Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

None are so blind as those who refuse to see.
1 posted on 05/27/2008 1:50:51 PM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dvan

Blind? Maybe.

Selfish? Most likely.

Evil? Some are - those would be the ones that know what this will do to society and promote it because of that very fact.


2 posted on 05/27/2008 1:54:50 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dvan
Same sex marriage would be a vast, untested experiment inflicted upon society and its principal victims will be the children. So much for the liberals putting them first. Instead, they put adult sexual desires first. That's really looking out for future generations!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 05/27/2008 1:55:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dvan
(there are no illegitimate children)

What's a bastard?

4 posted on 05/27/2008 1:57:51 PM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dvan

From the article: “The state endorses marriage primarily because of what marriage does for children and in turn society.”

Before we tear down fences, we need to remember why they were put up in the first place.


6 posted on 05/27/2008 2:16:55 PM PDT by keats5 (tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dvan

Awesome... bookmarked


7 posted on 05/27/2008 2:18:10 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I don't need Mr. Keyes lecturing me on Christianity. That's why I have a pastor." — Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dvan
Last I checked, you don't need to be married to have children. And most gays, when they marry, won't have children. So I don't follow the writer's argument. But I think the solution is "civil unions" for gay people (no automatic right to adopt children)—there might be a societal benefit to encouraging gays to be in committed, caring relationships (it might reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS, although it is true that many gays have "open" relationships).
9 posted on 05/27/2008 2:26:41 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dvan
I find that the reasons gay marriage advocates give seem a bit contrived. The "benefits" they claim to want could just as well be fought for outside of marriage, without mangling its legal definition. Citizenship, hospital visitation rights, whatever. It's more likely they want the legal power and recognition of a government-endorsed institution to further push their agenda. Legal power to sue schools and churches for discrimination, for instance. Any sane society doesn't want "alternative" behavior endorsed and encouraged by the government, if they want to stay a sane one, anyway.
10 posted on 05/27/2008 2:33:10 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson