Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Challenger Pulled From Reagan-Era Hat
NY Times ^ | March 3, 2006 | PATRICK HEALY

Posted on 03/02/2006 11:15:28 PM PST by neverdem

It was supposed to be a marquee Republican campaign of the 2006 elections — a fusillade-style effort to defeat Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, which, even if it did not succeed, would excite donors nationally, raise millions for the party and perhaps weaken Mrs. Clinton before the 2008 presidential race.

Instead, to the chagrin of Republicans in New York and Washington, the party has not recovered from the December implosion of Jeanine F. Pirro's campaign against Mrs. Clinton. Republicans have been desperate for a credible challenger, while party leaders in Washington have tried to fill the vacuum by attacking Mrs. Clinton as "angry" and "brittle" — criticism they wish was coming from the campaign trail in New York.

To put it nicely, the Republican game plan is nowhere after a year of strategizing and overtures to at least six potential challengers. One of those challengers even calls the selection process "a Keystone Kops operation," and the only Republican now running, John Spencer, denounces "party elitists" who are against him.

Just weeks ago, Mr. Spencer looked poised to be the challenger, with a record of accomplishment as a former mayor of Yonkers. But with a caustic manner and a history of marital infidelity, Mr. Spencer may foil the party's drive for female voters and match up badly against Mrs. Clinton, some Republicans say.

Those Republican critics are now coalescing around a late entry: Kathleen Troia McFarland, 54, a protégée of Henry A. Kissinger who has not been in public service since working as a Pentagon spokeswoman under President Ronald Reagan. Yet Ms. McFarland, known as K. T., is pretty green: She has been a stay-at-home mother since 1985, and was drawn to the Senate race only because she already believed she was going to lose her bid for a Congressional seat on...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary2006; hillaryrodhamclinton; kathleenmcfarland; republicanparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
K. T. McFarland at home on the Upper East Side of Manhattan.


1 posted on 03/02/2006 11:15:31 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Those Republican critics are now coalescing around a late entry: Kathleen Troia McFarland, 54, a protégée of Henry A. Kissinger who has not been in public service since working as a Pentagon spokeswoman under President Ronald Reagan. Yet Ms. McFarland, known as K. T., is pretty green: She has been a stay-at-home mother since 1985, and was drawn to the Senate race only because she already believed she was going to lose her bid for a Congressional seat on...

Sounds like a winner to me.

2 posted on 03/02/2006 11:17:40 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
. But with a caustic manner and a history of marital infidelity, Mr. Spencer may foil the party's drive for female voters and match up badly against Mrs. Clinton,

Nonsense, the witch does not want to bring up marital infidelity with Blozo in the background.
3 posted on 03/02/2006 11:21:48 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Sounds like a winner to me.

LOL! I'm not sure how to take that. Was that for real or sarcasm?

4 posted on 03/02/2006 11:31:55 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; John Lenin; Liz; Thinkin' Gal
But with a caustic manner and a history of marital infidelity, Mr. Spencer may foil the party's drive for female voters and match up badly against Mrs. Clinton

Are they kidding?

With those traits, he is Mrs. Clinton!

5 posted on 03/02/2006 11:38:47 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Nonsense, the witch does not want to bring up marital infidelity with Blozo in the background.

LOL! But Hillary was the victim of Blozo's infidelity. Look what it got her.

Pubbies are tripping all over themselves looking for women candidates. I still like Spencer.

6 posted on 03/02/2006 11:42:28 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Spence would run the best race, he's got a no fear of who he is up against.


7 posted on 03/02/2006 11:52:55 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I gotta think that two words would revolutionize this race...
Ru-Dy

Imagine if Rudy would come to the aid of his party and run against Hillary!
I suspect he would trounce her.

But he doesn't want to be a senator...he really wants to be Prez.

It seems to me that if he did take out Hillary!, he would actually increase his chances in 2008. (I'm no Rudy guy, just thinking this outloud)

He would be a sitting senator, and the Hero of NYC/9-11.
He would also earn some street cred from the party faithful for slaying a dragon on their behalf.
Even some of the "social conservatives" might be inclined to give him reserved support for his services...maybe.

then again, maybe the world is a better with Hillary the dingbat representing the Democrats on tv every night...


8 posted on 03/03/2006 12:02:23 AM PST by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht

scratch that...if rudy really wants to run for prez he should run for Gov of NY first.we need to keep hillary in the senate for the fundraising she generates us...hehe


9 posted on 03/03/2006 12:15:39 AM PST by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; neverdem
From the article:

Mr. Spencer, who has been running since last spring, dismissed Ms. McFarland in an interview as "a liberal Manhattan Republican elitist" and said she was too late because he had won support from Republicans and the Conservative Party's executive committee.

No Republican will beat Hillary! this year. John Spencer will get the Conservative party's nod and is not leaving the race. The NYS RINO establishment hates John Spencer, but the party would better be served by one candidate who can focus their gaze on Hillary! than another internal party squabble.

John Spencer will be willing to drag Hillary! through the mud, exposing the true Clinton legacy. I doubt Ms. McFarland would.
10 posted on 03/03/2006 12:34:05 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht
But he doesn't want to be a senator...he really wants to be Prez.

Funny, that's Hillary's goal ass well. So why not run RU-DY? Either way the New Yorkers get shortchanged.

11 posted on 03/03/2006 1:38:04 AM PST by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I'm doing my part to trash Hillaroo...

Image hosting by Photobucket

12 posted on 03/03/2006 1:52:10 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monica; BlowTheManDown


13 posted on 03/03/2006 3:46:48 AM PST by devolve (<-- (refresh-now-updated-graphix - accts Photobucket & Imagecave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

He'll lose horribly, but he'll do better then Pirro would have, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get more votes then her.


14 posted on 03/03/2006 3:49:14 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht

It would be too difficult and too risky.

If he lost, he'd be all but out as a Presidential candidate, and if he won, he'd have other duties to attend to other then campaigning and fundraising, and if he ignored his Senate duties, he'd be beaten up by everybody for not showing up for work. Let's not be hyporcitical, we did that to Kerry and Edwards all day long in 2004.

I'm not a Rudy guy either, at least not for President, but it's pretty clear why he doesn't wanna run.

I hope he serves as Secretary of State for whomever Republican wins in 2008. How would you like a Secretary of State that once kicked Yassir Arafat out of a party?


15 posted on 03/03/2006 3:53:28 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht

Wanna know what would have been the greatest? Had he run for Senate against Schumer in 2004.

Man, would that have been amazing! He would have crushed him too.


16 posted on 03/03/2006 3:54:21 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Spencer for Senate ! Accept no liberal substitutes.


17 posted on 03/03/2006 4:48:27 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Guess his role model is thrice-married Mayor Rudy who dumped his first wife when he met his second, then demanded his second wife move out so his mistress could move into Gracie mansion (/sarc).


18 posted on 03/03/2006 5:31:55 AM PST by Liz (Liberty consists in having the power to do that which is permitted by the law. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht

Absolutly correct.

without that, his chances on the National stage are low to zero, despite what the NE well wishers wish.


19 posted on 03/03/2006 5:39:21 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

If he lost??

Hey, if he lost to Hillary in his own homestate, then how could he win a national election against her?

He who loses his own state IS a loser.

His not running makes him suspect to many.


20 posted on 03/03/2006 5:44:57 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson