a theft in ANY court of law.

Before long, using the principles of rights to distribution under the new perversion of the DMCA, you will soon be committing a crime if you pass YOUR newspaper(now all of which are produced digitally, via computers) on to anyone, either in whole or in part... as your paper, will be converted into a license for use by one person only.

Discussing from memory will be disallowed if your recollection is over two paragraphs, or 240 words.

And certain of the conservatives, here on this website, will applaud any movement in that direction, as being fair protection of the copyright owner's "property".

Right now, this is just about restricting conservatives from researching the content of online journalism... by fear our wellknown products here, the online "expose" of journalistic Bullcrap.

But it will, or shall I say IS expanding.
I am conservative on the war on terror, and issues of individual freedom. The digital copyright act and all the other perverse interpretations of copyright law, now being used to fuel the growth of the "don't tell others what I said" list... NEED to be challenged and defeated.

I am sorry to see that list growing Jim.
Cockroaches have found a way to make it illegal to turn the rocks over... and expose them.

the law of unforseen consequences at work in living color, digitally of course.


355 posted on 07/13/2004 10:59:28 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson